References
- Gantz B, Hansen M, Turner C, et al. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiol Neurotol. 2009;14:32–38.
- Gantz B, Turner C, Gfeller K. Acoustic plus electric speech processing: preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/nucleus hybrid implant. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11:63–68.
- Dorman MF, Gifford RH, Spahr AJ, et al. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurotol. 2008;13:105–112.
- Cantore I, Della Volpe A, Nolè G, et al. First cochlear hybrid implants experience in southern Italy. Results and outcomes. Abstract book. 12th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory Technologies. Baltimore, USA; 2012.
- Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, et al. European multi-centre study of the nucleus hybrid L24 cochlear implant. Int J Audiol. 2013;52:838–848.
- Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, et al. Residual hearing thresholds in cochlear implantation and reimplantation. Audiol Neurotol. 2007;12:165–169.
- Roland JT, Jr, Zeitler DM, Jethanamest D, et al. Evaluation of the short hybrid electrode in human temporal bones. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29:482–488.
- Turner CW. Hearing loss and the limits of amplification. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11:2–5.
- Gfeller KE, Christ A, Knutson JF, et al. The musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:390–406.
- Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Turner C, et al. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11:12–15.
- Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J, et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear. 2007;28:412–423.
- Gfeller K, Jiang D, Oleson JJ, et al. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2010;21:28–34.
- Di Nardo W, Scorpecci A, Giannantonio S, et al. Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;268:27–39.
- Cantore I, De Nicola C, Santandrea A, et al. Performance differences with complex tests in noise between electroacoustic and electric alone cochlear stimulation. A pilot study. Hearing Balance Communic. 2016;14:194–200.
- Stickney GS, Zeng F-G, Litovsky R, et al. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;115:1729–1735.
- Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, et al. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:1150–1163.
- Henry BA, Turner CW, Behrens A. Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired and cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;118:1111–1121.
- Di Nardo W, Cantore I, Marchese MR, et al. Electric to acoustic pitch matching: a possible way to improve individual cochlear implant fitting. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265:1321–1328.
- Qin MK, Oxenham AJ. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;114:446–454.
- Woodson EA, Reiss LA, Turner CW, et al. The Hybrid cochlear implant: a review. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;67:125–134.
- Golub JS, Won JH, Drennan WR, et al. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:147–153.