Sustainability-oriented stimuli and their effects on circularity and novelty in conceptual design

References

• Achterberg, E., Hinfelaar, J., & Bocken, N. M. P. (2016). The value Hill business model tool: Identifying gaps and opportunities in a circular network. Circle Economy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. http://www.scienceandtheenergychallenge.nl/sites/default/files/multimedia/organization/sec/2016-06-16_NWO_Sc4CE/NWO%20Sc4CE%20-%20Workshop%20Business%20Models%20-%20Paper%20on%20Circular%20Business%20Models.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., & Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, A., Bundgaard, A., Rocha, C., Camocho, D., Mulet, E., Atin, E., Barros, F., Hofbauer, H., Celades, I., Alexandre, J., Lindenthal, J., Schmidt, K., Ruiz-Pastor, L., Kalleitner-Huber, M., Meissner, M., Royo, M., Hernaez, O., Pamminger, R., Lechner, R., Agudo, S., & Schmidt, S. (2020). C. Rocha, D. Camocho, J. Sampaio, & J. Alexandre, (Eds.), Product-service development for circular economy and sustainability course. Portugal: LNEG – Laboratório Nacional de Energia e Geologia.
   Google Scholar
• Artola González, T., Barraca, J., Mosteiro Pintor, P., Ancillo Gómez, I., Poveda, B., & Sánchez, N. (2012). PIC-A Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Adultos [PIC-A: Test of Creative Imagination for Adults]. TEA Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Bacciotti, D., Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2016). Product planning techniques: Investigating the differences between research trajectories and industry expectations. Research in Engineering Design, 27(4), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-016-0223-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacciotti, D., Borgianni, Y., & Rotini, F. (2016). An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features. Computers in Industry, 75, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellosta‐Batalla, M., Cebolla, A., Pérez‐Blasco, J., & Moya‐Albiol, L. (2021). Introducing mindfulness and compassion‐based interventions to improve verbal creativity in students of clinical and health psychology. Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice, 94(3), 541–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandino, G., Montagna, F., Cantamessa, M., & Colombo, S. (2023). A comparative review on the role of stimuli in idea generation. Ai Edam, 37, e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060423000124
   Google Scholar
• Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgianni, Y., Maccioni, L., Fiorineschi, L., & Rotini, F. (2020). Forms of stimuli and their effects on idea generation in terms of creativity metrics and non-obviousness. International Journal of Design Creativity & Innovation, 8(3), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1766379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. (2017) . Framework for implementing the principles of the circular economy in organizations-guide. BSI.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso Chrispim, M., Mattsson, M., & Ulvenblad, P. (2023). The underrepresented key elements of circular economy: A critical review of assessment tools and a guide for action. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., & González-Cruz, M. C. (2012). Medida de la creatividad en productos: Métricas y objetividad. Dyna Ingeniería e Industria, 87(1), 80–89. https://doi.org/10.6036/4138
   Google Scholar
• Cucuzzella, C. (2016). Creativity, sustainable design and risk management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 1548–1558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, R., Raghunathan, S., & Price, M. (2004). Review of aerospace engineering cost modelling: The genetic causal approach. Progress in aerospace sciences, 40(8), 487–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2004.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, E., Liu, W., Zhu, Z., Xu, Y., & Dai, J. S. (2022). The investigation of environmental sustainability within product design: A critical review. Design Science, 8, e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dybvik, H., Abelson, F. G., Aalto, P., Goucher-Lambert, K., & Steinert, M. (2022). Inspirational stimuli improve idea fluency during ideation: A replication and extension study with eye-tracking. Proceedings of the Design Society, Cavtat, Croatia, 2, 861–870.
   Google Scholar
• Eberhardt, L. C. M., Birkved, M., & Birgisdottir, H. (2022). Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 18(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1781588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015). EU Action plan for the circular economy.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). Categorisation system for the circular economy.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Bocken, N. (2013). Circular Economy Toolkit. Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing. http://circulareconomytoolkit.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F., & Rotini, F. (2020). Impact of missing attributes on the novelty metric of shah. Research in Engineering Design, 31(April 2020), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00332-x.
