1,821
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Athletes’ and coaches’ perceptions of deterrents to performance-enhancing drug use

, &

References

  • Aldhous, P., 2008. Inside the minds of athletes who cheat. New scientist. 2667, 8–9.
  • ASADA, 2012. 2011:12 Annual report. Canberra: Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority.
  • Australian Crime Commission, 2013. Organised crime and drugs in sport in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government.
  • Backhouse, S.H. and Mckenna, J., 2011. Doping in sport: a review of medical practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs. International journal of drug policy, 22 (3), 198–202. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.03.002
  • Backhouse, S.H. and Mckenna, J., 2012. Reviewing coaches’ knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding doping in sport. International journal of sports science & coaching, 7 (1), 167–176. doi:10.1260/1747-9541.7.1.167
  • British Medical Association, BMA, 2002. Drugs in sport: the pressure to win. London: BMJ Books.
  • Chan, J. and Oxley, D., 2004. The deterrent effect of capital punishment: a review of the research evidence crime and justice bulletin. Vol 84. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, 1–24.
  • Dunn, M., et al., 2010. Drug testing in sport: the attitudes and experiences of elite athletes. International journal of drug policy, 21, 330–332. doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.12.005
  • Engelberg, T., Moston, S., and Skinner, J., 2012. Public perception of sport anti-doping policy in Australia. Drugs: education, prevention & policy, 19 (1), 84–87. doi:10.3109/09687637.2011.590556
  • Gucciardi, D.F., Jalleh, G., and Donovan, R.J., 2010. Does social desirability influence the relationship between doping attitudes and doping susceptibility in athletes?. Psychology of sport and exercise, 11 (6), 479–486. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.06.002
  • Gudjonsson, G.H. and Pearse, J., 2011. Suspect interviews and false confessions. Current directions in psychological science, 20 (1), 33–37. doi:10.1177/0963721410396824
  • Hanstad, D. and Waddington, I., 2009. Sport, health and drugs: a critical re-examination of some key issues and problems. Perspectives in public health, 129 (4), 174–182. doi:10.1177/1466424008094806
  • Ingle, S. 5 May 2014. Tyson gay leniency shows amnesties for drug cheats will be hard to swallow. The guardian [online]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2014/may/04/tyson-gay-wada-drug-cheats-amnesty [Accessed 5 May 2014].
  • Kassin, S.M., 2005. On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?. American psychologist, 60, 215–228. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215
  • Kassin, S.M., et al., 2010. Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations. Law and human behavior, 34, 3–38. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6
  • Kassin, S.M., Dror, I.E., and Kukucka, J., 2013. The forensic confirmation bias: problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 2 (1), 42–52. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.01.001
  • Kassin, S.M. and Gudjonnson, G.H., 2004. The psychology of confessions: a review of the literature and issues. Psychological science, 5, 33–67.
  • Kayser, B. and Broers, B., 2012. The olympics and harm reduction?. Harm reduction journal, 9, 10.1186/1477-7517-9-33.
  • Kirby, K., Moran, A., and Guerin, S., 2011. A qualitative analysis of the experiences of elite athletes who have admitted to doping for performance enhancement. International journal of sport policy and politics, 3 (2), 205–224. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.577081
  • Kirkwood, K., 2009. Considering harm reduction as the future of doping control policy in international sport. Quest, 61 (2), 180–190. doi:10.1080/00336297.2009.10483609
  • Knoll, B.R., 2013. Assessing the effect of social desirability on nativism attitude responses. Social science research, 42 (6), 1587–1598. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.012
  • Matthews, S.K. and Agnew, R., 2008. Extending deterrence theory: do delinquent peers condition the relationship between perceptions of getting caught and offending?. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 45 (2), 91–118. doi:10.1177/0022427807313702
  • Mckenzie, C., 2007. The use of criminal justice mechanisms to combat doping in sport. Sports law eJournal [online], 1–9. Available from: http://epublications.bond.edu.au/slej/4 [Accessed 25 March 2013].
  • Mendoza, J., 2002 . The war on drugs in sport: a perspective from the front-line. Clinical journal of sport medicine, 12 (4), 254–258. doi:10.1097/00042752-200207000-00010
  • Morente-Sánchez, J. and Zabala, M., 2013. Doping in sport: a review of elite athletes’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Sports medicine, 43 (6), 395–411. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0037-x
  • Moston, S., Engelberg, T., and Skinner, J., 2013. Investigative interviewing and anti-doping developments in Australia. Investigative interviewing: research and practice, 5 (2), 144–149.
  • Moston, S., Skinner, J., and Engelberg, T., 2012. Perceived incidence of drug use in Australian sport: a survey of public opinion. Sport in society, 15 (1), 64–77. doi:10.1080/03031853.2011.625277
  • Overbye, M., Knudsen, M.L., and Pfister, G., 2013. To dope or not to dope: elite athletes’ perceptions of doping deterrents and incentives. Performance enhancement & health, 2, 119–134. doi:10.1016/j.peh.2013.07.001
  • Paternoster, R., 2010. How much do we really know about criminal deterrence?. Journal of criminal law & criminology, 100 (3), 765–823.
  • Paternoster, R. and Iovanni, L., 1986. The deterrent effect of perceived severity: a reexamination. Social forces, 64 (3), 751–777. doi:10.1093/sf/64.3.751
  • Petróczi, A. 2007. Attitudes and doping: a structural equation analysis of the relationship between athletes’ attitudes, sport orientation and doping behaviour. Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2, 10.1186/1747-597X-2-34.
  • Pound, R.W., et al. 2013. Report to WADA executive committee on lack of effectiveness of testing programs [online]. Montreal, WADA. Available from: http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/World_Anti-Doping_Program/Reports-Assessments/2013-05-12-Lack-of-effectiveness-of-testing-WG-Report-Final.pdf [Accessed 22 August 2013].
  • Pratt, T.C., et al. 2006. The empirical status of deterrence theory: a meta-analysis. In: F.T. Cullen, J.P. Wright, and K.R. Blevins, eds. Taking stock: the status of criminological theory. Vol 15. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 367–395.
  • Price, S.L., 10 August 2012. A doping free Olympics? Not in London – and maybe never [online]. Sports illustrated, Available from: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/olympics/2012/writers/sl_price/08/10/2012-olympics-doping/index.html#ixzz2M3Jd4lc7 [Accessed 12 August 2012].
  • Rumsby, B. 4 November 2013. British players’ unions call in lawyers to fight Wada’s ‘barbaric’ sanctions for recreational drug use [online]. The telegraph, Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/drugsinsport/10426224/British-players-unions-call-in-lawyers-to-fight-Wadas-barbaric-sanctions-for-recreational-drug-use.html [Accessed 4 November 2013].
  • Smith, A.C.T. and Stewart, B., 2008. Drug policy in sport: hidden assumptions and inherent contradictions. Drug and alcohol review, 27 (2), 123–129. doi:10.1080/09595230701829355
  • Stober, J., 1999. The social desirability scale-17 (SDS17): development and first results on reliability and validity. Diagnostica, 45, 173–177. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173
  • Strelan, P. and Boeckmann, R.J., 2006. Why drug testing in elite sport does not work: perceptual deterrence theory and the role of personal moral beliefs. Journal of applied social psychology, 36 (12), 2909–2934. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00135.x
  • WADA, 2003. World anti-doping code [online]. Montreal: WADA. Available from: http://www.wada-ama.org/ [Accessed 20 July 2010].
  • WADA, 2009. World anti-doping code [online]. Montreal: WADA. Available from: http://www.wada-ama.org/ [Accessed 20 July 2010].
  • WADA, 2011. Guidelines for coordinating investigations and sharing anti-doping information and evidence. Montreal: WADA.
  • WADA, 2012. 2011 laboratory testing figures [online]. Montreal: WADA. Available from: http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/Resources/Testing-Figures/WADA-2011-Laboratory-Testing-Figures.pdf [Accessed 31 July 2013].
  • WADA, 2013. World anti-doping code 2015 [online]. Montreal: WADA. Available from: http://www.wada-ama.org/ [Accessed 11 November 2013].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.