Supportive mobility devices across the lifespan in Cerebral Palsy: a modified Delphi study to establish stakeholder research priorities

References

• Data and Statistics for Cerebral Palsy. Centers for disease control and prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/cp/data.html. Updated December 30, 2020. Accessed November 16, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton M, Donohoe M. Ambulatory assistive devices for children and youth with cerebral palsy. In: Miller F, Bachrach S, Lennon N, O'Neil ME, editors. Cerebral Palsy. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 2963–2975. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74558-9_181
   Google Scholar
• Earde PT, Praipruk A, Rodpradit P, et al. Facilitators and barriers to performing activities and participation in children with cerebral palsy: caregivers’ perspective. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018;30(1):27–32. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Hanna SE, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Probability of walking, wheeled mobility, and assisted mobility in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(1):66–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03454.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day SM, Wu YW, Strauss DJ, et al. Change in ambulatory ability of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(9):647–653. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00647.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunton LK, McPhee PG, Gorter JW. Self-reported factors contributing to fatigue and its management in adolescents and adults with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2021;43(7):929–935. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1647294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Shimmell LJ, Stewart D, et al. Mobility experiences of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29(2):133–153. doi: 10.1080/01942630902784746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang IC, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Assistive devices and cerebral palsy: factors influencing the use of assistive devices at home by children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2009;35(1):130–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00898.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey J, Paleg G, Livingstone R. Facilitating child participation through power mobility. Brit J Occup Ther. 2013;76(3):158–160. doi: 10.4276/030802213X13627524435306.
   Google Scholar
• Feldner HA, Logan SW, Galloway JC. Why the time is right for a radical paradigm shift in early powered mobility: the role of powered mobility technology devices, policy and stakeholders. Disab Rehabil. 2016;11(2):89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Østensjø S, Carlberg EB, Vøllestad NK. The use and impact of assistive devices and other environmental modifications on everyday activities and care in young children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(14):849–861. doi: 10.1080/09638280400018619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano RJ, Tieman BL, Walter SD, et al. Effect of environmental setting on mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45(2):113–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00914.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak P, Lenski M, Hidecker MJC, et al. Cerebral palsy and aging. Dev MedChild Neurol. 2009;51:16–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03428.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morgan P, McGinley J. Gait function and decline in adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(1):1–9. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.775359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aycardi LF, Cifuentes CA, Múnera M, et al. Evaluation of biomechanical gait parameters of patients with cerebral palsy at three different levels of gait assistance using the CPWalker. J Neuro Engineering Rehabil. 2019;16(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0485-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lerner ZF, Damiano DL, Bulea TC. Relationship between assistive torque and knee biomechanics during exoskeleton walking in individuals with crouch gait. Paper presented at 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). 2017. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009296.
   Google Scholar
• Huang I-C, Sugden D, Beveridge S. Children’s perceptions of their use of assistive devices in home and school settings. Disabilnd Rehabil. 2009;4(2):95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Paleg G. Measuring outcomes for children with cerebral palsy who use gait trainers. Technologies. 2016;4(3):22. doi: 10.3390/technologies4030022.
   Google Scholar
• Paleg G, Livingstone R. Outcomes of gait trainer use in home and school settings for children with motor impairments: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(11):1077–1091. doi: 10.1177/0269215514565947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paleg G, Livingstone R. Evidence-informed clinical perspectives on selecting gait trainer features for children with cerebral palsy. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2016;23(9):444–454. doi: 10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.9.444.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Paleg G. Practice considerations for the introduction and use of power mobility for children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56(3):210–221. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargus‐Adams JN, Martin LK. Domains of importance for parents, medical professionals and youth with cerebral palsy considering treatment outcomes. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(2):276–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2010.01121.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long TM, Perry DF. Pediatric physical therapists’ perceptions of their training in assistive technology. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):629–639. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson P, Johnston C, Barker K. Influences on students’ assistive technology use at school: the views of classroom teachers, allied health professionals, students with cerebral palsy and their parents. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;13(8):763–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonehill J, von Benzon N, Shaw J. ‘The shops were only made for people who could walk’: impairment, barriers and autonomy in the mobility of adults with cerebral palsy in urban England. Mobilities. 2020;15(3):341–361. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2020.1746057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pons C, Brochard S, Gallien P, et al. Medication, rehabilitation and health care consumption in adults with cerebral palsy: a population based study. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(7):957–965. doi: 10.1177/0269215516663286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre S, Novak I, Cusick A. Consensus research priorities for cerebral palsy: a delphi survey of consumers, researchers, and clinicians. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(3):270–275. ():doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03358.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross PH, Bailes AF, Horn SD, et al. Setting a patient-centered research agenda for cerebral palsy: a participatory action research initiative. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(12):1278–1284. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu C-C, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2007;12(1):10.
   Google Scholar
• Custer RL, Scarcella JA, Stewart BR. The modified delphi technique – a rotational modification. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferds AN, Pearlman JL, Wee J, et al. International mobility technology research: a delphi study to identify challenges and compensatory strategies. Assist Technol. 2011;23(4):232–242. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2011.614677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Shea A, Boaz AL, Chambers M. A hierarchy of power: the place of patient and public involvement in healthcare service development. Front Sociol. 2019;4:38. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewar R, Claus AP, Tucker K, et al. Perspectives on postural control dysfunction to inform future research: a Delphi study for children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(3):463–479. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuthbertson BH, Goddard SL, Lorencatto F, et al. Barriers and facilitators to early rehabilitation in the ICU: a theory driven delphi study. Crit Care Med. 2020;48(12):e1171–e1178. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen L, Plummer T, Sabet A, et al. RESNA position on the application of power mobility devices for pediatric users. Assist Technol. 2018;35(1):14–22. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1415575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman M, Stewart D, Cunningham C, et al. “If I had been given that information back then”: an interpretive description exploring the information needs of adults with cerebral palsy looking back on their transition to adulthood. Child Care Health Dev. 2018;44(5):689–696. doi: 10.1111/cch.12579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljenquist K, O'Neil ME, Bjornson KF. Utilization of physical therapy services during transition for young people with cerebral palsy: a call for improved care into adulthood. Phys Ther. 2018;98(9):796–803. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers MR, De Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach. 2005;27(7):639–643. doi: 10.1080/13611260500069947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danial-Saad A, Kuflik T, Weiss PL, et al. Building an ontology for assistive technology using the Delphi method. Disabil Rehab. 2013;8(4):275–286.
   Google Scholar
• Feldner HA, Gaebler‐Spira D, Awasthi V, et al. Supportive mobility device use across the life span by individuals with cerebral palsy: a qualitative study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2022;64(11):1392–1401. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar