References
- Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, et al. European association of urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health; 2021. [cited 11 Jun 2021]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Sexual-and-Reproductive-Health-2021-1.pdf
- Picola N, Torremade J, Fiol M, et al. Analysis of satisfaction and surgical outcomes of a major ambulatory surgery program for penile implant. Actas Urol Esp. 2020;44(5):262–267. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2019.09.004
- NHS. Clinical commissioning policy: penile prosthesis surgery for end stage erectile dysfunction. London: National Health Service in England; 2016. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 19]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Penile-prostheses-for-end-stage-erectile-dysfunction.pdf
- Caraceni E, Utizi L. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: quality of life and sexuality with penile prosthesis (QoLSPP): to what extent does the implant affect the patient's life? J Sex Med. 2014;11(4):1005–1012. doi:10.1111/jsm.12453
- Ohl DA, Brock G, Ralph D, et al. Prospective evaluation of patient satisfaction, and surgeon and patient trainer assessment of the Coloplast titan one touch release three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis. J Sex Med. 2012;9(9):2467–2474. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02819.x
- Mondaini N, Sarti E, Giubilei G, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery in out-patient setting: effectiveness and costs in the “spending review” era. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014;86(3):161–163. doi:10.4081/aiua.2014.3.161
- MSCBS. Bloque quirúrgico. Estándares y recomendaciones. Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad [Ministry of Health]; 2009. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jul 9]. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/organizacion/sns/planCalidadSNS/docs/BQ.pdf
- Segal RL, Siegelbaum MH, Lerner BD, et al. Inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in the ambulatory setting: a systematic review. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8(2):338–347. doi:10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.07.006
- Mulhall JP, Bloom K. Comparison of in-patient and out-patient penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2001;13(5):251–254. doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900695
- Torremadé J, Presa M, Gorría O, et al. Systematic review of the implantation of penile prosthesis in major ambulatory surgery. Actas Urolog Esp (English Edition). 2022. doi:10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.08.019
- MSCBS. Portal Estadístico. Registro de Atención Especializada (RAE-CMBD). Madrid: Ministerio de Sanidad [Ministry of Health]; 2019. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 4]. Available from: https://pestadistico.inteligenciadegestion.mscbs.es/publicoSNS/N/rae-cmbd/rae-cmbd
- Weinberg AC, Siegelbaum MH, Lerner BD, et al. Inflatable penile prosthesis in the ambulatory surgical setting: outcomes from a large urological group practice. J Sex Med. 2020;17(5):1025–1032. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.02.015
- Base de datos de costes sanitarios eSalud [eSalud Health Cost database]. Barcelona: Oblikue Consulting; 2021. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 4]. Available from: http://esalud.oblikue.com/
- Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Carvalho J, et al. European association of urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health. 2021. [cited 2021 Jun 11]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/EAU-Guidelines-on-Sexual-and-Reproductive-Health-2021-1.pdf
- BMA. State of the health system Beds in the NHS:UK. London: British Medical Association; 2017. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Oct 6]. Available from: https://www.basw.co.uk/system/files/resources/basw_53535-7_0.pdf
- Berger A, Friedlander DF, Herzog P, et al. Impact of index surgical care setting on perioperative outcomes and cost following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2019;16(9):1451–1458. doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.07.004
- NICE. Medical technologies evaluation programme methods guide. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2017. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jan 14]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg33/resources/medical-technologies-evaluation-programme-methods-guide-pdf-72286774205893
- Marsh K, Phillips CJ, Fordham R, et al. Estimating cost-effectiveness in public health: a summary of modelling and valuation methods. Health Econ Rev. 2012;2(1):17. doi:10.1186/2191-1991-2-17