Preference between Indian Picture Symbols for Communication (IPSC) and Picture Communication Symbols (PCS) in neurotypical adults and adults with aphasia

References

• Arvidson, H. H., McNaughton, S., Nelms, G., Loncke, F. T., & Lloyd, L. L. (1999). Graphic symbols: Clinical issues. In F. T. Loncke, J. Clibbens, H. H. Arvidson, & L. L. Lloyd (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 174–189). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Hux, K., Dietz, A., Mckelvey, M., Beukelman, D. R., Hux, K., … Weissling, K. (2015). Using visual scene displays as communication support options for people with chronic, severe aphasia: A summary of AAC research and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2015.1052152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, H. (2003). Multiculturalism in contemporary India. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 5(2), 148–161. www.unesco.org/shs/ijms/vol5/issue2/art4.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomberg, K., Karlan, G. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1990). The comparative translucency of initial lexical items represented in five graphic symbol systems and sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 33(4), 717–725. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3304.717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boster, J., Stover, N. B., & Harlow, K. (2014). Iconicity of symbols : Adults vs. children [Poster presentation]. ASHA Convention. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277005314.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., & Thiessen, A. (2018). Using images with individuals with aphasia: Current research and clinical trends. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1S), 504–515. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J., Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D., & Hux, K. (2015). Noun representation in AAC grid displays: Visual attention patterns of people with traumatic brain injury. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31(1), 15–26. http://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.995224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborthy, S., Bhaumik, K., Sandip, H., Basu, S., Saha, M. S., Bhattacharya, B., … Khator, S. (2007). Indian Picture symbols for communication: User’s guide. Kolkata: Indian Institute of Cerebral Palsy.
   Google Scholar
• Chazhikat, E., & Olness, S. G. (2012). Awareness of aphasia and aphasia services in South India: Public health implications. In The Eagle Feather: A publication for undergraduate scholars (Vol. 9, pp. 1–12). University of North Texas Libraries. https://doi.org/10.12794/tef.2012.30
   Google Scholar
• Dada, S., Murphy, Y., & Tönsing, K. (2017). Augmentative and alternative communication practices: A descriptive study of the perceptions of South African speech-language therapists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(4), 189–200. http://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1375979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dattilo, J. (1986). Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19(4), 445–448. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1986.19-445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon, I. G., & Iwata, B. A. (1996). Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29(4), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Weissling, K., Griffith, J., McKelvey, M., & Macke, D. (2014). The Impact of interface design during an initial high-technology AAC experience: A collective case study of people with Aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30(4), 314–328. http://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2014.966207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, S. L., & Stevenson, M. B. (1975). Developmental changes in the understanding of implied motion in two-dimensional pictures. Child Development, 46(3), 773–778. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/1128578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, D. R., & Lloyd, L. L. (1997). Symbol selection. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 214–225). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Girish, K. S., & Shyamala, C. (2015). Standardization of action naming test (Unpublished master dissertation). All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, S. P., Uthappa, V., Krishna, M., Hengst, J. A., Suma, D. R., & Francis, R. C. (2020). Development of battery for cognitive communicative disorders-Kannada (Unpublished department of health research project). All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J., Dietz, A., & Weissling, K. (2014). Supporting narrative retells for people with aphasia using augmentative and alternative communication: Photographs or line drawings? Text or no text? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), S213. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huer, M. B. (2000). Examining perceptions of graphic symbols across cultures: Preliminary study of the impact of culture/ethnicity. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16(3), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610012331279034
   Google Scholar
• Huguet, A. (2012). The iconicity of picture communication symbols for children with English additional language and intellectual disabilities (Master dissertation). University of Pretoria. https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/26328.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M., Inglebret, E., Jones, C., & Ray, J. (2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500483588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery test manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Kozleski, E. B. (1991). Visual symbol acquisition by students with autism. Exceptionality, 2(4), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362839109524782
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, S., Justus, S., Meluveettil, R., Menon, R. N., Sarma, S. P., & Kishore, A. (2015). Validity of Montreal cognitive assessment in non-English speaking patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurology India, 63(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.4103/0028-3886.152637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. A. (2011). Vulnerability of migrants and responsiveness of the state: The case of unskilled migrant workers in Kerala, India [working paper]. Centre for Socioeconomic and Environmental Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id5460.html.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., Wilkinson, K. M., Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D. R., & Fager, S. K. (2019). Designing effective AAC displays for individuals with developmental or acquired disabilities: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1558283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M. L., Dietz, A. R., Hux, K., Weissling, K., & Beukelman, D. R. (2007). Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using personal and contextual pictures in a visual scene display prototype. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15(3), 305–317. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233401193.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M. L., Hux, K., Dietz, A., & Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on word-picture matching by people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, K., & Chatterjee, D. (2015). Augmentative and Alternative communication device based on eye-blink detection and conversion to Morse-code to aid paralyzed individuals. Proceedings of International Conference on Communication, Information and Computing Technology, ICCICT 2015. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCICT.2015.7045754
   Google Scholar
• Nigam, R. (2006). Socio-cultural development and validation of lexicon for Asian-Indian individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1(4), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500476063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pampoulou, E. (2017). Exploring professionals’ experiences when choosing graphic symbol sets. Journal of Enabling Technologies, 11(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-07-2016-0014
   Google Scholar
• Pampoulou, E., & Diamanti, I. (2020). Graphic symbol preferences of adults with disabilities in one non-profit foundation in Greece. Journal of Enabling Technologies. Vol. ahead-of-print, No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2019-0057
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R., Schooley, K., & Wilner, J. (2007). Visual features that convey meaning in graphic symbols: A comparison of PCS and artists’ depictions. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 4(1), 62–80. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ899368.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pauranik, A., George, A., Sahu, A., Nehra, A., Paplikar, A., Bhat, C., … Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2019). Expert group meeting on aphasia: A report. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 22(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip, J. E. (1992). Test of Aphasia in Malayalam (Unpublished master’s dissertation). All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Radhamani, M. (2015). Validation of Malayalam version of Montreal cognitive assessment for Keralite Patients with Parkinson’s disease (Doctoral dissertation). SCTIMST. http://dspace.sctimst.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2625/1/6289.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Shane, H., Debrowski, L., Bloomfield, E., DeLuca, T., Koul, R., … Neff, A. (2011). Animation of graphic symbols representing verbs and prepositions: Effects on transparency, name agreement, and identification. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0164)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S., Kim, Y. T., & Park, E. H. (2017). A study on the verification of AAC graphic symbols focusing on nouns, adverbs, and verbs. Communication Sciences and Disorders, 22(3), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.17423
   Google Scholar
• Shyamala, C., Sunil, K, & Vijetha, K. (2010). Development and standardization of Boston Naming test in Bilinguals (Unpublished ARF project). All India Institute of Speech and Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., Green, V. A., Payne, D., Son, S. H., O’Reilly, M., & Lancioni, G. E. (2009). A comparison of picture exchange and speech-generating devices: Acquisition, preference, and effects on social interaction. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 25(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610902739959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Ganz, J. B., Lancioni, G. E., & Schlosser, R. W. (2005). Supporting self-determination in AAC interventions by assessing preference for communication devices. Technology and Disability, 17(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.3233/tad-2005-17302
   Google Scholar
• Singhal, R., & Rana, R. (2015). Chi-square test and its application in hypothesis testing. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 1(1), 69. http://doi.org/10.4103/2395-5414.157577
   Google Scholar
• Soto, G., Belfiore, P., Schlosser, R., & Haynes, C. (1993). Teaching specific requests: A comparative analysis of skill acquisition and preference using two augmentative and alternative communication aids. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 169–178. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23878852.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, S., Mathew, S. N., & Lloyd, L. L. (2011). Insights into communication intervention and AAC in South India: A mixed-methods study. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 32(4), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740109354775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, O., & Clarke, M. (1994). Culture and Communication Disorders: A Theoretical Framework. Seminars in Speech and Language, 15(02), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1064136
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S., & Krishnan, G. (2011). Aphasia rehabilitation in India: A preliminary survey of speech-language pathologists. Journal of All India Institute of Speech & Hearing, 30(August), 106–116. http://eprints.manipal.edu/id/eprint/145842.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M.-J. (2013). Adults’ preferences between Picture Communication Symbols (PCSs) and Gus Communication Symbols (GCSs) used in AAC. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3536–3544. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RIDD.2013.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, L., Didden, R., Sutherland, D., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., & Sigafoos, J. (2012). Comparing three augmentative and alternative communication modes for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 24(5), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9283-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A., … Sigafoos, J. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.815801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, L., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M. F., & Lancioni, G. E. (2011). Assessing preferences for AAC options in communication interventions for individuals with developmental disabilities: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1422–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2011.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. E., Dietz, A., Hux, K., & Weissling, K. (2012). Augmented input: The effect of visuographic supports on the auditory comprehension of people with chronic aphasia. Aphasiology, 26(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.628004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Jagaroo, V. (2004). Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20(3), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610410001699717
   Google Scholar
• Worah, S. (2008). The effects of redesigning the representations of early emerging concepts on identification and preference: A comparison of two approaches for representing vocabulary in augmentative and alternative communication systems for young children (Doctoral dissertation). The Pennsylvania State University. Penn State Electronic thesis and dissertations for graduate school. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/8622
   Google Scholar
• Worah, S., McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Benedek-Wood, E. (2015). A comparison of two approaches for representing AAC vocabulary for young children. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17(5), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.987817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar