Physiotherapy as an academic discipline – from the perspective of Nordic doctoral dissertations

References

• Tammivaara J, Shephard KF. Theory: the guide to clinical practice and research. Phys Ther. 1990;70:578–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller PA, McKibbon K, Haynes A, et al. A quantitative analysis of research publications in physical therapy journals. Phys Ther. 2003;83:123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paci M, Cigna C, Baccini M, et al. Types of article published in physiotherapy journals: a quantitative analysis. Physiother Res Int. 2009;4:203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Costa LO, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, et al. Core journals that publish clinical trials of physical therapy interventions. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1631–1640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannapfel P, Peolsson A, Nilsen P. What supports physiotherapists’ use of research in clinical practice? A qualitative study in Sweden. Implement Sci. 2013;8:31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. Towards evidence-based physiotherapy – research challenges and needs. J Physiother. 2013;59:143–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg C. Om teori- och begreppsutveckling i sjukgymnastik i ett historiskt perspektiv (Theory and concept development in physiotherapy from a historical perspective). Sjukgymnasten – Vetenskapligt Suppl. 1993;1:4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson VJ. Research and the cumulation of knowledge in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1995;75:223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bithell C. Editorial. Developing theory in a practice profession. Physiother Res Int. 2005;10:iii–v.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholls DA, Gibson BE. The body and physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:497–509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wikström-Grotell C, Eriksson K. Movement as a basic concept in physiotherapy – a human science approach. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:428–438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hislop H. Tenth Mary McMillan lecture. The not-so-impossible dream. Phys Ther. 1975;55:1069–1080.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Knecht HG. Movement science and its relevance to physical therapy. Phys Ther. 1990;70:759–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson B. Practice, research and education: what is the link? Physiotherapy. 1993;79:317–322.
   Google Scholar
• Sahrmann SA. The twenty-ninth Mary McMillan lecture: Moving precisely? Or taking the path of least resistance? Phys Ther. 1998;78:1208–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg C, Tyni-Lenné R. Sjukgymnastik som vetenskap och profession (Physiotherapy as a science and a profession). Legitimerade Sjukgymnasters Riksförbund. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sahrmann SA. The human movement system: our professional identity. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1034–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan A. What are academic disciplines? Some observations on the disciplinarity vs interdisciplinarity debate. University of Southampton National Centre for Research Methods. NCRW Working Paper Series 2009; 03/09. [cited 2015 Sep 22]. Available from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/783/1/what_are_academic_disciplines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Grönblom Lundström L. Further arguments in support of a social humanistic perspective in physiotherapy versus the biomedical model. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:393–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw JA, DeForge RT. Physiotherapy as a bricolage: theorizing expert practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28:429–427.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls DA, Atkinson K, Bjorbaekmo WS, et al. Connectivity: an emerging concept for physiotherapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2016;32:159–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyni-Lenné R. To identify the physiotherapy paradigm: a challenge for the future. Physiother Theory Pract. 1989;5:169–170.
   Google Scholar
• Tyni-Lenné R, Barbosa da Silva A. Några vetenskapsteoretiska förutsättningar för sjukgymnastiken som självständig vetenskap och praxis [Some epistemological conditions for physiotherapy as an independent science and practice]. Sjukgymnasten – Vetenskapligt Suppl. 1993;1:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Noronen L, Wikström-Grotell C. Towards a paradigm-oriented approach in physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 1999;15:175–184.
   Google Scholar
• Kerry R, Maddocks M, Mumford S. Philosophy of science and physiotherapy: an insight into practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2008;24:397–407.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing paradigms in qualitative research: theories and issues. In: Nagy Hesse-Biber S, Leavy P, editors. Approaches to qualitative research: a reader on theory and practice. Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Törnebohm H. Program för studier av paradigm (Programs for studying paradigms). Institutionen för vetenskapsteori, Göteborgs Universitet; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Ekdal C, Nilstun T. Paradigms in physiotherapy research: an analysis of 68 Swedish doctoral dissertations. Physiother Theory Pract. 1998;14:159–169.
   Google Scholar
• Karolinska Institutet. Doctoral education at Karolinska Institutet; 2015. [cited 2015 Sep 22]. Available from: http://ki.se/en/education/doctoral-education-at-karolinska-institutet
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Moseley AM, Sherrington C, et al. Description of the trials, reviews and practice guidelines indexed in the PEDro database. Phys Ther. 2008;9:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. International classification of functioning, disability and health. World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivonen K, Kasén A, Eriksson K. Semantic analysis according to Peep Koort: a substance-oriented research methodology. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24:12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer-Somers K. Editorial. Incorporating research evidence into clinical practice decisions. Physiother Res Int. 2007;12:55–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WCPT. Policy statement: Description of physical therapy; 2011. [cited 2015 Sep 22]. Available from: http://www.wcpt.org/sites/wcpt.org/files/files/PS_Description_PT_Sept2011_FORMATTED_edit2013.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein MS, Scalzitti DA, Craik RL, et al. The revised research agenda for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2011;91:165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosberg S. Kropp, varande och mening i ett sjukgymnastiskt perspektiv (Body, being and meaning in a physiotherapeutic perspective). Akademisk avhandling (Academic dissertation). Avdelningen för socialt arbete. Göteborg, Göteborgs universitet; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Skjearven LH, Kristoffersen K, Gard G. How can movement quality be promoted in clinical practice? A phenomenological study of physical therapist experts. Phys Ther. 2010;10:1479–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg C, Aars M, Beckmann K, et al. A conceptual framework for curriculum design in physiotherapy education: an international perspective. Adv Physiother. 2003;5:161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard KF, Jensen GM, Schmoll BJ, et al. Alternative approaches to research in physical therapy: positivism and phenomenology. Phys Ther. 1993;73:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J, Connelly D, Zezevik A. Pragmatism in practice: mixed methods research for physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2010;26:510–518.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Metereen NLU, Helders PJM. Physical therapy: what about basic sciences? Adv Physiother. 2000;2:14–21.
   Google Scholar