Aphasia and high-tech communication support: a survey of SLPs in USA and India

References

• Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics subcommittee 2017 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–e603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian JD, Sudhan P. Stroke epidemiology and stroke care services in India. J Stroke. 2013;15(3):128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. NIDCD fact sheet : 2015. Aphasia [PDF] [NIH Pub. No. 97–4257]. Available from: https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Documents/health/voice/Aphasia6-1-16.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OMICS International. Available from: https://www.omicsonline.org/india/aphasia-peer-reviewed-pdf-ppt-articles/
   Google Scholar
• Basso A. Aphasia and its therapy. Oxford (NY): Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Davis GA. Aphasiology: disorders and clinical practice. (2nd ed.). Needham Heights (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ross K, Wertz R. Quality of life with and without aphasia. Aphasiology. 2003;17(4):355–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaccavento S, Craca A, Del Prete M, et al. Quality of life measurement and outcome in aphasia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Wallace SE, Weissling K. Revisiting the role of augmentative and alternative communication in aphasia rehabilitation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29(2):909–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett KL, Lasker JP. AAC and severe aphasia-enhancing communication across the continuum of recovery. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord. 2007;17(3):6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett KL, Lasker JP. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. In: Adults with severe aphasia. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brooks Publishing Company; 2005. p. 467–516.
   Google Scholar
• Elsahar Y, Hu S, Bouazza-Marouf K, et al. Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) advances: a review of configurations for individuals with a speech disability. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(8):1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM. Assistive technologies principles and practices. 4th ed. New York (NY): Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Giesbrecht E. Application of the human activity assistive technology model for occupational therapy research. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60(4):230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono T, Lyon K, Johnson H, et al. Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: an Australian context. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):392–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO):2003. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. What we know about women's technology use, avoidance, and abandonment. Women Ther. 1994;14(3-4):117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Lasker J, Bedrosian J. Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders. Augment Alternat Commun. 2001;17(3):141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge S. Why is the potential of augmentative and alternative communication not being realized? Exploring the experiences of people who use communication aids. Disabil Soc. 2007;22(5):457–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridges SJ. Multicultural issues in augmentative and alternative communication and language: research to practice. Topics Lang Disord. 2004;24(1):62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2015. Final decision memorandum on speech generating devices. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/medicare-coverage-document-details.aspx?MCDId=26&mcdtypename=National+Benefit+Category+Analyses&MCDIndexType=3&bc=AgAEAAAAAAAAAA%3d%3d&#final.
   Google Scholar
• Pauranik A, George A, Sahu A, et al. Expert group meeting on aphasia: a report. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2019;22(2):137–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalakannan S, Gudlavalleti ASV, Gudlavalleti VSM, et al. Incidence & prevalence of stroke in India: a systematic review. Indian J Med Res. 2017;146(2):175–185.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasker JP, Garrett KL. Using the multimodal communication screening test for persons with aphasia (MCST‐A) to guide the selection of alternative communication strategies for people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2006;20(2-4):217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett KL, Beukelman DR. 2006. Aphasia needs assessment revised. http://aac.unl.edu/screen/screen.html
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N. Cognitive linguistic quick test (CLQT). Bloomington (MN): Pearson Education; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz A. Western aphasia battery revised (WAB-R). San Antonio (TX): Pearson Education; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Halloran J, Halloran C. 2009. LAMP: Language acquisition through motor planning. Available from: http://www.aacandautism.com/lamp/why
   Google Scholar
• Walker M, Ghate R, Lal R. The Makaton vocabulary – Indian version. Mumbai, India: Makaton India; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Speech-Language Audiology Canada Position Paper on the Role of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Ottawa (Canada); 2015. Available from: https://www.sac-oac.ca/sites/default/files/resources/aac_position-paper_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moffatt K, Pourshahid G, Baecker R. Augmentative and alternative communication devices for aphasia: the emerging role of “smart” mobile devices. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2017;16(1):115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken M, Beukelman DR, Hux K. Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assist Technol. 2011;24(1):56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari S, Krishnan G. Aphasia rehabilitation in India: a preliminary survey of speech-language pathologists. J All India Inst Speech Hear. 2011;30:108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Light J, McNaughton D. Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: a new definition for a new era of communication? Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(1):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey D, Hurtig R. Re-thinking the use of AAC in acute care settings. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2006;15(4):3–8.
   Google Scholar
• McBride D. AAC evaluations and new mobile technologies: asking and answering the right questions. Perspect Augment Altern Commun. 2011;20(1):9–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Quach W, Lund SK, et al. AAC assessment and clinical-decision making: the impact of experience. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28(3):148–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative & alternative communication: supporting children & adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore (MD): Brookes Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Qist R, Lloyd L. Principles and uses of technology. In: Llyod L, Fuller D, Arvidson H, editors. Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 1997. p. 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Llyod L. Training speech-language pathologists as AAC practitioners: insuring AAC prerequisites for pre-service and in-service. Session presented at: 11^th Annual Conference on Augmentative and Alternative Communication Conference; 2011. Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers MA, Roye F, Mullen R. Measuring outcomes in aphasia and apraxia of speech in the context of a learning health care system. Paper presented at: 44th Clinical Aphasiology Conference; St. Simons Island, GA. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gatts J. Supporting individuals with aphasia learning to use high-tech AAC systems. Session presented at: Kansas speech and hearing annual convention. Wichita, KS; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Dolic J, Pibernik J, Bota J. Evaluation of mainstream tablet devices for symbol based AAC communication. In: Jezic G, Kusek M, Nguyen NT, Howlett RJ, Jain LC, editors. Agent and multi-agent systems. Technologies and applications. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ogletree BT, McMurry S, Schmidt M, et al. The changing world of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): examining three realities faced by today's AAC provider. Perspect ASHA SIGs. 2018;3(12):113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh J, Murza KA, Malani MD, et al. Effects of communication partner instruction on the communication of individuals using AAC: a meta-Analysis. Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(4):271–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JM, Inglebret E, Jones C, et al. Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2006;22(2):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangadharan KR. Geriatric hospitals in India, today and in the future. J Aging Soc Policy. 2003;15(2-3):143–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tripathy JP. Geriatric care in India: a long way to go. J Midlife Health. 2014;5(4):205–206.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim M, Ramdin V, Pozzar R, et al. Healthy aging adviser: designing a service to support the life transitions and autonomy of older adults. Des J. 2022;25(2):143–164.
   Google Scholar
• Binger C, Ball L, Dietz A, et al. Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augment Altern Commun. 2012;28(4):278–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Saddle River (NJ): Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
   Google Scholar