A Psychoanalytic Approach to Turkish Foreign Policy: Crisis, Disorder, and Disorientation

References

• Adisonmez, U. C. 2019. “When Conflict Traumas Fragment: Investigating the Sociopsychological Roots of Turkey’s Intractable Conflict.” Political Psychology 40 (6): 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adisonmez, U. C., and R. Onursal. 2020. “Governing Anxiety, Trauma and Crisis: The Political Discourse on Ontological (In)security After the July 15 Coup Attempt in Turkey.” Middle East Critique 29 (3): 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2020.1770445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adisonmez, U. C., and R. Onursal. 2022. “Strong, but Anxious State: The Fantasmatic Narratives on Ontological Insecurity and Anxiety in Turkey.” Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi 19 (73): 65–79. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.954772.
   Google Scholar
• Adisonmez, U. C., R. Onursal, and L. I. Oztig. 2023. “Quest for Regional Hegemony: The Politics of Ontological Insecurity in the Saudi–Iran Rivalry.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 48 (1): 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754221138186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agius, C., A. Bergman Rosamond, and C. Kinnvall. 2020. “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Gendered Nationalism: Masculinity, Climate Denial and Covid-19.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 21 (4): 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2020.1851871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahaber. 2012. “Davutoğlu: Yeni bir Ortadoğu Doğuyor, Türkiye …[Davutoglu: A New Middle East is Emerging, Turkey …],” Accessed April 26, 2012. https://www.ahaber.com.tr/gundem/2012/04/26/davutoglu-yeni-bir-ortadogu-doguyor-turkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Alim, E. 2023. “Prudence as an Antidote to Foreign Policy Adventurism: The Case of Turkey in the Syrian Crisis.” Global Society 37 (2): 292–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2110040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunisik, M. B. 2009. “Worldviews and Turkish Foreign Policy in the Middle East.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40:169–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600005264.
   Google Scholar
• Altunisik, M. B., and O. Tur. 2006. “From Distant Neighbours to Partners? Changing Syrian-Turkish Relations.” Security Dialogue 37 (2): 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010606066172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arab Weekly. 2022. “Turkey’s Erdogan Eyes Joining Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.” Accessed September 18, 2022. https://thearabweekly.com/turkeys-erdogan-eyes-joining-shanghai-cooperation-organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Aras, B., and H. Fidan. 2009. “Turkey and Eurasia: Frontiers of a New Geographic Imagination.” New Perspectives on Turkey 40:193–215. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0896634600005276.
   Google Scholar
• Arbell, D. 2014. “The U.S.-Turkey-Israel Triangle.” Center for Middle East Policy at Brookings. Accessed October 34, 2014. https://www.brookings.edu/wp- content/uploads/2016/06/USTurkeyIsrael-TriangleFINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Atac, C. A. 2021. “A Feminist Reading of Turkish Foreign Policy and the S-400 Crisis.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 46 (4): 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754211048994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, M. 2002. Ten Years After: Turkey’s Gulf Policy (1990–1991) Revisited. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, M., and C. Dizdaroglu. 2018. “Levantine Challenges on Turkish Foreign Policy.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler 15 (60): 89–103. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.525100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, A., C. Methmann, and D. Rothe. 2014. “Securitizing ‘Climate refugees’: The Futurology of Climate-Induced Migration.” Critical Studies on Security 2 (2): 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2014.943570.
   Google Scholar
• Baser, E. T. 2015. “Shift-Of-Axis in Turkish Foreign Policy: Turkish National Role Conceptions Before and During AKP Rule.” Turkish Studies 16 (3): 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2015.1050958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC. 2011. “’Erdoğan’ın AB Eleştirisi Erbakan’ı Hatırlatıyor [Erdogan’s EU Criticism Reminds Erbakan].” Accessed May 3, 2011. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler/2011/03/110304_economist.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2019. “US Removes Turkey from F-35 Fighter Jet Programme.” July 17. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49023115.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Turkce. 2019. “S-400 – Erdoğan: Mesele Doğrudan Egemenlik Haklarımızla İlgilidir, Geri Adım Atmayacağız [S-400 – Erdoğan: The Issue Is Directly Related to Our Sovereign Rights, We Will Not Back Down].” Accessed June 25, 2019. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-48756983.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Turkce. 2021. “S-400: Türkiye’nin Rusya’dan Satın Aldığı, ABD’yle Krize Yol Açan Füze Savunma Sistemi [S-400: The Missile Defense System That Turkey Bought from Russia, Which Caused the Crisis with the USA].” Accessed September 27, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-58709766.amp.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., K. L. Jacobsen, and L. Monsees. 2020. “Taking the Trouble: Science, Technology and Security Studies.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (2): 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1839852.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskotter, F. 2020. “Anxiety, Time, and Agency.” International Theory 12 (2): 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgic, A., and J. Pilcher. 2023. “Desires, Fantasies and Hierarchies: Postcolonial Status Anxiety Through Ontological Security.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 48 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754221086170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, P., and A. Bilgic. 2011. “Turkey’s “New” Foreign Policy Toward Eurasia.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 52 (2): 173–195. https://doi.org/10.2747/1539-7216.52.2.173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birgun. 2021. “MSB’den 2 Yıldır Depoda Bekletilen S-400’lere Dair Açıklama: ‘Nerede İhtiyaç Olursa Orada Konuşlandırılır’ [The Ministry of Defence Made a Statement Regarding 2-Year- Locked S-400s: They Will Be Deployed Whenever Needed].” Accessed November 1, 2021. https://www.birgun.net/haber/msb-den-2-yildir-depoda-bekletilen-s-400-lere-dair-aciklama-nerede-ihtiyac-olursa-orada-konuslandirilir-364083.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S. 2019. “Brexit Populism and Fantasies of Fulfilment.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1567461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R., ed. 2015. The Žižek Dictionary. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Capan, G., and A. Zarakol. 2019. “Turkey’s Ambivalent Self: Ontological Insecurity in ‘Kemalism’versus ‘Erdoğanism’.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1589419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernobrov, D. 2019. Public Perception of International Crises: Identity, Ontological Security and Self-Affirmation. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Contessi, N. P. 2019. “Turkey and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Common Values, Economics or Pure Geopolitics?” In Turkey’s Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, edited by E. Ersen and S. Kostem, 93–110. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crilley, R., and P. Chatterje-Doody. 2019. “Security Studies in the Age of ‘Post-truth’ Politics: In Defence of Poststructuralism.” Critical Studies on Security 7 (2): 166–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2018.1441634.
   Google Scholar
• Criss, N. B. 2010. “Dismantling Turkey: The Will of the People?” Turkish Studies 11 (1): 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683841003747021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumhuriyet. 2020. “Türkiye’nin Toplam 27 Milyar Lira Ödediği S-400 ve F-35’ler ABD’ye Takıldı [S-400 and F-35s, for Which Turkey Paid a Total of 27 Billion Liras, Were Blocked by the USA].” Accessed October 8, 2020. https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/haber/turkiyenin-toplam-27-milyar-lira-odedigi-s-400-ve-f-35ler-abdye-takildi-1757288.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, J. C. K. 2004. “Erdogan and ‘Conservative Democracy,’” UPI, Accessed January 29, 2004. https://www.upi.com/Erdogan-and-Conservative-Democracy/49051075413615.
   Google Scholar
• Darwich, M. 2016. “The Ontological (In)security of Similarity: Wahhabism versus Islamism in Saudi Foreign Policy.” Foreign Policy Analysis 12 (3): 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davutoglu, A. 2001. Stratejik Derinlik [Strategic Depth]. Istanbul: Küre Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Davutoglu, A. 2008. “Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007.” Insight Turkey 10 (1): 77–96.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis, Y. 2017. “The Psychoanalytic Concept of Jouissance and the Kindling Hypothesis.” Frontiers in Psychology 8:1593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01593.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eberle, J. 2019. “Narrative, Desire, Ontological Security, Transgression: Fantasy as a Factor in International Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22 (1): 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0104-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist. 2020. “India and China Have Their First Deadly Clashes in 45 Years.” Accessed June 18, 2020. https://www.economist.com/asia/2020/06/18/india-and-china-have-their-first-deadly-clashes-in-45-years.
   Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. 2018. “Critical Situations, Fundamental Questions and Ontological Insecurity in World Politics.” Journal of International Relations and Development 21 (4): 883–908. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0083-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. 2020. “Conflict, Peace, and Ontological Security.” In The Palgrave Encyclopedia ofPeace and Conflict Studies, edited by O. Richmond and G. Visoka. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_126-1.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan, R. T. 2018. “Erdogan: How Turkey Sees the Crisis with the U.S.” The New York Times, August 10, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/10/opinion/turkey-erdogan-trump-crisis-sanctions.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ersen, E. 2019. “The Return of Eurasianism in Turkey: Relations with Russia and Beyond.” In Turkey’s Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, edited by E. Erşen and S. Köstem. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429023064.
   Google Scholar
• Ersen, E., and S. Kostem, eds. 2019. Turkey’s Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Euronews. 2022a. “Almanya’da Koalisyon Ortaklarından ŞİÖ Üyeliği İçin Erdoğan’a Tepki Geldi [Coalition Partners in Germany Reacted to Erdogan Regarding the SCO Membership].” Accessed September 19, 2022. https://tr.euronews.com/2022/09/19/almanyada-koalisyon-ortaklarindan-sio-uyeligi-icin-erdogana-tepki-geldi.
   Google Scholar
• Euronews. 2022b. “NATO Üyesi Türkiye, Şanghay İ̇şbirliği Örgütü’ne Üye Olabilir Mi? [Can NATO Member Turkey Become a Member of Shanghai Cooperation Organization?].” Accessed September 20, 2022. https://tr.euronews.com/2022/09/20/nato-uyesi-turkiye-sanghay-isbirligi-orgutune-uye-olabilir-mi.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, B. 1995. A Clinical Introduction to Lacanian Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1951. “Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis.” Standard Edn I0:167–168. https://nosubject.com/Jouissance.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California, USA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gokmen, Y. 1994. Özal Yaşasaydı [If Özal had lived]. Ankara: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, P. 2018. “Ontological Security, the Struggle for Recognition, and the Maintenance of Security Communities.” Journal of International Relations and Development 21 (4): 858–882. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0108-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis, I. N. 2022. “Between Escalation and détente: Greek-Turkish Relations in the Aftermath of the Eastern Mediterranean Crisis.” Turkish Studies 23 (5): 802–820 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2022.2087509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunay, D. 2017. “The Roles Turkey Played in the Middle East (2002–2016).” In Turkish Foreign Policy: International Relations, Legality and Global Reach, edited by P. G. Ercan, 195–215. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hacaloglu, H. 2019. “Türkiye’nin S-400’le İmtihanı [Turkey’s S-400 Test].” VOA. Accessed November 18, 2019. https://www.voaturkce.com/a/turkiye-nin-s400-imtihani/5170310.html.
   Google Scholar
• Homolar, A., and R. Scholz. 2019. “The Power of Trump-Speak: Populist Crisis Narratives and Ontological Security.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1575796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hom, A. R., and B. J. Steele. 2020. “Anxiety, Time, and Ontological Security’s Third- Image Potential.” International Theory 12 (2): 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971920000135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HRW. 2023. “Kyrgyzstan/Tajikistan: Apparent War Crimes in Border Conflict.” Accessed May 2, 2023. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/05/02/kyrgyzstan/tajikistan-apparent-war-crimes-border-conflict.
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. 2011. “6 Saatlik Kritik Görüşmeden İlk Detaylar [First Details from 6 Hour-Long, Critical Meeting].” Accessed August 9, 2011. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/6-saatlik-kritik-gorusmeden-ilk-detaylar-18446872.
   Google Scholar
• Hurriyet. 2019. “S-400 Temmuzda Teslim Edilecek [S-400s Will Be Delivered in July].” Accessed February 16, 2019. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/s-400-temmuzda-teslim-edilecek-41118732.
   Google Scholar
• IISS (International Institute for Strategic Studies). 2019. Armed Conflict Survey 2019. London: CRC Press Book.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Turkce. 2022. “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan’dan Şanghay Beşlisi’ne Üyelik Açıklaması: Hedef O! [Shanghai Five Membership Statement from President Erdogan: That’s the Target!].” Accessed September 17, 2022. https://www.indyturk.com/node/553916/siyaset/cumhurba%C5%9Fkan%C4%B1-erdo%C4%9Fandan-%C5%9Fanghay-be%C5%9Flisine-%C3%BCyelik-a%C3%A7%C4%B1klamas%C4%B1-hedef-o.
   Google Scholar
• Kalayci, R., and U. Tuysuz. 2020. “Being Entrapped Between Change and Return to the Kemalist Political Culture: Two Stories of the AK Party Foreign Policy in the Context of Arab Spring.” Gazi Akademik Bakış 14 (27): 83–104.
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, I. 2011. “Turkish Foreign Policy: Frameworks, Values, and Mechanisms.” International Journal: Canada’s Journal of Global Policy Analysis 67 (1): 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/002070201206700102.
   Google Scholar
• Kasapoglu, C. 2017. “Turkey’s S-400 Dilemma.” EDAM Foreign Policy and Security Paper Series, 5, 2017. https://edam.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/s400en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kibaroglu, M. 2019. “On Turkey’s Missile Defense Strategy: The Four Faces of the S-400 Deal Between Turkey and Russia.” Perceptions 24 (2–3): 159–174. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/906932.
   Google Scholar
• Kinikoglu, S. 2007. “The Return of Ottomanism.” Today’s Zaman, Accessed 27 March 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political Psychology 25 (5): 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C. 2018. “Ontological Insecurities and Postcolonial Imaginaries: The Emotional Appeal of Populism.” Humanity & Society 42 (4): 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597618802646.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C. 2019. “Populism, Ontological Insecurity and Hindutva: Modi and the Masculinization of Indian Politics.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1588851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C., and J. Mitzen. 2018. “Ontological Security and Conflict: The Dynamics of Crisis and the Constitution of Community.” Journal of International Relations andDevelopment 21 (4): 825–835. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0161-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C., and J. Mitzen. 2020. “Anxiety, Fear, and Ontological Security in World Politics: Thinking with and Beyond Giddens.” International Theory 12 (2): 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297192000010X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C., and T. Svensson. 2018. “Misrecognition and the Indian State: The Desire for Sovereign Agency.” Review of International Studies 44 (5): 902–921. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc, M. B. 2011. “Reflections on the Davos Crisis in the Turkish Press and the Views of Opinion Leaders of the Turkish Jews on the Crisis.” Turkish Studies 12 (3): 383–398 . https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2011.604207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotan, B. G. 2017. “An Overview of Turkish-Egyptian Relations Since the Arab Uprising” TRT World. Accessed November 27, 2017. https://www.trtworld.com/mea/an-overview-of-turkish-egyptian-relations-since-the-arab-uprising-12658.
   Google Scholar
• Kutlay, M., and Z. Onis. 2021. “Understanding Oscillations in Turkish Foreign Policy: Pathways to Unusual Middle Power Activism.” Third World Quarterly 42 (12): 3051–3069. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.1985449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1977a. Écrits: A Selection, Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1977b. The Subversion of the Subject and the Dialectic of Desire in the Freudian Unconscious’ in Écrits: A Selection, Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1981. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1988. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II. The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis 1954-1955. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. 1991. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book I, Freud’s Papers on Technique, 1953–1954. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, A. 2014. “Disorderly Conduct: Neurosis, Psychosis and Perversion in Political Malaysia.” Asian Journal of Social Science 42 (6): 777–807. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-04206005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupovici, A. 2012. “Ontological Dissonance, Clashing Identities, and Israel’s Unilateral Steps Towards the Palestinians.” Review of International Studies 38 (4): 809–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynggaard, K. 2019. “Methodological Challenges in the Study of Emotions in Politics and How to Deal with Them.” Political Psychology 40 (6): 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malksoo, M. 2019. “The Normative Threat of Subtle Subversion: The Return of ‘Eastern Europe’ as an Ontological Insecurity Trope.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1590314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merino, P. K., and C. Kinnvall. 2023. “Governing Emotions: Hybrid Media, Ontological Insecurity and the Normalisation of Far-Right Fantasies.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 48 (1): 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754221123467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFA. 2011. “Address by H.E. Ahmet Davutoğlu, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey on the Occasion of the Opening of the Fourth Meeting of the Libya Contact Group.” Accessed July 15, 2011, Istanbul. https://www.mfa.gov.tr/address-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-turkey-on-the-occasion-of-the-opening-of-the-fourth-meeting-of.en.mfa.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, S. 2011. “Turkey Offers to Broker Libya Ceasefire as Rebels Advance on Sirte,” The Guardian, Accessed March 2, 2011. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/mar/27/libya-turkey-mediators-prime-minister.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12 (3): 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J., and K. Larson. 2017. “Ontological Security and Foreign Policy.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. http://oxfordindex.oup.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.458.
   Google Scholar
• Mustapha, J. 2013. “Ontological theorizations in critical security studies: making the case for a (modified) post-structuralist approach.” Critical Studies on Security 1 (1): 64–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2013.790193.
   Google Scholar
• Nicks, D. 2014. “U.S. Forms Anti-ISIS Coalition at NATO Summit.” TIME, Accessed September 5, 2014. http://time.com/3273185/isis-us-nato/.
   Google Scholar
• NTV. 2022. “Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan: Hedefimiz Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü’ne Tam Üyelik [President Erdogan: Our goal is full membership to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization].” Accessed September 17, 2022. https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-hedefimiz-sanghay-isbirligi-orgutune-tam-uyelikLfRNy56wFUqCn0BbwbF4lA.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. 2011. The Future of Power. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Oguzlu, T. 2008. “Middle Easternization of Turkey’s Foreign Policy: Does Turkey Dissociate from the West?” Turkish Studies 9 (1): 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683840701813960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oguzlu, T. 2019. “Turkey and the West: Geopolitical Shifts in the AK Party Era.” In Turkey’s Pivot to Eurasia: Geopolitics and Foreign Policy in a Changing World Order, edited by E. Ersen and S. Kostem, 15–30. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Onis, Z. 2014. “Turkey and the Arab Revolutions: Boundaries of Regional Power Influence in a Turbulent Middle East.” Mediterranean Politics 19 (2): 203–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2013.868392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onis, Z., and M. Kutlay. 2020. “The Anatomy of Turkey’s New Heterodox Crisis: The Interplay of Domestic Politics and Global Dynamics.” Turkish Studies 22 (4): 499–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2020.1833723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onis, Z., and S. Yılmaz. 2016. “Turkey and Russia in a Shifting Global Order: Cooperation, Conflict and Asymmetric Interdependence in a Turbulent Region.” Third World Quarterly 37 (1): 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1086638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oran, B., ed. 2008. Türk Dış Politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşından Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar [Turkish Foreign Policy: Facts, Documents, Comments Since the War of Independence]. Vol. 2. Istanbul: Iletisim.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, B. 2014. “Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan-Islamism.” Survival 56 (4): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2014.941570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oztig, L. I. 2018. “Türkiye ve Ermenistan İlişkilerinde Nahçıvan Sorunu.” Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi 18 (36): 413–430. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/559558.
   Google Scholar
• Oztig, L. I. 2022. “Refugee Flows, Foreign Policy, and Safe Haven Nexus in Turkey.” Third World Quarterly 43 (3): 684–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2021.2009335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oztig, L. I., T. A. Gurkan, and K. Aydin. 2021. “The Strategic Logic of Islamophobic Populism.” Government and Opposition 56 (3): 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, A. E. 2020. “An Alternative Reading of Religion and Authoritarianism: The New Logic Between Religion and State in the Akp’s New Turkey.” Islam, Populism and Regime Change in Turkey 19 (1): 78–97. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1576370.
   Google Scholar
• Ozturk, A. E. 2021. Religion, Identity and Power: Turkey and the Balkans in the Twenty-First Century. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, M., and A. Bilgic. 2018. “Trauma, Emotions, and Memory in World Politics: The Case of the European Union’s Foreign Policy in the Middle East Conflict.” Political Psychology 39 (3): 503–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, G., and A. Korolev. 2021. “The Struggle for Certainty: Ontological Security, the Rise of Nationalism, and Australia-China Tensions After COVID-19.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26 (1): 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09710-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, T. 2019. “Congress Passes More Legislation Aimed at Curbing Russia’s Energy Grip on Europe.” Radio Free Europe. Accessed December 21, 2019. https://www.rferl.org/a/congress-passes-more-legislation-aimed-at-curbing-russia-s-energy-grip-on-europe/30337217.html.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2011. “Turkey Tells Mubarak to Listen to People.” February 1. https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-54562520110201.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. B. 2020. “Ontological Security and the Gulf Crisis.” Journal of Arabian Studies 10 (2): 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/21534764.2020.1833413.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B. 2015. “Ontological (In)security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution.” In Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security, edited by B. Rumelili, 10–29. London: Rutledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B., and R. Suleymanoglu-Kurum. 2017. “Brand Turkey: Liminal Identity and Its Limits.” Geopolitics 22 (3): 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1270269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruti, M. 2012. The Singularity of Being: Lacan and the Immortal Within. New York: Fordham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rythoven, E. V. 2018. “Fear in the Crowd or Fear of the Crowd? The Dystopian Politics of Fear in International Relations.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (1): 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2017.1377527.
   Google Scholar
• Saatcioglu, B. 2017. “De-Europeanisation in Turkey: The Case of the Rule of Law”. In Is Turkey De-Europeanising?: Encounters with Europe in a Candidate Country, In edited by A. Kaliber and S. Aydin-Duzgit, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2016.1147994.
   Google Scholar
• Sayari, S. 2000. “Turkish Foreign Policy in the Post-Cold War Era: The Challenges of Multi- Regionalism.” Journal of International Affairs 54 (1): 169–182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24357694.
   Google Scholar
• Shenker, J. 2011. “Turkey’s PM Rallies Arab World in Cairo with Call for UN to Recognize Palestine.” The Guardian, September 13, 2011. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/sep/13/turkey-rallies-arab-world.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. H., and R. Youngs. 2018. “The EU and the Global Order: Contingent Liberalism.” The International Spectator 53 (1): 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2018.1409024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soler, C. 2003. “The Paradoxes of the Symptom in Psychoanalysis.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, edited by J.–. M. Rabaté, 86–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. 1999. Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IRState. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J., and A. Homolar. 2019. “Ontological Insecurities and the Politics of Contemporary Populism.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (3): 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1596612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotic, J. 2022. “Antisemitism in the Global Populist International.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 24 (3): 458–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211066970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telegraph. 2011. “Syria: Turkish Prime Minister Calls for Assad to Resign.” Accessed November 22, 2011. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/8906532/Syria-Turkish-prime-minister-calls-for-Assad-to-resign.html.
   Google Scholar
• TGRT. 2018. “Erdoğan: Hem Sahada Hem Masada Varız! [Erdogan: We are present both at table and field!].” Accessed January 13, 2018. https://www.tgrthaber.com.tr/politika/erdogan-hem-sahada-hem-masada-variz-220616.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of State. 2020. “The United States Sanctions Turkey Under CSSTSA.” Accessed December 14, 2020. https://2017-2021.state.gov/the-united-states-sanctions-turkey-under-caatsa-231/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ustuner, Y., and N. Yavuz. 2017. “Turkey’s Public Administration Today: An Overview and Appraisal.” International Journal of Public Administration 41 (10): 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1387147.
   Google Scholar
• Uzer, U. 2011. “Identity and Turkish Foreign Policy: The Kemalist Influence in Cyprus.” I.B.Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, M. A. 2018. “(Re-)Imagining the ‘Self’ of Ontological Security: The Case of Brazil’s Ambivalent Postcolonial Subjectivity.” Millennium Journal of International Studies 46 (2): 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817741255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. L. W., and S. C. Keong. 2014. “Just Jouissance: Discerning and Subverting a Politics of Inherent Transgression in Malaysian Socio-Political Discourse.” Asian Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2013.879068.
   Google Scholar
• Weise, Z. 2016. “EU Parliament Votes Overwhelmingly in Favour of Scrapping Turkey Accession Talks.” Telegraph, Accessed November 24, 2016. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/24/eu-votes-overwhelmingly-favour-scrapping-turkey-accession-talks/.
   Google Scholar
• Yanik, L. K. 2011. “Constructing Turkish ‘Exceptionalism’: Discourses of Liminality and Hybridity in Post-Cold War Turkish Foreign Policy.” Political Geography 30 (2): 80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yegin, M. 2016. “Turkey’s Reaction to the Coup in Egypt in Comparison with the US and Israel.” Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18 (4): 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2016.1196010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yegin, M. 2019. Turkey Between NATO and Russia: The Failed Balance: Turkey’s S-400 Purchase and Implications for Turkish Relations with NATO. SWP Comment, Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit.
   Google Scholar
• Yeni Akit. 2018. “Üç Kıtadan Anadolu Hapsine [From Three Continents to the Anatolian Prison].”Accessed June, 7 2018.https://www.yeniakit.com.tr/yazarlar/yavuz-bahadiroglu/uc-kitadan-anadolu-hapsine-24920.html.
   Google Scholar
• Yetim, H. T., and A. Hazar. 2023. “S400s, Sanctions and Defiance: Explaining Turkey’s Quest for Strategic Autonomy and the US Response.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 23 (1): 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2022.2095698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, Z. 2020. “Erdoğan’s Presidential Regime and Strategic Legalism: Turkish Democracy in the Twilight Zone.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 20 (2): 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1745418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2012. “Problem Areas for the New Turkish Foreign Policy.” Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 40 (5): 739–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2012.715146.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2017. “States and Ontological Security: A Historical Rethinking.” Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716653158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 1994. The Metastases of Enjoyment. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 2009. “Descartes and the Post-Traumatic Subject: On Catherine Malabou’s Les Nouveaux Blessés and Other Autistic Monsters.” Qui Parle 17 (2): 123–147. https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.17.2.123.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 2014. Event. London, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zupancic, A. 2003. “Ethics and Tragedy in Lacan.” In The Cambridge Companion to Lacan, edited by J.-M. Rabaté, 173–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar