Workshops of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: Defining the Future

References

• Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, McFarland DJ, Peckham PH, Schalk G, Donchin E, Quatrano LA, Robinson CJ, Vaughan TM. Brain-computer interface technology: A review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000 8:164–173.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan TM, Heetderks WJ, Trejo LJ, Rymer WZ, Weinrich M, Moore MM, Kubler A, Dobkin BH, Birbaumer N, Donchin E, Wolpaw EW, Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interface technology: A review of the second international meeting. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11:94–109.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. The third international meeting on brain-computer interface technology: Making a difference. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006;14:126–127.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. Special issue containing contributions from the fourth international brain-computer interface meeting. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:020201, 2560/8/2/020201. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
   Google Scholar
• Frye GE, Hauser CK, Townsend G, Sellers EW. Suppressing flashes of items surrounding targets during calibration of a P300-based brain-computer interface improves performance. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:025024.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers EW. New horizons in brain-computer interface research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Klobassa DS, Vaughan TM, Brunner P, Schwartz NE, Wolpaw JR, Neuper C, Sellers EW. Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain-computer interface. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120:1252–1261.
   Google Scholar
• Mak JN, McFarland DJ, Vaughan TM, McCane LM, Tsui PZ, Zeitlin DJ, Sellers EW, Wolpaw JR. EEG correlates of P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI) performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neural Eng. 2012;9:026014, 2560/9/2/026014. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann T, Schulz SM, Grunzinger C, Kubler A Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain-computer interface performance. J Neural Eng. 2011;8: 056016,2560/8/5/056016. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann T, Schulz SM, Köblitz A, Renner G, Wessig C, Kübler A. Face stimuli effectively prevent brain-computer interface inefficiency in patients with neurodegenerative disease. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:893–900.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend G, Shanahan J, Ryan DB, Sellers EW. A general P300 brain-computer interface presentation paradigm based on performance guided constraints. Neurosci Lett. 2012;531:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Mattia D, Rupp R, Tangermann M. Facing the challenge: Bringing brain-computer interfaces to end-users. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59:55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zickler C, Riccio A, Leotta F, Hillian-Tress S, Halder S, Holz E, Staiger-Salzer P, Hoogerwerf EJ, Desideri L, Mattia D, Kubler A. A brain-computer interface as input channel for a standard assistive technology software. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011;42:236–244.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan T, Sellers E, and Wolpaw JR Clinical Evaluation of BCIs In: Wolpaw JR, Winter-Wolpaw E, editors. Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 325–336.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers EW, Vaughan TM, Wolpaw JR. A brain-computer interface for long-term independent home use. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. 2010;11:449–455.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann N, Kubler A. Training locked-in patients: A challenge for the use of brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2003;11:169–172.
   Google Scholar
• Zickler C, Halder S, Kleih SC, Herbert C, Kübler A. Brain painting: Usability testing according to the user-centered design in end users with severe motor paralysis. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59:99–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Holz E, Kaufmann T, Zickler C. (2013). A User Centred Approach for Bringing BCI Controlled Applications to End-Users. In: Reza Fazel-Rezai, editors. Brain-Computer Interface Systems - Recent Progress and Future Prospects. doi: 10.5772/55802. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/brain-computer-interface-systems-recent-progress-and-future-prospects/a-user-centred-approach-for-bringing-bci-controlled-applications-to-end-users.
   Google Scholar
• Holz EM, Höhne J, Staiger-Sälzer P, Tangermann M, Kübler A. Brain-computer interface controlled gaming: Evaluation of usability by severely motor restricted end-users. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59:111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Riccio A, Leotta F, Bianchi L, Aloise F, Zickler C, Hoogerwerf EJ, Kübler A, Mattia D, Cincotti F. Workload measurement in a communication application operated through a P300-based brain-computer interface. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:025028.
   Google Scholar
• Holz EM, Kaufmann T, Desideri L, Malavasi M, Hoogerwerf E-, Kübler A. User centred design in BCI development. In: Allison BZ, Dunne S, Leeb R, Millán JDR, Nijholt A, editors. Towards Practical Brain-Computer Interfaces. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann T, Holz EM, Kubler A. Comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual modality for brain-computer interface use: A case study with a patient in the locked-in state. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:129.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, EM, Botrel, L, Kaufmann, T, Kübler, A Independent BCI home-use improves quality of life of a patient in the locked-in state (ALS): A long-term study. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2014 Special Issue on the 5th International BCI Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, EM, Botrel, L, Kaufmann, T, Kübler, A Long-Term Independent BCI Home-Use by a Locked-In End-User: An Evaluation Study. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting; 2013; Pacific Grove, California, United States. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Alles ist möglich Mein Hirn brennt [Internet]. Available from: http://www.startnext.de/mein-hirn-brennt
   Google Scholar
• Kübler A, Holz E, Sellers EW, Vaughan TM. Toward independent home use of BCI: A decision algorithm for selection of potential end-users. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2014; Special Issue on the Fifth International BCI Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Mirenda P. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. BaltimoreMD: Paul Brookes Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd LL, Fuller DR, Arvidson H. Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A handbook of principles and practices. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Fager S, Beukelman DR, Fried-Oken M, Jakobs T, Baker J. Access interface strategies. Assist Technol. 2011;24:25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Millan JD, Rupp R, Muller-Putz GR, Murray-Smith R, Giugliemma C, Tangermann M, Vidaurre C, Cincotti F, Kubler A, Leeb R, Neuper C, Muller KR, Mattia D. Combining brain-computer interfaces and assistive technologies: State-of-the-art and challenges. Front Neurosci. 2010;4. 10.3389/fnins.2010.00161.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technology: matching device and consumer for successful rehabilition. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2002 . 325 p.
   Google Scholar
• Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communication systems: State of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1988;4:66–82.
   Google Scholar
• White GW, Suchowierska M, Campbell M. Developing and systematically implementing participatory action research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins JE, Wren PA, Gruis KL. What would brain-computer interface users want? opinions and priorities of potential users with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotroph Lateral Scler. 2011 May 2; 12:318–324.
   Google Scholar
• Bieker G, Noethe G, Fried-Oken M. Locked-in and reaching new heights. Speak Up, publication of the United States Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 2011 December; 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Peters B, Bieker G, Fried-Oken M, Hartman S, Huggins JE, Wolf C, Zeitlin D. BCI users speak up: Feedback on brain-computer interface systems for people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2014; In review.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, C, Andreoni, G, Bianchi, L, Blankertz, B, Breitwieser, C, Kanoh, S, Kothe, CA, Lécuyer, A, Makeig, S, Mellinger, J, Perego, P, Renard, Y, Schalk, G Susila, IP, Venthur, B, Müller-Putz, GR. BCI Software Platforms. In: Allison, BZ, Dunne, S, Leeb, R, Millán, JdR, Nijholt, A, editors. Toward Practical BCIs: Bridging the Gap from Research to Real-World Applications. New York: Springer; 2013; p. 303–331.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk G, McFarland DJ, Hinterberger T, Birbaumer N, Wolpaw JR. BCI2000: A general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:1034–1043.
   Google Scholar
• Renard Y, Lotte F, Gibert G, Congedo M, Maby E, Delannoy V, Bertrand O, Lécuyer A. OpenViBE: An open-source software platform to design, test, and use brain–computer interfaces in real and virtual environments. Presence. 2010;19:35–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kothe CA, Makeig S. BCILAB: A platform for brain-computer interface development. J Neural Eng. 2013;10 056014,2560/10/5/056014. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
   Google Scholar
• Oostenveld R, Fries P, Maris E, Schoffelen JM. FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869.
   Google Scholar
• Muller-Putz GR, Breitwieser C, Cincotti F, Leeb R, Schreuder M, Leotta F, Tavella M, Bianchi L, Kreilinger A, Ramsay A, Rohm M, Sagebaum M, Tonin L, Neuper C, Millan Jdel R. Tools for brain-computer interaction: A general concept for a hybrid BCI. Front Neuroinform. 2011;5:30. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00030
   Google Scholar
• Ramoser H, Wolpaw JR, Pfurtscheller G. EEG-based communication: Evaluation of alternative signal prediction methods. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1997;42:226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi L, Quitadamo LR, Garreffa G, Cardarilli GC, Marciani MG. Performances evaluation and optimization of brain computer interface systems in a copy spelling task. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15:207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Dal Seno B, Matteucci M, Mainardi LT. The utility metric: A novel method to assess the overall performance of discrete Brain–Computer interfaces. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. IEEE Transactions. 2010;18:20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman Laghari KUR, Connelly K. Toward total quality of experience: A QoE model in a communication ecosystem. IEEE. 2012;50:58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan P, Gao X, Allison B, Wang Y, Bin G, Gao S. A study of the existing problems of estimating the information transfer rate in online brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2013: 026014,2560/10/2/026014. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
   Google Scholar
• Quitadamo LR, Abbafati M, Cardarilli GC, Mattia D, Cincotti F, Babiloni F, Marciani MG, Bianchi L. Evaluation of the performances of different P300 based brain-computer interfaces by means of the efficiency metric. J Neurosci Methods. 2012;203:361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Clausen J, Allison BZ, Haselager P. The asilomar survey: Stakeholders’ opinions on ethical issues related to brain-computer interfacing. Neuroethics. 2013;6:541–578.
   Google Scholar
• Billinger M, Daly I, Kaiser V, Jin J, Allison BZ, Müller-Putz GR, Brunner C. Is it significant? Guidelines for reporting BCI performance. In: Allison BZ, Dunne S, Leeb R, Millan J, Nijholt A, editors. Towards Practical BCIs: Bridging the Gap from Research to Real-World Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2013. p. 333–354.
   Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Clausen J, Allison BZ, Haselager P. Researchers’ opinions about ethically sound dissemination of BCI research to the public media. International Journal of Bioelectromagnetism. 2011;13:108–109.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk G, Leuthardt EC. Brain-computer interfaces using electrocorticographic signals. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;4:140–154.
   Google Scholar
• Miller KJ, Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, Rao RP, Anderson NR, Moran DW, Miller JW, Ojemann JG. Spectral changes in cortical surface potentials during motor movement. J Neurosci. 2007;27:2424–2432.
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Collinger JL, Degenhart AD, Tyler-Kabara EC, Schwartz AB, Moran DW, Weber DJ, Wodlinger B, Vinjamuri RK, Ashmore RC, Kelly JW, Boninger ML. An electrocorticographic brain interface in an individual with tetraplegia. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55344.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy P, Andreasen D, Ehirim P, King B, Kirby T, Mao H, Moore M. Using human extra-cortical local field potentials to control a switch. J Neural Eng. 2004;1:72–77.
   Google Scholar
• Yanagisawa T, Hirata M, Saitoh Y, Kishima H, Matsushita K, Goto T, Fukuma R, Yokoi H, Kamitani Y, Yoshimine T. Electrocorticographic control of a prosthetic arm in paralyzed patients. Ann Neurol. 2012;71:353–361.
   Google Scholar
• Chao ZC, Nagasaka Y, Fujii N. Long-term asynchronous decoding of arm motion using electrocorticographic signals in monkeys. Front Neuroeng. 2010;3:3.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer HM, Morris HH, Mascha EJ, Karafa MT, Bingaman WE, Bej MD, Burgess RC, Dinner DS, Foldvary NR, Hahn JF, Kotagal P, Najm I, Wyllie E, Luders HO. Complications of invasive video-EEG monitoring with subdural grid electrodes. Neurology. 2002;58:97–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fountas KN, Smith JR. Subdural electrode-associated complications: A 20-year experience. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2007;85:264–272.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gompel JJ, Worrell GA, Bell ML, Patrick TA, Cascino GD, Raffel C, Marsh WR, Meyer FB. Intracranial electroencephalography with subdural grid electrodes: Techniques, complications, and outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2008;63:498-505–505-506.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell MJ. RNS System in Epilepsy Study Group. Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011;77:1295–1304.
   Google Scholar
• Speer, J, Kuhn, R FDA Advisory Panel Recommends Approval of the NeuroPace RNS® System for Medically Refractory Epilepsy [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.neuropace.com/about/news/20130225.html
   Google Scholar
• Torres Valderrama A, Oostenveld R, Vansteensel MJ, Huiskamp GM, Ramsey NF. Gain of the human dura in vivo and its effects on invasive brain signal feature detection. J Neurosci Methods. 2010;187:270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Voytek B, Secundo L, Bidet-Caulet A, Scabini D, Stiver SI, Gean AD, Manley GT, Knight RT. Hemicraniectomy: A new model for human electrophysiology with high spatio-temporal resolution. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010;22:2491–2502.
   Google Scholar
• Flint RD, Wright ZA, Scheid MR, Slutzky MW. Long term, stable brain machine interface performance using local field potentials and multiunit spikes. J Neural Eng. 2013;10 056005,2560/10/5/056005. Epub 2013 Aug 5.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse AG, Williams JJ, Wheeler JJ, Moran DW. Cortical adaptation to a chronic micro-electrocorticographic brain computer interface. J Neurosci. 2013;33:1326–1330.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz DA, Wong YT, Gray CM, Pesaran B. Optimizing the decoding of movement goals from local field potentials in macaque cortex. J Neurosci. 2011;31:18412–18422.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard KE, Mesgarani N, Johnson K, Chang EF. Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation. Nature. 2013;495:327–332.
   Google Scholar
• Chang EF, Rieger JW, Johnson K, Berger MS, Barbaro NM, Knight RT. Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13:1428–1432.
   Google Scholar
• Flinker A, Chang EF, Barbaro NM, Berger MS, Knight RT. Sub-centimeter language organization in the human temporal lobe. Brain Lang. 2011;117:103–109.
   Google Scholar
• Slutzky MW, Jordan LR, Krieg T, Chen M, Mogul DJ, Miller LE. Optimal spacing of surface electrode arrays for brain-machine interface applications. J Neural Eng. 2010; 7:26004,2560/7/2/026004. Epub 2010 Mar 2.
   Google Scholar
• Treder MS, Schmidt NM, Blankertz B. Gaze-independent brain-computer interfaces based on covert attention and feature attention. J Neural Eng. 2011; 8:066003,2560/8/6/066003. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
   Google Scholar
• Tonin L, Leeb R, Del R, Millan J. Time-dependent approach for single trial classification of covert visuospatial attention. J Neural Eng. 2012 045011,2560/9/4/045011. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
   Google Scholar
• Sajda P, Pohlmeyer E, Jun Wang LC, Parra LC, Christoforou C, Dmochowski J, Hanna B, Bahlmann C, Singh MK, Shih-Fu Chang. In a blink of an eye and a switch of a transistor: Cortically coupled computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2010;98:462–478.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlmorgen J, Dornhege, G, Braun, ML, Blankertz B, Müller KR, Curio G, Hagemann K, Bruns A Schrauf M, Kincses W Improving human performance in a real operating environment through real-time mental workload detection In: Dornhege G, Millán JdR, Hinterberger T, McFarland D, Müller KR, editors. Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing. Cambridge, MA: MIT press; 2007; p. 409–422
   Google Scholar
• Gopher D, Donchin E. Workload: An Examination of the Concept. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP, editors. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol II, Cognitive Processes and Performance. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett D Consciousness Explained. Little Brown & Company, Boston, MA: 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Sirevaag EJ, Kramer AF, Coles MG, Donchin E. Resource reciprocity: An event-related brain potentials analysis. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1989;70:77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: Toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988;70:510–523.
   Google Scholar
• Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK. Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain. 1983;106:623–642.
   Google Scholar
• Lew E, Chavarriaga R, Silvoni S, Jdel R Millan. Detection of self-paced reaching movement intention from EEG signals. Detection of self-paced reaching. Front Neuroeng. 2012;5: 13.
   Google Scholar
• Bai O, Rathi V, Lin P, Huang D, Battapady H, Fei DY, Schneider L, Houdayer E, Chen X, Hallett M. Prediction of human voluntary movement before it occurs. Clin Neurophysiol. 2011;122:364–372.
   Google Scholar
• Haggard P. Human volition: Towards a neuroscience of will. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:934–946.
   Google Scholar
• Muralidharan A, Chae J, Taylor DM. Extracting attempted hand movements from EEGs in people with complete hand paralysis following stroke. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:39.
   Google Scholar
• Khaliliardali Z, Chavarriaga R. Andrei Gheorghe L, Millan Jdel R. Detection of anticipatory brain potentials during car driving. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:3829–3832.
   Google Scholar
• Chavarriaga R. Learning from EEG error-related potentials in noninvasive brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2010;18:381–388.
   Google Scholar
• Llera A, van Gerven MA, Gómez V, Jensen O, Kappen HJ. On the use of interaction error potentials for adaptive brain computer interfaces. Neural Netw. 2011;24:1120–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Milekovic T, Ball T, Schulze-Bonhage A, Aertsen A, Mehring C. Error-related electrocorticographic activity in humans during continuous movements. J Neural Eng. 2012;9: 026007,2560/9/2/026007. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
   Google Scholar
• Iturrate I, Chavarriaga R, Montesano L, Minguez J. Millan Jdel R. Latency correction of error potentials between different experiments reduces calibration time for single-trial classification. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;3288–3291.
   Google Scholar
• Chavarriaga R, Perrin X, Siegwart R. Millan Jdel R. Anticipation- and error-related EEG signals during realistic human-machine interaction: A study on visual and tactile feedback. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:6723–6726.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrez PW. Millan Jd. Simultaneous real-time detection of motor imagery and error-related potentials for improved BCI accuracy. Proceedings 4th Internat BCI. Workshop. 2008;1. 197-202.
   Google Scholar
• Spüler M, Bensch M, Kleih S, Rosenstiel W, Bogdan M, Kübler A. Online use of error-related potentials in healthy users and people with severe motor impairment increases performance of a P300-BCI. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:1328–1337.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi B, Sanchez JC. A symbiotic brain-machine interface through value-based decision making. PLoS One. 2011;6:e14760.
   Google Scholar
• Roset SA, Gonzalez HF, Sanchez JC. Development of an EEG based reinforcement learning brain-computer interface system for rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:1563–1566.
   Google Scholar
• Makeig S, Gramann K, Jung TP, Sejnowski TJ, Poizner H. Linking brain, mind and behavior. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;73:95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller G, Allison BZ, Brunner C, Bauernfeind G, Solis-Escalante T, Scherer R, Zander TO, Mueller-Putz G, Neuper C, Birbaumer N. The hybrid BCI. Front Neurosci. 2010:430.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Chavarriaga R. Goel MK, Gheorghe L, Millan Jdel R. Improved recognition of error related potentials through the use of brain connectivity features. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:6740–6743.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen T, Kothe C, Chi YM, Ojeda A, Kerth T, Makeig S, Cauwenberghs G, Jung TP. Real-time modeling and 3D visualization of source dynamics and connectivity using wearable EEG. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:2184–2187.
   Google Scholar
• Evans N, Blanke O. Shared electrophysiology mechanisms of body ownership and motor imagery. Neuroimage. 2013;64:216–228.
   Google Scholar
• Wolpaw J, Wolpaw EW. Brain-computer interfaces: principles and practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich EV, Neuper C, Scherer R. Whatever works: A systematic user-centered training protocol to optimize brain-computer interfacing individually. PLoS One. 2013;8:e76214.
   Google Scholar
• Faller J, Vidaurre C, Solis-Escalante T, Neuper C, Scherer R. Autocalibration and recurrent adaptation: Towards a plug and play online ERD-BCI. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20:313–319.
   Google Scholar
• Fruitet J, Carpentier A, Munos R, Clerc M. Automatic motor task selection via a bandit algorithm for a brain-controlled button. J Neural Eng. 2013;10: 016012,2560/10/1/016012. Epub 2013 Jan 21
   Google Scholar
• Lecuyer A, George L, Marchal M. Toward adaptive VR simulators combining visual, haptic, and brain-computer interfaces. IEEE. 2013;33:18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Velasco-Álvarez F, Ron-Angevin R, da Silva-Sauer L, Sancha-Ros S. Audio-Cued Motor Imagery-Based Brain–Computer Interface: Navigation through Virtual and Real Environments. Neurocomputing. 2013; 121:89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer R, Proll M, Allison B, Muller-Putz GR. New input modalities for modern game design and virtual embodiment. In: Virtual Reality Short Papers and Posters (VRW) IEEE 2012. 2012;5:163–164.
   Google Scholar
• Grosse-Wentrup M, Scholkopf B. High gamma-power predicts performance in sensorimotor-rhythm brain-computer interfaces. J Neural Eng. 2012;9: 046001,2560/9/4/046001. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
   Google Scholar
• Wander JD, Blakely T, Miller KJ, Weaver KE, Johnson LA, Olson JD, Fetz EE, Rao RP, Ojemann JG. Distributed cortical adaptation during learning of a brain-computer interface task. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:10818–10823.
   Google Scholar
• Lotte F, Larrue F, Muhl C. Flaws in current human training protocols for spontaneous brain-computer interfaces: Lessons learned from instructional design. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;17:568.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp R, Müller-Putz G BCI-Controlled Grasp Neuroprosthesis in High Spinal Cord Injury In: Converging Clinical and Engineering Research in Neurorehabilitation. 2012; p. 1255-9.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp R, Kreilinger A, Rohm M, Kaiser V, Muller-Putz GR. Development of a non-invasive, multifunctional grasp neuroprosthesis and its evaluation in an individual with a high spinal cord injury. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:1835–1838.
   Google Scholar
• Kreilinger A, Kaiser V, Breitwieser C, Williamson J, Neuper C, Muller-Putz GR. Switching between manual control and brain-computer interface using long term and short term quality measures. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:147.
   Google Scholar
• Muller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, Rupp R. EEG-based neuroprosthesis control: A step towards clinical practice. Neurosci Lett. 2005;382:169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller G, Muller GR, Pfurtscheller J, Gerner HJ, Rupp R. ‘Thought’–control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett. 2003;351:33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Rohm M, Schneiders M, Muller C, Kreilinger A, Kaiser V, Muller-Putz GR, Rupp R. Hybrid brain-computer interfaces and hybrid neuroprostheses for restoration of upper limb functions in individuals with high-level spinal cord injury. Artif Intell Med. 2013;59:133–142.
   Google Scholar
• Muller-Putz GR, Scherer R, Pfurtscheller G, Rupp R. Brain-computer interfaces for control of neuroprostheses: From synchronous to asynchronous mode of operation. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2006;51:57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Kreilinger A, Kaiser V, Rohm M, Leeb R, Rupp R, Müller-Putz G. Neuroprosthesis Control via Non-invasive Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rohm M, Rupp R, Schneiders M, Kreilinger A, Müller-Putz GR. Hybrid brain-computer interfaces for control of neuroprosthetic systems for restoration of upper limb functions in high spinal cord injured individuals. Proceedings IFESS. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hill NJ, Scholkopf B. An online brain-computer interface based on shifting attention to concurrent streams of auditory stimuli. J Neural Eng. 2012;9: 026011,2560/9/2/026011. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
   Google Scholar
• Hohne J, Schreuder M, Blankertz B, Tangermann M. A novel 9-class auditory ERP paradigm driving a predictive text entry system. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:99.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler A, Furdea A, Halder S, Hammer EM, Nijboer F, Kotchoubey B. A brain-computer interface controlled auditory event-related potential (p300) spelling system for locked-in patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1157:90–100.
   Google Scholar
• Nijboer F, Furdea A, Gunst I, Mellinger J, McFarland DJ, Birbaumer N, Kubler A. An auditory brain-computer interface (BCI). J Neurosci Methods. 2008;167:43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Riccio A, Mattia D, Simione L, Olivetti M, Cincotti F. Eye-gaze independent EEG-based brain-computer interfaces for communication. J Neural Eng. 2012;9: 045001,2560/9/4/045001. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
   Google Scholar
• Schreuder M, Rost T, Tangermann M. Listen, you are writing! speeding up online spelling with a dynamic auditory BCI. Front Neurosci. 2011;5:112.
   Google Scholar
• Fallani De Vico, Pichiorri F, Morone G, Molinari M, Babiloni F, Cincotti F, Mattia D. Multiscale topological properties of functional brain networks during motor imagery after stroke. Neuroimage. 2013;83:438–449.
   Google Scholar
• Soekadar SR, Witkowski M, Cossio EG, Birbaumer N, Robinson SE, Cohen LG. In vivo assessment of human brain oscillations during application of transcranial electric currents. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2032.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, Laer L, Yilmaz O, Brasil FL, Liberati G, Curado MR, Garcia-Cossio E, Vyziotis A, Cho W, Agostini M, Soares E, Soekadar S, Caria A, Cohen LG, Birbaumer N. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: A controlled study. Ann Neurol. 2013;74:100–108.
   Google Scholar
• Cho W, Vidaurre C, Hoffmann U, Birbaumer N, Ramos-Murguialday A. Afferent and efferent activity control in the design of brain computer interfaces for motor rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:7310–7315.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto Y, Ushiba J, Kimura A, Liu M, Tomita Y. Change in brain activity through virtual reality-based brain-machine communication in a chronic tetraplegic subject with muscular dystrophy. BMC Neurosci. 2010;11:117.
   Google Scholar
• Kasahara T, Terasaki K, Ogawa Y, Ushiba J, Aramaki H, Masakado Y. The correlation between motor impairments and event-related desynchronization during motor imagery in ALS patients. BMC Neurosci. 2012;13:13–66.
   Google Scholar
• Kasashima Y, Fujiwara T, Matsushika Y, Tsuji T, Hase K, Ushiyama J, Ushiba J, Liu M. Modulation of event-related desynchronization during motor imagery with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Exp Brain Res. 2012;221:263–268.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto J, Fujiwara T, Takahashi O, Liu M, Kimura A, Ushiba J. Modulation of mu rhythm desynchronization during motor imagery by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010;27:7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ono T, Kimura A, Ushiba J. Daily training with realistic visual feedback improves reproducibility of event-related desynchronisation following hand motor imagery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:1779–1786.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner R, Irimia DC, Scharinger J, Guger C. A motor imagery based brain-computer interface for stroke rehabilitation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;181:319–323.
   Google Scholar
• Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, Ota N, Ito M, Ota T, Kimura A, Liu M. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: A preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:951–957.
   Google Scholar
• Takemi M, Masakado Y, Liu M, Ushiba J. Event-related desynchronization reflects downregulation of intracortical inhibition in human primary motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2013;110:1158–1166.
   Google Scholar
• Tohyama T, Fujiwara T, Matsumoto J, Honaga K, Ushiba J, Tsuji T, Hase K, Liu M. Modulation of event-related desynchronization during motor imagery with transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with severe hemiparetic stroke: A case report. Keio J Med. 2011;60:114–118.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto T, Katayama Y, Ushiba J, Yoshino H, Obuchi T, Kobayashi K, Oshima H, Fukaya C. On-demand control system for deep brain stimulation for treatment of intention tremor. Neuromodulation. 2013;16:230–235.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto Y, Ushiba J. EEG-based classification of imaginary left and right foot movements using beta rebound. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013;124:2153–2160.
   Google Scholar
• Sainburg RL, Ghilardi MF, Poizner H, Ghez C. Control of limb dynamics in normal subjects and patients without proprioception. J Neurophysiol. 1995;73:820–835.
   Google Scholar
• Monzee J, Lamarre Y, Smith AM. The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:672–683.
   Google Scholar
• Weber DJ, London BM, Hokanson JA, Ayers CA, Gaunt RA, Torres RR, Zaaimi B, Miller LE. Limb-state information encoded by peripheral and central somatosensory neurons: Implications for an afferent interface. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011;19:501–513.
   Google Scholar
• Weber DJ, Friesen R, Miller LE. Interfacing the somatosensory system to restore touch and proprioception: Essential considerations. J Mot Behav. 2012;44:403–418.
   Google Scholar
• Koivuniemi AS, Otto KJ. The depth, waveform and pulse rate for electrical microstimulation of the auditory cortex. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:2489–2492.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefer MA, Tan DW, Anderson R, Keith M, Schmitt M, Tyler J, Tyler DJ. Restoring sensation in amputees with nerve cuff electrodes. In: BMES Annual Conference. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• O’Doherty JE, Lebedev MA, Ifft PJ, Zhuang KZ, Shokur S, Bleuler H, Nicolelis MA. Active tactile exploration using a brain-machine-brain interface. Nature. 2011;479:228–231.
   Google Scholar
• Tabot GA, Dammann JF, Berg JA, Tenore FV, Boback JL, Vogelstein RJ, Bensmaia SJ. Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:18279–18284.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson T, Ruiz-torres R, Miller LE. Multi-electrode stimulation in somatosensory area 2 induces a natural sensation of limb movement. In: Annual meeting, Society for Neuroscience; 2013. p. 835.03
   Google Scholar
• Dadarlat MC, O’Doherty JE, Sabes PN. Multisensory integration of vision and intracortical microstimulation for sensory substitution and augmentation. In: Annual meeting, Society for Neuroscience; 2012. p. 292–212
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg LR, Bacher D, Jarosiewicz B, Masse NY, Simeral JD, Vogel J, Haddadin S, Liu J, Cash SS, van der Smagt P, Donoghue JP. Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature. 2012;485:372–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kwok R. Neuroprosthetics: Once more, with feeling. Nature. 2013;497:176–178.
   Google Scholar
• Raspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Badia J, Navarro X, Micera S. Experimental validation of a hybrid computational model for selective stimulation using transverse intrafascicular multichannel electrodes. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20:395–404.
   Google Scholar
• Berg JA, Dammann JF, 3rd, Tenore FV, Tabot GA, Boback JL, Manfredi LR, Peterson, MLKatyal KD, Johannes MS, Makhlin A, Wilcox R, Franklin RK, Vogelstein RJ, Hatsopoulos NG, Bensmaia SJ. Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21:500–507.
   Google Scholar
• Chavarriaga, R, Biasiucci, A, Molina, A, RLeeb, Soto León, V, Campolo, M, Oliviero, A, Millán, JdR. tDCS Modulates Motor Imagery-Related BCI FeaturesIn: Pons, JL, Torricelli, D, Pajaro, M, editors. Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2013; p. 647–651
   Google Scholar
• Ang KK, Guan C, Phua KS, Wang C, Teh I, Chen CW, Chew E. Transcranial direct current stimulation and EEG-based motor imagery BCI for upper limb stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4128–4131.
   Google Scholar
• Ortner, R, Rodriguez, J, Guger, C A tactile P300 brain-computer interface, Technical Report 3. Austria: g.tec Medical Engineering GmbH; 2012 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, H, Matsumoto, Y, Makino, S, Kryssanov, V, Rutkowski, TM. Vibrotactile Stimulus Frequency Optimization for the Haptic BCI Prototype. In: Proceedings of The 6th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems, and The 13th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems; 2012; Kobe, Japan. 2012. p. 2150-3
   Google Scholar
• Mori H, Matsumoto Y, Kryssanov V, Cooper E, Ogawa H, Makino S, Struzik Z, Rutkowski TM. Multi-command tactile brain computer interface: A feasibility study. In: Oakley I, Brewster S, editors. Haptic and Audio Interaction Design 2013 (HAID 2013) vol. 7989 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2013. p. 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mori, H, Matsumoto, Y, Struzik, ZR, Mori, K, Makino, S, Mandic, D, Rutkowski, TM. Multi-command tactile and auditory brain computer interface based on head position stimulation. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting. 2013; Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, TM, Mori, H, Makino, S, Mori, K Novel spatial tactile and bone-conduction auditory brain computer interface. In: Neuroscience 2013 Abstracts; 2013; San Diego, CA, USA. 2013. p. abstract #12179,no. 79.03/VV1 in Brain-Machine Interface I.
   Google Scholar
• Guger G, Sorger B, Noirhomme Q, Naci L, Monti MM, Real R, Pokorny C, Veser S, Lugo Z, Quitadamo L, Lesenfants D, Risetti M, Formisano R, Toppi J, Astolfi L, Emmerling T, Heine L, Erlbeck H, Horki P, Kotchoubey B, Bianchi L, Mattia D, Goebel R, Owen AM, Pellas F, Müller-Putz G, Laureys S, Kübler A. Brain-computer interfaces for assessment and communication in disorders of consciousness. In: Naik, Ganesh R, editors. Emerging Theory and Practice in Neuroprosthetics. IGIGLOBAL, Hershey, PA: 2014 in press.
   Google Scholar
• Naci L, Monti MM, Cruse D, Kubler A, Sorger B, Goebel R, Kotchoubey B, Owen AM. Brain-computer interfaces for communication with nonresponsive patients. Ann Neurol. 2012;72:312–323.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler A, Kotchoubey B. Brain-computer interfaces in the continuum of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol. 2007;20:643–649.
   Google Scholar
• Pokorny C, Klobassa D, Pichler G, Erlbeck H, Real R, Kübler A, Lesenfants D, Habbal D, Noirhomme Q, Risetti M, Mattia D, Müller-Putz G. The auditory P300-based single-switch brain-computer interface: Paradigm transition from healthy subjects to minimally conscious patients. Artificial intelligence in medicine. 2013; 59:2;81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Putz G, Pokorny C, Klobassa D, Horki P. A single switch BCI based on passive and imagined movements: Towards restoring communication in minimally conscious patients. International journal of neural systems. 2013;23: 2.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D, Carroll, A, Stow, J, McCann, A, Ally, A, McElligott, J Enabling Control in the Minimally Conscious State in a Single Session with a Three Channel BCI. In: 1st International Decoder Workshop; 2012. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle, D, Carroll, Á, Stow, J, McCreadie, K, McElligott, J Visual and Stereo Audio Sensorimotor Rhythm Feedback in the Minimally Conscious State. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting; 2013. p. 38–39
   Google Scholar
• Risetti M, Formisano R, Toppi J, Quitadamo LR, Bianchi L, Astolfi L, Mattia D. On ERPs detection in disorders of consciousness rehabilitation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013 7:775, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lesenfants, D, Partoune, N, Soddu, A, Lehembre, R, Muller-Putz, G, Laureys, S, Noirhome, Q Design of a novel covert SSVEP-based BCI. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Brain-Computer Interface Conference. 2011;Graz, Austria. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lesenfants D, Habbal D, Lugo Z, Lebeau P, Horki P, Amico E, Pokorny C, Gomez F, Soddu A, Muller-Putz G, Muller-Putz G, Laureys S, Noirhomme Q. Independent SSVEP-based brain-computer interface in locked-in patients. Journal of Neural Engineering. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders -- Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, United States, 2008. 2012; 61:SS03:1–19. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6103a1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Lovaas OI. Behavioral treatment and normal educational and intellectual functioning in young autistic children. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55:3–9.
   Google Scholar
• McEachin JJ, Smith T, Lovaas OI. Long-term outcome for children with autism who received early intensive behavioral treatment. Am J Ment Retard. 1993;97:373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Oberman LM, Ramachandran VS, Pineda JA. Modulation of mu suppression in children with autism spectrum disorders in response to familiar or unfamiliar stimuli: The mirror neuron hypothesis. Neuropsychologia. 2008 ;46:1558–1565.
   Google Scholar
• Pineda JA, Juavinett A, Datko M. Self-regulation of brain oscillations as a treatment for aberrant brain connections in children with autism. Med Hypotheses. 2012;79:790–798.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend J, Westerfield M, Leaver E, Makeig S, Jung T, Pierce K, Courchesne E. Event-related brain response abnormalities in autism: Evidence for impaired cerebello-frontal spatial attention networks. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001;11:127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Pineda JA, Brang D, Hecht E, Edwards L, Carey S, Bacon M, Futagaki C, Suk D, Tom J, Birnbaum C, Rork A. Positive behavioral and electrophysiological changes following neurofeedback training in children with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders. 2008;2:557–581.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, LD, Lin, CT, McDowell, K, Wickenden, AE, Gramann, K, Jung,. TP, Ko, LW, Chang, JY. Biosensor technologies for augmented Brain–Computer interfaces in the next decades. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2012;100:1553–1566.
   Google Scholar
• Rapela J, Lin TY, Westerfield M, Jung TP, Townsend J. Assisting autistic children with wireless EOG technology. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;3504–3506.
   Google Scholar
• Jung TP, Makeig S, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Courchesne E, Sejnowski TJ. Removal of eye activity artifacts from visual event-related potentials in normal and clinical subjects. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;2012:111:1745–1758.
   Google Scholar
• Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP. Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103:3526–3534.
   Google Scholar
• Chi YM, Wang YT, Wang Y, Maier C, Jung TP, Cauwenberghs G. Dry and noncontact EEG sensors for mobile brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2012;20:228–235.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews R, McDonald NJ, Anumula H, Woodward J, Turner PJ, Steindorf MA, Chang K, Pendleton JM. Novel hybrid bioelectrodes for ambulatory zero-prep EEG measurements using multi-channel wireless EEG system. Foundations of Augmented Cognition Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2007;4565:137–146.
   Google Scholar
• Liao LD, Wang IJ, Chen SF, Chang JY, Lin CT. Design, fabrication and experimental validation of a novel dry-contact sensor for measuring electroencephalography signals without skin preparation. Sensors (Basel). 2011;11:5819–5834.
   Google Scholar
• Guger C, Krausz G, Allison BZ, Edlinger G. Comparison of dry and gel based electrodes for p300 brain-computer interfaces. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:60.
   Google Scholar
• Ryynanen OR, Hyttinen JA, Laarne PH, Malmivuo JA. Effect of electrode density and measurement noise on the spatial resolution of cortical potential distribution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004;51:1547–1554.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, EBJ, Brouwer, A-, Wilschut, ES, van Erp, JBF. Brain-machine interfaces in space: Using spontaneous rather than intentionally generated brain signals. Acta Astronautica. 2010;67:1–11
   Google Scholar
• Zander, T, Kothe, C, Welke, S, Roetting, M. Enhancing Human-Machine systems with secondary input from passive Brain-Computer interfaces. In: Proceedings from the 4th International BCI Workshop and Training Course; 2008; Graz, Austria. 2008
   Google Scholar
• Zander TO, Kothe C. Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: Applying brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general. J Neural Eng. 2011;8: 025005,2560/8/2/025005. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, A-, van Erp, JBF, Heylen, D, Jensen, O, Poel, M Effortless Passive BCIs for Healthy Users In: Stephanidis, C, Antona, M, editors. UAHCI/HCII 2013, Part I, LNCS 8009. Las VegasNV: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013; p. 615–622.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock PA, Meshkati N, Robertson MM. Physiological reflections of mental workload. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1985;56:1110–1114.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler L. A method for detecting deception. American Journal of Police Science. 1930;1:38–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kindermans, P-, Schrauwen, B Dynamic Stopping in a Calibration-less P300 Speller. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Brain Computer Interface Meeting 2013; 20132013. p. DOI:10.3217/978-3-85125-260-6-75.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer A-, Zander TO, Van Erp Jan BF Using neurophysiological signals that reflect cognitive or affective state [Internet]. Available from: http://www.frontiersin.org/neuroprosthetics/researchtopics/using_neurophysiological_signa/1528.
   Google Scholar
• Vuckovic A, Pineda JA, LaMarca K, Gupta D, Guger C. Frontiers in Neuroengineering: Interaction of BCI with the underlying neurological conditions in patients: pros and cons [Internet]. Available from: http://www.frontiersin.org/neuroengineering/researchtopics/interaction_of_bci_with_the_un/2020
   Google Scholar