Preparing the Leaders of Tomorrow: Learnings from a Two-Year Community of Practice in Fragility Fractures

References

• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE Clinical Guidelines no 146. Osteoporosis: assessing the risk of fragility fracture. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Chan CK, Mason A, Cooper C, et al. Novel advances in the treatment of osteoporosis. Br Med Bull. 2016;119(1):129–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller AN, Lake AF, Emory CL. Establishing a fracture liaison service: an orthopaedic approach. J Bone Hoint Surg Am. 2015;97(8):675–681.
   Google Scholar
• Osuna PM, Ruppe MD, Tabatabai LS. Fracture liaison services: multidisciplinary approaches to secondary fracture prevention. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(2):199–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore AP, Jull G. Complexities of patients and management approaches challenge tests of effectiveness. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017;32:iv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves D, Pye S, Ashcroft DM, et al. The challenge of ageing populations and patient frailty: can primary care adapt? BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2018;362:k3349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rinonapoli G, Ruggiero C, Meccariello L, et al. Osteoporosis in men: a review of an underestimated bone condition. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(4):2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren OJ, Carnall R. Medical leadership: why it’s important, what is required, and how we develop it. Postgrad Med J. 2011;87(1023):27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Medicine as a community of practice: implications for medical education. Acad Med. 2018;93(2):185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger E, Snyder WM. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(6):139–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyrko I, Dörfler V, Eden C. Thinking together: what makes communities of practice work? Hum Relat; Stud Twd Integ Soci Sci. 2017;70:389–409.
   Google Scholar
• Fingrut W, Beck LA, Lo D. Oncology communities of practice: insights from a qualitative analysis. Curr Oncol. 2018;25(6):378–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranmuthugala G, Plumb JJ, Cunningham FC, et al. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth CG, Eldin KW, Padmanabhan V, et al. Twelve tips for the introduction of emotional intelligence in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(7):746–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshetnikov VA, Tvorogova ND, Hersonskiy II, et al. Leadership and emotional intelligence: current trends in public health professionals training. Front Public Health. 2019;7:413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervero RM, Gaines JK. The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015;35(2):131–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional education: a review of context, learning and the research agenda. Med Educ. 2012;46(1):58–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listl S, Grytten JI, Birch S. What is health economics? Community Dent Health. 2019;36(4):262–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014;39(5):356–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein RM, Krasner MS. Physician resilience: what it means, why it matters, and how to promote it. Acad Med. 2013;88(3):301–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and NHS Institute. 2010. Medical leadership competency framework. 3rd (ed.). Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement, Coventry House, University of Warwick Campus.
   Google Scholar
• NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. 2nd ed. Bethesda: National Institutes of Health; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Regnault A, Willgoss T, Barbic S. Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research. J Patient-reported Outcomes. 2017;2(1):19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith J, Noble H. Bias in research. Evidence Based Nurs. 2014;17(4):100–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner SF, Cardinal LB, Burton RM. Research design for mixed methods: a triangulation-based framework and roadmap. Organizational Res Methods. 2015;20(2):243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham FC, Ranmuthugala G, Plumb J, et al. Health professional networks as a vector for improving healthcare quality and safety: a systematic review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(3):239–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard L, Chiocchio F, Essiembre H, et al. Communities of practice as a professional and organizational development strategy in local public health organizations in Quebec, Canada: an evaluation model. Health policy = Politiques de sante. 2014;9(3):26–39
   Google Scholar
• Yu M, Downey C, Torralba KD. The fracture liaison service to close the osteoporosis care gap: a leadership educational model for undergraduate and postgraduate trainees. Clin Rheumatol. 2020;39(3):619–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ, May CR. Promoting professional behaviour change in healthcare: what interventions work, and why? A theory-led overview of systematic reviews. BMJ open. 2015;5(9):e008592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhalalati BA, Taylor A. Adult learning theories in context: a Quick guide for healthcare professional educators. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019;6:2382120519840332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu F, Lemonde M. A comparison of online versus face-to-face teaching delivery in statistics instruction for undergraduate health science students. Adv health sci edu: theory and pract. 2013;18(5):963–973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen BA, Courtney MJ, Moist LM, et al. Needs assessment: towards a more responsive Canadian society of nephrology annual general meeting (CSN AGM) program. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2016;3:30.
   Google Scholar