Assistive technology use and its associated factors among university students with disabilities: a case study in a developing country-mixed study design

References

• WHO. Disability and health [cited 2022 Apr 11]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistics Agency of Ethiopia. The 1994 population and housing census of Ethiopia: result and country level.: Addis Ababa: Central Statistics Agency of Ethiopia; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistics Agency of Ethiopia. The 2007 population and housing census of Ethiopia: result and country level. Addis Ababa: Central Statistics Agency of Ethiopia; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank and World Health Organization. World report on disability 2011. Geneva: 2011. p. 350.
   Google Scholar
• Wa’el International Business and Development Consultant. Country profile study on persons with disabilities, Ethiopia. Addis Ababa; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney-Long EA, Carroll DD, Zhang QC, et al. Prevalence of disability and disability type among adults—United States, 2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(29):777–783. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6429a2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves CCdF, Monteiro GBM, Rabello S, et al. Assistive technology applied to education of students with visual impairment. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2009;26(2):148–152. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892009000800007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz S. Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriat Soc. 1983;31(12):721–727. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlinac ME, Feng MC. Assessment of activities of daily living, self-care, and independence. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(6):506–516. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acw049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer SM, Elsaesser L-J, Arthanat S. Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization’s, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(3):243–259. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2010.529631.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LoPresti EF, Bodine C, Lewis C. Assistive technology for cognition [understanding the needs of persons with disabilities]. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27(2):29–39. doi: 10.1109/EMB.2007.907396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):454–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RO, Scherer MJ, Cooper R, et al. Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):473–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver J, Ganus A, Ivey JM, et al. The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(6):468–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chikonzo AC, Muziringa M, Munyoro J. The role of assistive technology (at) in enhancing the educational experience of students with special needs in higher education: a case of University of Zimbabwe library. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Dewsbury G, Clarke K, Randall D, et al. The anti-social model of disability. Disabil Soc. 2004;19(2):145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, et al. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8(5):373–380. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.749429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacKay D. The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Syracuse J Int Law Commer. 2006;34:323.
   Google Scholar
• McNicholl A, Casey H, Desmond D, et al. The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021;16(2):130–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. The social model of disability. Disabil Stud Reader. 2006;2:197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi L. The social model of disability: a philosophical critique. J Appl Philos. 2004;21(2):141–157. doi: 10.1111/j.0264-3758.2004.00269.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mizunoya S, Mitra S, Yamasaki I. Disability and school attendance in 15 low-and middle-income countries. World Dev. 2018;104:388–403. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Simmons CD, Favreau M. Exploring occupational justice in consumer perspectives on assistive technology. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79(5):309–319. doi: 10.2182/CJOT.2012.79.5.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassen A, Amha S, Muzeyin A, et al. National priority assistive technologies and products list. Ministry of Health – Ethiopia; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gebru A. Accommodating the needs of students with visual impairment in Ethiopian national examinations. In: Special needs education. Addis Ababa: Addis Ababa University; 2015. p. 131.
   Google Scholar
• Read T. Reading for Ehiopia’s achievement developed technical assistance (READ TA). 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopian Ministry of Education. A master plan for special needs education/inclusive education in Ethiopia 2016-2025. Addis Ababa: Ministry of Education; 2016. p. 72.
   Google Scholar
• Matter R, Harniss M, Oderud T, et al. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(2):105–114. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1188170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen DL. Assistive technology for students with disabilities: resources and challenges encountered by teachers. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed A. Perceptions of using assistive technology for students with disabilities in the classroom. Int J Special Educ. 2018;33(1):129–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund Å, Lim N, Larsson H. Effective use of assistive technologies for inclusive education in developing countries: issues and challenges from two case studies. Int J Educ Dev ICT. 2010;6(4):5–26.
   Google Scholar
• Japan International Cooperation Agency Planning and Evaluation Department. Country profile on disability federal democratic republic of Ethiopia. 2002. p. 23.
   Google Scholar
• Forgrave KE. Assistive technology: empowering students with learning disabilities. Clear House. 2002;75(3):122–126. doi: 10.1080/00098650209599250.
   Google Scholar
• Oira M. Use of modern assistive technology and its effects on educational achievement of students with visual impairment at Kibos Special Secondary School Kisumu County, Kenya [unpublished master’s thesis]. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Parette P, Scherer M. Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2004;217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris A, Enfield S. Disability, equality and human rights: a training manual for development and humanitarian organisations. Oxfam GB; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Roll MC. The impact of assistive technology services in post-secondary education for students with disabilities: intervention outcomes, use-profiles, and user-experiences. Assist Technol. 2017;29(2):91–98. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2016.1214932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm MP, Roll MC. Self-reported assistive technology outcomes and personal characteristics in college students with less-apparent disabilities. Assist Technol. 2019;31(4):169–179. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2017.1406414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad FK. Use of assistive technology in inclusive education: making room for diverse learning needs. Transcience. 2015;6(2):62–77.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Craddock G, Mackeogh T. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(10):811–817. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.511418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer-Reiss ML. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. University of Northern Colorado; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Alquraini T, Gut D. Critical components of successful inclusion of students with severe disabilities: literature review. Int J Special Educ. 2012;27(1):42–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hersh MA, Johnson MA. Assistive technology for visually impaired and blind people. Springer; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Copley J, Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2004;11(4):229–243. doi: 10.1002/oti.213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Derer K, Polsgrove L, Rieth H. A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. J Spec Educ Technol. 1996;13(2):62–80. doi: 10.1177/016264349601300202.
   Google Scholar
• King TW. Assistive technology: essential human factors. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 1999.
   Google Scholar