110
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The local governance of Swedish schools in light of a new educational policy landscape empirical exploration and theoretical elaboration

ORCID Icon
Pages 85-97 | Received 13 Oct 2023, Accepted 23 Apr 2024, Published online: 01 May 2024

References

  • Adolfsson, C. H. (2018). Upgraded curriculum? An analysis of knowledge boundaries in teaching under the Swedish subject-based curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 29(3), 424–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2018.1442231
  • Adolfsson, C., & Alvunger, D. (2017). The nested systems of local school development: Understanding improved interaction and capacities in the different sub-systems of schools. Improving Schools, 20(3), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480217710874
  • Adolfsson, C.-H., & Alvunger, D. (2020). Power dynamics and policy actions in the changing landscape of local school governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1745621
  • Adolfsson, C., & Håkansson, J. (2021). Data analysis for school improvement within coupled local school systems: Which data and with what purposes? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 22(3), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2021.2010101
  • Ainley, J., & McKenzie, P. (2000). School governance: Research on educational and management issues. International Education Journal, 1(3), 139–151.
  • Alvunger, D., & Wahlström, N. (2021). Understanding transnational curriculum policies and curriculum making in local municipal arenas: The case of Sweden. In M. Priestly, D. Alvunger, S. Philippou, & T. Soini (Eds.), Curriculum making in Europe: Policy and practice within and across diverse contexts (pp. 223–245). Emerald.
  • Andersson, R. (2023). Managerial dilemmas of a borderland position: Professional standardization in the Swedish School-Age Educare [ Doctoral dissertation]. Linnaeus University. Linnaeus University Press.
  • Coburn, C. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070407700302
  • Dahlöf, U. (1967). Skoldifferentiering och undervisningsförlopp [School differentiation and teaching processes]. Almqvist & Wiksell.
  • Deng, Z., & Luke, A. (2008). Subject matter: Defining and theorizing school subjects. In M. F. Connelly, M. Fang, & J. Phillion (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 66–88). SAGE.
  • Englund, T. (1986). Läroplanens och skolkunskapens politiska dimension [Curriculum as a Political Problem]. Daidalos.
  • Englund, T., Forsberg, E., & Sundberg, D. (2012). Introduktion: Vad räknas som kunskap? [Introduction: What counts as knowledge? In T. Englund, E. Forsberg, & D. Sundberg (Eds.), Vad räknas som kunskap? Läroplansteoretiska utsikter och inblickar i lärarutbildning och skola [What counts as knowledge? Curriculum theoretical viewpoints and insights into teacher education and school] (pp. 5–17). Liber.
  • Fullan, M. (2009). Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2/3), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9108-z
  • Grek, S. (2020). Facing “a tipping point”? The role of the OECD as a boundary organisation in governing education in Sweden. Education Inquiry, 11(3), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1701838
  • Håkansson, J., & Adolfsson, C. (2022). Local education authority’s quality management within a coupled school system: Strategies, actions, and tensions. Journal of Educational Change, 23(3), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09414-6
  • Hall, J. B., Gunnulfsen, A. E., & Jensen, R. (2023). Organisational arrangements, resources and tensions in the enactment of a renewed state curriculum: The entrepreneurial role of principals and superintendents. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2023.2175801
  • Hanberger, A., Lindgren, L., & Lundström, U. (2016). Navigating the evaluation web: Evaluation in Swedish local school governance. Education Inquiry, 7(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.29913
  • Hopkins, M., & Woulfin, S. L. (2015). School system (re)design: Developing educational infrastructures to support school leadership and teaching practice. Journal of Educational Change, 16(4), 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-015-9260-6
  • Höstfält, G., Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2017). The recontextualisation of policy messages: The local authority as a policy actor. In In N. Wahlström & D. Sundberg Eds. Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices (pp. 66–82). Routledge.
  • Jensen, R., & Ottesen, E. (2023). Recursive and adaptive processes in strategic work: Municipality leaders’ and school leaders’ accounts of their work for educational reform. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 9(2), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2023.2178839
  • Lagrosen, S. (1997). Kvalitetsstyrning i skolan? En analys av TQM:s tillämpbarhet inom den svenska grundskolan sett från en företagsekonomisk utgångspunkt [Quality management in school? An analysis of TQM and its applicability within the Swedish compulsory school from an economical perspective] [ Doctoral dissertation]. University of Stockholm.
  • Liljenberg, M., & Andersson, K. (2023). Recognizing LEA officials’ translator competences when implementing new policy directives for documentation of schools’ systematic quality work. Leadership and Policy in Schools. Advance online publication. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2023.2206882
  • Lindensjö, B., & Lundgren, U. P. (2000). Utbildningsreformer och politisk styrning [Educational reforms and Political Governance]. HLS.
  • Lindgren, L., Hanberger, A., & Lundström, U. (2016). Evaluation systems in a crowded policy space: Implications for local school governance. Education Inquiry, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.30202
  • Linné, A. (2015). Curriculum theory and didactics – towards a theoretical rethinking. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(1), Article e27002. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27002
  • Lundgren, U. P. (1972). Frame factors and the teaching process: A contribution to curriculum theory and theory on teaching. University of Gothenburg.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (1979). Att organisera omvärlden: en introduktion till läroplansteori. [Organizing the World: an Introduction to Curriculum Theory] Liber Förlag.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (1983). Between hope and happening: Text and context in curriculum. Deakin University.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organisations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  • Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116639311
  • Moore Johnson, S., Marietta, G., Higgins, M. C., Mapp, K. L., & Grossman, A. (2017). Achieving coherence in district improvement: Managing the relationship between the central office and schools. Harvard University Press.
  • Nordholm, D. (2016). State policy directives and middle-tier translation in a Swedish example. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(4), 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2015-0036
  • Nordin, A. (2012). Kunskapens Politik: En studie av kunskapsdiskurser I svensk och europeisk utbildningspolicy [the policy of knowledge: A study of knowledge discourses in Swedish and European Education policy] (publication No. 97/2012) [ Doctoral dissertation]. Linnaeus University. Linnaeus University Press.
  • Nordin, A. (2017). Towards a European policy discourse on compulsory education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 474–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116681574
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Talis 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. OECD.
  • Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). Improving schools in Sweden: An OECD perspective. OECD.
  • Orton, J., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/258154
  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
  • Pinar, W. F. (2008). Internationalizing curriculum. In F. Connelly, F. Michael, M. F. He, & J. A. Phillion (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of curriculum and instruction (pp. 369–389). SAGE.
  • Psychogios, A. G., & Priporas, C. (2007). Understanding total quality management in context: Qualitative research on managers’ awareness of TQM aspects in the Greek service industry. The Qualitative Report, 12(1), 40–66.
  • Román, H., Hallsén, S., Nordin, A., & Ringarp, J. (2015). Who governs the Swedish school? Local school policy research from a historical and transnational curriculum theory perspective. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 1(1), Article e27009. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.27009
  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. SAGE.
  • Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests and identities. SAGE.
  • SFS 2010:800. (2010). Skollagen [the education act]. Ministry of Education.
  • Skedsmo, G., Rönnberg, L., & Ydesen, C. (2021). National testing and accountability in the Scandinavian welfare states: Education policy translations in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. In S. Grek, C. Maroy, & A. Verger (Eds.), World yearbook of education 2021: Accountability and datafication in the governance of education (pp. 113–129). Routledge.
  • Spillane, J. P., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and the technical core in K-12 schools: Loose coupling revisited. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87–102). SUNY Press.
  • Sundberg, D. (2005). Skolreformernas Dilemman: En läroplansteoretisk Studie Av Kampen Om Tid I den Svenska Obligatoriska Skolan [dilemmas of educational reforms – a curriculum study of the struggle for Time in Swedish Compulsory School] [ Doctoral dissertation]. Växjö University. Växjö University Press.
  • Sundberg, D., & Wahlström, N. (2012). Standards-based curricula in a denationalised conception of education: The case of Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.3.342
  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage handbook: Mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE.
  • Wahlström, N. (2020). Tracing implications of transnational policy in curriculum events. The Curriculum Journal, 31(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.62
  • Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2017a). Kommuner som aktörer i utbildningsreformer: implementeringen av läroplansreformen Lgr 11 (Report 2017:21). [municipalities as actors in educational reforms: The implementation of the curriculum reform]. Institutet för arbetsmarknadspolitisk utvärdering.
  • Wahlström, N., & Sundberg, D. (2017b). Transnational curriculum standards and classroom practices: The new meaning of teaching. Routledge.
  • Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.