Comparison of quick speech-in-noise test and pure tone audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss

References

• Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, et al. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(6):446–458. doi:10.1002/ajim.20223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I, Brug J, Hosli EJ, et al. MP3 players and hearing loss: adolescents’ perceptions of loud music and hearing conservation. J Pediatr. 2008;152(3):400–404. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.07.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel I, Brug J, van der Ploeg CP, et al. Strategies for the prevention of MP3-induced hearing loss among adolescents: expert opinions from a delphi study. Pediatrics. 2009;123(5):1257–1262. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-2291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits C, Kapteyn TS, Houtgast T. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol. 2004;43(1):15–28. doi:10.1080/14992020400050004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa EA. Brazilian portuguese speech material and its application in occupational audiology. Audiology. 2001;40(3):123–132. doi:10.3109/00206090109073107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koopman J, Davey E, Thomas N, et al. How should hearing screening tests be offered? Int J Audiol. 2008;47(5):230–237. doi:10.1080/14992020801908236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen E, Helleman H, Dreschler W, et al. Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(2):153–164. doi:10.1007/s00420-008-0317-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen MC, Dreschler WA. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(7):455–465. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.790565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DR, Edmondson-Jones M, Dawes P, et al. Relation between speech-in-noise threshold, hearing loss and cognition from 40–69 years of age. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S, Luts H, Dejonckere P, et al. Exploring the sensitivity of speech-in-noise tests for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2014;53(3):199–205. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.849361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen MC, de Laat JA, Snik AF, et al. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss. Int J Audiol. 2011;50(11):835–848. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.595017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leensen MC, Dreschler WA. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 3: test sensitivity for uncontrolled parameters in domestic usage. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(10):658–669. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.803610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH, Burks CA. Use of 35 words for evaluation of hearing loss in signal-to-babble ratio: a clinic protocol. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(6):839–852. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.01.0009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH, Carnell CS, Cleghorn AL. The words-in-Noise (WIN) test with multitalker babble and speech-spectrum noise maskers. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007;18(6):522–529. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.6.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;95(2):1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, et al. Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2004;116(4 Pt 1):2395–2405. doi:10.1121/1.1784440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL. An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50(4):844–856. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan KR, Aarts NL. A comparison of the HINT and quick SIN tests. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol. 2006;30(2):86.
   Google Scholar
• Hope A, Luxon L, Bamiou D. Effects of chronic noise exposure on speech-in-noise perception in the presence of normal audiometry. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127(3):233–238. doi:10.1017/S002221511200299X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbab H, Moossavi A, Javanbakht M, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of persian version of the quick speech in noise test in persian speaking 18-25 years old normal adults. J Rehabil Sci Res. 2016;3(3):51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nageris BI, Raveh E, Zilberberg M, et al. Asymmetry in noise-induced hearing loss: relevance of acoustic reflex and left or right handedness. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(4):434–437. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e3180430191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Moraes Arieta A, Marques do Couto C, Andrade da Costa E. Speech perception test hint Brazil in groups of subjects exposed and not exposed to occupational noise. Rev CEFAC. 2013;15(4):786–794.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili M, Fatahi J, Hajiabolhassan F, et al. Test-retest reliability and list equivalency of the persian quick speech in noise test. J Mod Rehabil. 2010;3(3):16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Pronk M, Deeg DJ, Festen JM, et al. Decline in older persons’ ability to recognize speech in noise: the influence of demographic, health-related, environmental, and cognitive factors. Ear Hear. 2013;34(6):722–732. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182994eee.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruickshanks KJ, Nondahl DM, Tweed TS, et al. Education, occupation, noise exposure history and the 10-yr cumulative incidence of hearing impairment in older adults. Hear Res. 2010;264(1–2):3–9. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobi I, Sheikh Rashid M, de Laat JAM, et al. Age dependence of thresholds for speech in noise in normal-hearing adolescents. Trends Hear. 2017;21:2331216517743641. doi:10.1177/2331216517743641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam M, Smits C, Twisk JW, et al. Deterioration of speech recognition ability over a period of 5 years in adults ages 18 to 70 years: results of the dutch online speech-in-noise test. Ear Hear. 2015;36(3):e129–e37. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar