309
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Consensus for a power wheelchair training approach for people with cognitive impairments

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 109-117 | Received 25 Jan 2022, Accepted 29 Aug 2022, Published online: 20 Oct 2022

References

  • Chatterji S, Byles J, Cutler D, et al. Health, functioning, and disability in older adults—present status and future implications. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):563–575.
  • Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222.
  • World Health Organization. World report on ageing and health: summary [Internet] [cited 2021 Sep 11]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/186468
  • Sund T, Iwarsson S, Anttila H, et al. Effectiveness of powered mobility devices in enabling community mobility-related participation: a prospective study among people with mobility restrictions. PM R. 2015;7(8):859–870.
  • Pettersson I, Törnquist K, Ahlström G. The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1(4):235–243.
  • Fomiatti R, Richmond J, Moir L, et al. A systematic review of the impact of powered mobility devices on older adults’ activity engagement. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2013;31(4):297–309.
  • Frank A, Neophytou C, Frank J, et al. Electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users’ views of influence on family, friends and carers. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(5):327–338.
  • Routhier F, Vincent C, Desrosiers J, et al. Mobility of wheelchair users: a proposed performance assessment framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(1):19–34.
  • Smith EM, Mortenson WB, Mihailidis A, et al. Understanding the task demands for powered wheelchair driving: a think-aloud task analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022;17(6):695–702.
  • Rice LA, Sung J, Peters J, et al. Perceptions of fall circumstances, injuries and recovery techniques among power wheelchair users: a qualitative study. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(7):985–993.
  • Fasciglione M. Article 20 [personal mobility]. In: Della Fina V, Cera R, Palmisano G, editors. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [Internet] [cited 2021 Feb 17]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 375–385. Available from:10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3_24
  • Hendriks A. UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Eur J Health Law. 2007;14(3):273–280.
  • World Health Organization, International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics, United States Agency for International Development. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings. Geneva: Guide Pour Les Services de Fauteuils Roulants Manuels Dans Les Régions à Faibles Revenus; 2008. p. 128.
  • Keeler L, Kirby RL, Parker K, et al. Effectiveness of the wheelchair skills training program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(4):391–409.
  • Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C, et al. Powered wheelchair skills training for persons with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93(12):1031–1043.
  • Kirby RL, Miller WC, Routhier F, et al. Effectiveness of a wheelchair skills training program for powered wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(11):2017–2026.e3.
  • Nilsson L, Nyberg P. Driving to learn: a new concept for training children with profound cognitive disabilities in a powered wheelchair. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57(2):229–233.
  • Benford F. Use of powered mobility for a young adult with profound and multiple learning disabilities: a practice analysis. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80(8):517–520.
  • Nilsson LM, Eklund M. Driving to learn: powered wheelchair training for those with cognitive disabilities. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2006;13(11):517–527.
  • Best K, Smith E, Pellichero A, et al. International research priorities on the role of cognition in power mobility device use: in pursuit of informed clinical practices and knowledge translation. Assistive Technol. 2021;1–8.
  • Pellichero A, Best K, Leblond J, et al. Relationships between cognitive functioning and power wheelchair performance, confidence and life-space mobility among experienced power wheelchair users: an exploratory study. J Rehabil Med. 2021;53(9):jrm00226.
  • Pellichero A, Kenyon LK, Best KL, et al. Relationships between cognitive functioning and powered mobility device use: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12467.
  • Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
  • Kroll T, Morris J. Challenges and opportunities in using mixed method designs in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(11 Suppl.):S11–S16.
  • Webber M, Reidy H, Ansari D, et al. Developing and modeling complex social interventions: introducing the connecting people intervention. Res Soc Work Pract. 2016;26(1):14–19.
  • Gainforth HL, Hoekstra F, McKay R, et al. Integrated knowledge translation guiding principles for conducting and disseminating spinal cord injury research in partnership. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(4):656–663.
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Guide to knowledge translation planning at CIHR: integrated and end-of-grant approaches. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2012.
  • Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):150.
  • MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first Global Research, Innovation, and Education on Assistive Technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):454–466.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Version 1.0. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Larivière N, Corbière M, editors. Méthodes qualitatives, quantitatives et mixtes: dans la recherche en sciences humaines, sociales et de la santé. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2014.
  • Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 4th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2015.
  • Linstone HA, Turoff M, editors. The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Advanced Book Program; 2002.
  • Kennedy HP. Enhancing Delphi research: methods and results. J Adv Nurs. 2004;45(5):504–511.
  • Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Boily J, et al. Overarching principles and salient findings for inclusion in guidelines for power mobility use within residential care facilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(2):199–208.
  • Mortenson WB, Clarke LH, Best K. Prescribers’ experiences with powered mobility prescription among older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67(1):100–107.
  • Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, Brandt Å, et al. Men’s and women’s perspectives on using a powered mobility device: benefits and societal challenges. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(6):438–446.
  • Torkia C, Reid D, Korner-Bitensky N, et al. Power wheelchair driving challenges in the community: a users’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(3):211–215.
  • Polatajko HJ, Mandich AD, Miller LT, et al. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP): part II. The evidence. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2001;20(2–3):83–106.
  • Toglia JP. The dynamic interactional model and the multicontext approach. In: Katz N, Toglia J, editors. Cognition, occupation, and participation across the lifespan: neuroscience, neurorehabilitation, and models of intervention in occupational therapy. AOTA Press; 2018.
  • Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51(1):S225–S239.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
  • Pellichero A, Best KL, Routhier F, et al. Blind spot sensor systems for power wheelchairs: obstacle detection accuracy, cognitive task load, and perceived usefulness among older adults. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;1–9.
  • Cicerone KD, Goldin Y, Ganci K, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(8):1515–1533.
  • Fisher AG. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: same, same or different? Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21(Suppl. 1):96–107.
  • Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. 4th ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2005.
  • Gillen G, Nilsen DM. Upper extremity function and management. In: Stroke rehabilitation [Internet] [cited 2021 Oct 27]. Elsevier; 2016. p. 424–485. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323172813000216
  • Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(4):620–628.
  • Schunk DH, DiBenedetto MK. Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2020;60:101832.
  • Corring D, Cook J. Client-centred care means that I am a valued human being. Can J Occup Ther. 1999;66(2):71–82.
  • Hammell KRW. Client-centred occupational therapy in Canada: refocusing on core values/Recentrer l’ergothérapie au Canada sur les valeurs fondamentales de la pratique centrée sur le client. Can J Occup Ther. 2013;80(3):141–149.
  • Lyons M. Reflections on client–therapist relationships. Aust Occup Ther J. 2010;41(1):27–29.
  • Palmadottir G. Client–therapist relationships: experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69(9):394–401.
  • Wright-St Clair V. Caring: the moral motivation for good occupational therapy practice: 2000 NZAOT Frances Rutherford Lecture. Aust Occup Ther J. 2001;48(4):187–199.
  • Sluijs EM, Knibbe JJ. Patient compliance with exercise: different theoretical approaches to short-term and long-term compliance. Patient Educ Counsel. 1991;17(3):191–204.
  • Kirwan T, Tooth L, Harkin C. Compliance with hand therapy programs: therapists’ and patients’ perceptions. J Hand Ther. 2002;15(1):31–40.
  • Tanner TC. Compliance and satisfaction with home exercise: a comparison of computer-assisted video instruction and routine rehabilitation practice. J Phys Ther Educ. 2007;21:77.
  • Weeks DL, Brubaker J, Byrt J, et al. Videotape instruction versus illustrations for influencing quality of performance, motivation, and confidence to perform simple and complex exercises in healthy subjects. Physiother Theory Pract. 2002;18(2):65–73.
  • Kirby RL, Smith C, Cowen R, et al. A one-day practical workshop can improve the knowledge and skills of therapists and research personnel about the Wheelchair Skills Program. Arlington; 2014. Available from: https://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/conference/2014/Wheeled%20Mobility/Kirby.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.