Mapping the first decade of circular economy research: a bibliometric network analysis

References

• D’Amato D, Droste N, Allen B, et al.. Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. J Clean Prod. 2017;168:716–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce D, Turner R. Economics of natural resources and the environment. Balt: John Hopkis Univerity Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Murray A, Skene K, Haynes K. The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J Bus Ethics. 2017;140:369–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmykova Y, Sadagopan M, Rosado L. Circular economy–From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools. Resources. Conserv Recycl. 2018;135:190–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr J, Reike D, Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: an analysis of 114 definitions. Resources. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2017;127:221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witjes S, Lozano R. Towards a more circular economy: proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. ResouConserv Recycl. 2016;112:37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winans K, Kendall A, Deng H. The history and current applications of the circular economy concept. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2017;68:825–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merli R, Preziosi M, Acampora A. How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. J Clean Prod. 2018;178:703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homrich A, Galvao G, Abadia L, et al.. The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways. J Clean Prod. 2018;175:525–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commoner B. The closing circle: nature, man, and technology. New York: Dover Publications; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Mollison B, Holmgren D. Permaculture one: A perennial agriculture for human settlements. Tasmania, Australia: Tagari Publications; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Ayres R. Industrial metabolism. In: Ausubel, Jesse, Sladovich, editors. Technology and Environment. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Lyle J. Regenerative design for sustainable development, the wiley series in sustainable design. New York, Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews J, Tan H. Progress toward a circular economy in China: the drivers (and inhibitors) of eco‐industrial initiative. J Ind Ecol. 2011;15:435–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkman S. Industrial ecology: an historical view. J Clean Prod. 1997;5:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Graedel T, Allenby B. Industrial Ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Lovins A, Lovins L, Hawken P. A road map for natural capitalism. Harv Bus Rev. 1999;77:145–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braungart M, McDonough W, Bollinger A. Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions–a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. J Clean Prod. 2007;15:1337–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahel W. The performance economy: business models for the functional service economy. In: Handbook of performability engineering. London: Springer; 2008. p. 127–138.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall W, Geng Y, Huang B, et al.. Circular economy policies in China and Europe. J Ind Ecol. 2017;21:651–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson N, Crang M, Fuller S, et al.. Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Economy Soc. 2015;44:218–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Shi Y, Xia Q, et al.. Effectiveness of the policy of circular economy in China: A DEA-based analysis for the period of 11th five-year-plan. ResouConserv Recycl. 2014;83:163–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deus R, Savietto J, Battistelle R, et al.. Trends in publications on the circular economy. Revista Espacios. 2017;38:20–38.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen J, Nuur C, Feldmann A, et al.. Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. J Clean Prod. 2018b;175:544–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomponi F, Moncaster A. Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. J Clean Prod. 2017;143:710–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken N, et al.. The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. J Clean Prod. 2017;143:757–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J. Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol Econ. 2018a;143:37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobre G, Tavares E. Scientific literature analysis on big data and internet of things applications on circular economy: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2017;111:463–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saidani M, Yannou B, Leroy Y, et al.. A taxonomy of circular economy indicators. J Clean Prod. 2019;207:542–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Real J, Uribe-Toril J, De Pablo Valenciano J, et al.. Worldwide research on circular economy and environment: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luis E, Celma D. Circular economy: A review and bibliometric analysis. Sustainability. 2020;12:6381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saavedra Y, Iritani D, Pavan A, et al.. Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy. J Clean Prod. 2018;170:1514–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türkeli S, Kemp R, Huang B, et al.. Circular economy scientific knowledge in the European Union and China: A bibliometric, network and survey analysis (2006–2016). J Clean Prod. 2018;197:1244–1261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Davis C, Dijkema G. Understanding the evolution of industrial symbiosis research. J Ind Ecol. 2013;18:280–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui T, Zhang J. Bibliometric and review of the research on circular economy through the evolution of Chinese public policy. Scientometrics. 2018;116:1013–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taranic I, Behrens A, Topi C. Understanding the circular economy in Europe, from resource efficiency to sharing platforms: the CEPS framework. CEPS Spec Rep. Brussels. 2016;43: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Hara K, Yabar H, et al.. Comparative analysis of socio-economic and environmental performances for Chinese EIPs: case studies in Baotou, Suzhou, and Shanghai. Sustainability Sci. 2009;4:263–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira Gregorio V, Pié L, Terceño A. A systematic literature review of bio, green and circular economy trends in publications in the field of economics and business management. Sustainability. 2018;10:4232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genovese A, Acquaye A, Figueroa A, et al.. Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications. Omega (Westport). 2017;66:344–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng Y, Zhu Q, Doberstein B, et al.. Implementing China’s circular economy concept at the regional level: A review of progress in Dalian, China. Waste Manage. 2009;29:996–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamba S, Mishra D. Big data integration with business processes: A literature review. Bus Process Manage J. 2017;23:477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Available from: http:www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• van Eck N, Waltman L. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: Ding Y, Rousseau R, Wolfram D, editors. Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. Springer International Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Merediz-Sola I, Bariviera A. A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Res Int Bus Finance. 2019;50:294–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayantha W, Oladinrin O. Knowledge mapping of office workspace: A scientometric review of studies. Facilities. 2019;38:316–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccurullo C, Aria M, Sarto F. Foundations and trends in performance management. A twenty-five years bibliometric analysis in business and public administration domains. Scientometrics. 2016;108(2):595–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zupic I, Cater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Res Methods. 2015;18:429–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleixandre J, Aleixandre-Tudo J, Bolanos-Pizarro M, et al.. Mapping the scientific research in organic farming: A bibliometric review. Scientometrics. 2015;105:295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajiferuke I, Burrel Q, Tague J. Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics. 1988;14:421–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price D, Beaver D. Collaboration in an invisible college. Am Psychologist. 1966;21:1011–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mostafa M. Do consumers recall products’ warning labels? A meta-analysis. Int J Manage Marketing Res. 2016;9:81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafa M. Do products’ warning labels affect consumer safe behavior? A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. J Bus Econ Stud. 2015;22:24–39.
   Google Scholar
• Corte. V, Gaudio G, Sepe F. Ethical food and the Kosher certification: A literature review. Br Food J. 2018;120:2270–2288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aryadoust V, Ang B. Exploring the frontiers of eye tracking research in language studies: A novel co-citation scie Mishra ntometric review. Comput Assisted Lang Learn. 2019;1–36. DOI:10.1080/09588221.2019.1647251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Khalifa H. Scientometric assessment of Saudi publication productivity in computer science in the period of 1978–2012. Int J Web Inf Syst. 2014;10:194–208.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke D, Yang S. Social network analysis. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Khan G, Wood J. Knowledge networks of the information technology management domain: A social network analysis approach. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2016;39:367–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzd A, Wellman B, Takhteyev Y. Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. Am Behav Sci. 2011;55:1294–1318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banckendorff P. Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: A social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994–2007). J Hospitality Tourism Manage. 2009;16:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorland B. Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Inf Process Manage. 2013;49:1313–1325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiau W, Dwivedi Y, Yang H. Co-citation and cluster analysis of extant literature on social networks. Inter J Inf Manage. 2017;37:390–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Li G, Li C, et al.. Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value. Scientometrics. 2015;105:1319–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Yin J, Wu B. Climate change and tourism: A scientometric analysis using CiteSpace. J Sustainable Tourism. 2018;26:108–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Han R, Wolfram D, et al.. Visualizing the intellectual structure of information science (2006–2015): introducing author-keyword coupling analysis. J Informetrics. 2016;10:132–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Lim M, Zhao L, et al.. The evolution of omega-the international journal of management science over the past 40 years: A bibliometric overview. Omega (Westport). 2020;93:102098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Liu Y. Visualization analysis of high-speed railway research based on CiteSpace. Transp Policy. 2020;85:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield R. Networks of accounting research: A citation-based structural and network analysis. Br Accounting Rev. 2008;40:228–244.
   Google Scholar
• Zou X, Yue W, Vu H. Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;118:131–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glänzel W, Schubert A. Analyzing scientific networks through co-authorship. In: Moed H, Glanzel W, Schmoch U, editors. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: the use of publication and patent statistics in studies of sandT systems. Springer: Dordrecht; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ding Y. Scientific collaboration and endorsement: network analysis of co-authorship and citation networks. J Informetrics. 2011;5:187–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Space D, Owens K. Lexical co-occurrence and association strength. J Psycholinguist Res. 1990;19:317–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law J, Bauin S, Courtial J, et al.. Policy and the mapping of scientific change: A co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics. 1988;14:251–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzales-Valiente C. Redes de citación de revistas iberoamericanas de bibliotecología y ciencia de la información en Scopus. Bibliotecas Anales De Investigación. 2019;15:83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Callon M, Courtial J, Laville F. Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics. 1991;22:155–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ávila-Robinson A, Wakabayashi N. Changes in the structures and directions of destination management and marketing research: A bibliometric mapping study, 2005–2016. J Destination Marketing Manage. 2018;10:101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khasseh A, Soheili F, Moghaddam N, et al.. Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrivs: A co-word analysis. Inf Process Manage. 2017;53:705–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Chen T. Revealing research themes and trends in knowledge management: from 1995 to 2010. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2012;28:47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong Q, Shen H, Yuan Q, et al.. Doctoral dissertations of library and information science in China: A co-word analysis. Scientometrics. 2013;94:781–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzstein A, Feisel E, Hartmann E, et al.. Uncovering the supplier selection knowledge structure: A systematic citation network analysis from 1991 to 2017. J Purchasing Supply Manage. 2019;25:100519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo M, Lopez-Herrera A, Herrera-Viedma E, et al.. Science mapping software tools: review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011b;62:1382–1402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Chen C. A scientometric review of emerging trends and new developments in recommendation systems. Scientometrics. 2015;104:239–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Li X, Campbell R, et al.. Visualizing the hotspots and emerging trends of 3D printing through scientomerics. Rapid Prototyping J. 2018;24(801–812):2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM; 2002. p. 91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg J. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery. 2003;7:373–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. J Inf Sci. 2004;30:119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strozzi F, Colicchia C, Creazza A, et al.. Literature review on the ‘Smart Factory’ concept using bibliometric tools. Int J P Res. 2017;55:6572–6591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Chen H, Hong R, et al.. Mapping knowledge structure and research trends of emergency evacuation studies. Saf Sci. 2020;121:348–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar H, Dora M. Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations at IIMA: A review of the local use of journals. Lib Collect Acquisit Tech Serv. 2011;35:32–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford S. Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering. 1934;137:85–86.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon C, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1949.
   Google Scholar
• Lotka AJ. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. J Washington Acad Sci. 1926;16:317–323.
   Google Scholar
• Corbet S, Dowling M, Gao X, et al.. An analysis of the intellectual structure of research on financial economics of precious metals. Resour Policy. 2019;63:101416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talukdar D. Research productivity patterns in the organizational behavior and human resource management literature. Int J Human Resour Manage. 2015;26:467–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun-Hao C, Jian-Min Y. A bibliometric study of financial risk literature: A historic approach. Appl Econ. 2012;44:2827–2839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira F, Brito C. Science mapping in industrial marketing. J Business Indus Market. 2015;16:5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin B. The need for a theory of citing. J Doc. 1981;37:16–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield E. Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Vol. 8, New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Adams W, Lind Infeld D, Wikrent K, et al.. Network bibliometrics of public policy journals. Policy Stud J. 2016;44:S133–S151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Strotmann A. Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Synth Lect Inf Concepts Retrieval Serv. 2015;7:1–207.
   Google Scholar
• Pieters R, Baumgartner H. Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals. J Econ Lit. 2002;40:483–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff L. Theories of citation?. Scientometrics. 1998;43:5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doreian P. Measuring the relative standing of disciplinary journals. Inf Process Manage. 1988;24:45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe R, Berthon P, Pitt L, et al.. Analysing ‘theory networks’: identifying the pivotal theories in marketing and their characteristics. J Marketing Manag. 2007;23:181–206.
   Google Scholar
• Pasadeos Y, Phelps J, Kim B. Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. J Advertising. 1998;27:53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva S, Antonio N, Carvalho J. Analysis of the service dominant logic network, authors, and articles. Serv Indust J. 2017;37:125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Bowen W, Steinbacher R. Social and demographic dimensions of sex selection technologies: review and analysis of the research literature. Biodemography Soc Biol. 2012;58:62–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekmann F, Ford R, Harisson S, et al.. Bibliometric analysis of the literature on Giant Ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.). J Agricult Food Informat. 2013;14:290–320.
   Google Scholar
• Lin J, Himelboim I. Political brand communities as social network clusters: winning and training candidates in the GOP 2016 primary elections. J Polit Market. 2018;16:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bakshy E, Hofman J, Mason W, et al. Everyone’s an influencer. In I. King, W. Nejdl, and H. Li (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining – WSDM’11, New York: ACM Press; 2011. p. 65.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook J. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu Rev Sociol. 2001;27:415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findlay K, van Rensburg O. Using interaction networks to map communities on Twitter. Int J Market Res. 2018;60:169–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Ritchie B, Benckendorff P. Bibliometric visualization: an application to tourism crisis and disaster research. Curr Issues Tourism. 2019;22:1925–1957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt R. Structural holes. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite C. Social network analysis: an approach and technique for the study of information exchange. Library Inf Sci Res. 1996;18:323–342.
   Google Scholar
• Burt R. The social capital of opinion leaders. ANNALS Am Acad Political Social Sci. 1999;566:37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glötzl F, Aigner E. Orthodox core-heterodox periphery? Contrasting citation networks of economics departments in Vienna. RevPolitical Econ. 2018;30:210–240.
   Google Scholar
• Khan G, Sarstedt M, Shiau W, et al.. Methodological research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an analysis based on social network approaches. Internet Res. 2019;29:407–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trier M, Molka-Danielsen J. Sympathy or strategy: social capital drivers for collaborative contributions to the IS community. Eur J Inf Syst. 2013;22:317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidgen R, Henneberg S, Naude P. What sort of community is the European conference on information systems? A social network analysis 1993–2005. Eur J Inf Syst. 2007;22:317–335.
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Song I, Yuan X, et al.. The thematic and citation landscape of data and knowledge engineering (1985–2007). Data Knowledge Eng. 2008;67:234–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su H, Lee P. Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: A first look at journal papers in technology foresight. Scientometrics. 2010;85:65–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Dublin R, Kim M. Orphan drugs and rare diseases: A scientometric review (2000–2014). Expert Opin Orphan Drugs. 2014;2:709–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Hu Z, Liu S, et al.. “Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace,”. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12:593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian J, Law R, Wei J. Knowledge mapping in travel website studies: A scientometric review. Scand J Hospitality Tourism. 2019;19:192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colicchia C, Creazza A, Noe C, et al.. Information sharing in supply chains: A review of risks and opportunities using the systematic literature network analysis (SLNA). Supply Chain Manage. 2019;24:5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankey H. Introductory note on the thermal efficiency of stream-engines. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers; 1898. p. 278–283.
   Google Scholar
• Soundararajan K, Ho H, Su B. Sankey diagram framework for energy and exergy flows. Appl Energy. 2014;136:1035–1042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neff M, Corley E. 35 years and 160,000 articles: A bibliometric exploration of the evolution of ecology. Scientometrics. 2009;80:657–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiroz F, Haase T. The concept of resilience: A bibliographic analysis of the emergency and disaster management literature. Local Govern Stud. 2019;45:308–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles M, Gruenes J, Morscheck G. Waste management in Germany–development to a sustainable circular economy?. Procedia Environ Sci. 2016;35:6–14.
   Google Scholar
• Niero M, Hauschild MZ. Closing the loop for packaging: finding a framework to operationalize Circular Economy strategies. Procedia Cirp. 2017;61:685–690.
   Google Scholar
• Bernon M, Tjahjono B, Ripanti E. Aligning retail reverse logistics practice with circular economy values: an exploratory framework. Prod Plann Control. 2018;29:483–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo M, Lopez-Herrera A, Herrera-Viedma E, et al.. An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Informetrics. 2011a;5:146–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoff R, Del Rio J, Humenik J, et al.. Citation mining: integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2001;52:1148–1156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima S, Carlos Filho F. Bibliometric analysis of scientific production on sharing economy. Revista De Gestão. 2019;26:237–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wastling T, Charnley F, Moreno M. Design for circular behavior: considering users in a circular economy. Sustainability. 2018;10:1743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar