Exploring high-technology augmentative and alternative communication interfaces: the effect of age and technology experience

References

• Papathanasiou I, Coppens P. Aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders. 2nd ed. Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Light JC. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 5th ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Koul R, Corwin M, Nigam R, et al. Training individuals with chronic severe Broca's aphasia to produce sentences using graphic symbols: implications for AAC intervention. J Assistive Technol. 2008;2(1):23–34. 03
   Google Scholar
• Nakkawita SG, Duncan ES, Hartzheim DU. AAC apps for aphasia: a pilot study on the role of intuition and learning. Disabil and Rehabil: Assistive Technol. 2021;23:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hough M, Johnson RK. Use of AAC to enhance linguistic communication skills in an adult with chronic severe aphasia. Aphasiology. 2009;23(7–8):965–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Weissling K, Griffith J, et al. The impact of interface design during an initial high-technology AAC experience: a collective case study of people with aphasia. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(4):314–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith J, Dietz A, Weissling K. Supporting narrative tells for people with aphasia using augmentative and alternative communication: photographs or line drawings? Text or no text? Am J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2014;23(2):213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey ML, Dietz AR, Hux K, et al. Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using personal and contextual pictures in a visual scene display prototype. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2007;15(3):305–317.
   Google Scholar
• Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, et al. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249(5):413–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis C, Urban S. Age and aphasia: a review of presence, type, recovery and clinical outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(6):430–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the center for research and education on aging and technology enhancement (CREATE). Psychol and Aging. 2006;21(2):333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu CJ, Hu YH, Lin DC, et al. The attitudes, impact, and learning needs of older adults using apps on touchscreen mobile devices: results from a pilot study. Comp Hum Behav. 2016;63:189–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwangbo H, Yoon SH, Jin BS, et al. A study of pointing performance of elderly users on smartphones. Int J Human-Comput Interaction. 2013;29(9):604–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broady T, Chan A, Caputi P. Comparison of older and younger adults' attitudes towards and abilities with computers: implications for training and learning. Br J Educational Technol. 2010;41(3):473–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreurs K, Quan-Haase A, Martin K. Problematizing the digital literacy paradox in the context of older adults' ICT use: aging, media discourse, and self-determination. Can J Commun. 2017;42(2):359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroi D, Koul RK, Corwin M. Eeffect of number of graphic symbols, levels, and listening conditions on symbol identification and latency in persons with aphasia. Aac. 2014;30(1):40–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas M, Connor LT. People with aphasia using AAC: are executive functions important. Aphasiology. 2017;31(7):819–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey ML, Hux K, Dietz A, et al. Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on word-picture matching by people with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;19(1):22–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivia A, Torralba A. The role of context in object recognition. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2007;11(12):819–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen A, Beukelman D, Ullman C, et al. Measurement of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia: a preliminary investigation of two types of human engagement in photographic images. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(2):120–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock K, Koul R, Corwin M, et al. A comparison of visual scene and grid displays for people with chronic aphasia: a pilot study to improve communication using AAC. Aphasiology. 2017;31(11):1282–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light JC, Wilkinson KM, Thiessen A, et al. Designing effective AAC displays for individuals with developmental or acquired disabilities: state of the science and future research directions. Augment Altern Commun. 2019;35(1):42–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron J, Light J, Davidoff BE, et al. Comparison of the effects of mobile technology AAC apps on programming visual scene displays. Augment Altern Commun. 2017;33(4):239–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light J. Toward a definition of communicative competence for individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems. Aac. 1989;5(2):137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen GJ. Aging and vision: change in function and performance from optics to perception. WIREs Cogn Sci. 2012;3(3):403–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teeken JC, Adam JJ, Paas FG, et al. Effects of age and gender on discrete and reciprocal aiming movements. Psychol Aging. 1996;11(2):195–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse CS, Balota DA, Yap MJ, et al. Effects of healthy aging and early stage dementia of the Alzheimer's type on components of response time distributions in three attention tasks. Neuropsychology. 2010;24(3):300–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system of quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1993;36(2):338–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum J. Rosenbaum vision pocket screener. Quincy, MA: Grass Instruments; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Clark JH. The Ishihara test for color blindness. American J Physiol Optics. 1924;5:269–276.
   Google Scholar
• Keened JS, Brassell EG. Aphasia language performance scale. Murfeesboro, TN: Pinnacle Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetti HC, Lacritz LH, Cullum CM, et al. Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Neurology. 2011;77(13):1272–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque NA, Boot WR. A new tool for assessing mobile device proficiency in older adults: the mobile device proficiency questionnaire. J Appl Gerontol. 2018;37(2):131–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AssistiveWare. Proloquo2Go [Mobile App]. 4.4.1 (861). 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tobii Dynavox LLC [Mobile App]. Snap Scene. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace SE, Hux K. Effect of two layouts on high technology AAC navigation and content location by people with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil: Assistive Technol. 2014;9(2):173–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace SE, Dietz A, Hux K, et al. Augmented input: the effect of visuographic supports on the auditory comprehension of people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26(2):162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown J, Thiessen A. Using images with individuals with aphasia: current research and clinical trends. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018;27(1S):504–515.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brookshire RH, Nicholas LE. Performance deviations in the connected speech of adults with no brain damage and adults with aphasia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1995;4(4):118–123.
   Google Scholar
• Capilouto G, Wright HH, Wagovich SA. CIU and main event analyses of the structured discourse of older and younger adults. J Commun Disord. 2005;38(6):431–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy KM, Raz N. Aging white matter and cognition: differential effects of regional variations in diffusion properties on memory, executive functions, and speed. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(3):916–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukhovny E, Zhou Y. Effects of icon size and location on speed and accuracy of SGD access. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(4):241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commodari E, Guarnera M. Attention and aging. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(6):578–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madden DJ. Aging and visual attention. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(2):70–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistle JJ, Wilkinson KM. Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(3):235–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson W, Logie RH, Brockmole JR. Working memory tasks differ in factor structure across age cohorts: implications for dedifferentiation. Intelligence. 2010;38(5):513–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson KM, Light J. Preliminary investigation of visual attention to human figures in photographs: potential considerations for the design of aided AAC visual scene displays. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011;54(6):1644–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen A, Beukelman D, Hux K, et al. A comparison of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia and adults without neurological conditions for camera-engaged and task-engaged Visual Scenes. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59(2):290–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drager KD, Light J, Currall J, et al. AAC technologies with visual scene displays and “just in time” programming and symbolic communication turns expressed by students with severe disability. J Intellect Developmental Disabil. 2019;44(3):321–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy M, Dietz A. Factors influencing AAC usage by individuals with aphasia. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2010;19(3):70–78.
   Google Scholar
• Judge S, Townend G. Perception of the design of voice output communication aids. Int J Lang Commun Dis. 2013;48(4):366–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar