Speech generating technology to support request responses of persons with intellectual and multiple disabilities

References

• Achmand, D., van der Meer, L., Augusta, J., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G., O’Reilly, M., Lang, R., Schlosser, R., Hodis, F., Green, V., Sutherland, D., McLay, L., and Marschik, P. 2015. Undergraduates perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18, 22–25.10.3109/17518423.2014.962767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, A. A. and Shane, H. C. 2014. Autism spectrum disorders in the era of mobile technologies: Impact on caregivers. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 110–114.10.3109/17518423.2014.882425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., Nock, M., and Hersen, M. 2009. Single-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change 3rd ed.. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Boesch, M. C., Wendt, O., Subramanian, A., and Hsu, N. 2013. Comparative efficacy of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) versus a speech-generating device: Effects on requesting skills. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 480–493.10.1016/j.rasd.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken, M. and Rohrer, N. 2014. Using an adapted form of the Picture Exchange Communication System to increase independent requesting in deafblind adults with learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 269–277.10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, K., Henson, R., and Cowan, A. K. 2008. Social validation of evidence-based practices in autism by parents, teachers, and administrators. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 678–692.10.1007/s10803-007-0434-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Y.-C., Carter, E. W., and Sisco, L. G. 2012. Social interactions of students with disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive classrooms. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 117, 349–367.10.1352/1944-7558-117.5.349
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cockerill, H., Elbourne, D., Allen, E., Scrutton, D., Will, E., McNee, A., Fairhurst, C., and Baird, G. 2014. Speech, communication and use of augmentative communication in young people with cerebral palsy: The SH&PE population study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40, 149–157.10.1111/cch.2014.40.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper, L., van der Meer, L., Schäfer, M. C. M., McKenzie, E., McLay, L., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Marschik, P. B., Sigafoos, J., and Sutherland, D. 2014. Comparing acquisition of and preference for manual signs, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices in nine children with autism spectrum disorder. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 99–109.10.3109/17518423.2013.870244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, T. M., Strnadová, I., Knox, M., and Parmenter, T. 2014. Mobile technology in inclusive research: Tools of empowerment. Disability & Society, 29, 999–1012.10.1080/09687599.2014.886556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M., Musgrove, K., Renner, S., Hinton, V., Strozier, S., Franklin, S., and Hil, D. 2012. A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 74–84.10.3109/07434618.2011.644579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, A. and Ferri, B. A. 2012. Technology for people, not disabilities: ensuring access and inclusion. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 12, 192–200.10.1111/jrse.2012.12.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Lang, R., Lancioni, G. E., and Sigafoos, J. 2013a. Comparisons of intervention components within augmentative and alternative communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4404–4414.10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevarter, C., O’Reilly, M. F., Rojeski, L., Sammarco, N., Lang, R., Lancioni, G. E., and Sigafoos, J. 2013b. Comparing communication systems for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of single-case research studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 4415–4432.10.1016/j.ridd.2013.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, L. and Thompson, H. 2014. It’s good to talk: Developing the communication skills of an adult with intellectual disability through augmentative and alternative communication. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Lyon, K., Johnson, H., and West, D. 2013. Experiences of adults with complex communication needs receiving and using low tech AAC: An Australian context. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8, 392–401.10.3109/17483107.2013.769122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Green, V. A., O'Reilly, M. F., Mulloy, A., Lancioni, G. E., Lang, R., and Sigafoos, J. 2010. Behavioral intervention promotes successful use of an iPod-based communication device by an adolescent with autism. Clinical Case Studies, 9, 328–338.10.1177/1534650110379633
   Google Scholar
• Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Ramdoss, S., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Davis, T. N., Rispoli, M., Lang, R., Marschik, P. B., Sutherland, D., Green, V. A., and Sigafoos, J. 2013. Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156.10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. 2011. Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings 2nd ed.. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. L., Takeguchi, K., Barry, S. R., Rehfeldt, R. A., Boyer, V. E., and Mathews, T. L. 2014. Evaluation of the iPad in the acquisition of requesting skills for children with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8, 1107–1120.10.1016/j.rasd.2014.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamontagne, M.-E., Routhier, F., and Auger, C. 2013. Team consensus concerning important outcomes for augmentative and alternative communication assistive technologies: A pilot study. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 182–189.10.3109/07434618.2013.784927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Cuvo, A. J., Singh, N. N., Sigafoos, J., and Didden, R. 2007. PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: An overview of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28, 468–488.10.1016/j.ridd.2006.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Green, V. A., Van der Meer, L., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., Boccasini, A., La Martire, M. L., and Lang, R. 2016. A speech generating device for persons with intellectual and sensory-motor disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 85–98.10.1007/s10882-015-9424-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Ricci, I., Addante, L. M., and Trubia, G. 2011. A woman with multiple disabilities uses a VOCA system to request for and access caregiver-mediated stimulation events. Life Span and Disability, 14, 91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni, G. E., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., and Singh, N. N. 2013. Assistive technology: Interventions for individuals with severe/profound and multiple disabilities. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4614-4229-5
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Ramdoss, S., Sigafoos, J., Green, V., van der Meer, L., Tostanoski, A., Lee, A., and O’Reilly, M. 2014. Assistive technology for postsecondary students with disabilities. In: G. E. Lancioni and N. N. Singh eds. Assistive technology for people with diverse abilities. New York: Springer, pp. 53–76. 10.1007/978-1-4899-8029-8
   Google Scholar
• Lang, R., Sigafoos, J., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., Green, V. A., Lancioni, G. E., and O’Reilly, M. F. 2014. Teaching functional communication to adults with autism spectrum disorders. In: M. Tincani and A. Bondy eds. Adults with autism spectrum disorders: Evidenced-based and promising practices. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 118–139.
   Google Scholar
• Lenker, J. A., Harris, F., Taugher, M., and Smith, R. O. 2013. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8, 373–380.10.3109/17483107.2012.749429
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lidström, H. and Hemmingsson, H. 2014. Benefits of the use of ICT in school activities by students with motor, speech, visual, and hearing impairment: A literature review. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 251–266.10.3109/11038128.2014.880940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J. and McNaughton, D. 2012. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204.10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luiselli, J. K., Bass, J. D., and Whitcomb, S. A. 2010. Teaching applied behavior analysis knowledge competencies to direct-care service providers: Outcome assessment and social validation of a training program. Behavior Modification, 34, 403–414.10.1177/0145445510383526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makel, M. C. and Plucker, J. A. 2014. Facts are more important than novelty: replication in the education sciences. Educational Researcher, 43, 304–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. and Light, J. 2013. The iPad and Mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.10.3109/07434618.2013.784930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meder, A. M. and Wegner, J. R. 2015. iPads, mobile technologies, and communication applications: A survey of family wants, needs, and preferences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 27–36.10.3109/07434618.2014.995223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näslund, R. and Gardelli, Å. 2013. ‘I know, I can, I will try’: Youths and adults with intellectual disabilities in Sweden using information and communication technology in their everyday life. Disability and Society, 28, 28–40.10.1080/09687599.2012.695528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D. M., Yu, C. T., Martin, T., Fregeau, P., Pogorzelec, C., and Martin, G. L. 2009. Teaching object-picture matching to improve concordance between object and picture preferences for individuals with developmental disabilities: Pilot study. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 15, 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, P., Ekins, R., Timmins, B., Timmins, F., Long, S., and Coyle, E. 2014. Crucial design issues for special access technology; a Delphi study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9, 48–59.10.3109/17483107.2013.806599
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedhazur, E. and Schmelkin, L. 1991. Measurement design and analysis: An integrated approach. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ramdoss, S., Lang, R., Mulloy, A., Franco, J., O’Reilly, M., Didden, R., and Lancioni, G. 2011. Use of computer-based interventions to teach communication skills to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 55–76.10.1007/s10864-010-9112-7
   Google Scholar
• Rispoli, M. J., Franco, J. H., van der Meer, L., Lang, R., and Camargo, S. P. H. 2010. The use of speech generating devices in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 276–293.10.3109/17518421003636794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Green, V. A., Sutherland, D., van der Meer, L., Schlosser, R. W., Marschik, P. B., and Edrisinha, C. D. (2014). Tangible symbols as an AAC option for individuals with developmental disabilities: A Systematic review of intervention studies. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 28–39.10.3109/07434618.2013.878958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis, M. M. and Reid, D. H. 1995. Effects of a voice output communication aid on interactions between support personnel and an individual with multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 73–77.10.1901/jaba.1995.28-73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Achmadi, D., Stevens, M., Roche, L., Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., Lang, R., Marschik, P. B., McLay, L., Hodis, F., and Green, V. A. 2013. Teaching two boys with autism spectrum disorders to request the continuation of toy play using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 923–930.10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Schlosser, R. W., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Green, V. A., and Singh, N. N. 2014. Assistive technology for people with communication disorders. In: G. E. Lancioni and N. N. Singh eds. Assistive technologies for people with diverse abilities. New York: Springer, pp. 77–112.10.1007/978-1-4899-8029-8
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Wermink, H., Didden, R., Green, V. A., Schlosser, R. W., O’Reilly, M. F., and Lancioni, G. E. 2011. Effects of varying lengths of synthetic speech output on augmented requesting and natural speech production in an adolescent with Klinefelter syndrome. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 27, 163–171.10.3109/07434618.2011.610355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, M. R., Stoner, J. B., and Angell, M. E. 2013. Teaching conceptually referenced core vocabulary for initial augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 322–333.10.3109/07434618.2013.848932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., and Balla, D. A. 2005. Vineland adaptive behavior scales 2nd ed. (Vineland II). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, D., van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., Mirfin-Veitch, B., Milner, P., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. F., and Marschik, P. B. 2014. Survey of AAC needs for adults with intellectual disability in New Zealand. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 115–122.10.1007/s10882-013-9347-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D., Cooijmans, M., Didden, R., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Roche, L., Stevens, M., Carnett, A., Hodis, F., Green, V. A., Sutherland, D., Lang, R., Rispoli, M., Marschik, P. B., and Sigafoos, J. 2015. An iPad-based intervention for teaching picture and word matching to a student with ASD and severe communication impairment. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27, 67–78.10.1007/s10882-014-9401-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Achmadi, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., and Sigafoos, J. 2012. Speech-generating devices versus manual signing for children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1658–1669.10.1016/j.ridd.2012.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., and Sigafoos, J. 2012. A further comparison of manual signing, picture exchange, and speech-generating devices as communication modes for children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1247–1257.10.1016/j.rasd.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdugo, M. A., Navas, P., Gómez, L. E., and Schalock, R. L. 2012. The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1036–1045.10.1111/jir.2012.56.issue-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virués-Ortega, J., Pritchard, K., Grant, R. L., North, S., Hurtado-Parrado, C., Lee, M. S. H., Temple, B., Julio, F., and Yu, C. T. 2014. Clinical decision making and preference assessment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119, 151–170.10.1352/1944-7558-119.2.151
   PubMedGoogle Scholar