Disentangling assistive technology: exploring the experiences of athletes with physical impairments in disability sport

References

• Apelmo, Elisabet. 2012. “Falling in Love with a Wheelchair: Enabling/Disabling Technologies.” Sport in Society 15 (3): 399–408. doi:10.1080/17430437.2012.653208.
   Google Scholar
• Apelmo, Elisabet. 2017. Sport and the Female Disabled Body. 2 Park Square. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4R: Routledge. www.routledge.com/series/.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, Johan, Stig Larsson, and Per Olof Östergren. 2011. “The Right to Assistive Technology: For Whom, for What, and by Whom?” Disability & Society 26 (2): 151–167. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.543862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. “Posthuman Humanities.” European Educational Research Journal 12 (1): 1–19. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners.
   Google Scholar
• Brett, Smith, and Kerry R. McGannon. 2018. “Developing Rigor in Qualitative Research: Problems and Opportunities Within Sport and Exercise Psychology.” International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11 (1): 101–121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton, James. 2015. “Researching Disabled Sporting Bodies: Reflections from an ’Able’-Bodied Ethnographer.” In Embodied Research in Sport, edited by I Wellard, 163–177. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brighton James, R., Townsend, Natalie Campbell, L. Williams. Toni, and T L. Williams. 2021. “Moving Beyond Models: Theorizing Physical Disability in the Sociology of Sport.” Sociology of Sport Journal 38 (4, January): 1–13. doi:10.1123/ssj.2020-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett, Brendan. 2010. “Technology in Paralympic Sport: Performance Enhancement or Essential for Performance?” British Journal of Sports Medicine 44 (3): 215–220. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.067249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett, Brendan, Mike Mcnamee, and Wolfgang Potthast. 2011. “Shifting Boundaries in Sports Technology and Disability: Equal Rights or Unfair Advantage in the Case of Oscar Pistorius?” Disability & Society 26 (5): 643–654. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.589197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butryn, Ted M. 2003. “Posthuman Podiums: Cyborg Narratives of Elite Track and Field Athletes.” Sociology of Sport Journal 20 (1): 17–39. doi:10.1123/ssj.20.1.17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butryn, Ted M., and Matthew A. Masucci. 2009. “Traversing the Matrix: Cyborg Athletes, Technology, and the Environment.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 33 (3): 285–307. doi:10.1177/0193723509340000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain, Kerry, and Antonia C Lyons. 2016. “Using Material Objects and Artifacts in Research.” In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, edited by Brett Smith and Andrew C. Sparkes, 164–176. London: Routledge. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/waikato/detail.action?docID=4684241.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. edited by W. John Creswell. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• deBono, Cynthia Maria. 2017. “The Rollercoaster Ride: The Lived Experience of People Acquiring a Physical Impairment in Youth.” Journal of Humanities in Rehabilitation 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies of Etnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. “Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature.” New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1987. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Australian Feminist Studies 2 (4): 1–42. doi:10.1080/08164649.1987.9961538.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. 1st ed. New York: Routledge. https://org.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/10.4324/9780203873106.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, P. David. 2011. “Cyborg and Supercrip: The Paralympics Technology and the (Dis)empowerment of Disabled Athletes.” Sociology 45 (5): 868–882. doi:10.1177/0038038511413421.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill. 2000. “Medicine and the Aesthetic Invalidation of Disabled People.” Disability & Society 15 (4): 555–568. doi:10.1080/09687590050058170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kath, Elizabeth, Osorio Coelho Guimarães Neto, and Marcelo El Khouri Buzato. 2019. “Posthumanism and Assistive Technologies: On the Social Inclusion/Exclusion of Low-Tech Cyborgs.” Trabalhos Em Linguística Aplicada 58 (2): 679–703. doi:10.1590/0103181386558805282019.
   Google Scholar
• Khasnabis, Chapal, Zafar Mirza, and Malcolm MacLachlan. 2015. “Opening the GATE to Inclusion for People with Disabilities.” The LancetLancet Publishing Group. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01093-4.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, Drew. 1999. The Absent Body. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loja, Ema, Maria Emília Costa, Bill Hughes, and Isabel Menezes. 2013. “Disability, Embodiment and Ableism: Stories of Resistance.” Disability & Society 28 (2): 190–203. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.705057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, Amanda, Robert C. Townsend, Kirsten Petrie, and Lynda Johnston. 2022. “‘Cripping’ Care in Disability Sport: An Autoethnographic Study of a Highly Impaired High-Performance Athlete.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 14 (6, February): 1–13. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2022.2037695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2004. The World of Perception. 2 Park Square. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4RN: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2006. “Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment Within an Order of the Normal.” Information, Communication & Society 9 (3): 373–395. doi:10.1080/13691180600751348.
   Google Scholar
• Nind, Melanie, and Jane Seale. 2009. “Concepts of Access for People with Learning Difficulties: Towards a Shared Understanding.” Disability & Society 24 (3): 273–287. doi:10.1080/09687590902789446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, Michael. 2013. “The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years on.” Disability & Society 28 (7): 1024–1026. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.818773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, Katherine. 2015. “Prosthetics.” In Keywords for Disability Studies, edited by Rachel Adams, Benjamin Reiss, and David Serlin, 140–143, New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, Christina. 2008. “Becoming En-Wheeled: The Situated Accomplishment of Re-Embodiment as a Wheelchair User After Spinal Cord Injury.” Disability & Society 23 (7): 691–704. doi:10.1080/09687590802469420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullen, Emma, and Michael Silk. 2020. “Gender, Technology and the Ablenational Paralympic Body Politic.” Cultural Studies 34 (3): 466–488. doi:10.1080/09502386.2019.1621917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravneberg, Bodil, and Sylvia Söderström. 2017. “Disability, Society and Assistive Technology: A Multidisciplinary Field.” In Disability, Society and Assistive Technology, 1–14. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, Donna. 2012. “Cyborgs, Cripples and ICrip: Reflections the Contribution of Haraway to Disability Studies.” In Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions, edited by D. Goodley, B. Hughes, and L. J. Davis, 91–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ripat, Jacquie, and Roberta Woodgate. 2011. “The Intersection of Culture, Disability and Assistive Technology.” Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology 6 (2): 87–96. doi:10.3109/17483107.2010.507859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva, Carla Filomena, and P. David Howe. 2012. “The (In)validity of Supercrip Representation of Paralympian Athletes.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 36 (2): 174–194. doi:10.1177/0193723511433865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Brett, and Nick Caddick. 2012. “Qualitative Methods in Sport: A Concise Overview for Guiding Social Scientific Sport Research.” Asia Pacific Journal of Sport and Social Science 1 (1): 60–73. doi:10.1080/21640599.2012.701373.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Andy, and Nigel Thomas. 2012. “The Politics and Policy of Inclusion and Technology in Paralympic Sport: Beyond Pistorius.” International Journal of Sport Policy 4 (3): 397–410. doi:10.1080/19406940.2012.745893.
   Google Scholar
• Sparkes, Andrew C., James Brighton, and Kay Inckle. 2018. “‘It’s a Part of Me’: An Ethnographic Exploration of Becoming a Disabled Sporting Cyborg Following Spinal Cord Injury.” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 10 (2): 151–166. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2017.1389768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 1999. Female Forms : Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2020. “Health Topic Disabilities.” World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring, Gregor. 2008. “Oscar Pistorius and the Future Nature of Olympic, Paralympic and Other Sports.” SCRIPT-Ed 5 (1): 139–160. doi:10.2966/scrip.050108.139.
   Google Scholar
• Wolbring, Gregor, and Jeremy Tynedal. 2013. “Pistorius and the Media: Missed Story Angles.” Sports Technology 6 (4): 177–183. doi:10.1080/19346182.2013.826666.
   Google Scholar