Assistive technology services for adults with disabilities in state-federal vocational rehabilitation programs

References

• Rehabilitation Act [Internet]. 1973. 29 U.S.C. § 701. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2020-title29/pdf/USCODE-2020-title29-chap16-other-sec701.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Assistive Technology Act [Internet]. 2004. 108 U.S.C. § 364. Available from: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-118/pdf/STATUTE-118-Pg1707.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Services Administration [Internet]. 2017. Reporting manual for the case service report (RSA). Available from: https://www2.ed.gov/policy/speced/guid/rsa/subregulatory/pd-16-04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sprong ME, Dallas B, Paul E, et al. Rehabilitation technology services and employment outcomes among consumers using division of rehabilitation services. Disab Rehab. 2019;14(5):445–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan JC, Childers WL, Pete JP, . The effect of providing rehabilitation technology services through vocational rehabilitation in persons with amputation. PMRD. 2020;6(4):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ahonle ZJ, Barnes M, Romero S, et al. State-federal vocational rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury: what predictors are associated with employment outcomes? Rehab Couns Bull. 2020;63(3):143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Holzbauer JJ, Lee EJ, et al. Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for adults with cerebral palsy in the United States. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55(11):1000–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeager P, Kaye HS, Reed M, et al. Assistive technology and employment: experiences of californians with disabilities. Work. 2006;27(4):333–344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, et al. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disab Rehab. 2013;8(5):373–380.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer AL, Parks A, Heyn PC. Assistive technology effects on the employment outcomes for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic review. Disab Rehab. 2010;5(6):377–391.
   Google Scholar
• Morash-Macneil V, Johnson F, Ryan JB. A systematic review of assistive technology for individuals with intellectual disability in the workplace. J Spec Educ Technol. 2018;33(1):15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damianidou D, Arthur-Kelly M, Lyons G, et al. Technology use to support employment-related outcomes for people with intellectual and developmental disability: an updated meta-analysis. Int J Dev Disabil. 2018;65(4):220–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bross LA, Travers JC, Munandar VD, et al. Video modeling to improve customer service skills of an employed young adult with autism. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 2019;34(4):226–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke RV, Allen KD, Howard MR, et al. Tablet-based video modeling and prompting in the workplace for individuals with autism. J Vocat Rehabil. 2013;38(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Allen KD, Wallace DP, Renes D, et al. Use of video modeling to teach vocational skills to adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorders. Educ Treat Child. 2010;33(3):339–349.
   Google Scholar
• Tomczak MT, Wojcikowski M, Listewnik P, et al. Support for employees with ASD in the workplace using a bluetooth skin resistance sensor: a preliminary study. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali LJ, Sanfilippo F. A review of the state-of-the-art of assistive technology for people with ASD in the workplace and in everyday life. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2019;11701:520–532.
   Google Scholar
• Moon NW, Baker PMA, Goughnour K. Designing wearable technologies for users with disabilities: accessibility, usability, and connectivity factors. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:2055668319862137–2055668319862137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson J, Limbrick L. A review of the use of touch-screen mobile devices by people with developmental disabilities. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(12):3777–3791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook AJP, Encarnacao P. Assistive technologies: principles and practice. 5 ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas KH, Wojcik BW, Thompson JR. Is there an app for that? J Spec Educ Technol. 2012;27(2):59–70.
   Google Scholar
• Collins JC, Collet-Klingenberg L. Portable electronic assistive technology to improve vocational task completion in young adults with an intellectual disability: a review of the literature. J Intellect Disabil. 2018;22(3):213–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laricchia F. Smartphone ownership in the U.S. 2011-2021. United States: Statista Research Department; 2022. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/219865/percentage-of-us-adults-who-own-a-smartphone/
   Google Scholar
• Anderson M. Technology device ownership: 2015. United States: Pew Research Center; 2015. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/29/technology-deviceownership-2015
   Google Scholar
• Kaye HS, Yeager P, Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist Technol. 2008;20(4):194–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockenhoff CE. Aging and decision-making: a conceptual framework for future research – a mini-review. Gerontology. 2018;64(2):140–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, et al. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(6):1710–1721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly SL, Miller CJ, Koenig CJ, et al. Veterans’ attitudes toward smartphone app use for mental health care: qualitative study of rurality and age differences. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(8):e10748-e10748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Ding D, Teodorski EE, et al. Use of assistive technology for cognition among people with traumatic brain injury: a survey study. Mil Med. 2016;181(6):560–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall KN, Johnson F, Adams SE, et al. Use of a iPhone task analysis application to increase employment-related chores for individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Spec Educ Technol. 2020;35(1):26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Zeev D, Brenner CJ, Begale M, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bull. 2014;40(6):1244–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba D. How smartphone apps can treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. WIRED [Internet]. [Updated 2014 Nov 20; cited 2022 Jul 29]. Available from: http://www.wired.com/2014/11/mental-health-apps/
   Google Scholar
• Harrison V, Proudfoot J, Wee PP, et al. Mobile mental health: review of the emerging field and proof of concept study. J Ment Health. 2011;20(6):509–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O'Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(1):1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlow L, Abdelaal F, Etienne A, et al. Exploring the current usage and preferences for everyday technology among people with serious mental illnesses. Occup Ther Ment Health.. 2017;33(1):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang MMY, Man DWK. A virtual reality-based vocational training system (VRVTS) for people with schizophrenia in vocational rehabilitation. Schizophrenia Res. 2013;144(1-3):51–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell MD, Weinstein A. Simulated job interview skill training for people with psychiatric disability: feasibility and tolerability of virtual reality training. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2011;37(suppl 2):S91–S97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G. Matching person & technology (MPT) assessment process. TAD. 2002;14(3):125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wielandt T, McKenna K, Tooth L, et al. Factors that predict the post-discharge use of recommended assistive technology (at). Disabil Rehabil. 2006;1(1-2):29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Noll A, Owens L, Smith RO, et al. Survey of state vocational rehabilitation counselor roles and competencies in assistive technology. Work. 2006;27(4):413–419.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith EM, Gowran RJ, Mannan H, et al. Enabling appropriate personnel skill-mix for progressive realization of equitable access to assistive technology. Disab Rehab. 2018;13(5):445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disab Rehab. 2007;2(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. TAD. 2004;15(4):231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Glueckauf R. Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehab Psychol. 2005;50(2):132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shay A, Anderson C, Grott R, et al. Assistive technology service delivery: a practical guide for disability and employment professionals. London (UK): Elsevier Academic Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Triolo DL. Understanding the person behind the technology. In: scherer MJ, editor. Assistive technology: matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2002. p. 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wang IT, Lee S-J, Bezyak J, et al. Factors associated with recommendations for assistive technology devices for persons with mobility limitations using workplace accommodation services. Rehabil Couns Bull.. 2018;61(4):228–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand P, Sevak P. The role of workplace accommodations in the employment of people with disabilities. J Labor Policy. 2017;6(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Field MJ, Jette AM, editors. The future of disability in america. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu CY, Tansey TN, Arora S, et al. Effect of rehabilitation technology services on vocational rehabilitation outcomes of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehab Res Policy Educ.. 2015;29(2):183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Cimera RE, Rumrill PD, Chan F, et al. Vocational rehabilitation services and outcomes for transition-age youth with visual impairments and blindness. JVR. 2015;43(2):103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Miller E, Gonzalez R, Kim JH. Vocational rehabilitation outcomes among older adults with diabetes. JVR. 2016;44(1):109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Cheing G, Rumrill P, et al. Characteristics of people with disabilities receiving assistive technology services in vocational rehabilitation: a logistic regression analysis. JVR. 2016;45(1):63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Chen JL, Sung C, Pi S. Vocational rehabilitation service patterns and outcomes for individuals with autism of different ages. J Autism Dev Disord. 2015;45(9):3015–3029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E-J, Park J, Chun J, et al. State vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes for asian americans with psychiatric disabilities. Community Ment Health J. 2020;56(5):854–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alston R, Lewis A, Loggins S. Assistive technology and veterans with severe disabilities examining the relationships among race, personal factors, medical support, income support, and use. Med Care. 2014;52(10 Suppl 3):S17–S24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski EM, Leahy MJ, Linkowski DC. Reported preparedness of certified counselors in rehabilitation counseling knowledge areas. Rehabil Couns Bull.. 1993;37(2):146–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froehlich RJ, Linkowski DC. An assessment of the training needs of state vocational rehabilitation counselors. Rehabil Couns Bull.. 2002;46(1):41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada-Hernandez N, Wheaton JE, Dawson RD, et al. Current status of assistive technology education in rehabilitation counseling programs. Rehab Educ. 2007;21(2):117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Barzegarian B, Sax CL. Rehabilitation counsellors: incorporation of assistive technology device selection and referrals into professional practice. Disab Rehab. 2011;6(5):378–385.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss ML. Rehabilitation professionals’ perceived competencies in assistive technology selection and referral: a preliminary analysis. Sgrjarc. 2003;34(2):33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Elsaesser L-J, Bauer S. A survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA. Disab Rehab. 2017;12(8):789–800.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo HJ, Kosciulek J. Rehabilitation counsellor perceived importance and competence in assistive technology. Disab Rehab. 2021;1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Education Programs. 2016 CACREP standards [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: http://www.cacrep.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2016-Standards-with-Glossary-5.3.2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stumbo NJ, Martin JK, Hedrick BN. Assistive technology: impact on education, employment, and independence of individuals with physical disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2009;30(2):99–110.
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disab Rehab. 2018;13(5):454–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard J, Fisher Z, Kemp AH, et al. Exploring the barriers to using assistive technology for individuals with chronic conditions: a meta-synthesis review. Disab Rehab. 2022;17(4):390–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning B. Funding, ethics, and assistive technology: should medical necessity be the criterion by which wheeled mobility equipment is justified? Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(3):77–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace J. Assistive technology funding in the United States. Neuro Rehab. 2011;28(3):295–302.
   Google Scholar
• Capella ME. Inequities in the VR system: do they still exist? Rehab Couns Bull. 2002;45(3):143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson KB. Exploration of VR acceptance and ethnicity: a national investigation. Rehab Couns Bull. 2002;45(3):168–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellini J. Counselors’ multicultural competencies and vocational rehabilitation outcomes in the context of counselor—client racial similarity and difference. Rehab Couns Bull. 2003;46(3):164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson KB, Senices J. Exploring the vocational rehabilitation acceptance rates for hispanics versus non-hispanics in the United States. J Couns Dev. 2005;83(1):86–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprong ME, Dallas B, Upton TD, et al. The influence of race, causal attribution, and in-group favoritism on recommendations for rehabilitation services. Rehab Couns Bull. 2015;58(4):227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin M, Pathak A, Lin D, et al. Identifying racial differences in vocational rehabilitation services. Rehab Couns Bull. 2022;66(1):13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification. Code of professional ethics for rehabilitation counselors [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jan 12]. Available from: https://crccertification.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2023-Code-of-Ethics-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Murtagh KN, Hubert HB. Gender differences in physical disability among an elderly cohort. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(8):1406–1411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoro CA, Hollis ND, Cyrus AC, et al. Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type among adults—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(32):882–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaren C, Rosenblum D, DeDona M, et al. Spotlight on women with disabilities. Department of Labor Office of Disability Employment Policy [Internet]. 2021; Mar [cited 2022 Aug 2]: [:1–22. Available from: https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ODEP/pdf/Spotlight-on-Women-with-Disabilities-March-2021.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The US Department of Labor. Persons with a disability: Labor force characteristics. United States: Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2021. (BLS publication; no. USDL-21-0316). Available from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/disabl_02242021.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder F. Summary of changes in the workforce innovation and opportunity act. National Rehabilitation Association [Internet]. [updated 2014 Jul 24; cited 2022 Jul 28]. Available from: http://adsd.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/adsdnvgov/content/Boards/Autism/AdultsAging/Summary%20of%20Changes%20in%20the%20Workforce%20Innovation%20and%20Opportunity%20Act.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oertle KM, O’Leary S. The importance of career development in constructing vocational rehabilitation transition policies and practices. JVR. 2017;46(3):407–423.
   Google Scholar
• Kartovicky L. Improving self-advocacy skills for students with disabilities in postsecondary educational settings. Sgrjarc. 2020;51(3):238–248.
   Google Scholar
• Moore M, McNaught J. Virginia’s self-determination project: assisting students with disabilities to become college and career ready. J Vocat Rehab. 2014;40(3):247–254.
   Google Scholar