   Google Scholar
• García-García, J. A., Reding-Bernal, A., & López-Alvarenga, J. C. (2013). Sample size calculation in medical education research. Investigación en Educación Médica, 2(8), 217–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-5057(13)72715-7
   Google Scholar
• Golinska, P., Kosacka, M., Mierzwiak, R., & Werner-Lewandowska, K. (2015). Grey decision making as a tool for the classification of the sustainability level of remanufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 105, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goucher-Lambert, K., Moss, J., & Cagan, J. (2019). A neuroimaging investigation of design ideation with and without inspirational stimuli—understanding the meaning of near and far stimuli. Design Studies, 60, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graedel, T. E., Comrie, P. R., & Sekutowski, J. C. (1995). Green product design. AT&T Technical Journal, 74(6), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1995.tb00262.x
   Google Scholar
• Hallstedt, S. I., Villamil, C., Lövdahl, J., & Nylander, J. W. (2023). Sustainability fingerprint-guiding companies in anticipating the sustainability direction in early design. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 37, 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, J., Zhou, Y., Zhao, Q., & Xue, Q. (2019). An evolutionary computation based method for creative design inspiration generation. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(4), 1673–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1347-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2011). Reuse of ideas and concepts for creative stimuli in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(8), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544821003598573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibbotson, S. M., & Kara, S. (2018). A framework for determining the life time energy consumption of a product at the concept design stage. Procedia CIRP, 69, 704–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.052
   Google Scholar
• Küçüksayraç, E., Keskin, D., & Brezet, H. (2015). Intermediaries and innovation support in the design for sustainability field: Cases from the Netherlands, Turkey and the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics Bulletin, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   Google Scholar
• López-Forniés, I., Sierra-Pérez, J., Boschmonart-Rives, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2017). Metric for measuring the effectiveness of an eco-ideation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 865–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Mesa, B., Mulet, E., Vidal, R., & Thompson, G. (2011). Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820902911366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur Foundation, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Maccioni, L., Borgianni, Y., & Pigosso, D. C. (2021). Creativity in successful eco-design supported by ten original guidelines. International Journal of Design Creativity & Innovation, 9(4), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2021.1965033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, M. A., Ponte, O., & Charnley, F. (2017). Taxonomy of design strategies for a circular design tool. PLATE: Product Lifetimes and the Environment vol. 9, 275–279. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-820-4-275
   Google Scholar
• Ortega-Martín, J. L., Portnova, T., Zurita-Ortega, F., & Ubago-Jiménez, J. L. (2021). Correlation between the need for cognitive closure and narrative creativity in secondary education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18084333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupiales-Rueda, B. E., Riveros-Suárez, S. P., & Romero-Medina, R. (2013). La creatividad y la tendencia en pruebas de creatividad. Revista Perspectivas Educativas, 6, 155–173.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. A., & Kishawy, H. A. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing and design: Concepts, practices and needs. Sustainability, 4(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su4020154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Pastor, L., Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., & Royo, M. (2022). A metric for evaluating novelty and circularity as a whole in conceptual design proposals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 337, 130495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Pastor, L., Chulvi, V., Royo, M., & Sampaio, J. N. (2023). Bio-inspired design as a solution to generate creative and circular product concepts. International Journal of Design Creativity & Innovation, 11(1), 42–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2022.2128886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Pastor, L., Mulet, E., Chulvi, V., & Royo, M. (2021). Effect of the application of circularity requirements as guided questions on the creativity and the circularity of the design outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, D., & Spreafico, C. (2020). TRIZ-based guidelines for eco-improvement. Sustainability, 12(8), 3412. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliminamin, S., Becattini, N., & Cascini, G. (2019). Sources of creativity stimulation for designing the next generation of technical systems: Correlations with R&D designers’ performance. Research in Engineering Design, 30(1), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-018-0299-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). Studying engineering design creativity- developing a common definition and associated measures. Invited Paper in the Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on Studying Design Creativity, Provence, France Gero, John.
   Google Scholar
• Sassanelli, C., Urbinati, A., Rosa, P., Chiaroni, D., & Terzi, S. (2020). Addressing circular economy through design for X approaches: A systematic literature review. Computers in Industry, 120, 103245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvé, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: Alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development, 17, 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scurati, G. W., Nylander, J. W., Ferrise, F., & Bertoni, M. (2022). Sustainability awareness in engineering design through serious gaming. Design Science, 8, e12. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Vargas-Hernandez, N., & Smith, S. M. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Sierra-Pérez, J., López-Forniés, I., Boschmonart-Rives, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2016). Introducing eco-ideation and creativity techniques to increase and diversify the applications of eco-materials: The case of cork in the building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 606–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snider, C. M., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2013). Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process. Design Studies, 34(5), 543–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, R., Vasconcelos, L. A., & Cardoso, C. C. (2018). Design briefs in creativity studies. In DS 89: Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2018), University of Bath, Bath, UK (pp. 403–410).
   Google Scholar
• Spreafico, C. (2022). Can TRIZ (theory of inventive problem solving) strategies improve material substitution in eco-design? Sustainable Production and Consumption, 30, 889–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2016). Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies, 42, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, W., Reike, D., & Witjes, S. (2018). Solving confusion around new conceptions of circularity by synthesising and re-organising the 3R’s concept into a 10R hierarchy. International Sustainable Development Research Society, 27, 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente-Yagüe-Jara, M. I., López-Martínez, O., Navarro-Navarro, V., & Cuéllar-Santiago, F. (2023). Escritura, creatividad e inteligencia artificial. ChatGPT en el contexto universitario. Comunicar Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 31(77), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.3916/C77-2023-04
   Google Scholar
• Weustink, I. F., Ten Brinke, E., Streppel, A. H., & Kals, H. J. J. (2000). A generic framework for cost estimation and cost control in product design. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 103(1), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00405-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar