References
- Ripat J, Woodgate R. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(2):87–96.
- Ravneberg B, Soderstrom S. Disability, society and assistive technology. Florence: Taylor & Francis Group; 2017.
- Ravneberg B. Identity politics by design: users, markets and the public service provision for assistive technology in Norway. Scand J Disab Res. 2009;11(2):101–115.
- Harraway D, Cyborgs S. Women: the reinvention of nature. London: Routledge; 1991.
- Sakellariou D. Home modifications and ways of living well. Med Anthropol. 2015;34(5):456–469.
- Batten H, Kuys S, Mandrusiak A, et al. Does gait speed indicate prosthetic walking potential following lower limb amputation? Physiotherapy. 2015;101(1):E128–e129.
- Astell A, McGrath C, Dove E. That’s for old so and so’s!’: does identity influence older adults’ technology adoption decisions? Ageing and Society. 2020;40(7):1550–1576.
- McCreadie C, Tinker A. The acceptability of assistive technology to older people. Age Soc. 2005;25(01):91–110.
- Mehndiratta MM, Mehndiratta P, Pande R. Poliomyelitis. Neurohospitalist. 2014;4(4):223–229.
- Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Australian Atlas of Healthcare Variation. Australian Government. 2016. http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/atlas/
- Riessman CK. Performing identities in illness narrative: masculinity and multiple sclerosis. Qual Res. 2003;3(1):5–33.
- Fox N. Induction. In: Given LM, editor. The sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. p. 430.
- Singh R, Hunter J, Philip A, et al. Gender differences in amputation outcome. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):122–125.
- Andrews M, Tamboukou M, Squire C. From experience-centred to socioculturally-oriented approaches to narrative. Doing narrative research. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2013. p. 47.
- Corbin J, Strauss A. Analysing data for concepts, in basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2012.
- Salkind NJ. Encyclopedia of research design., Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2010..
- Carroll K. Older adults can thrive as prosthesis users [internet]. Washington: Amputee Coalition; 2004. https://www.amputee-coalition.org/resources/thrive-as-prosthesis-users/
- Gregory G, Kaufeldt M. The motivated brain: improving student attention, engagement, and perseverance. Alexandria (VA): ASCD; 2015.
- Shakespeare T. Disabled sexuality: toward rights and recognition. Sexual Disabil. 2000;18(3):159–166.
- Shakespeare T, Davies D, Gillespie-Sells K. The sexual politics of disability: untold desires. London: Cassell; 1996.
- CAOT Position Statement: occupations and health. Occupational Therapy Now. 2009;11(1):24.
- Aplin T, de Jonge D, Gustafsson L. Understanding home modifications impact on clients and their family’s experience of home: a qualitative study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2015;62(2):123–131.
- Ching N. Self-perceived burden in palliative care [Internet]. Palliative Medicine Grand Round. 2007. http://www.fmshk.org/database/articles/selfperceivedburdeninpalliativecarengjschkspmnews.pdf
- Dokumaci A. People as affordances. Current Anthropol. 2020;61(S21):S97–S108.
- Murphy RF. The body silent: the different world of the disabled. New York (NY): Norton; 2001.
- Ginsburg F, Rapp R. Cripping the new normal: Making disability count. Alter. 2017;11(3):179–192.
- Bury M. Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociol Health Illn. 1982;4(2):167–182.
- Cook AM, Polgar JM. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 4th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2015.