234
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The Impact of Active Learning Instructional Techniques on Recreational Therapy Undergraduate Students

, , , &

References

  • Anderson, L. S. (2013). Development of learning outcomes for therapeutic recreation education accreditation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 47(4), 226.
  • Anderson, S. C., Ashton-Shaeffer, C., & Autry, C. E. (2000). Therapeutic recreation education: 1999 Survey. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 34(4), 335.
  • Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (2012). Classroom assessment techniques. Jossey Bass Wiley.
  • Anthony, G. (1996). Active learning in a constructivist framework. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(4), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369153
  • Austin, D. R., Crawford, M. E., McCormick, B. P., & Puymbroeck, M. V. (2015). Recreational therapy: An introduction. Sagamore Publishing.
  • Barnes, D. R. (1989). Active learning. Leeds University TVEI Support Project.
  • Bean, J. C. (2011). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Bednar, A. K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T. M., & Perry, J. D. (1992). Theory into practice: How do we link. In Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 17–34). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Benjamin, L. T. (1991). Personalization and active learning in the large introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 18(2), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1802_1
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC.
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Sutherland, T. E. (1996). The active learning continuum: Choosing activities to engage students in the classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(67), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966704
  • Brooks, D. C. (2011). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x
  • Colbeck, C. L., Campbell, S. E., & Bjorklund, S. A. (2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(1), 60–83.
  • Cooperstein, S. E., & Kocevar-Weidinger, E. (2004). Beyond active learning: A constructivist approach to learning. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320410537658
  • Costello, M. (2017). The benefits of active learning: Applying Brunner’s discovery theory to the classroom: Teaching clinical decision-making to senior nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 12(3), 212–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2017.02.005
  • Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2008). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x
  • Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (1996). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives, and Practice, 2, 8–33.
  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  • Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293990240401
  • Good, T., & Brophy, J. (1994). Looking in classrooms (6th ed.). Harper Collins.
  • Grabinger, R. S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1995). Rich environments for active learning: A definition. ALT-J, 3(2), 5–34.
  • Hansen, R. S. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19
  • Harlow, S., Cummings, R., & Aberasturi, S. M. (2007). Karl Popper and Jean Piaget: A rationale for constructivism [Paper presentation]. The Educational Forum.
  • Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
  • Hoellwarth, C., & Moelter, M. J. (2011). The implications of a robust curriculum in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 79(5), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3557069
  • Huda, S. U., Ali, T. S., Nanji, K., & Cassum, S. (2016). Perceptions of undergraduate nursing students regarding active learning strategies, and benefits of active learning. International Journal of Nursing, 8(4), 193–199.
  • Jaramillo, J. A. (1996). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory and contributions to the development of constructivist curricula. Education, 117(1), 133.
  • Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. d M. (2015). Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar5.
  • Keller, T. E., Whittaker, J. K., & Burke, T. K. (2001). Student debates in policy courses: Promoting policy practice skills and knowledge through active learning. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2001.10779059
  • Kinchin, I., & Hay, D. (2005). Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: A pilot study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 51(2), 182–187.
  • Kothiyal, A., Majumdar, R., Murthy, S., & Iyer, S. (2013). Effect of think-pair-share in a large CS1 class: 83% sustained engagement [Paper presentation]. Proceedings of the ninth annual international ACM conference on International computing education research.
  • Kyriacou, C. (1992). Active learning in secondary school mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 18(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192920180308
  • Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning. Strategies for the college classroom. ERIC.
  • Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
  • Mills, A., Crocamo, J. T., & Levin, M. J. (2015). Using the one-minute paper to assess learning objectives: A pilot project. Columbia University Libraries.
  • Nisbett, N., Brown-Welty, S., & O’Keefe, C. J. T. R. J. (2002). A study of ethics education within therapeutic recreation curriculum. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 36(3), 282.
  • Petersen, C. I., & Gorman, K. S. (2014). Strategies to address common challenges when teaching in an active learning classroom. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20086
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  • Rancourt, A. (1986). Internal components of undergraduate curricula in therapeutic recreation. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 20(3), 21–29.
  • Robertson, K. (2006). Increase student interaction with “think-pair-shares” and “circle chats.” Available at: https://www.colorincolorado.org/article/increase-student-interaction-think-pair-shares-and-circle-chats
  • Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1999). Concept mapping as a tool for learning: Broadening the framework for student-centered instruction. College Teaching, 47(2), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567559909595789
  • Silberman, M. (1996). Active learning: 101 Strategies to teach any subject. ERIC.
  • Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., Adams, W. K., Wieman, C., Knight, J. K., Guild, N., & Su, T. T. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science, 323(5910), 122–124.
  • Stoltzfus, J. R., & Libarkin, J. (2016). Does the room matter? Active learning in traditional and enhanced lecture spaces. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4), ar68.
  • Stumbo, N. J., Carter, M. J., & Kim, J. (2004). 2003 National therapeutic recreation curriculum study part B: University, faculty, student, and placement characteristics. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 38(1), 53.
  • Stumbo, N. J., Carter, M. J., Wilder, A., & Greenwood, J. (2013). 2012 Therapeutic recreation curriculum survey. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 47(3), 179.
  • Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50–60.
  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00869951
  • Wei, H.-C., Peng, H., & Chou, C. (2015). Can more interactivity improve learning achievement in an online course? Effects of college students’ perception and actual use of a course-management system on their learning achievement. Computers & Education, 83, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.12.013
  • Wilder, A., Zahl, M., Greenwood, J., Carter, M., & Stumbo, N. (2015). Trend analysis of therapeutic recreation curricula. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 49(2), 1970–2013.
  • Zahl, M., Greenwood, J., Ramella, K., Sullivan, A.-M., & Wilder, A. (2016). Interprofessional education and experiences within therapeutic recreation education. Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 50(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.18666/TRJ-2016-V50-I4-7687

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.