Housing of persons with disabilities: what can be learned from the introduction of more demand-driven subsidies in Flanders?

References

• Beer, A., & Faulkner, D. (2009). The housing careers of people with a disability and carers of people with a disability. AHURI Research, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Fyffe, C. (2006). Tensions between institutional closure and deinstitutionalisation: What can be learned from Victoria’s institutional redevelopment? Disability and Society, 21(6), 567–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Roit, B., & Le Bihan, B. (2010). Similar and yet so different: Cash-for-care in six european countries’ long-term care policies. The Milbank Quarterly, 88(3), 286–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, H. (2017). Individual funding systems: What works? Evidence Base, 2017(3), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dursin, W. (2021). The role of government in the implementation of personal budget policies: Access, organization and choice [PhD thesis]. Universiteit Gent. Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde.
   Google Scholar
• Dursin, W., Benoot, T., Roose, R., & Verschuere, B. (2021). Choice and opportunity on the welfare care market: An experimental evaluation of decision-making in a context of individual funding policy. Social Policy & Administration, 55(7), 1276–1292.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, L., Muñoz, S.-A., Narzisi, K., Bradley, S., & Hall, J. (2020). Creating community and belonging in a designated housing estate for disabled people. Social Inclusion, 8(3), 66–76.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K., & Mansell, J. (1996). Deinstitutionalization and community living. Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, J., Kendall, J., Davey, V., & Knapp, M. (2007). Direct payments in England: Factors linked to variations in local provision. Journal of Social Policy, 36(1), 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. R., Gleeson, R., Edwards, R., Purcal, C., Sitek, T., Dinning, B., Laragy, C., D'aegher, L., & Thompson, D. (2010). Effectiveness of individual funding approaches for disability support (Occasional Paper Number 29). Australian Government Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. R., Purcal, C., Jones, A., Lutz, D., Robinson, S., & Kayess, R. (2021). What place is there for shared housing with individualized disability support? Disability and Rehabilitation, 43(1), 60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forder, J., Jones, K., Glendinning, C., Caiels, J., Welch, E., Baxter, K., Davidson, J., Windle, K., Irvine, A., King, D., & Dolan, P. (2012). Evaluation of the personal health budget pilot Programme. University of Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, G. (1997). Comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies: Sub-market and spatial perspectives. Housing Studies, 12(4), 561–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernandez, J.-L., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., Manthorpe, J., Moran, N., Netten, A., Stevens, M., & Wilberforce, M. (2008). Evaluation of the individual budgets pilot programme: Final report. Social Policy Research Unit, York, University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, K. (2018). Occupying and Rethinking Disability. Meanings of the new Flemish personal care budget for persons with disabilities and its impact on care organisations An ethnographic study of Monnikenheide (103 p.) [Master thesis social and cultural anthropology]. KU Leuven. Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen.
   Google Scholar
• Harflett, N., Pitts, J., Greig, R., & Bown, H. (2017). A proposed typology of housing and support (Housing Choices Discussion Paper 2). National Development Team for Inclusion.
   Google Scholar
• Heylen, K., & Vanderstraeten, L. (2019). Wonen in Vlaanderen anno 2018 (165 p.). Steunpunt Wonen.
   Google Scholar
• Hoek-Smit, M. C., & Diamond, D. (2003, March 2003). The design and implementation of subsidies for housing finance [Paper presentation]. Presentation at the World Bank Seminar on Housing Finance. https://studylib.net/doc/10297631/the-design-and-implementation-of-subsidies-for-housing-fi
   Google Scholar
• Knijn, T., & Verhagen, S. (2007). Contested professionalism: Payments for care and the quality of home care. Administration & Society, 39(4), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707300520
   Google Scholar
• Kozma, A., Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: A systematic review. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 114(3), 193–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lebeer, J., Vinck, J., & Farah, S. (2018). Belgium fact sheet on social care & support services sector for persons with disabilities, part of a series of country fact sheets available on the EASPD website. EASPD.
   Google Scholar
• Marangos, A. M., Iedema, J., de Klerk, M., Woittiez, I., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2020). The relationship of personal budgets with independence, participation and quality of life; a secondary analysis of survey data using propensity score matching. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 4(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00258-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Needham, C. (2011). Personalization: From story-line to practice. Social Policy & Administration, 45(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00753.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattyn, E., Werbrouck, A., Gemmel, P., & Trybou, P. (2021). The impact of cash-for-care schemes on the uptake of community-based and residential care: A systematic review. Health Policy, 125(3), 363–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Priemus, H., & Dieleman, F. (2002). Social housing policy in the European Union. Past, present and perspectives. Urban Studies, 39(4), 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A., & Gaete-Reyes, M. (2018). Neoliberal abandonment in disability housing provision: a look at England and Chile. Housing Studies, 34(5), 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2018.1478068
   Google Scholar
• Power, A., Lord, J., & de Franco, A. (2014). Active citizenship and disability: Implementing the personalisation of support. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342711
   Google Scholar
• Ridente, P., & Mezzina, R. (2016). From residential facilities to supported housing: The personal health budget model as a form of coproduction. International Journal of Mental Health, 45(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207411.2016.1146510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, G., Dermaut, V., Benoot, T., Claes, C., Schiettecat, T., Roose, R., Van Lancker, W., & Vandevelde, S. (2020). A critical analysis of disability policy and practice in Flanders: Toward differentiated manifestations of interdependency. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulstone, A., & Morgan, H. (2009). Nel-liberal individualsm or self-directed support: Are we all speaking the same language on mondernising adult social care? Social Policy & Society, 8(3), 333–345.
   Google Scholar
• Schepers, W., Van den Broeck, K. & Winters, S. (2020). Wonen met een beperking. Onderzoek naar de mogelijke invloed van de invoering van de persoonsvolgende financiering Steunpunt Wonen.
   Google Scholar
• Timonen, V., Convery, J., & Cahill, S. (2006). Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash-for-care programmes in four European countries. Aging & Society, 26, 455–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Campen, C., & Hessing-Wagner, J. (2003). Gezondheid en zorg. In T. Roes (Ed.), De sociale staat van Nederland (pp. 107–128). Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Vandeurzen, J. (2010). Perspectief 2020: Nieuw ondersteuningsbeleid voor personen met een handicap (77 p.). Vlaamse Regering.
   Google Scholar
• Van Haaster, H., Janssen, M., & van Wijnen, A. (2012). Persoonsgebonden budget, eigen regie en empowerment. ZonMw.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, M., Treacy, S., Carr, S., Clark, M., & Parker, G. (2014). The effectiveness of personal budgets for people with mental health problems: A systematic review. Journal of Mental Health (Abingdon, England), 23(3), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2014.910642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, C. (2015). From social housing to subsidized housing? Accommodating low-income households in Europe. Built Environment, 41(2), 244–257.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., & Habibis, D. (2015). NDIS, housing assistance and choice and control for people with disability (AHURI Final Report 258). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., Laragy, C., Gendera, S., Fisher, K. R., Jenkinson, S., Hill, T., Finch, K., Shaw, W., & Bridge, C. (2015). Moving to my home: Housing aspirations, transitions and outcomes of people with disability (AHURI Final Report No. 246). Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, S. (2018). Flemish housing policy and outcomes: new directions after the reform of the Belgian State? Housing Finance International, Autumn 2018, 36–42.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, S., & Heylen, K. (2014). How housing outcomes vary between the Belgian regions. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), 541–556.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, S., & Van den Broeck, K. (2020). Social housing in Flanders: Best value for society from Social Housing Associations or Social Rental Agencies? Housing Studies, 37, 7. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2020.1823329
   Google Scholar
• Woolham, J., Daly, G., Sparks, T., Ritters, K., & Steils, N. (2017). Do direct payments improve outcomes for older people who receive social care? Differences in outcome between people aged 75+ who have a managed personal budget or a direct payment. Ageing and Society, 37(5), 961–984. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J., & Whitehead, C. (1998). In defense of greater agnosticism: A response to Galster’s comparing demand-side and supply-side housing policies. Housing Studies, 13(3), 415–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar