Understanding the use and benefits of assistive devices among young children with cerebral palsy and their families in Norway: a cross-sectional population-based registry study

References

• Kling A, Campbell PH, Wilcox J. Young children with physical disabilities: caregiver perspectives about assistive technology. Infants Young Child. 2010;23(3):169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollung SJ, Vik T, Lydersen S, et al. Decreasing prevalence and severity of cerebral palsy in Norway among children born 1999 to 2010 concomitant with improvements in perinatal health. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22(5):814–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy april 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnahan KD, Arner M, Hägglund G. Association between gross motor function (GMFCS) and manual ability (MACS) in children with cerebral palsy. A population-based study of 359 children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007;8:50–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollung SJ, Bakken IJ, Vik T, et al. Comorbidities in cerebral palsy: a patient registry study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62(1):97–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva (CH): WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad NK. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(14):849–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak I, Smithers-Sheedy H, Morgan C. Predicting equipment needs of children with cerebral palsy using the gross motor function classification system: a cross-sectional study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(1):30–36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ISO 9999 Assistive products for persons with disability - Classification and terminology. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• NAV Department of Assistive Technology. Assistive technology in Norway - a part of a larger system. Oslo: NAV; 2017. https://www.nav.no/_/attachment/inline/7b119b1c-fe72-488a-a1ef-be424e72faff:c52b8c6ee759299749538a6fd0554d1efa695abf/assistive-technology-in-norway-170217v2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):454–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg A, Sund F, Malasevska I. Kjønnsdelte hjelpemidler [gender-segregated aids]. (Rapport 1). Likestillingssenteret (Norway). 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Brogren E, Vøllestad NK. Everyday functioning in young children with cerebral palsy: functional skills, caregiver assistance, and modifications of the environment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(9):603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung J, Evans J, Lee C, et al. Effectiveness of adaptive seating on sitting posture and postural control in children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2008;20(4):303–317. Winter
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan SE. An overview of systematic reviews of adaptive seating interventions for children with cerebral palsy: where do we go from here? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(2):104–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angsupaisal M, Maathuis CGB, Hadders-Algra M. Adaptive seating systems in children with severe cerebral palsy across international classification of functioning, disability and health for children and youth version domains: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57(10):919–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glickman LB, Geigle PR, Paleg GS. A systematic review of supported standing programs. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2010;3(3):197–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paleg G, Livingstone R. Outcomes of gait trainer use in home and school settings for children with motor impairments: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(11):1077–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Field D. Systematic review of power mobility outcomes for infants, children and adolescents with mobility limitations. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(10):954–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray N, Kolehmainen N, McAnuff J, et al. Powered mobility interventions for very young children with mobility limitations to aid participation and positive development: the EMPoWER evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24(50):1–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolson A, Moir L, Millsteed J. Impact of assistive technology on family caregivers of children with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(5):345–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andersen GL, Hollung SJ, Klevberg GL, et al. Norsk kvalitets- og oppfølgingsregister for cerebral parse (NorCP). Årsrapport for 2020 med plan for forbedringstiltak [Norwegian quality and follow-up register for cerebral palsy (NorCP). Annual report for 2020 with a plan for improvement measures]. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Cha E-S, Kim KH, Erlen JA. Translation of scales in cross-cultural research: issues and techniques. J Adv Nurs. 2007;58(4):386–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myrhaug HT, Østensjø S. Motor training and physical activity among preschoolers with cerebral palsy: a survey of parents’ experiences. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34(2):153–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cans C. Surveillance of cerebral palsy in Europe: a collaboration of cerebral palsy surveys and registers. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;42(12):816–824.
   Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:214–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, et al. Content validity of the expanded and revised gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(10):744–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson AC, Krumlinde‐Sundholm L, Rösblad B, et al. The manual ability classification system (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(7):549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson A-C, Ullenhag A, Wahlström U, et al. Mini-MACS: development of the manual ability classification system for children younger than 4 years of age with signs of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(1):72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alriksson-Schmidt A, Nordmark E, Czuba T, et al. Stability of the gross motor function classification system in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a retrospective cohort registry study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(6):641–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Avery L, Gorter JW, et al. Stability of the gross motor function classification system, manual ability classification system, and communication function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(10):1026–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000;42(5):292–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor E, Schachar R, Thorley G, et al. Parental account of children’s symptoms. Br J Psychiatry. 1986;149:760–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen GL, Hollung SJ, Vik T, et al. Cerebral pareseregsteret i Norge (CPRN), Årsrapport for 2018 med plan for bedringstiltak; Cerebral Parese oppfølgingsprogram (CPOP), Årsrapport for 2018 [Cerebral palsy register in Norway (CPRN), Annual report for 2018 with a plan for improvement measures; Cerebral Palsy follow-up program (CPOP), yearly report 2018] 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Inthachom R, Prasertsukdee S, Ryan SE, et al. Evaluation of the multidimensional effects of adaptive seating interventions for young children with non-ambulatory cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;16(7):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin J, Colver A, Basu A, et al. Understanding frames: a UK survey of parents and professionals regarding the use of standing frames for children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44(2):195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornberg ÅB, Lauruschkus K. Non-ambulatory children with cerebral palsy: effects of four months of static and dynamic standing exercise on passive range of motion and spasticity in the hip. PeerJ. 2020;8:e8561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson D, Campos J, Witherington D, et al. The role of locomotion in psychological development [review]. Front Psychol. 2013;4:440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Hospodar CM, Feldner HA, et al. Modified Ride-On car use by young children with disabilities. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018;30(1):50–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole M, Simkiss D, Rose A, et al. Anterior or posterior walkers for children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(4):422–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAV Kunnskapsbanken: elektrisk rullestol for barn [Knowledge bank:_powered mobility devices for children] Oslo: NAV. [cited 2023 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.kunnskapsbanken.net/bevegelse/elektrisk-rullestol/elektrisk-rullestol-for-barn/
   Google Scholar
• James D, Pfaff J, Jeffries LM. Modified ride-on cars as early mobility for children with mobility limitations: a scoping review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2019;39(5):525–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H-H. Perspectives on early power mobility training, motivation, and social participation in young children with motor disabilities. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2330–2330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong EL, Spencer S, Kentish MJ, et al. Efficacy of cycling interventions to improve function in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019; Jul33(7):1113–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAV. Hjelpemiddeldatabasen [Assistive technology available in Norway] Oslo: NAV. [cited 2023 Feb 12]. Available from: https://www.hjelpemiddeldatabasen.no/
   Google Scholar
• Santer M, Ring N, Yardley L, et al. Treatment non-adherence in pediatric long-term medical conditions: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies of caregivers’ views. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unicef. Convention on the Rights of the Child: Unicef; 1989. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention
   Google Scholar
• Baker FS. Engaging in play through assistive technology: closing gaps in research and pratice for infants and toddlers with disabilities. In: da Costa B, Seok S, editors. Assistive technology research, practice, and theory. Vol. 1. Beaverton: Ringgold Inc; 2014. p. 207–222.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Lewis M. Assistive technology for the very young: creating responsive environments. Infants Young Child. 2000;12(4):34–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar