Barriers and facilitators of assistive technology service delivery process (AT-SDP) in South Korea

References

• World Health Organization. Disability and health [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020. cited 2021 Nov 30]. Available from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
   Google Scholar
• 2020. Korea national survey of the disabled persons. [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare [cited 2021 Nov 28]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=365357.
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe [AAATE]. Service Delivery Systems for Assistive Technology in Europe; 2012. Available from: http://www.aaate.net/sites/default/files/ATServiceDelivery_PositionPaper.pdf. [last accessed 08 Jul 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Cook AM, Polgar JM, Encarnacao P. Assistive technologies – principles & practice. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2020. 104–107.
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-364.118 Stat.1707 [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2021 Nov. 28]. GPO Access database. Available from: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-108publ364/pdf/PLAW-108publ364.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Christensen A, Grünberger P. How to accomplish the assistive technology service delivery process for adults in order to obtain the best outcome – a systematic review. Stud Health Technol Infor. 2015;217:469–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt A, Hansen EM, Christensen JR. The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes-a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(5):590–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlayson M, van Denend T. Experiencing the loss of mobility: perspectives of older adults with MS. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(20):118–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictor of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rackensperger T, Krezman C, McNaughton D, et al. ‘When I first got it, I wanted to throw it off a cliff’: the challenges and benefits of learning AAC technologies as described by adults who use AAC. Augment Alter Commun. 2005;21(3):165–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(19):1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack C, Collins B. Can disability studies contribute to client-centered occupational therapy practice? Br J Occup Ther. 2010;73(7):339–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisinger KD, Ripat RD. Assistive technology provision within the Navajo nation: user and provider perceptions. Qual Health Res. 2014;24(11):1501–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, et al. Consumer perspective on assistive technology outcome. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):373–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, et al. Patients in Europe evaluate general practice care: an international comparison. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50(460):882–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling A, Campbell P, Wilcox J. Young children with physical disabilities: caregiver perspectives about assistive technology. Infants Young Child. 2010;23(3):169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telfer S, Solomonidis S, Spence W. An investigation of teaching staff members’ and parents’ views on the current state of adaptive seating technology and provision. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(1):14–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SH. Users’ satisfaction with assistive devices in South Korea. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(4):509–512.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lim MJ, Jung SM. A brief introduction of assistive technology service delivery system in Republic Of Korea. Amsterdam, NED: IOS Press 2015. 991–995.
   Google Scholar
• Jung SM. Analysis on the use status of assistive technology service and the satisfaction level by service process stage. J RWEAT. 2020;5:92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Korea national assistive technology center. [Internet]. Seoul. [cited 2021. Nov. 28]. Available from https://knat.go.kr/knw/home/eng_knat.html.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int. J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• de Witte L, Steel E, Gupta S, et al. Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):467–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The study on Supporting and the activation plan of Assistive device for People with disability. Seoul: Korea Disabled people’s development institute; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Steel EJ, De Witte LP. Advances in European Assistive technology service delivery and recommendations for further improvement. Technol Disabil. 2011. 23:131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Tegart G. Australia Needs an “Assistive Technology” Network. Australasian Science [Internet]. 2018 Jan/Feb 2013. [cited 2021. Nov. 28]; Science policy: Available from: http://www.australasianscience.com.au/article/issue-januaryfebruary-2013/australia-needs-%E2%80%9Cassistive-technology%E2%80%9D-network.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jun YH, Rhee KM. An analysis of satisfaction of assistive technology service provided by sector of employment of persons with disabilities. J RWEAT. 2014;6:127–150.
   Google Scholar
• An NY, Kong JY. A survey on need and demands for assistive technology device and service of people with disability: focusing on Chungnam area. J Spec Educ Rehabilitation. 2011;50:121–142.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson K, Balandin S, Stancliffe R. Australian parents’ experiences of speech generating device (SGD) service delivery. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(2):75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Simmons CD, Favreau M. Exploring occupational justice in consumer perspectives on assistive technology. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79(5):309–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desideri L, Stefanelli B, Bitelli C, et al. Satisfaction of users with assistive technology service delivery: an exploratory analysis of experiences of parents of children with physical and multiple disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2016;19(4):255–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelinas-Bronsard D, Mortenson WB, Ahmed S, et al. Co-construction of an internet-based intervention for older assistive technology users and their family caregivers: stakeholder’s perception. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(6):602–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Elsaesser LJ, Bauer SA. Survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(8):789–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranada ÅL, Lidstörm H. Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process-A systematic review. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):82–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprigle S, Lenker J, Searcy K. Activities of suppliers and technicians during the provision of complex and standard wheeled mobility devices. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(3):219–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nace S, Tiernan J, Ni Annaidh A. Manufacturing custom-contoured wheelchair seating: a state-of-the art review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(4):382–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y-S, Koontz AM, Triolo RJ, et al. Surface electromyography activity of trunk muscles during wheelchair propulsion. Clin Biomech. 2006;21(10):1032–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Back YE. The analysis of assistive technology device support. Korea employment agency for persons with disabilities. Seongnam-si. 2020;1-80.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Wressle E. Powered wheelchairs and scooters for outdoor mobility: a pilot study on costs and benefits. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9(4):330–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sund T, Iwarsson S, Andersen MC, et al. Documentation of and satisfaction with the service delivery process of electric powered scooters among adult users in different national contexts. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(2):151–160.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar