Establishing supplementary response time validity indicators in the Word Memory Test (WMT) and directions for future research

References

• Arnold, N. R., Broder, A., & Bayen, U. J. (2015). Empirical validation of the diffusion model for recognition memory and a comparison of parameter-estimation methods. Psychological Research, 79, 882–898. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0608-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2006). Coverage of the test of memory malingering, victoria symptom validity test, and word memory test on the internet: Is test security threatened? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D. (2014). Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 28 (13–14), 1623–1638. doi:10.3109/02699052.2014.947627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D. (2015). Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9, 421–444. doi:10.1007/s11682-015-9409-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolan, B., Foster, J. K., Schmand, B., & Bolan, S. (2002). A comparison of three tests to detect feigned amnesia: The effects of feedback and the measurement of response latency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 154–167. doi:10.1076/jcen.24.2.154.1000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 729–741. doi:10.1080/13854040802427803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic psychology: An evidence-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K., Lu, P., & Herzberg, D. S. (2002). The Dot Counting Test manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
   Google Scholar
• Carone, D. A. (2014). Young child with severe brain volume loss easily passes the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test: Implications for mild tbi. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 146–162. doi:10.1080/13854046.2013.861019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cercy, S. P., Schretlen, D. J., & Brandt, J. (1997). Simulated amnesia and the pseudo memory phenomena. In R. Rogers (Ed.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed. pp. 85–107). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. M., Shear, P. K., Howe, S., & Ris, M. D. (2003). Detecting neuropsychological malingering: Effects of coaching and information. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 121–134. doi:10.1093/arclin/18.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutilh, G., Annis, J., Brown, S. D., Cassey, P., Evans, N. J., Grasman, R., … Donkin, C. (2018). The quality of response time data inference: A blinded, collaborative assessment of the validity of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1417-1422
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Tyson, B. T., Shahein, A. G., Lichtenstein, J. D., Abeare, C. A., Pelletier, C. L., … Roth, R. M. (2017). The power of timing: Adding a time-to-completion cutoff to the word choice test and recognition memory test improves classification accuracy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39, 369–383. doi:10.1080/13803395.2016.1230181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, D., Ahern, D. C., Bridges, A. J., & Yonce, L. J. (2012). Assessment of malingering and falsification: Conceptual foundations and sources of error (ch. 1). In C. R. Reynolds & A. M. Horton Jr. (Eds.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (pp. 1–67), New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forstmann, B. U., Ratcliff, R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Sequential sampling models in cognitive neuroscience: Advantages, applications, and extensions. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 641–666. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, R. I. (2002). A review of rey’s strategies for detecting malingered neuropsychological impairment. In J. Hom & R. L. Denney (Eds.), Detection of response bias in forensic neuropsychology. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2003). Green’s Word Memory Test for windows: User’s manual. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Green’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2005). Green‘s Word Memory Test for windows: User’s manual (revised june 2005). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Green’s Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2007). The pervasive influence of effort on neuropsychological tests. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 18, 43–68. doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2006.11.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green, P., Allen, L., & Astner, K. (1996). The Word Memory Test: A user’s guide to the oral and computer-administered forms, us version 1.1. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & Flaro, L. (2015). Results from three Performance Validity Tests (PVTs) in adults with intellectual deficits. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 22, 293–303. doi:10.1080/23279095.2014.925903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., Rohling, M. L., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15, 1045–1060. doi:10.1080/02699050110088254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grote, C. L., & Hook, J. N. (2007). Forced-choice recognition tests of malingering (ch. 4). In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 44–79). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, J. M., & Gur, R. C. (2012). Detection of malingering using forced-choice techniques (ch. 4). In C. R. Reynolds & A. M. J. Horton (Eds.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation (2nd ed., pp. 151–167). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hegedish, O., & Hoofien, D. (2013). Detection of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among patients with acquired brain injuries: A Word Memory Test study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 253–262. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, B. D., Rohling, M. L., Boettcher, A. C., & Meyers, J. E. (2013). Cognitive intra-individual variability has a positive association with traumatic brain injury severity and suboptimal effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 640–648. doi:10.1093/arclin/act045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W. Jr, Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (Vol. 398). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, G. L. (1995). Qualitative aspects of malingered memory deficits. Brain Injury, 9, 35–40. doi:10.3109/02699059509004569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanser, R. J., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., & Hanks, R. A. (2018). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury: Combining response time with Performance Validity Test accuracy. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 1–18. doi:10.1080/13854046.2018.1440006(Epub ahead of Print).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., Boone, K. B., Victor, T., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Cottingham, M. E., … Zeller, M. A. (2010). The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on ‘real world‘ credible and noncredible subjects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25, 60–70. doi:10.1093/arclin/acp088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, L., Basso, M. R., Estevis, E., Miller, A., Whiteside, D. M., Combs, D., & Arentsen, T. J. (2017). Detecting coached neuropsychological dysfunction: A simulation experiment regarding mild traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 1412–1431. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1318954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton, A., Weinborn, M., & Maybery, M. (2014). Bridging the gap between neurocognitive processing theory and performance validity assessment among the cognitively impaired: A review and methodological approach. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20, 873–886. doi:10.1017/S135561771400085X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, T., Elbaum, T., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2018). Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the Word Memory Test. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25, 532–542. doi:10.1080/23279095.2017.1341410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of north american professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29, 741–776. doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, C., Crawford, S., & Evans, J. J. (2018). Effort testing in dementia assessment: A systematic review. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/arclin/acy012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2018). Detection strategies for malingering and defensiveness (ch. 2). In R. Rogers & S. D. Bender (Eds.), Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (pp. 18–41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Gillard, N. D. (2011). Research methods for the assessment of malingering (ch. 10). In B. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 1–74). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136, 414–429. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., & Odland, A. P. (2016). Expert beliefs and practices regarding neuropsychological validity testing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 515–535. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1177118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, E., Hultsch, D. F., Hunter, M., Slick, D. J., Patry, B., & Levy-Bencheton, J. (1999). Using intraindividual variability to detect malingering in cognitive performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 420–432. doi:10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., Van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 428–453. doi:10.1037/bul0000087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How’d they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 495–505. doi:10.1076/clin.16.4.495.13909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardif, H. P., Barry, R. J., & Johnstone, S. J. (2002). Event-related potentials reveal processing differences in honest vs malingered memory performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 147–158. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00090-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N., Rees, L., Stormer, P., Harrison, A. G., & Smith, A. (2007). The effects of mild and severe traumatic brain injury on speed of information processing as measured by the computerized tests of information processing (ctip). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(1), 25–36. doi: doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomer, E., Lupu, T., Golan, L., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2018). Eye tracking as a mean to detect feigned cognitive impairment in the Word Memory Test. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–13. doi: doi:10.1080/23279095.2018.1480483 (Epub ahead of Print).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vagnini, V. L., Berry, D. T., Clark, J. A., & Jiang, Y. (2008). New measures to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit: Applying reaction time and event-related potentials. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 766–776. doi:10.1080/13803390701754746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooff, J. C., Sargeant, E., Foster, J. K., & Schmand, B. A. (2009). Identifying deliberate attempts to fake memory impairment through the combined use of reaction time and event-related potential measures. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 73, 246–256. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickery, C. D., Berry, D. T., Inman, T. H., Harris, M. J., & Orey, S. A. (2001). Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic review of selected procedures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 45–73. doi:10.1093/arclin/16.1.45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Harris, L. L., Duck, T. K., & Mulay, D. (2014). A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2014.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar