Persons with multiple disabilities manage positive leisure and communication engagement through a technology-aided program

References

• Bache, J. and Derwent, G. 2008. Access to computer-based leisure for individuals with profound disabilities. NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badia, M., Orgaz, M. B., Verdugo, M. A. and Ullán, A. M. 2013a. Patterns and determinants of leisure participation of youth and adults with developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 57, 319–332.10.1111/jir.2013.57.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badia, M., Orgaz, M. B., Verdugo, M. A., Ullán, A. M. and Martínez, M. 2013b. Relationships between leisure participation and quality of life of people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 533–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M. and Hersen, M. 2009. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, J., Larsson, S. and Östergren, P. O. 2011. The right to assistive technology: for whom, for what, and by whom? Disability and Society, 26, 151–167.10.1080/09687599.2011.543862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, I., Hatton, C. and Emerson, E. 2013. Quality of life indicators for individuals with intellectual disabilities: extending current practice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 316–332.10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryen, D. N., Carey, A. and Friedman, M. 2007. Cell phone use by adults with intellectual disabilities. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 1–2.10.1352/1934-9556(2007)45[1:CPUBAW]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, K., Henson, R. and Cowan, A. K. 2008. Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 678–692.10.1007/s10803-007-0434-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon, A. 2014. Intellectual disability and activity engagement: exploring the literature from an occupational perspective. Journal of Occupational Science, 21, 443–458.10.1080/14427591.2013.829398
   Google Scholar
• Cook, B. G. 2014. A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 233–246.10.1177/0741932514528995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., Knox, M. and Parmenter, T. 2014. Mobile technology in inclusive research: tools of empowerment. Disability & Society, 29, 999–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlin, E. and Rydén, M. 2011. Assistive technology for persons with psychiatric disabilities: accessibility and cost-benefit. Assistive Technology Research Series, 29, 294–299.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, L., Weiss-Lambrou, R. and Ska, B. 2002. The quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview of recent progress. Technology and Disability, 14, 101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Den Brok, W. L. and Sterkenburg, P. S. 2015. Self-controlled technologies to support skill attainment in persons with an autism spectrum disorder and/or an intellectual disability: a systematic literature review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10, 1–10.10.3109/17483107.2014.921248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, C. M. and Carr, J. E. 2007. Assessing indices of happiness and unhappiness in individuals with developmental disabilities: a review. Behavioral Interventions, 22, 229–244.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-078X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, A. and Ferri, B. A. 2012. Technology for people, not disabilities: ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 192–200.10.1111/jrse.2012.12.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Fried-Oken, M., Beukelman, D. R. and Hux, K. 2012. Current and future AAC research considerations for adults with acquired cognitive and communication impairments. Assistive Technology, 24, 56–66.10.1080/10400435.2011.648713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, B. E., Carnevale, F. A. and King, G. 2012. “This is my way”: reimagining disability, in/dependence and interconnectedness of persons and assistive technologies. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34, 1894–1899.10.3109/09638288.2012.670040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama, T., Watanabe, T., Takahashi, K., Doi, K. and Fukuda, A. 2015. Development of communication assistive technology for persons with deaf-blindness and physical limitation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 217, 974–979.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppestad, B. S. 2013. Current perspective regarding adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities accessing computer technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8, 190–194.10.3109/17483107.2012.723239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hreha, K. and Snowdon, L. 2011. We all can call: enhancing accessible cell phone usage for clients with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technology, 23, 76–80.10.1080/10400435.2011.567373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Marschik, P. B., Sutherland, D., Green, V. A. and Sigafoos, J. 2013. Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. 2011. Single-case research designs: methods for clinical and applied settings. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kontu, E. K. and Pirttimaa, R. A. 2009. Teaching methods and curriculum models used in Finland in the education of students diagnosed with having severe/profound intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 175–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Boccasini, A., La Martire, M. L., Perilli, V. and Spagnuolo, C. 2016. Technology to support positive occupational engagement and communication in persons with multiple disabilitiers. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 15, 111–116. doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0023.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Green, V. A., Oliva, D., Alberti, G. and Carrella, L. 2013. Two women with multiple disabilities communicate with distant partners via a special text messaging system. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 397–403.10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O'Reilly, M. F., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., Smaldone, A., La Martire, M., Navarro, J., Spica, A. and Chirico, M. 2011. Technology-assisted programs for promoting leisure or communication engagement in two persons with pervasive motor or multiple disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6, 108–114.10.3109/17483107.2010.496524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F. and Singh, N. N. 2013. Assistive technology: interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-4229-5
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Simone, I. L., De Caro, M. F., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Ferlisi, G., Zullo, V., Schirone, S., Denitto, F. and Zonno, N. 2015. Assisting persons with advanced amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in their leisure engagement and communication needs with a basic technology-aided program. NeuroRehabilitation, 36, 355–365.10.3233/NRE-151224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Green, V. A., Oliva, D., Buonocunto, F., Sacco, V., Biancardi, E. M. and Di Nuovo, S. 2012. Technology-based programs to support forms of leisure engagement and communication for persons with multiple disabilities: two single-case studies. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15, 209–218.10.3109/17518423.2012.666766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Boccasini, A., La Martire, M. L. and Lang, R. 2014. Case studies of technology for adults with multiple disabilities to make telephone calls independently 1. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 119, 320–331.10.2466/15.PMS.119c14z4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Buonocunto, F., Sacco, V., Navarro, J., Lanzilotti, C., D’Amico, F., Sasanelli, G., De Tommaso, M. and Megna, M. 2013. Technology-aided recreation and communication opportunities for post-coma persons affected by lack of speech and extensive motor impairment. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 2959–2966.10.1016/j.ridd.2013.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D., Buonocunto, F., Sacco, V., D’Amico, F., Navarro, J., Lanzilotti, C., De Tommaso, M. and Megna, M. 2014. Post-coma persons with multiple disabilities use assistive technology for their leisure engagement and communication. NeuroRehabilitation, 34, 749–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Oliva, D. and Cingolani, E. 2009. Students with multiple disabilities using technology-based programs to choose and access stimulus events alone or with caregiver participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 689–701.10.1016/j.ridd.2008.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker, J. A., Harris, F., Taugher, M. and Smith, R. O. 2013. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8, 373–380.10.3109/17483107.2012.749429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light, J. and Mcnaughton, D. 2015. Designing AAC research and intervention to improve outcomes for individuals with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 85–96.10.3109/07434618.2015.1036458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, H. and Umb-Carlsson, Õie 2013. Cognitive assistive technology and professional support in everyday life for adults with ADHD. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8, 402–408.10.3109/17483107.2013.769120
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luiselli, J. K., Bass, J. D. and Whitcomb, S. A. 2010. Teaching applied behavior analysis knowledge competencies to direct-care service providers: outcome assessment and social validation of a training program. Behavior Modification, 34, 403–414.10.1177/0145445510383526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S. 2014. The results from a two-year case study of an information and communication technology support system for family caregivers. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 353–358.10.3109/17483107.2013.814170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makel, M. C. and Plucker, J. A. 2014. Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43, 304–316.10.3102/0013189X14545513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDougall, J., Evans, J. and Baldwin, P. 2010. The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 252–260.10.1177/0741932509355989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meder, A. M. and Wegner, J. R. 2015. iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: a survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 27–36.10.3109/07434618.2014.995223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund, R. and Gardelli, Å. 2013. ‘I know, I can, I will try’: youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disability and Society, 28, 28–40.10.1080/09687599.2012.695528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, P., Ekins, R., Timmins, B., Timmins, F., Long, S. and Coyle, E. 2014. Crucial design issues for special access technology; a delphi study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 48–59.10.3109/17483107.2013.806599
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. and Schmelkin, L. 1991. Measurement design and analysis: an integrated approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat, J. and Woodgate, R. 2011. The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6, 87–96.10.3109/17483107.2010.507859
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherer, M. J., Craddock, G. and Mackeogh, T. 2011. The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 811–817.10.3109/09638288.2010.511418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shogren, K. A. and Broussard, R. 2011. Exploring the perceptions of self-determination of individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 86–102.10.1352/1934-9556-49.2.86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V. and Balla, D. A. 2005. Vineland adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. (Vineland II). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Stasolla, F., Perilli, V., Di Leone, A., Damiani, R., Albano, V., Stella, A. and Damato, C. 2015. Technological aids to support choice strategies by three girls with Rett syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 36–44.10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., Wehmeyer, M. L. and Palmer, S. B. 2008. Evaluation of cognitively accessible software to increase independent access to cellphone technology for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 52, 1155–1164.10.1111/jir.2008.52.issue-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland, N., Catalano, T. and Kendall, E. 2009. Missing discourses: concepts of joy and happiness in disability. Disability and Society, 24, 703–714.10.1080/09687590903160175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D., van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., Mirfin-Veitch, B., Milner, P., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E. and Marschik, P. B. 2014. Survey of AAC needs for adults with intellectual disability in New Zealand. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 115–122.10.1007/s10882-013-9347-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. L. and Hodapp, R. M. 2012. Doing nothing: adults with disabilities with no daily activities and their siblings. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 67–79.10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verdugo, M. A., Navas, P., Gómez, L. E. and Schalock, R. L. 2012. The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1036–1045.10.1111/jir.2012.56.issue-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar