Effects of irrelevant speech on semantic and phonological judgments of Chinese characters

References

• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Mund, I. (2008). Age-related differences in irrelevant-speech effects. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., Irmen, L., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). On the irrelevance of semantic information for the “irrelevant speech” effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 49, 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner, A., Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & Mehl, B. (2004). Valence of distractor words increases the effects of irrelevant speech on serial recall. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 722–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS One, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauchard, F., Cane, J. E., & Weger, U. W. (2012). Influence of background speech and music in interrupted reading: An eye-tracking study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B. G., & Peng, D. L. (2001). The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese character recognition (I). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 33, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B. G., Wang, L. X., & Peng, D. L. (2003). The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese character recognition (II). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 576–581.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y. S., Kuo, W. J., Lee, C. Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2016). The explicit and implicit phonological processing of Chinese characters and words in Taiwanese deaf signers. Language and Linguistics, 17, 63–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822X15614518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976). Acoustic masking in primary memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(76)90003-7
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L. Q., & Gao, X. L. (2005). A study of foreign students’ Chinese phonological awareness development. Journal of Yunnan Normal University, 3, 7–13. https://doi.org/10.16802/j.cnki.ynsddw.2005.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Hyönä, J., & Ekholm, M. (2016). Background speech effects on sentence processing during reading: An eye movement study. PLoS One, 11(3), e0152133. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Macken, W. J. (1995). Phonological similarity in the irrelevant speech effect: Within- or between-stream similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., Miles, C., & Page, C. (1990). Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350040203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. M., & Tremblay, S. (2000). Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(3), 550–558. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCompte, D. C., & Shaibe, D. M. (1997). On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(1), 100–118. http://doi.org/10.1080/713755679
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin, D., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Zhang, J., Aram, D., & Levin, I. (2010). Small wins big: Analytic pinyin skills promote Chinese word reading. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610375447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macken, W., Tremblay, S., Alford, D., & Jones, D. (1999). Attentional selectivity in short-term memory: Similarity of process, not similarity of content, determines disruption. International Journal of Psychology, 34(5–6), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075999399639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hanczakowski, M., Beaman, C. P., Meng, Z., & Jones, D. M. (2024). Thinking about meaning: Level-of-processing modulates semantic auditory distraction, Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2008a). Auditory distraction in semantic memory: A process-based approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Hughes, R. W., & Jones, D. M. (2009). Interference by process, not content, determines semantic auditory distraction. Cognition, 110(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2008b). When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(1), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., Yang, J., Qualter, P., Richardson, C., Perham, N., Vachon, F., & Hughes, R. W. (2018). Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(6), 882–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000492
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Wolgalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988). Reading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90063-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Z., Lan, Z., Yan, G., Marsh, J. E., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Task demands modulate the effects of speech on text processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(10), 1892–1905. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullady-Dellicarpini, M. E. (2005). Phonological awareness and adult second language literacy development [Doctoral dissertation]. State University of New York at Stony Brook.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, C. B., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). The importance of semantic similarity to the irrelevant speech effect. Memory & Cognition, 27(1), 37–44. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevin, J. A. (1969). Signal detection theory and operant behavior: A review of David M. Green and John A. Swets’ signal detection theory and psychophysics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(3), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-475
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E. H., Tardif, T., Huang, J., & Shu, H. (2011). Phonemes matter: The role of phoneme-level awareness in emergent Chinese readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(2), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., & Lange, E. B. (2008). Interference in verbal working memory: Distinguishing similarity-based confusion, feature overwriting, and feature migration. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 730–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passonneau, R. J., Bhardwaj, V., Salleb-Aouissi, A., & Ide, N. (2012). Multiplicity and word sense: Evaluating and learning from multiply labeled word sense annotations. Language Resources and Evaluation, 46(2), 219–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-012-9188-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey, R. (2022). Individual differences in word senses. Cognitive Linguistics, 33(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2021-0020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading (2nd ed.). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rettie, L., Potter, R. F., Brewer, G., Degno, F., Vachon, F., Hughes, R. W., & Marsh, J. E. (2023). Warning—Taboo words ahead! Avoiding attentional capture by spoken taboo distractors. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2023.2285860
   Google Scholar
• Röer, J. P., Körner, U., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2017). Attentional capture by taboo words: A functional view of auditory distraction. Emotion, 17(4), 740–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuma, Y., & Takaki, S. (2018). Phonological awareness in EFL elementary school students participating in foreign- (English-) language activities. Journal of Center for Regional Affairs, 29, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Disruption of short-term memory by unattended speech: Implications for the structure of working memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7
   Google Scholar
• Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Phonological factors in STM: Similarity and the unattended speech effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24(4), 263–265. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03330135
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Beaman, C. P., Davis, J. P., & Wise, R. J. S. (2009). The neural processing of masked speech: Evidence for different mechanisms in the left and right temporal lobes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(3), 1737–1743. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3050255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14(5–6), 429–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Halin, N., & Hygge, S. (2010). Individual differences in susceptibility to the effects of speech on reading comprehension. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Nöstl, A., & Halin, N. (2012). Disruption of writing processes by the semanticity of background speech. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00936.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing, 10(3/5), 165–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008086231343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilev, M. R., Liversedge, S. P., Rowan, D., Kirkby, J. A., & Angele, B. (2019). Reading is disrupted by intelligible background speech: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(11), 1484–1512. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., & Andrews, J. F. (2021). Chinese Pinyin: Overview, history and use in language learning for young deaf and hard of hearing students in China. American Annals of the Deaf, 166(4), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2021.0038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Jiang, M., Huang, Y., & Qiu, P. (2021). An ERP study on the role of phonological processing in reading two-character compound Chinese words of high and low frequency. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 637238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixted, J. T. (2020). The forgotten history of signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(2), 201–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., Pollatsek, A., & Potter, M. C. (1999). The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(4), 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, G. L., Meng, Z., Liu, N. N., He, L. Y., & Paterson, K. B. (2018). Effects of irrelevant background speech on eye movements during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1270–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1339718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Miller, K., Cleveland, R., & Cortina, K. (2018). How listening to music affects reading: Evidence from eye tracking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(11), 1778–1791. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., & Perfetti, C. (2021). Consistency and regularity effects in character identification: A greater role for global than local mapping congruence. Brain and Language, 221, 104997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1245–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2009). Pseudohomophone effects in processing Chinese compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(7–8), 1009–1038. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802174514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar