Variability propagation in manufacturing systems: the impact of the processing time distribution

References

• Romero-Silva R, Marsillac E, Shaaban S, et al. Serial production line performance under random variation: dealing with the ‘law of variability’. J Manuf Syst. 2019b;50:278–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiacci L. Mixed-model u-shaped assembly lines: balancing and comparing with straight lines with buffers and parallel workstations. J Manuf Syst. 2017;45:286–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil RA, Stockton DJ, Fresco JA. Predicting the effects of common levels of variability on flow processing systems. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 2008;21(3):325–336. doi: 10.1080/09511920701233472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor G, Heragu S. A comparison of mean reduction versus variance reduction in processing times in flow shops. Int J P Res. 1999;37(9):1919–1934. doi: 10.1080/002075499190833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roda I, Macchi M. Factory-level performance evaluation of buffered multi-state production systems. J Manuf Syst. 2019;50:226–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battesini M, ten Caten CS, de Jesus Pacheco DA. Key factors for operational performance in manufacturing systems: conceptual model, systematic literature review and implications. J Manuf Syst. 2021;60:265–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav A, Jayswal S. Modelling of flexible manufacturing system: a review. Int J P Res. 2018;56(7):2464–2487. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1387302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortolini M, Galizia FG, Mora C. Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: literature review and research trend. J Manuf Syst. 2018;49:93–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik AA, Masood T, Kousar R. Reconfiguring and ramping-up ventilator production in the face of covid-19: can robots help? J Manuf Syst. 2021;60:864–875. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman RR. Empirical evaluation of exponential and independence assumptions in queueing models of manufacturing systems. Prod Oper Manage. 1999;8(4):409–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1999.tb00316.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Yao DD. Fundamentals of queueing networks: performance, asymptotics, and optimization. Vol. 4. New York: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan J, Halton M, Qiao Y, et al. Industry 4.0 smart reconfigurable manufacturing machines. J Manuf Syst. 2021;59:481–506. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Huang H, Li J. Transients in flexible manufacturing systems with setups and batch operations: modeling, analysis, and design. IISE Transactions2021. 2021;53(5):523–540. doi: 10.1080/24725854.2020.1766728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry GL, Feldman RM. Manufacturing systems modeling and analysis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasov VN. Analysis of queues with hyperexponential arrival distributions. Problems Of Information Transmission. 2016;52(1):14–23. doi: 10.1134/S0032946016010038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross D, Juttijudata M. Sensitivity of output performance measures to input distributions in queueing simulation modeling. In: Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation; Atlanta, Georgia (USA). 1997. p. 296–302.
   Google Scholar
• Felsberger A, Qaiser FH, Choudhary A, et al. The impact of industry 4.0 on the reconciliation of dynamic capabilities: evidence from the european manufacturing industries. Prod Plann Control. 2022;33(2–3):277–300. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2020.1810765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo TC, Hsu NY, Li TY, et al. Industry 4.0 enabling manufacturing competitiveness: delivery performance improvement based on theory of constraints. J Manuf Syst. 2021;60:152–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanchettin AM. Robust scheduling and dispatching rules for highmix collaborative manufacturing systems. Flex Serv Manuf J. 2022;34(2):293–316. doi: 10.1007/s10696-021-09406-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Lu Y, Vogel-Heuser B, et al. Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0—inception, conception and perception. J Manuf Syst. 2021;61:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddikunta PKR, Pham QV, Prabadevi B, et al. Industry 5.0: a survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. J Ind Inf Integr. 2022;26:100257. doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Zheng H, Chand S, et al. Outlook on human-centric manufacturing towards industry 5.0. J Manuf Syst. 2022;62:612–627. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coito T, Martins MS, Firme B, et al. Assessing the impact of automation in pharmaceutical quality control labs using a digital twin. J Manuf Syst. 2022;62:270–285. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu K, Srivathsan S, Shen Y. Three-moment approximation for the mean queue time of a gi/g/1 queue. IISE Trans. 2018;50(2):63–73. doi: 10.1080/24725854.2017.1357216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanthikumar J, Buzacott J. On the approximations to the single server queue. Int J P Res. 1980;18(6):761–773. doi: 10.1080/00207548008919705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myskja A. On approximations for the gi/gi/1 queue. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 1990;20(1–5):285–295. doi: 10.1016/0169-7552(90)90037-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan B. An analytical formula for variance of output from a series parallel production system with no interstation buffers and time-dependent failures. MathComput Modell. 1998;27(6):95–112. doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(98)00031-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MA, Taaffe MR. An investigation of phase-distribution moment-matching algorithms for use in queueing models. Queueing Syst. 1991b;8(1):129–147. doi: 10.1007/BF02412246
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MA. An empirical study of queueing approximations based on phase-type distributions Communications In Statistics. Stochastic Mod. 1993;9(4):531–561. doi: 10.1080/15326349308807280
   Google Scholar
• Sahin I, Perrakis S. Moment inequalities for a class of single server queues. INFOR. 1976;14(2):144–152. doi: 10.1080/03155986.1976.11731634
   Google Scholar
• Brandwajn A, Begin T. A note on the effects of service time distribution in the m/g/1 queue. In: Computer Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: SPEC Benchmark Workshop 2009. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. pp. 138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MA, Taaffe MR. A graphical investigation of error bounds for moment-based queueing approximations. Queueing Syst. 1991a;8(1):295–312. doi: 10.1007/BF02412257
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks KB, McClain JO. The output process of serial production lines of general machines with finite buffers. Manage Sci. 1993;39(10):1194–1201. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell S, Pyke D. An empirical investigation of the two-moment approximation for production lines. Int J P Res. 1994;32(5):1137–1157. doi: 10.1080/00207549408956992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LAUf HS, Martin G. The effects of skewness and kurtosis of processing times in unpaced lines. Int J P Res. 1987;25(10):1483–1492. doi: 10.1080/00207548708919927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Silva R, Marsillac E, Shaaban S, et al. Reducing the variability of inter-departure times of a single-server queueing system–the effects of skewness. Computers & Ind Eng 2019a. 2019;135:500–517. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp W, Spearman ML. Factory physics. 3 ed. Maidenhead, England: McGraw Hill Higher Education; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Silva R, Shaaban S, Marsillac E, et al. Studying the effects of the skewness of inter-arrival and service times on the probability distribution of waiting times. Pesquisa Operacional. 2020;40:40. doi: 10.1590/0101-7438.2020.040.00223190
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan TS. In search of the memoryless property. In: 2008 Winter Simulation Conference; Miami, Florida (USA). IEEE; 2008. p. 2572–2576.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier M. Designing unpaced production lines to optimize throughput and work-in-process inventory. IIE Trans. 2013;45(5):516–527. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2012.706733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabuncuoglu I, Erel E, Gurhan Kok A. Analysis of assembly systems for interdeparture time variability and throughput. IIE Trans. 2002;34(1):23–40. doi: 10.1080/07408170208928847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack N. Work–time distributions. Wiley Encyclopedia Of Oper Manage. 2015;10:1–1. doi: 10.1002/9781118785317.weom100178
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez CEP, de Souza GFM. Reliability concepts applied to cutting tool change time. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2010;95(8):866–873. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vineyard M, Amoako-Gyampah K, Meredith JR. Failure rate distributions for flexible manufacturing systems: an empirical study. Eur J Oper Res. 1999;116(1):139–155. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb DJ, Silver EA. Scheduling in a management context: uncertain processing times and non-regular performance measures. Decis Sci. 1993;24(6):1085–1108. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00505.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad D, Jayswal S. Assessment of a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Benchmarking: Int J. 2019;28(5):1558–1575. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-06-2018-0147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz CAB, Aslam T, Ng AH. Optimizing reconfigurable manufacturing systems for fluctuating production volumes: a simulation-based multi-objective approach. IEEE Access. 2021;9:144195–144210. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3122239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbasi M, Houshmand M. Production planning and performance optimization of reconfigurable manufacturing systems using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;54(1–4):373–392. doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2914-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara S, Kayis B. Manufacturing flexibility and variability: an overview. J Manuf Technol Manage. 2004;15(6):466–478. doi: 10.1108/17410380410547870
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Shen ZJM. Fast algorithm for predicting the production process performance in flexible production lines with delayed differentiation. IISE Trans. 2022:1–23. doi: 10.1080/24725854.2022.2126564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arteaga A, Calvo R. Influence of product variety on work allocation and server distribution of flexible manufacturing lines. In: 9th Manufacturing Engineering Society International Conference (MESIC 2021); Gijόn, Spain. IOP Publishing; 2021. p. 012046. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1193/1/012046
   Google Scholar
• El-Khalil R, Darwish Z. Flexible manufacturing systems performance in us automotive manufacturing plants: a case study. Prod Plann Control. 2019;30:48–59. doi: 10.1080/09537287.2018.1520318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar