3,301
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effective Learning in Virtual Conferences: The Application of Five Principles of Learning

, ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2019435 | Received 24 Sep 2021, Accepted 10 Dec 2021, Published online: 10 Jan 2022

References

  • Jung S, Professional conferences in the COVID-19 era. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021. 47(1): 1–9.
  • Roos G, Oláh, J, Ingle, R, Kobayashi, R, Feldt, M, Online conferences–Towards a new (virtual) reality. Comput Theor Chem, 2020. 1189: p. 112975.
  • Adnan M, Anwar K, Online Learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: students’ perspectives. Online Submission, 2020. 2(1): 45–51.
  • Bousema T, Selvaraj P, Djimde AA, et al.et al. Reducing the carbon footprint of academic conferences: the example of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Am J Trop Med Hyg, 2020. 103(5): 1758.
  • McWhorter RR, Roberts PB, Mancuso D. Exploring professional online conferences for the adult learner. In Boden, CJ, ed. Developing and sustaining adult learner. Charlotte, NC: IAP, 2014: pp. 267–281.
  • Hanson SL, Sykes M, Pena LB, Gender equity in science: the global context. Int J Od Social Sci Stud 2018. 6(1): 33–47.
  • Sarabipour S, Virtual conferences raise standards for accessibility and interactions. eLife, 2020. 62668(9).
  • Niner HJ, Wassermann SN, Better for whom? Leveling the injustices of international conferences by moving online. Front Mar Sci, 2021. 8: p. 146.
  • Sá MJ, Ferreira CM, Serpa S, Virtual and face-to-face academic conferences: comparison and potentials. J Educ Social Res, 2019. 9(2): 35.
  • Salomon D, Feldman MF, The future of conferences, today: are virtual conferences a viable supplement to “live” conferences? EMBO Rep, 2020. 21(7): 1–4.
  • Welch CJ, Ray S, Melendez J, et al.et al. Virtual conferences becoming a reality. Nat Chem, 2010. 2(3): 148–152.
  • Lortie CJ, Online conferences for better learning. Ecol Evol, 2020. 10(22): 12442–12449.
  • Houston S, Lessons of COVID-19: virtual conferences. 2020, New York: Rockefeller University Press.
  • Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EHJ, The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Med Educ, 2011. 45(8): 792–806.
  • Mamede S, Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Innovations in problem-based learning: what can we learn from recent studies? Adv Health Sci Educ, 2006. 11(4): 403–422.
  • Schmidt HG, Loyens SOFIEMM, Van Gog T, et al.et al., Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educ Psychologist, 2007. 42(2): 91–97.
  • Alvermann DE, Hynd CR, Effects of prior knowledge activation modes and text structure on nonscience majors’ comprehension of physics. J Educ Res, 1989. 83(2): 97–102.
  • Carr SC, Thompson B, The effects of prior knowledge and schema activation strategies on the inferential reading comprehension of children with and without learning disabilities. Learn Disability Q, 1996. 19(1): 48–61.
  • ChanLin L, Formats and prior knowledge on learning in a computer‐based lesson. J Comput Assist Learn, 2001. 17(4): 409–419.
  • Hailikari T, Katajavuori N, Lindblom-Ylanne S, The relevance of prior knowledge in learning and instructional design. Am J Pharm Educ, 2008. 72(5): 113–121.
  • Liu T-C, Lin Y-C, Paas F, Effects of prior knowledge on learning from different compositions of representations in a mobile learning environment. Comput Educ, 2014. 72: p. 328–338.
  • Machielsbongaerts M, Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA, Effects of mobilizing prior knowledge on information-processing - studies of free-recall and allocation of study time. Br J Psychol, 1993. 84: p. 481–498.
  • Shapiro AM, How including prior knowledge as a subject variable may change outcomes of learning research. Am Educ Res J, 2004. 41(1): 159–189.
  • Durning SJ, Artino AR, Boulet JR, et al.et al. The impact of selected contextual factors on experts’ clinical reasoning performance (does context impact clinical reasoning performance in experts?). Adv Health Sci Educ, 2012. 17(1): 65–79.
  • Godden DR, Baddeley AD, Context‐dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br J Psychol, 1975. 66(3): 325–331.
  • Johnson AJ, Miles C, Chewing gum and context‐dependent memory: the independent roles of chewing gum and mint flavour. Br J Psychol, 2008. 99(2): 293–306.
  • Schwabe L, Böhringer A, Wolf OT, Stress disrupts context-dependent memory. Learn Memory, 2009. 16(2): 110–113.
  • Smith SM, Background music and context-dependent memory. Am. J. Psychol, 1985. 98(4): 591–603.
  • Smith SM, Vela E, Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev, 2001. 8(2): 203–220.
  • Hamilton RJ, Effects of three types of elaboration on learning concepts from text. Contemp Educ Psychol, 1997. 22(3): 299–318.
  • Levin JR, Elaboration-based learning strategies: powerful theory= powerful application. Contemp Educ Psychol, 1988. 13(3): 191–205.
  • Peeck J, Van Den Bosch A, Kreupeling W, Effect of mobilizing prior knowledge on learning from text. J Educ Psychol, 1982. 74(5): 771–777.
  • Schmidt HG, De Volder ML, De Grave WS, et al.et al. Explanatory models in the processing of science text: the role of prior knowledge activation through small-group discussion. J Educ Psychol, 1989. 81(4): 610–619.
  • Spires HA, Donley J, Prior knowledge activation: inducing engagement with informational texts. J Educ Psychol, 1998. 90(2): 249–260.
  • Stark R, Mandl, H, Gruber, H, Renkl, A, Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learn Instruction, 2002. 12(1): 39–60.
  • Van Blankenstein FM, Dolmans DHJM, Van der Vleuten CPM, et al.et al. Elaboration during problem-based group discussion: effects on recall for high and low ability students. Adv Health Sci Educ, 2013. 18(4): 659–672.
  • van Boxtel C, van der Linden J, Kanselaar G, Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learn Instruction, 2000. 10(4): 311–330.
  • Weinstein CE, Training students to use elaboration learning strategies. Contemp Educ Psychol, 1982. 7(4): 301.
  • Zhu X, Lee Y, Simon HA, et al.et al. Cue recognition and cue elaboration in learning from examples. Proc Nat Acad Sci, 1996. 93(3): 1346–1351.
  • Durning SJ, Costanzo ME, Beckman TJ, et al.et al. Functional neuroimaging correlates of thinking flexibility and knowledge structure in memory: exploring the relationships between clinical reasoning and diagnostic thinking. Med Teach, 2016. 38(6): 570–577.
  • Rikers RMJP, Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA, Knowledge encapsulation and the intermediate effect. Contemp Educ Psychol, 2000. 25(2): 150–166.
  • Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HP, Encapsulation of biomedical knowledge, In: Advanced models of cognition for medical training and practice. 1992, New York: Springer. 265–282.
  • Schmidt HG, Rikers RM, How expertise develops in medicine: knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ, 2007. 41(12): 1133–1139.
  • van de Wiel MWJ, Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG, Knowledge restructuring in expertise development: evidence from pathophysiological representations of clinical cases by students and physicians. Eur J Cognit Psychol, 2000. 12(3): 323–355.
  • Bergin DA, Influences on classroom interest. Educ Psychologist, 1999. 34(2): 87–98.
  • Berlyne DE, A theory of human curiosity. Br J Psychol, 1954. 45(3): 180–191.
  • Berlyne DE, Curiosity and learning. Motivation Emotion, 1978. 2(2): 97–175.
  • Berlyne DE, Curiosity and exploration. Science, 1966. 153(3731): 25–33.
  • Berlyne DE, Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. 1960, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG, Situational interest and learning: thirst for knowledge. Learn Instruction, 2014. 32: p. 37–50.
  • Rotgans JI, Schmidt HG, Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learn Instruction, 2011. 21(1): 58–67.
  • Kang MJ, Hsu M, Krajbich IM, et al.et al. The Wick in the Candle of Learning: epistemic Curiosity Activates Reward Circuitry and Enhances Memory. Psychol Sci, 2009. 20(8): 963–973.