Robotic telescopes in education

References

• LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, Abbott BP, Abbott R, et al. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116(6):061102-1-16. http://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall LA, Safko J. Technology and astronomy education. In: Percy JA, editor. Astronomy education: current developments, future coordination. Proceedings of an ASP Symposium; 1994 Jun 24–25; College Park, MD. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific (ASP); 1996. p. 148.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler PM, Gould R, Brecher K, et al. Astronomical experiences using internet-accessible remote instrumentation. In: Jacobson M, Kosma R, editors. Innovations in science and mathematics education: advanced designs for technologies of learning. Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum; 2000. p. 259–280.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne J, Simon S, Collins S. Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. Int J Sci Edu. 2003;25(9):1049–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannady MA, Greenwald E, Harris KN. Problematizing the STEM Pipeline metaphor: is the STEM pipeline metaphor serving our students and the STEM workforce? Sci Ed. 2014;98(3):443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Tirado AJ. Robotic Autonomous observatories: a historical perspective. Adv Astron. 2010;2010:e570489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genet R. Real-time control with the TRS-80. Indianapolis (IN): Howard W. Sams; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Genet RM, Hayes DS, Epand H, et al. Robotic observatories: remote-access personal-computer astronomy. Mesa (AZ): Autoscope Corporation; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch JEF. Robots in astronomy. Vistas Astron. 1992;35(4):399–438.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch JEF. The future of robotic telescopes for education. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2000;17:119–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbell-Clarke J, Pack H, Pennypacker C, et al. Hands-on universe: bringing astronomical explorations to the classroom. In: Percy JA, editor. Astronomy education: current developments, future coordination. Proceedings of an ASP Symposium; 1994 Jun 24--25; College Park, MD. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1996. p. 158–160.
   Google Scholar
• Pennypacker C. Hands-on universe and plans for large-scale internet-mediated teacher training. In: Okyudo M, et al, editors. Astronomical education with the internet, frontiers of science series no. 27. Tokyo: Universal Academic Press; 1998. p. 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Clark G. Telescopes in education (TIE): bringing live astronomy to the classroom utilizing remotely controlled telescopes. In: Okyudo M, et al. editors. Astronomical education with the internet, frontiers of science series no. 27. Tokyo: Universal Academic Press; 1998. p. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon DH. The eye observatory remote telescope project: practical astronomy for years 7, 8 and 9. Australia: Charles Sturt University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lubin P, van der Veen J. The remote access astronomy project: an example of a university/high school cooperative effort. Edu Comput. 1992;8(1):79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Zijlstra A, Wallander A, Kaper L, et al. Remote observing at the ESO NTT & CAT telescopes. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 1997;109(741):1256–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querci FR, Querci M. Robotic telescopes and networks: new tools for education and science. Astrophys Space Sci. 2000;273(1):257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashley MCB, Burton MG, Lawrence JS, et al. Robotic telescopes on the Antarctic plateau. Astron Nachr. 2004;325(6–8):619–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelderman R. A global network of autonomous observatories dedicated to student research. In: Pasachoff JM, Ros RM, Pasachoff N, editors. Innovation in astronomy education. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 226–232.
   Google Scholar
• Percy JR. Small telescopes in astronomy education. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Dordrecht: Springer; 2003. p. 113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kyba CCM, Tong KP, Bennie J, et al. Worldwide variations in artificial skyglow. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AG. Telescopes in schools for IYA2009. Astron Geophys. 2009;50:1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler PM, Gould RR, Leiker PS, et al. Microobservatory net: a network of automated remote telescopes dedicated to educational use. J Sci Edu Technol. 2001;10(1):39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton JA, Henry GW, Fekel FC. Advantages of automated observing with small telescopes. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 489–507.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch JEF, Hedges DG, Machell J, et al. A global network of autonomous observatories dedicated to student research. In: Pasachoff JM, Ros RM, Pasachoff N, editors. Innovation in astronomy education. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gould R, Dussault M, Sadler P. What’s educational about online telescopes? Evaluating 10 years of microobservatory. Astron Edu Rev. 2006;5(2):127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Steele IA. The liverpool telescope. Astron Nachr. 2004;325(6–8):519–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code AD. The Wisconsin APT -- the first robotic telescope. In: Robotic telescopes in the 1990s. Proceedings of the Symposium of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1991 Jun 22--24; Laramie (WY): University of Wyoming; 1992. p. 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• McCord TB, Snellen G, Paavola S. The MIT automated astrophysical observatory. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 1972;84(497):220–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colgate SA, Moore EP, Carlson R. A fully automated digitally controlled 30-inch telescope. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 1975;87(518):565–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd LJ, Genet RM, Hall DS. Automatic photoelectric telescope. Int Amateur-Prof Photoelectr Photometry Commun. 1984;15:20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Helmer L, Morrison LV. Carlsberg automatic meridian circle. Vistas Astron. 1985;28(3):505–518.
   Google Scholar
• Filippenko AV. The scientific potential of automatic CCD imaging telescopes. In: Robotic telescopes in the 1990s. Proceedings of the Symposium of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1991 Jun 22--24; Laramie (WY): University of Wyoming; 1992. p. 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter S, Muller RA, Newberg HJM, et al. A doubly robotic telescope -- the Berkeley automated supernova search. In: Robotic telescopes in the 1990s. Proceedings of the Symposium of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1991 Jun 22--24; Laramie (WY): University of Wyoming; 1992. p. 55–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lubin P, van der Veen J. The UCSB remote access astronomy project. In: Robotic telescopes in the 1990s. Proceedings of the Symposium of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1991 Jun 22--24; Laramie (WY): University of Wyoming; 1992. p. 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Lubin P. The personal observatory. 32-Bit PC image processing, photometry and computer control of a filter wheel CCD Camera and telescope. I.A.P.P.P. Commun. 1992;49:17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Smith D, Penston M, Roche P. Beyond backyard astronomy: professional telescopes online for schools. Phys. Educ. 2001;3AG. Telescopes in schools for IYA2009. Astron Geophys. 2009;50:1.39.6(3):178
   Google Scholar
• Pennypacker C, Barclay T. Building a global education and science system based on modest-aperture telescopes: the hands-on universe system. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 421–426.
   Google Scholar
• Neely AW. The ARLT (Automatic Radio-Linked Telescope): An Imaging Observatory. Int Amateur-Prof Photoelectr Photometry Commun. 1995;58:51.
   Google Scholar
• Bor M, Thibaut C, Pack H, et al. Hands-on universe: a global program for education and public outreach in astronomy. In: Harnden FR, Primini FA, Payne HE, editors. Astronomical data analysis software and systems X. ASP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 238, San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Paciffic; 2001. p. 103.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlet R. Hands-on universe Europe (EU-HOU). In: Pasachoff JM, Ros RM, Pasachoff N, editors. Innovation in astronomy education. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 23–26.
   Google Scholar
• Spuck T. Hands-on universe asteroid search. In: Okyudo M, et al, editors. Astronomical education with the internet, frontiers of science series no. 27. Tokyo: Universal Academic Press; 1998. p. 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond MW, van Dyk SD, Ho W, et al. UBVRI photometry of the type IC SN 1994I in M51. Astron J. 1996;111(1):327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould A. Transits, binaries, and hands-on universe. In: Barnes J, Smith DA, Gibbs MG, et al, editors. Science education and outreach: forging a path to the future. ASP Conference Series 431; 2009 Sep 12–16; Millbrae, CA. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2010. p. 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon DH, Mainwaring A. The Charles Sturt university remote telescope project: astronomy for primary school students. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2000;17(2):125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaia LJ. Students’ experiences, perceptions and performance in junior secondary school science: an intervention study involving astronomy and a remote telescope [dissertation]. Bathurst (NSW): Charles Sturt University; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon DH, Geissinger H. Interactive astronomy in elementary schools. J Int Forum Edu Technol Soc. 2002;5(1):124–128.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend A, McKinnon DH, Fitzgerald M, Lummis G, Morris J. Educative Curricula and PCK development driven by STEM professional learning in rural and remote schools: A longitudinal Type IV case study. Int J Innov Sci Math Edu: Going Rural Special Edition. 2016;24(4):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford DL, Craine E. GNAT: A global network of small astronomical telescopes. In: Percy JA, editor. Astronomy education: current developments, future coordination. Proceedings of an ASP Symposium; 1994 Jun 24--25; College Park, MD. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1996. p. 183.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford D. GNAT: A global network of small telescopes as a resource for astronomical research and education. U N Program Space Appl. 1997;8:9094.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford DL, Craine ER, Tucker RA. GNATA Global network of small astronomical telescopes. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 189–200.
   Google Scholar
• Graves K, Mackie G. Internet telescopes: capabilities and benchmarks. In: Genet RM, Johnson JM, Wallen V, editors. Small telescopes and astronomical research. 3rd ed. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation Press; 2010. p. 81.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald MT, Hollow R, Rebull LM, et al. A review of high school level astronomy student research projects over the last two decades. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2014;31(e037):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Newsam A, Carter D, Roche P. The Liverpool and Faulkes telescopes. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 391–410.
   Google Scholar
• Brown TM, Baliber N, Bianco FB, et al. Las Cumbres Observatory global telescope network. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 2013;125(931):1031–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichart D, Nysewander M, Moran J, et al. PROMPT: panchromatic robotic optical monitoring and polarimetry telescopes. Nuovo Cimento C Geophys Space Phys C. 2005;28(4):767.
   Google Scholar
• McLin KM. Using robotic telescopes to teach STEM skills: undergraduate and high school students. In: Telescopes from Afar. Proceedings of the Conference; 2011 Feb 28--Mar 3; Waikoloa Beach, Hawai’i; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cominsky L, McLin K, Simonnet A, et al. Fourteen years of education and public outreach for the swift gamma-ray burst explorer mission [Internet]. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2104v1
   Google Scholar
• Williams RJ. Commercial remote astronomical observatories for education and research. In: Genet RM, Johnson JM, Wallen V, editors. Small telescopes and astronomical research. 3rd ed. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation Press; 2010. p. 95.
   Google Scholar
• Williams R, Beshore E. Sierra stars observatory network: an accessible global network. In: Telescopes from Afar. Proceedings of the Conference; 2011 Feb 28--Mar 3; Waikoloa Beach, Hawai’i; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• White V, Croft SK, Gould A, et al.. No Ph.D. Required: remote telescopes reaching a wider audience. In: Garmany C, Gibbs MG, Moody JW, editors. EPO and a changing world: creating linkages and expanding partnerships; 2007 Sep 5--7; Chicago, IL. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2008. p. 231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Henden AA. A scientific network of small telescopes. In: Telescopes from Afar. Proceedings of the Conference; 2011 Feb 28--Mar 3; Waikoloa Beach, Hawai’i; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Henden AA, Smith TC, Levine SE. 2012. The AAVSO photometric all-sky survey completes the sky. Am Astrono Soc Meet Abstr 220 [Internet]. Available from:https://www.aavso.org/files/henden_aas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff K, Hessman FV, Tuparev G, et al.. New robotic telescopes by Halfmann-Teleskoptechnik GmbH and Tuparev Technologies Inc.. In: Stepp LM, Gilmozzi R, editors. Ground-based and airborne telescopes II. Proc. SPIE 7012; 2008. p. 70122X.
   Google Scholar
• Coward DM, Heary A, Venville G, et al. The Zadko telescope: a resource for science education enrichment. Adv Space Res. 2011;47(11):1922–1930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckas P. The design, construction and use of an internet accessible, robotic optical telescope initiative for student research projects [master’s thesis]. Western Australia: The University of Western Australia; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs G, Hollow R, Champion D, et al. The PULSE@Parkes project: a new observing technique for long-term pulsar monitoring. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2009;26(4):468–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen R, Swiggum J, McLaughlin MA, et al. The pulsar search collaboratory: discovery and timing of five new pulsars. Astrophys J. 2013;768(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelaz MW, Cline JD, Osborne C, et al. Small radio telescopes. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 271–285.
   Google Scholar
• Salah JE, Pratap P, Rogers AEE. The educational role of small telescopes in radio astronomy. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 623–636.
   Google Scholar
• Bessell MS. Beauty and astrophysics. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2000;17(2):179–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg-Christensen L. 2007. The hands-on guide for science communicators [Internet]. New York (NY): Springer New York. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-0-387-49960-4
   Google Scholar
• Rector TA, Levay ZG, Frattare LM, et al. Image-processing techniques for the creation of presentation-quality astronomical images. Astron J. 2007;133(2):598–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcand KK, Watzke M, Rector T, et al. Processing color in astronomical imagery. Stud Media Commun. 2013;1(2):25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Percy JR. Why astronomy is useful and should be included in the school curriculum. In: Pasachoff J, Percy JR, editors. Teaching and learning astronomy: effective strategies for educators worldwide. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Slater SJ, Slater TF. Questioning the fidelity of the next generation science standards for astronomy and space sciences education. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2015;2(1):51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaia L, Fitzgerald M, McKinnon D. Students’ perceptions of high school science: what has changed over the last decade? Res Sci Educ. 2012;43(4):1501–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaia L, McKinnon DH. Common alternative astronomical conceptions encountered in junior secondary science classes: why is this so? Astron Edu Rev. 2007;6(2):32–53.
   Google Scholar
• Slater SJ, Price Schleigh S, Stork DJ. Analysis of individual test of astronomy standards (TOAST) item responses. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2015;2(2):89
   Google Scholar
• Hintz EG, Hintz ML, Lawler MJ. Prior knowledge base of constellations and bright stars among non-science majoring undergraduates and 14–15 year old students. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2015;2(2):115.
   Google Scholar
• Slater TF, Burrows AD, French DA. A proposed astronomy learning progression for remote telescope observation. J College Teaching & Learning. 2014;11(4):197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sergio Bretones P, Megid Neto J. An analysis of papers on astronomy education in proceedings of IAU meetings from 1988 to 2006. Astron Edu Rev. 2011;10(1):0101020101029.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald M, McKinnon DH, Danaia L. Inquiry-based educational design for large-scale high school astronomy projects using real telescopes. J Sci Educ Technol. 2015;24(6):747–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch J. Final report to the primary (formerly AstraZeneca) science teaching trust. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch J. A robotic telescope for science and education. Astron Geophys. 2015;56(2):18–2.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould RR, Sunbury S, Krumhansl R. Using online telescopes to explore exoplanets from the physics classroom. Am J Phys. 2012;80(5):445–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beare R. Investigation into the potential of investigative projects involving powerful robotic telescopes to inspire interest in science. Int J Sci Edu. 2007;29(3):279–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche P, Szymanek N. The Faulkes telescope project. Commun Astron Public. 2005:384–386.
   Google Scholar
• Beare R. Astronomy-related content and robotic telescopes in upper secondary physics courses. School Sci Rev. 2004;86(314):113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis F, Street R, Roche P, et al. Robotic astronomy with the Faulkes telescopes and Las Cumbres Observatory global telescope. Adv Astron. 2010;2010:e873059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche P, Roberts S, Gomez E, et al. Education and public outreach programmes from the Faulkes telescope project. In: Simpson RJ, Ward-Thompson D, editors. Astronomy: networked astronomy and the new media. Bristol (UK): Canopus publishing; 2009. p. 95–107.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JP, Davis JW, Holmes RE, et al. An international asteroid search campaign. Astron Edu Rev. 2008;7(1):57–83.
   Google Scholar
• Danaia L, McKinnon D, Parker Q, et al. Space to grow: LCOGT.net and improving science engagement in schools. Astron Edu Rev. 2012;11(1):010106.
   Google Scholar
• Kadooka MA, Meech KJ, Bedient J. TOPS telescope projects on variable stars and other objects. J Am Assoc Var Star Obs. 2002;31(1):39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kadooka MA, Bedient J, Hu S, Hemphill R, Meech KJ. US student astronomy research and remote observing projects. In: Pasachoff JM, Ros RM, Pasachoff N, editors. Innovation in astronomy education. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 218–225.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge B, Greenstein G. Goals for astro 101: Report on workshops for department leaders. Astron Edu Rev. 2003;2(2):46–89.
   Google Scholar
• Waller WH, Slater TF. Improving introductory astronomy education in American colleges and universities: a review of recent progress. J Geosci Edu. 2011;59(4):176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Lazendic-Galloway J, Fitzgerald M, McKinnon D. Implementing studio-based flipped classroom approaches in 1st year astronomy. Int J Innov Sci Math Edu, Australian Sci Math Edu. Edition. 2016:24(5). p.35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Slater T. Using remote-control telescopes in ASTR 101, a brief report from a break out discussion. Astronomical Society of the Pacific COSMOS in the classroom conference. Clarement, California, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Privon GC, Beaton RL, Whelan DG, et al. The importance of hands-on experience with telescopes for students. Astro 2010: the astronomy and astrophysics decadal survey, position papers 45. 2009. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009astro2010P..45P
   Google Scholar
• Russell SH, Hancock MP, McCullough J. Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science. 2007;316(5824):548–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caton DB. Astronomy back east: The future of the university telescope. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 209–218
   Google Scholar
• Im M, Choi C, Kim K. Lee Sang Gak telescope (LSGT): a remotely operated robotic telescope for education and research at Seoul National University. J Korean Astron Soc. 2015;48(4):207–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukes RJ Jr. The four-college consortium and the future of APT’s. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 155–179.
   Google Scholar
• Eastwood KDG. The national undergraduate research observatory. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Percy JR. Variable star research experiences for high school students, undergraduates, and amateur astronomers. In: Gibbs MG, Barnes J, Manning JG, et al, editors. Preparing for the 2009 International Year of Astronomy: A Hands-on Symposium. ASP Conference Series 400; 2008 Jun 1--5; St. Louis, MO. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2008. p. 363–367.
   Google Scholar
• Beaky MM. Observational astronomy research at a primarily undergraduate instituition. In: Genet RM, Johnson JM, Wallen V, editors. Small telescopes and astronomical research. 3rd ed. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation Press; 2010. p. 213.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes S, Kolb U, Haswell CA, et al. PIRATE: a remotely operable telescope facility for research and education. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 2011;123(908):1177–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb U. The PIRATE facility: at the crossroads of research and teaching. Rev Mex Astron Asteofs. 2014;45:16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur M, Kolb U, Minocha S, et al. Teaching undergraduate astrophysics with PIRATE. Rev Mex Astron Asteofs. 2014;45:129–132.
   Google Scholar
• Norton AJ, Wheatley PJ, West RG, et al. New periodic variable stars coincident with ROSAT sources discovered using SuperWASP. Astron Astrophys. 2007;467(2):785–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulley D, Faillace G, Owen C. Investigating the properties of the near-contact binary system TW CrB. J Br Astron Assoc. 2013;123(2):100.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce A, Cruickshank S, Rodda T, et al. BAA journal 2013 August an investigation of GSC 02038–00293, a suspected RS CVn star, using CCD photometry. J Br Astron Assoc. 2013;123(4):221–226.
   Google Scholar
• Genet RM, Johnson JM, Wallen V. One-semester astronomical research seminars. In: Genet RM, Johnson JM, Wallen V, editors. Small telescopes and astronomical research. 3rd ed. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation Press; 2010. p. 203.
   Google Scholar
• Genet RM, Fulton BJ, Bianco FB, et al.. Observing double stars. Society for astronomical sciences annual symposium. In: Warner DB, Buchleim RK, Foote JL, et al., editors. The Society for Astronomical Sciences 31st Annual Symposium on Telescope Science; 2012 May 22--24; Big Bear Lake, CA. Rancho Cucamongo (CA): Society for Astronomical Sciences; 2012. p. 147–157.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge B. The OTHER keck observatories. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Willis S. CCD observations and period determination of six minor planets. Minor Planet Bull. 2004;31(4):82–83.
   Google Scholar
• Fraknoi A. The state of astronomy education in the US. In: Percy JA, editor. Astronomy education: current developments, future coordination Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series; 1994 Jun 24--25; College Park, MD. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1996. p. 9–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom Z, Sadler P, Sonnert G. Evolution and persistence of students astronomy career interests: a gender study. J Astron Earth Sci Edu (JAESE). 2016;3(1):77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennypacker C. The real astronomy experience: making the IVO effective for international planetaria and science centers. In: Quinn PJ, Grski KM, editors. Toward an international virtual observatory. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg; 2004. p. 238–241.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce-Price D, Lowery S, Michaela E, et al. Around the world in 80 telescopes. CAP J. 2009;6:18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe SR. AstroTwitter. In: Simpson RJ, Ward-Thompson D, editors. Astronomy: networked astronomy and the new media. 2009. 10 p. Located at: https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.0193
   Google Scholar
• Gomez E. Show me stars: engaging celebrities in astronomy outreach with their twitter followers. CAP J. 2014;14:15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sage LJ. Community perceptions of the relative worth of large and small telescopes. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Abt HA. The productivity of ground-based optical telescopes of various apertures. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Huchra J. Small telescopes in the New Millennium. In: Oswalt TD, editor. The future of small telescopes in the New Millennium. Springer; 2003. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg RT, Stencel R. Educational opportunities in proam collaboration. In: Pasachoff JM, Ros RM, Pasachoff N, editors. Innovation in astronomy education. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fortson L, Masters K, Nichol R, et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphological classification and citizen science. Adv Mach Learn Data Min Astron. 2012:213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Lintott CJ, Schawinski K, Slosar A, et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the sloan digital sky survey. Mon Not R Astron Soc. 2008;389(3):1179–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox J, et al. Defining and measuring success in online citizen science: a case study of zooniverse projects. Comput Sci Eng. 2015;17(44):28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mankowski TA, Slater SJ, Slater TF. An interpretive study of meanings citizen scientists make when participating in Galaxy Zoo. Contemp Issues Edu Res. 2011;4(4):25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Raddick MJ, Bracey G, Gay PL. Galaxy Zoo: exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astron Edu Rev. 2010;9(1):010103.
   Google Scholar
• Price A, Turner R, Stencel RE, et al. The origins and future of the citizen sky project. J Am AssocVar Star Obs. 2012;40(2):614–617.
   Google Scholar
• Stencel RE. e Aurigae - an overview of the 2009–2011 eclipse campaign results. J Am AssocVar Star Obs. 2012;40(2):618–632.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins JL. The international e Aurigae Campaign 2009 photometry report. J Am AssocVar Star Obs. 2012;40(2):633–646.
   Google Scholar
• Hollow R. Engaging gifted science students through astronomy. In: Pasachoff J, Percy JR, editors. Teaching and learning astronomy: effective strategies for educators worldwide. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hollow RP. The student as scientist: secondary student research projects in astronomy. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2000;17(2):162–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts LF, Wassersug RJ. Does doing scientific research in high school correlate with students staying in science? A half-century retrospective study. Res Sci Educ. 2008;39(2):251–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy JR. Variable star research projects for outstanding senior high school students. J Am AssocVar Star Obs. 2007;35(1):284–287.
   Google Scholar
• Pennypacker C, Asbell-Clarke J. Hands-on astronomy for education. In: Percy JA, editor. Astronomy education: current developments, future coordination astronomical society of the pacific conference series; 1994 Jun 24--25; College Park, MD. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 1996. p. 61.
   Google Scholar
• Pack H. The hands-on universe web-based asteroid school project and discovery of trans-neptunian object 1998 FS144. In: Percy JA, Wilson JB, editor. Amateur-professional partnerships in astronomy. ASP Conference Proceedings 220. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2000. p. 303.
   Google Scholar
• Beuermann K, Diese J, Paik S, et al. A long-term optical and X-ray ephemeris of the polar EK Ursae Majoris. Astron Astrophys. 2009;507(1):385–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuermann K, Buhlmann J, Diese J, et al. The giant planet orbiting the cataclysmic binary DP Leonis. Astron Astrophys. 2011;526:A53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus U, Bauer S, Beuermann K, et al. The quest for companions to post-common envelope binaries: I. Searching a sample of stars from the CSS and SDSS. Astron Astrophys. 2012;538:A84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frew DJ, Stanger J, Fitzgerald M, et al. K 1–6: An asymmetric planetary Nebula with a binary central star. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2011;28:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald MT, Criss J, Lukaszewicz T, et al. RR Lyrae stars in the globular cluster NGC 6101. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2012;29(1):72–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald MT, Inwood L, McKinnon DH, et al. Photometric and proper motion study of the neglected open cluster NGC 2215. Astron J. 2015;149(6):190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guieu S, Rebull LM, Stauffer JR, et al. Spitzer observations of IC 2118. Astrophys J. 2010;720(1):46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell SB, Brinkworth C, Hoard DW, et al. First Spitzer space telescope observations of magnetic cataclysmic variables: evidence of excess emission at 3–8 m. Astrophys J. 2006;646(1):L65–L68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell SB, Hoard DW, Brinkworth C, et al. Dark matter in accretion disks. Astrophys J. 2008;685(1):418–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebull LM, Johnson CH, Hoette V, et al. New young star candidates in CG4 and Sa101. Astron J. 2011;142(1):25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy JR, Favaro E, Glasheen J, et al. Period changes in pulsating red supergiant stars: a science and education project. J Am Assoc Var Star Obs. 2008;36(2):145–147.
   Google Scholar
• Clark RK. All about the journal of double star observations. In: Genet RM, Johnson JM, Wallen V, editors. Small telescopes and astronomical research. 3rd ed. Santa Margarita (CA): Collins Foundation Press; 2010. p. 155.
   Google Scholar
• Mason BD, Wycoff GL, Hartkopf WI, et al. The 2001 US Naval observatory double star CD-ROM. I. The Washington double star catalog. Astron J. 2001;122(6):3466–3471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyle R. Observing and measuring visual double stars. London: Springer-Verlag; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• White JC II. The virtual observatory and education: a view from the classrom. In: Brunner RJ, Djorgovski G, Szalay AS, editors. Virtual observatories of the future, ASP Conference Proceedings 225. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2001. p. 159–164.
   Google Scholar
• Russo P, Gomez E, Heenatigala T, et al. Peer-review platform for astronomy education activities. eLearn Pap. 2015;40:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb WH, Buxner S, Schwerin T, et al. NASA wavelength: education and public outreach resources for scientists and engineers. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference [Internet]; 2015 Mar 16--20; The Woodlands, TX; 2015. p. 2706. Available from: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015LPI..46.2706C
   Google Scholar
• Gershun DC, Slater TF, Berryhill KJ. Mixed-methods study that examines nine science teachers perceptions of SLOOH robotic telescope for teaching astronomy. Rev Latino-Am Edu Astron - RELEA. 2014;17:7–37.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon DH, Danaia L. Remote telescopes in education: report of an Australian study. In: Pasachoff JM, Ros RM, Pasachoff N, editors. Innovation in astronomy education. Cambridge University Press; 2008. p. 232–242.
   Google Scholar
• Slater SJ, Slater TF, Olsen JK. Survey of K-12 science teachers’ educational product needs from planetary scientists. Astron Edu Rev. 2009;8(1):010101.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald M, Danaia L, McKinnon D. Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Res Sci Edu. Forthcoming 2017. Doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall JC, Smart JB, Alston DM. Inquiry-based instruction: a possible solution to improving student learning of both science concepts and scientific practices. Int J of Sci and Math Educ. 2016;1–20. Doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9718-x.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie P, Kos J, Walker M, et al. Staff in Australias schools 2007. Canberra (ACT): Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations; 2008. (IBN:0 642 77711 X).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York (NY): Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rebull LM, Gorjian V, Squires GK, et al. The NASA/IPAC teacher archive research program (NITARP). Poster session presented at: American Astronomical Society [Internet]. AAS Meeting 227, id.246.13. Available from: http://nitarp.ipac.caltech.edu/system/media_files/binaries/173/original/rebull2016.pdf?1450366040.
   Google Scholar
• Dresner M, Worley E. Teacher research experiences, partnerships with scientists, and teacher networks sustaining factors from professional development. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2006;17(1):114.
   Google Scholar
• Buxner SR. Exploring how research experiences for teachers changes their understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2015;1(1):53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wells DC, Greisen EW, Harten RH. FITS - a flexible image transport system. Astron Astrophys Suppl Ser. 1981;44(3):363–370.
   Google Scholar
• Lang D, Hogg DW, Mierle K, et al. Astrometry.net: blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images. Astron J. 2010;139(5):1782–1800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran R, Melchior A-L, Boudier T. Astrophysics datamining in the classroom: exploring real data with new software tools and robotic telescopes. 2012. 10 p. Located at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2764v1
   Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Method. 2012;9(7):671–675. PMID 22930834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laher RR, Gorjian V, Rebull LM, et al. Aperture photometry tool. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 2012;124(917):737–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laher RR, Rebull LM, Gorjian V, et al. Aperture photometry tool versus SExtractor for noncrowded fields. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 2012;124(917):764–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes-Gehrke M, Benik J, Kovacs Z, et al. Lightcurves for 938 Chlosinde and 3408 Shalamov. Minor Planet Bull. 2011;38(2):75.
   Google Scholar
• Souza SP, Beltz-Mohrmann G, Sami M. Two new cool variable stars in the field of NGC 659. J Am Assoc Var Star Obs. 2013;41(1):92–96.
   Google Scholar
• Souza SP, Beltz-Mohrmann G, Sami M. The light curve and period of MT696. J Am Assoc Var Star Obs. 2014;42(1):154–160.
   Google Scholar
• Collins KA, Kielkopf JF, Stassun KG, Hessman FV. AstroImageJ: image processing and photometric extraction for ultra-precise astronomical light curves. AJ 153(2):77. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-3881/153/2/77/meta
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetson PB. DAOPHOT -- a computer program for crowded-field stellar photometry. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 1987;99:191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schechter PL, Mateo M, Saha A. DoPHOT, A CCD photometry program: description and tests. Publ Astron Soc Pac. 1993;105(693):1342–1353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertin E. Automated morphometry with SExtractor and PSFEx. In: Evans IN, Accomazzi A, Mink DJ, et al., editors. Astronomical data analysis software and systems XX.ASP Conference Proceedings 442; 2010 Nov 7--11; Boston, MA. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2011. p. 435.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey JM, Lombardi D. Blazing the trail for astronomy education research. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2015;2(2):77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prather EE, Rudolph AL, Brissenden G, et al. A national study assessing the teaching and learning of introductory astronomy. Part I: The effect of interactive instruction. Am J Phys. 2009;77(4):320–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater SJ, Tatge CB, Bretones PS, et al. iSTAR first light: characterising astronomy education research dissertations in the iSTAR Database. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2016;3(2):125.
   Google Scholar
• Lelliott A, Rollnick M. Big Ideas: a review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. Int J Sci Edu. 32(13):1771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretones PS, Jafelice LC, Horvath JE. Ten years of Latin-American journal of astronomy education RELEA: achievements and challenges for international astronomy education development. J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 3(2):111.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald M, McKinnon DH, Danaia L, et al. A large-scale inquiry-based astronomy intervention project: impact on students content knowledge performance and views of their high school science classroom. Res Sci Educ. 2016;46(6):901–916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace CS, Prather EE, Mendelsohn BM. Astro 101 students perceptions of science: results from the thinking about science survey instrument. Astron Edu Rev. 2013;12(1):010101.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey JM, Slater SJ, Slater TF. Astronomy education research: a primer. 1st ed. New York (NY): W. H. Freeman; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Slater SJ, Slater TF, Bailey JM. Discipline-based science education research: a scientists guide. 1st ed. New York (NY): W. H. Freeman; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Frechtling J, Mark MM, Rog DJ, et al. The 2010 user-friendly handbook for project evaluation. Nat Sci Found. 2010. Located at: https://apps-spisu.sws.iastate.edu/resources/view/id/50
   Google Scholar
• Borrow J, Russo P. A blueprint for public engagement appraisal: supporting research careers. arXiv:1510.02017 [physics.soc-ph]. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Buxner SR, Sharma M, Hsu B, et al.. Hands-on universe: bringing astronomical explorations to the classroom. In: Jensen JB, Manning JG, Gibbs MG, et al., editors. Connecting people to science: a national conference on science education and public outreach. ASP Conference Series 457; 2012 Jul 3--Aug 3; Baltimore, MD. San Francisco (CA): Astronomical Society of the Pacific; 2012. p. 81.
   Google Scholar
• Slater SJ. The development and validation of the test of astronomy standards (TOAST). J Astron Earth Sci Edu. 2015;1(1):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel B, Slater T, Deming G, et al. Pre-course results from the astronomy diagnostic test. Publ Astron Soc Aust. 2000;17(2):152–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey JM, Bruce J, Prather EE, et al. Development and validation of the star properties concept inventory. Int J Sci Edu. 2012;13(14):2257–2286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardar EM, Prather EE, Brecher K, et al. The need for a light and spectroscopy concept inventory for assessing innovations in introductory astronomy survey courses. Astron Edu Rev. 2005;4(2):20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler PM, Coyle H, Miller JL, et al. The astronomy and space science concept inventory: development and validation of assessment instruments aligned with the K-12 national science standards. Astron Edu Rev. 2009;8(1):p. 010111.
   Google Scholar
• Hake RR. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am J Phys. 1998;66(1):64–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kind P, Jones K, Barmby P. Developing attitudes towards science measures. Int J Sci Edu. 29(7):871–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams WK, Perkins KK, Podolefsky NS. New instrument for measuring student beliefs about physics and learning physics: the Colorado learning attitudes about science survey. Phys Rev ST-PER. 2006;2:010101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman NG, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bell RL, et al. Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;39:497–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeilik M, Schau C, Mattern N. Conceptual astronomy. II. Replicating conceptual gains, probing attitude changes across three semesters. Am J Phys. 67(10):923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PC, Fraser BJ. CLES: an instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Assocation for Research in Science Teaching (NARST). The Abbey, Fontane, Apr 1991 ; Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Brogt E, Dokter E, Antonellis J, et al. Regulations and ethical considerations for astronomy education research II: resources and worked examples. Astron Edu Rev. 2007;6(2):99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Buxner SR. Exploring the impact of science research experiences for teachers: stories of growth and identity [dissertation]. Tuscon (AZ): The University of Arizona; 2010.
   Google Scholar