Qualitative experiences of new motorised mobility scooter users relevant to their scooter skills: a secondary analysis

References

• Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/guidelines-on-the-provision-of-manual-wheelchairs-in-less-resourced-settings/.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan SJ, La Grow S, Alla S, et al. Riding into the future: a snapshot of elderly scooter riders and how they use their scooters. N Z Med J. 2014;127(1402):43–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karmarkar AM, Dicianno BE, Graham JE, et al. Factors associated with provision of wheelchairs in older adults. Assist Technol. 2012;24(3):155–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund T, Brandt A. Adult Scandinavians' use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(3):212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Hagberg L, Fredriksson C, et al. The effect of powered scooters on activity, participation and quality of life in elderly users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(7):558–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Pieper C, Branch LG, et al. Effect of motorized scooters on physical performance and mobility: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(3):279–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Wressle E. Powered wheelchairs and scooters for outdoor mobility: a pilot study on costs and benefits. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):330–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredriksson C, Pettersson I, Hagberg L, et al. The value of powered mobility scooters from the perspective of elderly spouses of their users – a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;Aug 10:1–5. online ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Pirruccio K, Sloan M, Sheth NP. Historical and projected fractures associated with mobility scooters presenting to US emergency departments: 2004-2025. J Orthop. 2019;16(4):280–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, Brandt A, et al. Men's and women's perspectives on using a powered mobility device: benefits and societal challenges. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(6):438–446.,
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Doucette SP. Relationship between wheelchair services received and wheelchair-user outcomes in less-resourced settings: a cross-sectional survey in Kenya and the Philippines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(9):1648–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynamic links to articles in PubMed about wheelchair skills testing and wheelchair skills training programs. https://wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/en/publications-impact/.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Hurd Clarke L, Goldsmith CH, et al. Measurement properties of the wheelchair skills test for scooters among experienced users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(1):60–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler L, Kirby RL, Parker K, et al. Effectiveness of the wheelchair skills training program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(4):391–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitz JC. Evidence from a cohort of able bodied adults to support the need for driver training for motorized scooters before community participation. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;70(2):276–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Hoag E, Higgins R, et al. Stakeholders’ perspectives related to the development of a scooter training program. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:289–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend K, Watson A. Competent use of a motorised mobility scooter-assessment, training and ongoing monitoring: a vital role for occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(6):454–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jannink MJA, Erren-Wolters CV, de Kort AC, et al. An electric scooter simulation program for training the driving skills of stroke patients with mobility problems: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2008;11(6):751–754.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toosizadeh N, Bunting M, Howe C, et al. Motorized mobility scooters: the use of training/intervention and technology for improving driving skills in aging adults – a mini-review. Gerontology. 2014;60(4):357–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards K, Mccluskey A. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):411–419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Kim J. Scoping review of mobility scooter-related research studies. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(5):531–540.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirby RL, Rushton PW, Smith C, et al. Wheelchair skills program manual version 5.1. 2020. Halifax (Nova Scotia): Published electronically at Dalhousie University. www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/eng/manual.php.
   Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Jang S, Goldsmith CH, et al. Feasibility of a systematic, comprehensive, one-to-One training (SCOOT) program for new scooter users: study protocol for a randomized control trial. Trials. 2017;18(1):235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Battalova A, Hurd L, et al. Correlates of self-reported wheelchair skills test questionnaire scores of new users of mobility scooters: a cross-sectional study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;27:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Battalova A, Hurd L, Hobson S, et al. "Dirty looks": a critical phenomenology of motorized mobility scooter use. Soc Sci Med. 2022;297:114810. Online ahead of print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C. Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health. 2017;40(1):23–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton PW, Kirby RL, Routhier F, et al. Measurement properties of the wheelchair skills Test-Questionnaire for powered wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(5):400–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Worobey LA, Cowan R, et al. Wheelchair skills capacity and performance of manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(10):1761–1769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archambault PS, Blackburn E, Owonuwa D, et al. Driving challenges faced by new users of motorized mobility scooters. Asst Technol. 2019;31:232. Abstract.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sund T, Iwarsson S, Anttila H, et al. Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: a prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. PM&R. 2015;7(8):859–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitching FA, Ozanne-Smith J, Gibson K, et al. Deaths of older Australians related to their use of motorised mobility scooters. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2016;23(4):346–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Souza C, Paquet VL, Lenker JA, et al. Self-reported difficulty and preferences of wheeled mobility device users for simulated low-floor bus boarding, interior circulation and disembarking. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(2):109–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost K, Bertocci G, Smalley C. Wheelchair tiedown and occupant restraint practices in paratransit vehicles. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0186829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostyniuk LP, D'Souza CR. Effect of passenger encumbrance and mobility aid use on dwell time variability in low-floor transit vehicles. Transp Res A Policy Pract. 2020;132:872–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fomiatti R, Moir L, Richmond J, et al. The experience of being a motorised mobility scooter user. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(3):183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirby RL, Thoren F, Ashton B, et al. Effect of the position of rear antitippers on safety and maneuverability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(5):525–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigras C, Owonuwa DD, Miller WC, et al. A scoping review of powered wheelchair driving tasks and performance-based outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(1):76–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Routhier F, Mahmood A, et al. Predictors of psychological distress and confidence negotiating physical and social environments among mobility device users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(4):324–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan SJ, Handcock P, Jackson DS. Does the purchase of a mobility scooter alter physical activity levels in older adults? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(8):856–861.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström Holmqvist K, Pettersson I, et al. Attitudes is the most important environmental factor for use of powered mobility devices - users' perspectives. Scand J Occup Ther. 2020;27(4):298–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maywald A, Stanley M. Prescribing mobility scooters in Australia: occupational therapists' narratives. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):86–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Rushton PW, Smith C, et al. Wheelchair skills program manual version 5.2. 2021. Halifax (Nova Scotia): Published electronically at Dalhousie University. www.wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/eng/manual.php.
   Google Scholar