Grupo de Aprendizaje Afectivo en la formación para la psicoterapia y el psicoanálisis

Referencias

• Anzul M, Ely M (1988). Halls of mirrors: the introduction of the reflective mode. Language Arts 65 (7):675–87.
   Google Scholar
• Arlow JA (1963). The supervisory situation. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 11:576–94. doi: 10.1177/000306516301100306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlow JA (1972). Some dilemmas in psychoanalytic education. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 20:556–66. doi: 10.1177/000306517202000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson P (1992). Understanding ethnographic texts. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1961). Experiences in groups. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1962a). Learning from experience, 31–58. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Bion WR (1962b). The psycho-analytic study of thinking. Int J Psychoanal 43:306–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas C (1989). Forces of destiny. London: Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bolognini S (2014). Towards a ‘quadripartite model’? IPA e-Newsletter, Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner J (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
   Google Scholar
• De Mare P, Piper R, Thompson S (1991). Koinonia: From hate through dialogue, to culture in the large group. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Ely M, Anzul M, Friedman T, Garner D, Steinmetz AM (1991). Doing qualitative research: Circles within circles. London and Philadelphia, PA: Palmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of the personality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairbairn WRD (1963). Synopsis of an object relations theory of the personality. Int J Psychoanal 44:224–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist E, Target M (2005). Affect regulation, mentalization, and the development of the self. London: Other Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman H (1999). Discussion of J. and D. Scharff’s precirculated paper ‘The group affective model: an alternative model for learning psychoanalytic therapy’ at the American Psychoanalytic Association winter meeting, New York, December.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1989). On fieldwork. J Contemp Ethnogr 18(2):123–32. doi: 10.1177/089124189018002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln Y (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman RJ (1988). On seeking one’s own clinical voice: A personal account. In: Berg DN, Smith KK, editors. The self in social inquiry: Researching methods, 267–81. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz L (2014). Listening with the fourth ear: Unconscious dynamics in analytic group psychotherapy. London: Karnac.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson P, Stadter M, Poulton J (2007). Sustained and sustaining continuing education for therapists. Psychother Theor Res Pract Train 44(1):110–14. doi: 10.1037/0033-3204.44.1.110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg O (1986). Institutional problems of psychoanalytic education. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 34:799–834. doi: 10.1177/000306518603400403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernberg O (1998). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. Unpublished paper. Presented at the Swiss Psychoanalytic Society, Geneva, Switzerland, October 3.
   Google Scholar
• Klein M (1946). Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. Int J Psychoanal 27:99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein M (1975). Envy and gratitude and other works 1946–1963. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
   Google Scholar
• Losso R, Setton L, Scharff DE (2017). Enrique Pichon-Riviere: The self and the link. London: Karnac, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden T (1989). The primitive edge of experience. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden TH (2008). Bion’s four principles of mental functioning. Fort Da 14:11–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pichon-Riviere E (1956–57). Teorıa del vınculo, Taragano F, editor. Buenos Aires: Nueva Vision, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Rice AK (1965). Learning for leadership. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Rioch M (1970). Group relations: Rationale and technique. In: Colman A, Beston WH, editors. Group relations reader, 3–9. Sausalito, CA: Grex, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Schore A (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff DE (1992). Refinding the object and reclaiming the self. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff DE, Losso R, Setton L (2017). Pichon-Riviere’s psychoanalytic contributions: some comparisons with object relations and modern developments in psychoanalysis. Int J Psychoanal February, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff DE, Savege Scharff J (1979). Teaching and learning: An experiential conference. J Pers Soc Sys 2(1):53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Scharff DE, Savege Scharff J (2001). Deterministic chaos theory: a new paradigm for psychoanalysis. Paper read at ‘Chaos theory and psychoanalysis’ panel, chaired by J-M Quinodoz, at the International Psycho-Analytic Association meeting, Nice, July
   Google Scholar
• Savege Scharff J (1992). Projective and introjective identification and the use of the therapist’s self. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Savege Scharff J, Scharff DE (1999). Precirculated paper ‘The group affective model: an alternative model for learning psychoanalytic therapy’ at the American Psychoanalytic Association winter meeting, New York, December.
   Google Scholar
• Savege Scharff J, Scharff DE (2000). Tuning the therapeutic instrument: Affective learning of psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Savege Scharff J, Scharff DE (2005). The primer of object relations (2nd edn). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Savege Scharff J, Scharff DE (2014). Das affektbasierte Ausbildungsmodell fur die Ausbildung in psychoanalytischer Theorie und klinischer Praxis der psychoanalytischen Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse. (The Group Affective Model of learning psychoanalytic theory and clinical practice of psychoanalytic psychotherapy and psychoanalysis). Psyche 11:1132–63.
   Google Scholar
• Savege Scharff J, Sehon CM (2015). Competency-based psychoanalytic supervision: a proposal for course design. Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman R, Webb R (1988). Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland J (1980). The British object relations theorists: Balint, Winnicott, Fairbairn, Guntrip. J Amer Psychoanal Assoc 28(4):829–60. doi: 10.1177/000306518002800404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen J (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago, IL: Chicago UP.
   Google Scholar
• Vermote R (2001). Discussion of J. and D. Scharff ‘A qualitative action research project: The affective learning of psychoanalytic concepts and clinical applications’. 2nd Annual Joseph Sandler Research conference on Research in Psychoanalytic Education, London, March.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1941). The observation of infants in a set situation. Int J Psychoanal 22:229–49.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1945). Primitive emotional development. Int J Psychoanal 26:137–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1951). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena. In: Through pediatrics to psychoanalysis, 229–42. London: Tavistock, 1952. Reprinted by Hogarth Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Winnicott DW (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment, 1975. London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolcott HF (1990). On seeking-and-rejecting-validity in qualitative research. In: Eisner E, Peshkin A, editors. Qualitative inquiry in education: The continuing debate, 121–52. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar