Narrow band CE-Chirp stimulus in auditory steady state response threshold estimation in normal hearers and patients with various degrees of sensorineural hearing loss

References

• Lin Y, Ho H, Wu H. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36:140–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venail F, Artaud JP, Blanchet C, et al. Refining the audiological assessment in children using narrow-band CE-Chirp-evoked auditory steady state responses. Int J Audiol. 2015;54:106–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühler R, Mentzel K, Verhey J. Fast hearing-threshold estimation using multiple auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns. Sci World J. 2012;2012:92178.
   Google Scholar
• Elberling C, Don M, Cebulla M, et al. Auditory steady-state responses to chirp stimuli based on cochlear traveling wave delay A. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;122:2772–2785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Ahn S, Lee H, et al. Narrow band CE-Chirp auditory steady-state response is more reliable than the conventional ASSR in predicting the behavioral hearing threshold. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016;43:259–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J. Uses and abuses of hearing loss classification. ASHA. 1981;23:493–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soliman S. Speech discrimination audiometry using Arabic phonetically balanced words. Ain Shams Med J. 1976;27:27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman S, FathAllah A, Shehata W. Development of the Arabic Staggered Spondaic Words (SSW) test. Proceedings of the 8th Ain Shams Medical Congress; 1985. p. 1220–1246.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel D, Flemming T, Park J, et al. Hearing threshold estimation by auditory steady-state responses with narrow-band chirps and adaptive stimulus patterns: implementation in clinical routine. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272:51–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu WC, Wu HP, Liu TC. Objective assessment of auditory thresholds in noise induced hearing loss using steady state evoked potentials. Clin Otolaryngol. 2003;28:195–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M, Purcell D, Dimitrijevic A, et al. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13:246–259.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M, Savio G, Torres A, et al. Steady state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: an optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear. 2001;22:200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A, Stapells D. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:237–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’haenens W, Dhooge I, Maes L, et al. The clinical value of the multiple-frequency 80-Hz auditory steady-state response in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;135:496–506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A, John M, Van Roon P, et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 2002;13:205–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O, Picton T, Boucher B, et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear. 1996;17:81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G, Rickards F, Cohen L, et al. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear. 1995;16:499–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G, Briggs R. Assessment of hearing in infants with moderate to profound impairment: the Melbourne experience with auditory steady-state evoked potential testing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(5-Suppl):22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komazec Z, Lemajić-Komazec S, Jović R, et al. Comparison between auditory steady-state responses and pure-tone audiometry. VSP. 2010;67:761–765.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseinabadi R, Jafarzadeh S. Auditory steady-state response thresholds in adults with conductive and mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17:e18029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey KA, Small SA. Comparisons of auditory steady state response and behavioral air conduction and bone conduction thresholds for infants and adults with normal hearing. Ear Hear. 2014;35:423–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlumak AI, Rubinstein E, Durrant JD. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Int J Audiol. 2007;46:692–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida I, Cuthbert B, Stapells D. Multiple auditory steady state response thresholds to bone conduction stimuli in adults with normal and elevated thresholds. Ear Hear. 2011;32:373–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M, Brown D, Muir P, et al. Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear. 2004;25:539–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korczak P, Smart J, Delgado R, et al. Auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23:146–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen A, Stapells D. Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol. 2005;44:613–624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachowska M, Bohórquez J, Özdamar Ö. Simultaneous acquisition of 80 Hz ASSRs and ABRs from quasi ASSRs for threshold estimation. Ear Hear. 2012;33:660–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachowska M, Bohórquez J, Özdamar Ö, et al. Estimating audiometric thresholds using simultaneous acquisition of ASSR and ABR from QASSR in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2016;55:748–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck R, Ramos B, Grasel S, et al. Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:35–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannoum T, El-Khousht M, El-Abd S, et al. Comparison of auditory steady state response among normal hearers and patients with different degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Med J Cairo Univ 2008;76:349–358.
   Google Scholar
• Scherf F, Brokx J, Wuyts F, et al. The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. Int J Audiol. 2006;45:281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canale A, Lacilla M, Cavalot AL, et al. Auditory steady-state responses and clinical applications. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;263:499–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel D, Erasmus H. Auditory steady-state responses for estimating moderate hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:755–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn J, Lee H, Kim Y, et al. Comparing pure-tone audiometry and auditory steady state response for the measurement of hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:966–971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdek A, Karacay M, Saylam G, et al. Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;267:43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlin D, Rance G, Graydon K, et al. A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects. Int J Audiol. 2006;45:580–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar