‘Musical effort’ and ‘musical pleasantness’: a pilot study on the neurophysiological correlates of classical music listening in adults normal hearing and unilateral cochlear implant users

References

• Sacks O. The power of music. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 10):2528–2532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns L, Mürbe D, Hahne A. Understanding music with cochlear implants. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitani C, Nakata T, Trehub SE, et al. Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007;28(2 Suppl):29S–33S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon RV. Speech and music have different requirements for spectral resolution. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;70:121–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin III, JJ, Fu QJ, Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear. 2007;28(3):302–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BS, Dorman MF. Cochlear implants: current designs and future possibilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):695–730.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisvert I, Reis M, Au A, et al. Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: a scoping review. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DR, Shannon RV. Beyond cochlear implants: awakening the deafened brain. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(6):686–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debruyne JA, Janssen AM, Brokx JP. Systematic review on late cochlear implantation in early-deafened adults and adolescents: clinical effectiveness. Ear Hear. 2020;41(6):1417–1430.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Looi V, Gfeller K, Driscoll VD. Music appreciation and training for cochlear implant recipients: a review. Semin Hear. 2012;33(4):307–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, et al. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11(7):390–406.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif. 2004;8(2):49–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veekmans K, Ressel L, Mueller J, et al. Comparison of music perception in bilateral and unilateral cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects. Audiol Neurootol. 2009;14(5):315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran M, Rousset A, Looi V. Music appreciation and music listening in prelingual and postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol. 2016;4:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly PJ, Limb CJ. Music perception in cochlear implant users. Cochlear Implants: Principles Prac. 2009;2:223.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M, et al. Recognition of “real-world” musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hearing. 2005;26(3):237–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambert-Dahan E, Giraud AL, Sterkers O, et al. Judgment of musical emotions after cochlear implantation in adults with progressive deafness. Front Psychol. 2015;6:181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faulkner KF, Pisoni DB. Some observations about cochlear implants: challenges and future directions. Neurosci Discov. 2013;1(1):9.
   Google Scholar
• Salimpoor VN, Benovoy M, Longo G, et al. The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal. PLoS One. 2009;4(10):e7487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nummenmaa L, Putkinen V, Sams M. Social pleasures of music. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021;39:196–202.
   Google Scholar
• Wright R, Uchanski RM. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening. J Am Acad Audiol. 2012;23(5):350–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT. Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(5):779–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Alessandro HD, Ballantyne D, Portanova G, et al. 2021. Temporal coding and music perception in bimodal listeners. Auris Nasus Larynx. Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(7 Pt 1):634–640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulte E, Kerber M. Music perception with the MED-EL implants. In: Hochmair-Desoyer LJ, Hochmair EC, editors. Advances in cochlear implants. Vienna: Menz; 1994. p. 326–332.
   Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, et al. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;9(1):1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGarrigle R, Munro KJ, Dawes P, et al. Listening effort and fatigue: what exactly are we measuring? A british society of audiology cognition in hearing special interest group ‘white paper. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(7):433–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller PE. Attentional resource allocation in musical ensemble performance. Psychol. Music. 2001;29(1):20–38.
   Google Scholar
• Shenhav A, Musslick S, Falk F, et al. Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017;40:99–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endestad T, Godøy RI, Sneve MH, et al. Mental effort when playing, listening, and imagining music in one pianist’s eyes and brain. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:576888.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Noble W. The speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004;43:85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby BW. The effects of hearing-aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands. Ear Hear. 2013;34(5):523–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild CJ, Yusuf A, Wilson DE, et al. Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention. J Neurosci. 2012;32(40):14010–14021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartocci G, Maglione AG, Rossi D, et al. Alpha and theta EEG variations as indices of listening effort to be implemented in neurofeedback among cochlear implant users. In: International workshop on symbiotic interaction. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 30–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cartocci G, Scorpecci A, Borghini G, et al. EEG rhythms lateralization patterns in children with unilateral hearing loss are different from the patterns of normal hearing controls during speech-in-noise listening. Hear Res. 2019;379:31–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kang R, Nimmons GL, Drennan W, et al. Development and validation of the university of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test. Ear Hear. 2009;30(4):411–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nimmons GL, Kang RS, Drennan WR, et al. Clinical assessment of music perception in cochlear implant listeners. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(2):149–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnupp J, Nelken I, King A. 2011. Auditory neuroscience: Making sense of sound. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gevins A. High resolution EEG. Brain Topogr. 1993;5(4):321–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Im C-H. Computational EEG analysis. Singapore: Springer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Turrini M, Cutugno F, Maturi P, et al. Bisyllabic words for speech audiometry: a new italian material. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1993;13(1):63–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peretz I, Gagnon L, Bouchard B. Music and emotion: perceptual determinants, immediacy, and isolation after brain damage. Cognition. 1998;68(2):111–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalfa S, Roy M, Rainville P, et al. Role of tempo entrainment in psychophysiological differentiation of happy and sad music? Int J Psychophysiol. 2008;68(1):17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalla Bella S, Peretz I, Rousseau L, et al. A developmental study of the affective value of tempo and mode in music. Cognition. 2001;80(3):B1–B10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K, Witt S, Mehr MA, et al. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111(4):349–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino F, Gheller F, Favaretto N, et al. Music perception in adult patients with cochlear implant. Hear Balance Commun. 2020;18(1):3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini P, Dincer D’Alessandro H, Portanova G, et al. Bimodal cochlear implantation in elderly patients. Inter J Audiol. 2020;60(6):469–478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campbell J, Sharma A. Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopyan T, Manno III FA, Papsin BC, Gordon KA. Sad and happy emotion discrimination in music by children with cochlear implants. Child Neuropsychol, 2016;22(3):366–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper HH. The 10/20 international electrode system, EEG. Clin Neurophysiology. 1985;10:371–375. 
   Google Scholar
• Di Flumeri G, Aricò P, Borghini G, et al. A new regression-based method for the eye blinks artifacts correction in the EEG signal, without using any EOG channel. In: 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). Presented at the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2016, 3187–e3190..
   Google Scholar
• Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134(1):9–21..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aricò P, Borghini G, Di Flumeri GD, et al. Passive BCI in operational environments: insights, recent advances, and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2017;64(7):1431–1436..
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghini G, Aricò P, Di Flumeri G, et al. EEG-based cognitive control behaviour assessment: an ecological study with professional air traffic controllers. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1).
   Google Scholar
• Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999;29(2-3):169–e195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglione A, Borghini G, Aricò P, et al. Evaluation of the workload and drowsiness during car driving by using high resolution EEG activity and neurophysiologic indices. In 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014, 6238–6241. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cartocci G, Maglione AG, Vecchiato G, et al. Mental workload estimations in unilateral deafened children. In 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) 2015, 1654–1657. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Sciaraffa N, Liu J, Aricò P, et al. Multivariate model for cooperation: bridging social physiological compliance and hyperscanning. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021;16(1-2):193–209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidson RJ, Ekman P, Saron CD, et al. Approach-withdrawal and cerebral asymmetry: emotional expression and brain physiology: I. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58(2):330–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson JR. What does the prefrontal cortex “do” in affect: perspectives on frontal EEG asymmetry research. Biol Psychol. 2004;67(1-2):219–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartocci G, Modica E, Rossi D, et al. Antismoking campaigns’ perception and gender differences: a comparison among EEG indices. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2019;2019:7348795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cartocci G, Modica E, Rossi D, et al. Neurophysiological measures of the perception of antismoking public service announcements among young population. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Modica E, Rossi D, Cartocci G, et al. Neurophysiological profile of antismoking campaigns. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2018;2018:9721561.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inguscio BM, Cartocci G, Modica E, et al. Smoke signals: a study of the neurophysiological reaction of smokers and non-smokers to smoking cues inserted into antismoking public service announcements. Int J Psychophysiol. 2021;167:22–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalton BH, Behm DG. Effects of noise and music on human and task performance: a systematic review. OER. 2008;7(3):143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Cockerton T, Moore S, Norman D. Cognitive test performance and background music. Percept Mot Skills. 1997;85(3 Pt 2):1435–1438.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison DW, Kelly PL. Age differences in cardiovascular and cognitive performance under noise conditions, perceptual and motor skills. Effects Noise Music Hum Task Perform System Rev. 1989;(16):547–554. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234654021_Effects_of_noise_and_music_on_human_and_task_performance_A_systematic_review
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund G, Sikström S, Smart A. Listen to the noise: noise is beneficial for cognitive performance in ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48(8):840–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng FG, Fu QJ, Morse R. Human hearing enhanced by noise. Brain Res. 2000;869(1-2):251–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M, Robert ME. Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2001;2(2):159–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiam NT, Caldwell M, Deroche ML, et al. Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2017;352:30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee M, Zion DJ, Deroche ML, et al. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers. Hear Res. 2015;322:151–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House D. Perception and production of mood in speech by cochlear implant users. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 1994, 2051–2054. Online archive of International Speech Communication Association/
   Google Scholar
• Fritz T, Jentschke S, Gosselin N, et al. Universal recognition of three basic emotions in music. Curr Biol. 2009;19(7):573–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer C, Hutchins S. What is musical prosody? Psychol Learn Motivat. 2006;46:245–278.
   Google Scholar
• Winn MB, Nelson PB. 2021. Cochlear implants. In: Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics. Available from: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.893
   Google Scholar
• Limb CJ, Roy AT. Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2014;308:13–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler DM, Ananthakrishnan S, Smith SB, et al. Frequency following response and speech recognition benefit for combining a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid. Trends Hear. 2020;24:2331216520902001.
   Google Scholar
• Trehub SE, Vongpaisal T, Nakata T. Music in the lives of deaf children with cochlear implants. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1169(1):534–542.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalathottukaren RT, Purdy SC, Ballard E. Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants. Int J Audiol. 2015;54(7):444–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirvani S, Jafari Z, Motasaddi Zarandi M, et al. Emotional perception of music in children with bimodal fitting and unilateral cochlear implant. Annals of otology. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016;125(6):470–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cartocci G, Maglione AG, Vecchiato G, et al. Frontal brain asymmetries as effective parameters to assess the quality of audiovisual stimuli perception in adult and young cochlear implant users. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2018;38(4):346.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vecchiato G, Maglione AG, Scorpecci A, et al. EEG frontal asymmetry related to pleasantness of music perception in healthy children and cochlear implanted users. In 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2012, 4740–4743. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlberg G, Spitzer JB, Mancuso D, et al. Does cochlear implantation restore music appreciation? Laryngoscope. 2014;124(3):587–588.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar