Disciplinary convergence: landscape architecture and the spatial design disciplines

References

• Allen, S. (2009), ‘Beyond Landscape Urbanism’, Lotus International 139: 112–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. (2014), ‘In Conversation with Marc Antrop’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 9:2: 40–41. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2014.931701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antrop, M. (2003), ‘Expectations of Scientists towards Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Research’, in B. Tress et al. (eds.), Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies (Wageningen: Delta Series 2), 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P. (2010), ‘Boundaries? What boundaries?’, The Design Journal 13/2: 137–155. doi: 10.2752/175470710X12735884220817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, T. C. and Szczygiel, B. (2007), ‘Sociology of Professions: The Evolution of Landscape Architecture in the United States’, Landscape Review 12/1: 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, J. (2000), ‘A Word for Landscape Architecture’, Harvard Design Magazine 12: 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Beardsley, J. (1988), ‘Earthworks: The Landscape after Modernism’, in S. Wrede and W. H. Adams (eds.), Denatured Visions (New York: Museum of Modern Art), 110–117.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J. and Young, M. F. D. (2005), ‘The Assault on the Professions and the Restructuring of Academic and Professional Identities: A Bernsteinian Analysis’, British Journal of Sociology of Education 26/2: 183–197. doi: 10.1080/0142569042000294165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. and Holmes, R. (2010), ‘Architects without Architecture: Interview with Kazys Varnelis’, Mammoth [website], http://m.ammoth.us/blog/2010/09/architects-without-architecture/, accessed on 14 September 2010
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973), ‘The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas’, Journal of Applied Psychology 58: 195–203. doi: 10.1037/h0034701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchon-Caillot, B., Gill, K., Jørgensen, K., Rinaldi, B. M., and Shannon, K. (2013), ‘Editorial: Landscape Architecture in an Expanded Field’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 8/1: 4–5. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2013.798916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullivant, L. (2006), ‘The Thickening Ground: The Landscape Urbanism Graduate Programme’, Architecture+Urbanism 426/3: 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. (2011), ‘Impermeable Boundaries? Developments in Professional and Inter-Professional Practice’, Journal of Interprofessional Care 25/1: 53–58. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.488766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corner, J. (2006), ‘Terra Fluxus’, in C. Waldheim (ed.), The Landscape Urbanism Reader (New York: Princeton Architectural Press): 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, J. (1990), ‘A Discourse on Theory I: Sounding the Depths’, Landscape Journal 9/2: 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Costanzo, M. (2009), ‘Twenty Years After (Deconstructivism): Interview with Bernard Tschumi’, Architectural Design 79/1: 24–9. doi: 10.1002/ad.804
   Google Scholar
• Dagenhart, R. and Sawicki, D. (1992), ‘Architecture and Planning: The Divergence of Two Fields’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 12: 1–16. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9201200102
   Google Scholar
• Design Intelligence (2015) America's Best Architecture & Design Schools 2015 [website], www.di.net/archschools/schools.html
   Google Scholar
• Dyck, R. G. (1994), ‘Discipline vs. Profession’, Journal of Planning Education and Research 13/2: 143–146. doi: 10.1177/0739456X9401300206
   Google Scholar
• Fein, A. and Crespi, I. (1977), ‘Landscape Architecture among the Design Professions’, Journal of Architectural Education 31/2: 12–17. doi: 10.1080/10464883.1977.10758595
   Google Scholar
• Fein, A. (1972), ‘Report on the Profession of Landscape Architecture’, Landscape Architecture 63/1: 34–47, 97.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (1994a), ‘Can This Profession Be Saved?’ Progressive Architecture 75/2: 44–49, 84.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, T. (1994b), ‘Three Models for the Architecture Profession’, GSD News Winter/Spring: 42–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gazvoda, D. (2002), ‘Characteristics of Modern Landscape Architecture and its Education’, Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 117–133. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00064-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. W. (2002), ‘Modes of Legal Education and the Social Conditions that Sustain Them’, SELA Papers, Paper 5, Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository [website], http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yls_sela/5/
   Google Scholar
• Ground Up: Landscapes of Uncertainty (2012), Issue 01: (Berkeley, CA: University of California).
   Google Scholar
• Gutman, R. (1988), Architectural Practice: A Critical View (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Architectural Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hines, S. (2004), ‘Back to the Drawing Board: Interview with Diana Balmori’, Landscape Architecture 94/3: 108–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann, H. and Langhorst, J. (2004), ‘Landscape Architecture: An Apocalyptic Manifesto’ [website], www.public.iastate.edu/~isitdead/
   Google Scholar
• Hollein, H. (1968), ‘Alles ist Architektur’, Bau 23: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Huggan, G. (2002), ‘Mixing Disciplines: The Anxiety of Interdisciplinarity’, Postcolonial Studies 5/3: 245–275. doi: 10.1080/1368879022000032784
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, P. (2005), ‘Hold That Eulogy!’ Landscape Architecture 95/4: 34, 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (1990), Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, R. (1979), ‘Sculpture in the Expanded Field’, October 8: 30–44. doi: 10.2307/778224
   Google Scholar
• Krog, S. (1985), ‘The Language of Modern,’ Landscape Architecture 75/2: 56–59, 130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwinter, S. (2002), ‘American Design?’, Praxis 4: 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kwinter, S. (1992), ‘Landscapes of Change: Boccioni's Stati D'Animo as a General Theory of Models’, Assemblage 19: 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2015a), ‘The Usefulness of Uselessness: Towards a Landscape Framework for Un-Activated Urban Public Space’, Architectural Theory Review 19/2: 154–173. doi: 10.1080/13264826.2014.967330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2015b), ‘Ecologies of Spectacle: Reflecting on the New Presidio Parklands Design Competition’, Ground Up 4: 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2014), ‘Hyper-realism and Loose-reality: the Limitations of Digital Realism and Alternative Principles in Landscape Design Visualization’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 19: 20–31. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2014.968412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kullmann, K. (2013), ‘Design for Decline: Landscape Architecture Strategies for the Western Australian Wheatbelt’, Landscape Journal 32/2: 243–260. doi: 10.3368/lj.32.2.243
   Google Scholar
• Department of Landscape Architecture and Environmental Planning (LAEP) (2013), ‘Local Landscape Architecture Profession: Focus Group Discussion’ (unpublished report, LAEP [Berkeley: University of California]).
   Google Scholar
• McAvin, M. (1992), ‘Most Important Questions’, Landscape Journal 11/2: 173.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, M. (2003), ‘The Need for Knowledge Brokers’, in B. Tress et al. (eds.), Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies (Wageningen: Delta Series 2), 33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. (2005), ‘Eyes That Cannot See?’ Landscape Architecture 95/4: 36, 38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, T. (2014) ‘Robot Doctors, Online Lawyers and Automated Architects: The Future of the Professions?’, The Guardian, 15 June [website], www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/ jun/15/, accessed on 15 June 2014
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. A. (1997), ‘A Profession in Peril?’, Landscape Architecture 87/8: 66–71, 85–87.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. A. (1998), ‘A Profession in Peril? Take Two’, Landscape Architecture 88/2: 74–79, 90–91, 93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Perrella, S. (1998), ‘Hypersurface Theory: Architecture>Culture’, Architectural Design 68/5–6: 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, L. (2001), ‘Building City Landscape’, in J. Czerniak (ed.) Case: Downsview Park Toronto (New York: Prestel Verlag), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, L. (1997), ‘Pieces of the World: Nature-Object and Nature-Space’, Daidalos 65: 28–41.
   Google Scholar
• RMIT (2009), Kerb: Is LA Dead? (Melbourne: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. (2003), ‘Are Landscape Architects Stuck in a Rut?’, Landscape Design 322: 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Saks, M. (2012), ‘Defining a Profession: The Role of Knowledge and Expertise’, Professions and Professionalism 2/1: 1–10. doi: 10.7577/pp.v2i1.151
   Google Scholar
• Schurch, T. W. (1999), ‘Reconsidering Urban Design: Thoughts about its Definition and Status as a Field or Profession’, Journal of Urban Design 4/1: 5–28. doi: 10.1080/13574809908724436
   Google Scholar
• Scully, V. (1988), ‘Architecture: The Natural and the ManMade’, in S. Wrede and W. H. Adams (eds.), Denatured Visions (New York: Museum of Modern Art), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. and Deming, M. E. (2011), ‘Research Strategies in Landscape Architecture’, Journal of Landscape Architecture 6/1: 34–45. doi: 10.1080/18626033.2011.9723445
   Google Scholar
• Swaffield, S. (2002), ‘Social Change and the Profession of Landscape Architecture in the Twenty-First Century’, Landscape Journal 21/1: 183–189. doi: 10.3368/lj.21.1.183
   Google Scholar
• Treib, M. (1995), ‘Must Landscapes Mean?’, Landscape Journal 14/1: 46–62.
   Google Scholar
• United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (USBLS) (2012), Occupational Outlook Handbook, USBLS [website], www.bls.gov/ooh/, accessed on 15 January 2013
   Google Scholar
• Varnelis, K. (2008), ‘Victory Gardens, or the Impact of the Financial Crisis on Architecture’ [website], www.archinect.com/views/view.php?id=84101_0_36_0_C, accessed on 20 June 2010
   Google Scholar
• Varnelis, K. (2007), ‘The Post-Critical Collapse’, varnelis.net/blog/the_postcritical_collapse, accessed on 10 November 2010
   Google Scholar
• Vidler, A. (2004), ‘Architecture's Expanded Field’, Artforum 42/8: 142–47.
   Google Scholar
• Waldheim, C. (2002), ‘Landscape Urbanism: A Genealogy’, Praxis 4: 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (2014), ASLA-NCC Legacy Lecture: A Conversation With Peter Walker, interviewed by Charles Birnbaum, 31 March, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (2005), ‘These Warnings May Focus Debate in an Overly Conservative and Complacent Body’, Landscape Architecture 95/4: 44–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (1998), ‘Commentary’, Landscape Architecture 88/2: 74–79, 90–91, 93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. S. (1998), Unnatural Horizons (New York: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• White, S. (1952), ‘The Case for Landscape Architecture’, Forsite 2: 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Wigley, M. (1998), ‘Whatever Happened to Total Design?’ Harvard Design Magazine 5: 18–25.
   Google Scholar