Prevalence and socio-economic determinants of consanguineous marriages in Algeria according to Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2019 data (MICS6)

References

• Abdalla, B., and A. Zaher. 2013. Consanguineous marriages in the Middle East: Nature versus nurture. The Open Complementary Medicine Journal 5:1–10. doi:10.2174/1876391X01305010001.
   Google Scholar
• Abolfotouh, M. A., and M. Almuneef. 2020. Prevalence, pattern and factors of intimate partner violence against Saudi women. Journal of Public Health 42 (3):e206–e14. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdz092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assaf, S., and M. Khawaja. 2009. Consanguinity trends and correlates in the Palestinian Territories. Journal of Biosocial Science 41 (1):107–24. doi:10.1017/S0021932008002940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benallegue, A., and F. Kedji. 1984. [Consanguinity and public health. Algerian study]. Archives Françaises de Pédiatrie 41 (6):435–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bener, A., and K. A. Alali. 2006. Consanguineous marriage in a newly developed country: The Qatari population. Journal of Biosocial Science 38 (2):239–46. doi:10.1017/S0021932004007060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhamadi, B. 1997. Les déterminants de l’endogamie au Maroc, DHS I et II. Thèse Doctorat. Canada: Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Bhinder, M. A., H. Sadia, N. Mahmood, M. Qasim, Z. Hussain, M. M. Rashid, M. Y. Zahoor, R. Bhatti, W. Shehzad, A. M. Waryah, et al. 2019. Consanguinity: A blessing or menace at population level? Annals of Human Genetics 83 (4):214–219. doi:10.1111/ahg.12308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemont, C., A. R. Bouffette, and J. Bouffette. 1974. Théorie chromosomique de l’inbreeding : Modèle probabiliste. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 36:417–34. doi:10.1016/S0092-8240(74)80039-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bittles, A. H. 2001. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clinical Genetics 60 (2):89–98. doi:10.1034/j.1399-0004.2001.600201.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittles, A. H. 2011. The global prevalence of consanguinity. http://www.consang.net.
   Google Scholar
• Bittles, A. H. 2012. Consanguinity in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bittles, A. H., and M. L. Black. 2010. Consanguineous marriage and Human evolution. Annual Review of Anthropology 39 (1):193–207. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105051.
   Google Scholar
• Bittles, A. H., J. C. Grant, and S. A. Shami. 1993. Consanguinity as a determinant of reproductive behavior and mortality in Pakistan. International Journal of Epidemiology 22 (3):463–67. doi:10.1093/ije/22.3.463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chentouf, A., R. Talhi, A. Dahdouh, L. Benbihi, S. Benilha, M. L. Oubaiche, and M. Chaouch. 2015. Consanguinity and epilepsy in Oran, Algeria: A case-control study. Epilepsy Research 111:10–17. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, Z., and J. A. Böök. 1983. Consanguinity and incidence of thalassaemia in Egypt. Hereditas 99 (2):215–17. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5223.1983.tb00894.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamamy, H., L. Jamhawi, J. Al-Darawsheh, and K. Ajlouni. 2005. Consanguineous marriages in Jordan: Why is the rate changing with time? Clinical Genetics 67 (6):511–16. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00426.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hami, H., A. Soulaymani, and A. Mokhtari. 2009. Les Déterminants des Mariages Consanguins dans la Région de Rabat-Salé-Zemmour-Zaer (Maroc). Antropo 18:27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari, F., S. Dastgiri, R. Akbari, Z. Khamnian, E. Khanlarzadeh, M. Baradaran, S. Jabbary-Fam, S. Badrazar, M. Heidarzadeh, N. Tajaddini, et al. 2014. Prevalence and risk factors of consanguineous marriage. European Journal of General Medicine 11 (4):248–55. doi:10.15197/sabad.1.11.81.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, R., and A. H. Bittles. 1998. The prevalence and demographic characteristics of consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 30 (2):261–275. doi:10.1017/S0021932098002612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. M. 2018. The changing pattern and determinants of declining consanguinity in Jordan during 1990–2012. Annals of Human Biology 45 (2):140–47. doi:10.1080/03014460.2018.1429655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurdi, R., and P. C. Saxena. 2003. The prevalence and correlates of consanguineous marriages in Yemen: Similarities and contrasts with other Arab countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 35 (1):1–13. doi:10.1017/S0021932003000014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelmemi, W., I. Chelly, M. Kharrat, and H. Chaabouni-Bouhamed. 2015. Consanguinity and homozygosity among Tunisian patients with an autosomal recessive disorder. Journal of Biosocial Science 47 (6):718–26. doi:10.1017/S002193201400056X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkeni, E., K. Monastiri, B. Saket, D. Rudan, L. Zgaga, and H. Ben Cheikh. 2006. Association among education level, occupation status, and consanguinity in Tunisia and Croatia. Croatian Medical Journal 47 (4):656–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khlat, M. 1988. Consanguineous marriage and reproduction in Beirut, Lebanon. American Journal of Human Genetics 43 (2):188–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari, N., A. H. Bittles, and P. Saxena. 2020. Has the long-predicted decline in consanguineous marriage in India occurred? Journal of Biosocial Science 52 (5):746–755. doi:10.1017/S0021932019000762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévi-Strauss, C. 1967. Les structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Ed, Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Modell, B. 1991. Social and genetic implications of customary consanguineous marriage among British Pakistanis. Report of a meeting held at the Ciba Foundation on 15 January 1991. Journal of Medical Genetics 28 (10):720. doi:10.1136/jmg.28.10.720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modell, B., and A. Darr. 2002. Science and society: Genetic counselling and customary consanguineous marriage. Nature Reviews Genetics 3 (3):225–29. doi:10.1038/nrg754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussouni, A., A. A. Metri, O. Chaif, and H. Bouazza. 2019. Etude anthropo-sociologique des mariages consanguins dans la population de sabra (Ouest-Algerien). Lebanese Science Journal 20 (2):323–41. doi:10.22453/LSJ-020.2.323-341.
   Google Scholar
• Rahaman, M., S. Sen, M. J. Rana, and S. Ghosh. 2022. Is consanguineous marriage related to spousal violence in India? Evidence from the national family health survey, 2015-16. Journal of Biosocial Science 54 (6):959–74. doi:10.1017/S0021932021000626.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajab, A., and M. A. Patton. 2000. A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Annals of Human Biology 27 (3):321–26. doi:10.1080/030144600282208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, N., R. E. Hamad, and S. Mohamed. 1990. Inbreeding effects on reproductive outcome in a Sudanese population. Human Heredity 40 (4):208–12. doi:10.1159/000153932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandridge, A. L., J. Takeddin, E. Al-Kaabi, and Y. Frances. 2010. Consanguinity in Qatar: Knowledge, attitude and practice in a population born between 1946 and 1991. Journal of Biosocial Science 42 (1):59–82. doi:10.1017/S002193200999023X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. K., M. A. Kalam, S. Ghosh, and S. Roy. 2021. Prevalence and determinants of consanguineous marriage and its types in India: Evidence from the national family health survey, 2015-2016. Journal of Biosocial Science 53 (4):566–76. doi:10.1017/S0021932020000383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subalakshmi, T., and J. C. Mohan. 2021. Influence of maternal age and consanguinity on pregnancy outcome in Sivagangai, Tamil Nadu, South India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology 42:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Talbi, J., A. Khadmaoui, A. Soulaymani, and A. Chafik. 2008. Caractérisation de l’évolution de la consanguinité dans la population des Doukkala (Maroc). Antropo 17:7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Wahab, A., and M. Ahmad. 1996. Biosocial perspective of consanguineous marriages in rural and urban swat, Pakistan. Journal of Biosocial Science 28 (3):305–313. doi:10.1017/S0021932000022379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yahyaa, B. T., M. A. M. Al-Samarrai, and S. A. A. Jadoo. 2019. Prevalence and perception of women about consanguineous marriage in Al-Ramadi City. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development 10 (4):567–73. doi:10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00758.7.
   Google Scholar
• Zaoui, S., and C. Biemont. 2002. [Frequency of consanguineous unions in the Tlemcen area (West Algeria)]. Sante 12 (3):289–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar