References
- Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, et al. The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:1591–1599.
- Saariniemi KM, Joukamaa M, Raitasalo R, et al. Breast reduction alleviates depression and anxiety and restores self-esteem: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43:320–324.
- Thoma A, Sprague S, Veltri K, et al. A prospective study of patients undergoing breast reduction surgery: health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:13–26.
- Pusic AL, Chen CM, Cano S, et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: a systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:823–837. discussion 38–39.
- Anderson RC, Cunningham B, Tafesse E, et al. Validation of the breast evaluation questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:597–602.
- Fonseca CC, Veiga DF, Garcia EDS, et al. Breast hypertrophy, reduction mammaplasty, and body image. Aesthet Surg J 2018;Feb 7. doi-org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.1093/asj/sjx271.
- Abdiu A, Elander A, Gerdin B, et al. Bröstreduktionsplastik - bröstförminskade kirurgi vid stor byst. Rapport från experttgruppen för plastikkirurgi: sverges Kommuner och Landsting [Breast reduction plastic – breast-reducing surgery at large bust. Report from the expert group for plastic surgery]; 2008.
- Ferreira LF, Neto MS, Silva MMdA, et al. Brazilian version of the breast evaluation questionnaire: cultural adaptation and validation. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2013;28:270–275.
- Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1349–1358.
- Sullivan M, Karlsson J. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol.1998;51:1105–1113.
- Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M. Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2.0. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:251–256.
- Eggert E, Schuss R, Edsander-Nord A. Clinical outcome, quality of life, patients' satisfaction, and aesthetic results, after reduction mammaplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43:201–206.
- Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:345–353.
- Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. The BREAST-Q: further validation in independent clinical samples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:293–302.
- Gonzalez MA, Glickman LT, Aladegbami B, et al. Quality of life after breast reduction surgery: a 10-year retrospective analysis using the Breast Q questionnaire: does breast size matter? Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:361–363.
- Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011;17:268–274.
- Cogliandro A, Barone M, Cassotta G, et al. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes following 414 breast reductions: application of BREAST-Q. Aesth Plast Surg. 2017;41:245–249.
- Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. London: Routledge; 2000.
- Aaronson N, Alonso J, Burnam A, et al. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:193–205.
- Petrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, et al. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health. 2015;18:25–34.
- Joliffe IT, Morgan BJ. Principal component analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 1992;1:69–95.
- Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.