Universal Design and the Problem of “Post-Disability” Ideology

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2012. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822395324
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, H-Dirksen L., and Joseph J. Murray. 2014. “Deaf Gain: An Introduction.” In Deaf Gain: Raising the Stakes for Human Diversity, edited by H-Dirksen, L. Bauman and Joseph J. Murray, xv–xlii. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Moshe, Liat, and Justin Powell. 2007. “Sign of Our Times? Revis(it)ing the International Symbol of Access.” Disability and Society 22 (5): 489–505.10.1080/09687590701427602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Universal Design. 1997. “Principles of Universal Design 2.0.” https://www.ncsu.edu/project/design-projects/sites/cud/content/principles/principles.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Chris, Allison Carey, and Liat Ben-Moshe. 2014. “Reconsidering Confinement: Interlocking Locations and Logics of Incarceration.” In Disability Incarcerated, edited by Chris Chapman, Allison Carey and Liat Ben-Moshe, 2–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cogdell, Christina. 2010. Eugenic Design: Streamlining in America in the 1930s. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Lennard. 2010. “Constructing Normalcy: The Bell Curve, the Novel, and the Invention of the Disabled Body in the Nineteenth Century.” In Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard Davis, 2–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfuss, Henry. 1960. The Measure of Man: Human Factors in Design. New York: Whitney Library of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Ellcessor, Elizabeth. 2015. “Blurred Lines: Accessibility, Disability, and Definitional Limitations.” First Monday 20 (9–7). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i9.6169
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, Doris Zames, and Frieda Zames. 2011. The Disability Rights Movement: From Charity to Confrontation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedlander, Henry. 2000. The Origins of Nazi Genocide: From Euthanasia to the Final Solution. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2014. “A Habitable World: Harriet McBryde Johnson’s ‘Case for My Life’.” Hypatia 30 (1): 300–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2012. “The Case for Conserving Disability.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (3): 339–355.10.1007/s11673-012-9380-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2011. “Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept.” Hypatia 26 (3): 591–609.10.1111/hypa.2011.26.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, Barbara. 2014. “Parallels and Problems of Normalization in Rehabilitation and Universal Design: Enabling Connectivities.” Disability and Rehabilitation 36 (16): 1328–1333.10.3109/09638288.2014.891661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golonka, Krystyna. 2006. “Ronald Mace and His Philosophy of Universal Design.” Ergonomics 28 (3): 184–190.
   Google Scholar
• Guffey, Elizabeth. 2015. “The Scandinavian Roots of the International Symbol of Access.” Design and Culture 7 (3): 357–376.10.1080/17547075.2015.1105527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, Harlan. 2002. “Academic Debates and Political Advocacy.” In Disability Studies Today, edited by Colin Barnes and Len Barton, 162–189. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamraie, Aimi. 2013. “Designing Collective Access: A Feminist Disability Theory of Universal Design.” Disability Studies Quarterly 33 (4): http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3871/3411.
   Google Scholar
• Hamraie, Aimi. 2012. “Universal Design Research as a New Materialist Practice.” Disability Studies Quarterly 32 (4): http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3246/3185.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, Stephen. 1998. “'Good Design is Largely a Matter of Common Sense': Questioning the Meaning and Ownership of a Twentieth-Century Orthodoxy.” Journal of Design History 11 (3): 217–233.10.1093/jdh/11.3.217
   Google Scholar
• Hosey, Lance. 2001. “Hidden Lines: Gender, Race, and the Body in Graphic Standards.” Journal of Architectural Education 55 (2): 101–112.10.1162/104648801753199527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. 1997. Enabling America: Assessing the Role of Rehabilitation Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson, S., and A. Ståhl. 2003. “Accessibility, Usability and Universal Design – Positioning and Definition of Concepts Describing Person-Environment Relationships.” Disability and Rehabilitation 25 (2): 57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers, James. 1977. “Barrier-Free Design: A Legislative Response.” In Barrier-Free Environments, edited by Michael J. Bednar, 44–66. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson, and Ross.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Harriet McBryde. 2003. “The Disability Gulag.” New York Times Magazine, November 23: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Stanton, and Polly Welch. 1999. “Evolving Visions: Segregation, Integration, and Inclusion in the Design of Built Places.” In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association, edited by Thorbjoern Mann, 106–116. Orlando, FL: EDRA. http://www.edra.org/sites/default/files/publications/EDRA30-Jones-106-116.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist Queer Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, Steven, Kristen Gillespie-Lynch, Lauren Sherman, and Ted Hutman. 2013. “Deficit, Difference, or Both? Autism and Neurodiversity.” Developmental Psychology 49 (1): 59–71.10.1037/a0028353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kira, Alexander. 1960. “Housing Needs of the Aged, with a Guide to Functional Planning for the Elderly and Handicapped.” Rehabilitation Literature 21 (12): 370–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine, Denise. 2003. Universal Design New York. Buffalo, NY: Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access. http://www.nyc.gov/html/ddc/downloads/pdf/udny/udny2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lifchez, Raymond, and Barbara Winslow. 1982. Design for Independent Living: The Environment and Physically Disabled People. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linton, Simi. 1998. Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lusher, Ruth, and Ronald Mace. 1989. “Design for Physical and Mental Disabilities.” In Encyclopedia of Architecture: Design Engineering and Construction, edited by Wilkes and Packard, 755. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, Ronald. 1994. “Design for Diversity: An Issue of Sustainability.” Transcript of Designing the Future: Toward Universal Design Symposium, Boston, MA, November 17, 1–65. Elaine Ostroff Universal Design Papers, ca. 1960s–2015, Archives Center, National Museum of American History.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, Ronald. 1985. “Universal Design: Barrier-Free Environments for Everyone.” Designers West 33 (1): 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, Ronald. 1980. Letter to Hale Zukas, September 9, Eric Dibner Papers, BANC MSS99/186c, Carton 1. Berkeley, CA: Bancroft Library, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, Ronald. 1977. “Architectural Accessibility.” Paper presented at the White House Conference on Handicapped Individuals, Washington, DC, May 23–27. Awareness Papers, vol. 1, 160–161.
   Google Scholar
• McAdams, Daniel, and Vincent Kostovich. 2011. “A Framework and Representation for Universal Product Design.” International Journal of Design 5 (1): 29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Disability and Queerness. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mingus, Mia. 2010. “Changing the Framework: Disability Justice.” RESIST Newsletter. http://www.resistinc.org/sites/default/files/NovDec10NL_sm.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David, and Sharon Snyder. 2006. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullick, Abir, and Edward Steinfeld. 1997. “Universal Design: What It Is and What It Isn’t.” Innovation 16 (1): 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nagi, Saad. 1991. “Disabilty Concepts Revisted.” In Disability in America: Toward a National Agenda for Prevention, edited by Andrew Pope and Andrew Tarlov, 309–327. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, Timothy. 1960. “Design of Buildings to Permit Their Use by the Physically Handicapped.” In New Building Research: Proceedings of the Conference of the Building Research Institute, 51-66. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1
   Google Scholar
• Padden, Carol, and Tom Humphries. 2005. Inside Deaf Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelka, Fred. 2012. What Have We Done: An Oral History of the Disability Rights Movement. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pell, Ed. 1990. “Universal Design: One in Eight Americans is over 65.” Kitchen and Bath Business, September: 40-41.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, Barbara. 2013. Bathroom. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, Annie. 2015. “The Substantive Impact of Universal Design.” Daily Californian, April 10. http://www.dailycal.org/2015/04/10/the-substantive-impact-of-universal-design.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin, Graham. 2009. Design Meets Disability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Services Administration. 1967. Design for All Americans: A Report of the National Commission on Architectural Barriers to Rehabilitation of the Handicapped. Washington, DC: Rehabilitation Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Remich, Norman. 1992. “Universal Design.” Appliance Manufacturer, July: 50–52.
   Google Scholar
• Reno, Janet. 2000. “Enforcing the ADA.” Tenth Anniversary Status Report from the Department of Justice, Washington, DC. http://www.ada.gov/pubs/10thrpt.htm#anchor40768.
   Google Scholar
• Rusk, Howard, and Eugene Taylor. 1949. New Hope for the Handicapped. New York: Harper and Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Safdie, Josh, and Susan Szenasy. 2011. “Accessibility Watch: Q&A with Josh Safdie.” Metropolis Magazine, February 4. http://www.metropolismag.com/Point-of-View/February-2011/Accessibility-Watch-Q-A-with-Josh-Safdie/.
   Google Scholar
• Salmen, John. 1994. “The Differences between Accessibility and Universal Design.” Universal Design Newsletter 1 (7): 2.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, Ellen. 2014. Fantasies of Identification: Disability, Gender, and Race. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schweik, Susan. 2009. The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serlin, David. 2004. Replaceable You: Engineering the Body in Postwar America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.309723
   Google Scholar
• Silvers, Anita. 1998. “Formal Justice.” In Disability, Difference, and Discrimination, edited by Anita Silvers, David Wasserman, and Mary Mahowald, 13–146. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, Jim. 2012. “Don’t Mourn for Us.” Autonomy: The Critical Journal of Interdisciplinary Autism Studies 1 (1): 1-4.
   Google Scholar
• Story, Molly. 2011. “The Principles of Universal Design.” In Universal Design Handbook, 2nd ed, edited by Wolfgang Preiser, and Korydon Smith, 4.1–4.12. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Story, Molly. 2001. “Principles of Universal Design. In Universal Design Handbook, 1st ed, edited by Wolfgang Preiser, and Elaine Ostroff, 10.1-10.8. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• “The University Picture”. 1962. Toomey Gazette 5 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation. 1972. “Policy Statement.” http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIASUPIAS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Van Cleve, John V., and Barry A. Crouch. 1989. A Place of Their Own: Creating the Deaf Community in America. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Bess. 2012a. “Electric Moms and Quad Drivers: People with Disabilities Buying, Making, and Using Technology in Postwar America.” American Studies 52 (1): 5–30.10.1353/ams.2012.0030
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, Bess. 2012b. “Getting a Grip: Disability in American Industrial Design of the Late Twentieth Century.” Winterthur Portfolio 46 (4): 213–236.10.1086/669668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost, Edna, and Lillian Gilbreth. 1944. Normal Lives for the Disabled. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar