Teaching mands for actions to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction, behavior chain interruption, and a speech-generating device

References

• Achmadi, D., et al. 2012. Teaching advanced operation of an iPod-based speech-generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1258–1264. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert, K. M., et al. 2012. Increasing the mand repertoire of children with autism through the use of an interrupted chain procedure. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 65–76.10.1007/BF03391825
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter, M. and Grunsell, J. 2001. The behavior chain interruption strategy: A review of research and discussion of future directions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 26, 37–49. doi:10.2511/rpsd.26.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H., et al. 2010. Teaching requesting and rejecting sequences to four children with developmental disabilities using augmentative and alternative communication. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 560–567. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W., et al. 1992. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. W., et al. 1996. Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. American Journal of Mental Retardation: AJMR, 101, 15–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganz, J. B. 2015. AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., et al. 2012. A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 60–74. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganz, J. B., et al. 2014. Moderation of effects of AAC based on setting and types of aided AAC on outcome variables: An aggregate study of single-case research with individuals with ASD. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 17, 184–192. doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.748097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L. and Ledford, J. R., eds. 2009. Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, L., et al. 1985. Using a behavior chain interruption strategy to teach communication skills to students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 21–30. doi:10.1177/154079698501000103
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. and Sundberg, M. L. 1987. Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53.10.1007/BF03392819
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunt, P. and Goetz, L. 1988. Teaching spontaneous communication in natural settings through interrupted behavior chains. Topics in Language Disorders, 9, 58–71. doi:10.1097/00011363-198812000-00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., et al. 2013. Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1125–1133. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechago, S. A. and Low, A. 2015. A review of the mand-for-information training research literature. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Lorah, E., et al. 2013. Evaluating picture exchange and the iPad as a speech-generating device to teach communication to young children with autism. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25, 637–649. doi:10.1007/s10882-013-9337-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovaas, I. 1977. The autistic child: Language development through behavior modification. New York: Irving publishers.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D. and Light, J. 2013. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116.10.3109/07434618.2013.784930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raulston, T., et al. 2013. Teaching individuals with autism spectrum disorders to ask questions: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 866–878. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W. and Wendt, O. 2008. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: A systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 212–230. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schopler, E., et al. 1980. Toward an objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 91–103. doi:10.1007/BF02408436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sennott, S. and Bowker, A. 2009. Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.137
   Google Scholar
• Shillingsburg, M. A., et al. 2013. Teaching children with autism spectrum disorders to mand for the removal of stimuli that prevent access to preferred items. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 51–57.10.1007/BF03393123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., et al. 2013. Teaching two boys with autism spectrum disorders to request the continuation of toy play using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 923–930. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. 1957. Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.10.1037/11256-000
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, S., et al. 2005. Vineland-II adaptive behavior scales. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, M. L. 2008. VB-MAPP verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program. Chicago: AVB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundberg, M. and Michael, J. 2001. The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724. doi:10.1177/0145445501255003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tager-Flusberg, H. and Kasari, C. 2013. Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: The neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Research, 6, 468–478. doi:10.1002/aur.1329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L., et al. 2013. Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 222–234. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, L. and Rispoli, M. 2010. Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: A review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306. doi:10.3109/17518421003671494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddington, H., et al. 2014. Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wodka, E., et al. 2013. Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131, 1128–1134. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar