293
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Child-Speech

Relations between speech production, speech perception, and spelling in children with complex communication needs: a preliminary examination

, &
Pages 61-70 | Received 21 Nov 2016, Accepted 01 Oct 2017, Published online: 26 Oct 2017

References

  • American Speech-Hearing Association. (1997). Audiologic screening guidelines, pediatric section. ASHA, IV–74 gi. doi: 10.1044/policy.GL1997-00199
  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Baddeley, A. D, Thomson, N., & Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4
  • Besner, D., & Davelaar, E. (1983). Suedohomofoan effects in visual word recognition: Evidence for phonological processing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 300–305. doi: 10.1037/h0080719
  • Bishop, D. V. M. (1985). Spelling ability in congenital dysarthria: Evidence against articulatory coding in translating between phonemes and graphemes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 229–251. doi: 10.1080/02643298508252867
  • Bishop, D. V. M., & Robson, J. (1989). Accurate non-word spelling despite congenital inability to speak: Phoneme-grapheme conversion does not require subvocal articulation. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02300.x
  • Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Hjelmquist, E. (1996). Phonologic awareness and literacy abilities in nonspeaking preschool children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 48, 629–634. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206001344
  • Dahlgren Sandberg, A., Smith, M., & Larsson, M. (2010). An analysis of reading and spelling abilities of children using AAC: Understanding a continuum of competence. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 26, 191–202. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2010.505607
  • Dowden, P. A. (1997). Augmentative and alternative communication decision making for children with severely unintelligible speech. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 48–59. doi: 10.1080/07434619712331277838
  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.
  • Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19–36. doi: 10.1097/00011363-200020030-00005
  • Foley, B. E., & Pollatsek, A. (1999). Phonological processing and reading abilities in adolescents and adults with severe congenital speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 156–173. doi: 10.1080/07434619912331278695
  • Hart, P., Scherz, J., Apel, K., & Hodson, B. (2007). Analysis of spelling error patterns of individuals with complex communication needs and physical impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 16–29. doi: 10.1080/07434610600802737
  • Hitch, G. J, & Halliday, M. S. (1983). Working memory in children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 302, 325–340. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1983.0058
  • Hitch, G. J., Halliday, M. S., & Littler, J. E. (1989). Item identification time and rehearsal rate as predictors of memory span in children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 321–337. doi: 10.1080/14640748908402368
  • Holt, L., & Lotto, A. (2010). Speech perception as categorization. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1218–1227. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1218
  • Hustad, K. C., & Gearhart, K. J. (2004). Listener attitudes toward individuals with cerebral palsy who use speech supplementation strategies. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 168–181. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/017)
  • Hustad, K. C., Jones, T., & Dailey, S. (2003). Implementing speech supplementation strategies: Effects on intelligibility and speech rate of individuals with chronic severe dysarthria. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 462–474.
  • Koppenhaver, D. A., Steelman, J. D., Pierce, P., Yoder, D. E., & Staples, A. (1993). Developing augmentative and alternative communication technology in order to develop literacy. Technology and Disability, 2, 32–41.
  • Koppenhaver, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1992). Literacy issues in persons with severe physical and speech impairments. In R. Gaylord-Ross (Ed.), Issues and research in special education (Vol. 2, pp. 156–201). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Koppenhaver, D. A., & Yoder, D. E. (1993). Classroom literacy instruction for children with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI): What is and what might be. Topics in Language Disorders, 13, 1–15. doi: 10.1097/00011363-199302000-00003
  • Larsen, S. C., Hammill, D. D., & Moats, L. C. (1999). Test of written spelling (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Larsson, M., Dahlgren Sandberg, A., & Smith, M. (2009). Reading and spelling in children with severe speech and physical impairments. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21, 369–392. doi: 10.1007/s10882-009-9149-5
  • Light, J., McNaughton, D., Weyer, M., & Karg, L. (2008). Evidence-based literacy instruction for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A case study of a student with multiple disabilities. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 120–132. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1079126
  • Massaro, D. (1998). Perceiving talking faces: From speech perception to a behavioral principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
  • Masterson, J., & Apel, K. (2000). Spelling assessment: Charting a path to optimal assessment. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 50–65. doi: 10.1097/00011363-200020030-00007
  • Moats, L. C. (1995). Spelling: Development, disability, and instruction. Timonium, MD: York Press.
  • McCarthy, J.H. (2011). The impact of artificial subvocal articulation during spelling activities for children who do and do not use augmentative and alternative communication. ETD collection for University of Nebraska - Lincoln. AAI3465574. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI3465574
  • McCarthy, J.H., Hogan, T.P., Beukelman, D.R., & Schwarz, I.E. (2015). Influence of computerized sounding out on spelling performance for children who do and do not use augmentative and alternative communication. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 10(2), 221–230, doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.883650
  • Peeters, M., Verhoeven, L., de Moor, J., & van Balkom, H. (2009). Importance of speech production for phonological awareness and word decoding: The case of children with cerebral palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 712–726. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2008.10.002
  • Rosenblum, L. (2005). Primacy of multimodal speech perception. In D. Pisoni, & R. Remez (Eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 51–78). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Schlosser, R. W., & Blischak, D. M. (2004). Effects of speech and print feedback on spelling by children with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 848–862. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/063)
  • Smith, M., Dalhgren Sandberg, A., & Larsson, M. (2009). Reading and spelling in children with severe speech and physical impairments: A comparative study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 44, 864–882. doi: 10.1080/13682820802389873
  • Storkel, H. L. (2001). Learning new words: Phonotactic probability in language development. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 407–425. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/103)
  • Vallar, G., & Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Short-term forgetting and the articulatory loop.? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 53–60. doi: 10.1080/14640748208400857
  • Vandervelden, M., & Siegel, L. (1999). Phonological processing and literacy in AAC users and students with motor speech impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 191–211. doi: 10.1080/07434619912331278725
  • Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (2004). A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavioral Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers, 36, 481–487. doi: 10.3758/BF03195594

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.