This will only take a minute: Time cutoffs are superior to accuracy cutoffs on the forced choice recognition trial of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised

References

• Abeare, C. A., Freund, S., Kaploun, K., McAuley, T., & Dumitrescu, C. (2017). The Emotion Word Fluency Test (EWFT): Initial psychometric, validation, and physiological evidence in young adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(8), 738–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1259396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, C., Erdodi, L., Messa, I., Terry, D. P., Panenka, W. J., Iverson, G. L., & Silverberg, N. D. (2021). Development of embedded performance validity indicators in the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery. Psychological Assessment, 33(1), 90–96. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, C. A., Hurtubise, J., Cutler, L., Sirianni, C., Brantuo, M., Makhzoun, N., & Erdodi, L. (2020). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1779348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, C., Messa, I., Whitfield, C., Zuccato, B., Casey, J., Rykulski, N., & Erdodi, L. (2019). Performance validity in collegiate football athletes at baseline neurocognitive testing. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 34(4), E20–E31. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, C., Sabelli, A., Taylor, B., Holcomb, M., Dumitrescu, C., Kirsch, N., & Erdodi, L. (2019). The importance of demographically adjusted cutoffs: Age and education bias in raw score cutoffs within the Trail Making Test. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramson, D. A., Resch, Z. J., Ovsiew, G. P., White, D. J., Bernstein, M. T., Basurto, K. S., & Soble, J. R. (2020). Impaired or invalid? Limitations of assessing performance validity using the Boston Naming Test. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1774378
   Google Scholar
• An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., Enache, A., Dhuga, J., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Reexamining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test-Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2018.1483488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, K. Y., Kaploun, K., Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2017). Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: A comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1217046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arentsen, T. J., Boone, K. B., Lo, T. T., Goldberg, H. E., Cottingham, M. E., Victor, T. L., Ziegler, E., & Zeller, M. A. (2013). Effectiveness of the Comalli Stroop Test as a measure of negative response bias. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.803603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf, L. (2019). Neurobehavioral symptom validity in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) mild traumatic brain injury evaluations. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1567693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf, L., Clark, E. L., & Sugarman, M. A. (2017). Performance validity and processing speed in a VA polytrauma sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(5), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1285961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, B. N., Fichtenberg, N. L., Liethen, P. C., Czarnota, M. A., & Stucky, K. (2001). Performance characteristics of postacute traumatic brain injury patients on the WAIS-III and WMS-III. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(4), 516–520. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.15.4.516.1884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, B. N., Meyers, J. E., & Davis, J. J. (2014). Finger tapping test performance as a measure of performance validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(5), 876–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.907583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, K. C., Soble, J. R., Bain, K. M., & Fullen, C. (2018). Embedded performance validity tests in the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised: A Replication Study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 33(7), 895–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, K. M., & Soble, J. R. (2019). Validation of the Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice Test (WCT) in a mixed clinical sample: Establishing classification accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and cutoff scores. Assessment, 26(7), 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117725172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain, K. M., Soble, J. R., Webber, T. A., Messerly, J. M., Bailey, K. C., Kirton, J. W., & McCoy, K. J. M. (2021). Cross-validation of three advanced clinical solutions performance validity tests: Examining combinations of measures to maximize classification of invalid performance. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1585352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barhon, L. I., Batchelor, J., Meares, S., Chekaluk, E., & Shores, E. A. (2015). A comparison of the degree of effort involved in the TOMM and the ACS Word Choice Test using a dual-task paradigm. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 22(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.863775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, C., Lev, A., Braw, Y., Elbaum, T., Wagner, M., & Rassovsky, Y. (2019). Detection of feigned ADHD using the MOXO-d-CPT. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1(16), 108705471986465. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054719864656
   Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D. (2012). Symptom validity testing, effort, and neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 18(4), 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712000252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D. (2014). Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 28(13–14), 1623–1638. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.947627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler, E. D. (2015). Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9409-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examinations. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802427803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boskovic, I., Biermans, A. J., Merten, T., Jelicic, M., Hope, L., & Merckelbach, H. (2018). The Modified Stroop Task is susceptible to feigning: Stroop performance and symptom over-endorsement in feigned test anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1195–1197. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowden, S. C., Shores, A. E., & Mathias, J. L. (2006). Does effort suppress cognition after traumatic brain injury? A re-examination of the evidence for the Word Memory Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(4), 858–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040500246935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, J., & Benedict, R. H. B. (2001). Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. Psychological Assessment Services.
   Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M. (2011). Reducing the probability of false positives in malingering detection of Social Security disability claimants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(7), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.586785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M. D., Williams, M. A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Bianchini, K. J., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Larrabee, G. J., & Ord, J. S. (2015). Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration policy on validity testing: Guidance and recommendations for change. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1099738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherner, M., Suarez, P., Lazzaretto, D., Artiola, i., Fortuny, L., Rivera Mindt, M., Dawes, S., Marcotte, T., Grant, I., Heaton, R., & The, H. g. (2007). Demographically corrected norms for the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – Revised and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised in monolingual Spanish speakers from the U.S.–Mexico border region. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, K. L., Thompson, L. K., Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2008). Verbal fluency indicators of malingering in traumatic brain injury: Classification accuracy in known groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(5), 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701563591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Merckelbach, H., & Ponds, R. W. H. M. (2017). Neuropsychologists' ability to predict distorted symptom presentation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1223278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. J. (2014). Further consideration of Advanced Clinical Solutions Word Choice: Comparison to the Recognition Memory Test-words and classification accuracy in a clinical sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1278–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.975844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E. F., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS): Technical manual. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. (2000). The California Verbal Learning Test – second edition. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Denning, J. (2021). When 10 is enough: Errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMMe10) and administration time predict freestanding performance validity tests (PVTs) and underperformance on memory measures. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult. 28(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1588122
   Google Scholar
• Denning, J. H. (2014). The efficiency and accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering Trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(7), 729–730. https://doi.org/10.109/arclin/acu051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, R. A., Garrett, D. D., Lentz, T. L., MacDonald, S. W., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2007). Neurocognitive markers of cognitive impairment: Exploring the roles of speed and inconsistency. Neuropsychology, 21(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.21.3.381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders, J., & Strong, C. H. (2015). Clinical utility of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition after traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 22(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114530776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeland, J., & Langfjaeran, T. (2007). Differentiating malingering from genuine cognitive dysfunction using the Trail Making Test – Ratio and Stroop interference scores. Applied Neuropsychology, 14(2), 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084280701319953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eglit, G. M. L., Jurick, S. M., Delis, D. C., Filoteo, J. V., Bondi, M. W., & Jak, A. J. (2020). Utility of the D-KEFS Color Word Interference Test as an embedded measure of performance validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(2), 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1643923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdal, K. (2004). The effects of motivation, coaching, and knowledge of neuropsychology on the simulated malingering of head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00214-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 26(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1384925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2020). Stronger together: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition as a Multivariate Performance Validity Test in patients with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 35(2), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acz032/5613200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Abeare, C. A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Tyson, B. T., Kucharski, B., Zuccato, B. G., & Roth, R. M. (2017). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Abeare, C. A., Medoff, B., Seke, K. R., Sagar, S., & Kirsch, N. L. (2018). A single error is one too many: The Forced Choice Recognition trial of the CVLT-II as a measure of performance validity in adults with TBI. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 33(7), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Green, P., Sirianni, C., & Abeare, C. A. (2019). The myth of high false positive rates on the Word Memory Test in mild TBI. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09356-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Hurtubise, J. L., Charron, C., Dunn, A., Enache, A., McDermott, A., & Hirst, R. (2018). The D-KEFS Trails as performance validity tests. Psychological Assessment, 30(8), 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Kirsch, N. L., Lajiness-O’Neill, R., Vingilis, E., & Medoff, B. (2014). Comparing the Recognition Memory Test and the Word Choice Test in a mixed clinical sample: Are they equivalent? Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9197-8
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Kirsch, N. L., Sabelli, A. G., & Abeare, C. A. (2018). The Grooved Pegboard Test as a validity indicator – A study on psychogenic interference as a confound in performance validity research. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9337-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Lichtenstein, J. D. (2017). Invalid before impaired: An emerging paradox of embedded validity indicators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(6–7), 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1323119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Lichtenstein, J. D. (2021). Information processing speed tests as PVTs. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment. A neuropsychological perspective. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Rai, J. K., & Flaro, L. (2017). Embedded validity indicators in Conners’ CPT-II: Do adult cutoffs work the same way in children? Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 6(4), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2016.1198908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Pelletier, C. L., & Roth, R. M. (2018). Elevations on select Conners' CPT-II scales indicate noncredible responding in adults with traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 25(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1232262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Rai, J. K. (2017). A single error is one too many: Examining alternative cutoffs on Trial 2 of the TOMM. Brain Injury, 31(10), 1362–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1332386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Roth, R. M. (2017). Low scores on BDAE Complex Ideational Material are associated with invalid performance in adults without aphasia. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 24(3), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1298600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Roth, R. M., Kirsch, N. L., Lajiness-O'neill, R., & Medoff, B. (2014). Aggregating validity indicators embedded in Conners' CPT-II outperforms individual cutoffs at separating valid from invalid performance in adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 29(5), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Sagar, S., Seke, K., Zuccato, B. G., Schwartz, E. S., & Roth, R. M. (2018). The Stroop Test as a measure of performance validity in adults clinically referred for neuropsychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 30(6), 755–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdődi, L. A., Seke, K. R., Shahein, A., Tyson, B. T., Sagar, S., & Roth, R. M. (2017). Low scores on the Grooved Pegboard Test are associated with invalid responding and psychiatric symptoms. Psychology & Neuroscience, 10(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000103
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Taylor, B., Sabelli, A., Malleck, M., Kirsch, N. L., & Abeare, C. A. (2019). Demographically adjusted validity cutoffs in the Finger Tapping Test are superior to raw score cutoffs. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09352-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Tyson, B. T., Abeare, C. A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Pelletier, C. L., Rai, J. K., & Roth, R. M. (2016). The BDAE Complex Ideational Material – a measure of receptive language or performance validity? Psychological Injury and Law, 9(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-016-9254-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Tyson, B. T., Abeare, C. A., Zuccato, B. G., Rai, J. K., Seke, K. R., Sagar, S., & Roth, R. M. (2018). Utility of critical items within the Recognition Memory Test and Word Choice Test. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 25(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1298600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Tyson, B. T., Shahein, A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Abeare, C. A., Pelletier, C. L., Zuccato, B. G., Kucharski, B., & Roth, R. M. (2017). The power of timing: Adding a time-to-completion cutoff to the Word Choice Test and Recognition Memory Test improves classification accuracy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1230181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherton, J. L., Bianchini, K. J., Heinly, M. T., & Greve, K. W. (2006). Pain, malingering, and performance on the WAIS-III Processing Speed Index. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(7), 1218–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500346595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazio, R. L., Denning, J. H., & Denney, R. L. (2017). TOMM Trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1213316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuermaier, A. B. M., Tucha, O., Koerts, J., Grabski, M., Lange, K. W., Weisbrod, M., Aschenbrenner, S., & Tucha, L. (2016). The development of an embedded figures test for the detection of feigned attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in adulthood. PLOS One, 11(10), e0164297. https://doi.org/10.1037/journal.pone.0164297
   Google Scholar
• Fuermaier, A. B. M., Tucha, O., Koerts, J., Lange, K. W., Weisbrod, M., Aschenbrenner, S., & Tucha, L. (2017). Noncredible cognitive performance at clinical evaluation of adult ADHD: An embedded validity indicator in a visuospatial working memory test. Psychological Assessment, 29(12), 1466–1479. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabel, N. M., Waldron-Perrine, B., Spencer, R. J., Pangilinan, P. H., Hale, A. C., & Bieliauskas, L. A. (2019). Suspiciously slow: Timed digit span as an embedded performance validity measure in a sample of veterans with mTBI. Brain Injury, 33(3), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1553311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Barbosa, F., Coga, G., Azeredo, A., Viglione, D., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Using the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 27(6), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (3rd ed.). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2004). Green’s Medical Symptom Validity Test. Green’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6(3), 218–224.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Doane, B. M. (2006). Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering in traumatic brain injury: Results of a known-group analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(7), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390500263550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Mathias, C. W., Houston, R. J., & Crouch, J. A. (2002). Detecting malingered pain-related disability: Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040902828272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise, B. J., Thompson, M. D., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & West, L. (2014). Assessment of performance validity in the Stroop Color and Word Test in mild traumatic brain injury patients: A criterion-groups validation design. Journal of Neuropsychology, 8(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, V. L., Worthington, A., & Venables, K. (2014). A UK pilot study: The specificity of the Word Memory Test effort sub‐tests in acute minimal to mild head injury. Journal of Neuropsychology, 8(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, M. J., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, R. K., Smith, H. H., Lehman, R. A., & Vogt, A. T. (1978). Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(5), 892–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.892
   Google Scholar
• Hurtubise, J., Baher, T., Messa, I., Cutler, L., Shahein, A., Hastings, M., Carignan-Querqui, M., & Erdodi, L. (2020). Verbal fluency and Digit Span variables as performance validity indicators in experimentally induced malingering and real world patients with TBI. Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 9(4), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2020.1719409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, T. H., & Berry, D. T. R. (2002). Cross-validation of indicators of malingering: A comparison of nine neuropsychological tests, four tests of malingering, and behavioral observations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 17(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00073-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelicic, M., Ceunen, E., Peters, M. J., & Merckelbach, H. (2011). Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(9), 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2013). Test of Memory Malingering: Cutoff scores for psychometrically defined malingering groups in a military sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.804949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., Boone, K. B., Victor, T., Lu, P., Keatinge, C., & Mitchell, C. (2010). Sensitivity and specificity of a digit symbol recognition trial in the identification of response bias. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 25(5), 420–428. https://doi.org/10.1903/arclin/acq040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., Boone, K. B., Victor, T., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Cottingham, M. E., Ziegler, E. A., & Zeller, M. A. (2010). The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on “real world” credible and noncredible subjects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosky, K. M., Lace, J. W., Austin, T. A., Seitz, D. J., & Clark, B. (2020). The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, 64-card Version to detect noncredible attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864633
   Google Scholar
• Kulas, J. F., Axelrod, B. N., & Rinaldi, A. R. (2014). Cross-validation of supplemental Test of Memory Malingering Scores as performance validity measures. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9200-4
   Google Scholar
• Kura, K. (2013). Japanese north–south gradient in IQ predicts differences in stature, skin color, income, and homicide rate. Intelligence, 41(5), 512–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lace, J. W., Grant, A. F., Kosky, K. M., Teague, C. L., Lowell, K. T., & Gfeller, J. D. (2020). Identifying novel embedded performance validity test formulas within the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: A simulation study. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09382-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lace, J. W., Grant, A. F., Ruppert, P., Kaufman, D. A. S., Lowell, K. T., Teague, C. L., & Gfeller, J. D. (2019). Detecting noncredible performance with the Neuropsychological Assessment Battery: A simulation study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1694703
   Google Scholar
• Lafayette Instrument. (2015). Grooved Pegboard user manual. Lafayette Instrument Company.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., Brickell, T. A., Staver, T., Pancholi, S., Bhagwat, A., & French, L. M. (2013). Clinical utility of the Conners' Continuous Performance Test-II to detect poor effort in U.S. military personnel following traumatic brain injury. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Assessment of malingering. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach (2nd ed., pp. 116–159). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2014a). False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 29(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2014b). Minimizing false positive error with multiple performance validity tests: Response to Bilder, Sugar, and Hellemann (2014 this issue). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(8), 1230–1242. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.988754
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, F. R., & León, A. B. (2014). Why complex cognitive ability increases with absolute latitude. Intelligence, 46, 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed., pp. 830–862). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Erdodi, L. A., & Linnea, K. S. (2017). [Formula: see text] Introducing a forced-choice recognition task to the California Verbal Learning Test – Children's Version. Child Neuropsychology: A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 23(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2015.1135422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Erdodi, L. A., Rai, J. K., Mazur-Mosiewicz, A., & Flaro, L. (2018). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test embedded validity indicators developed for adults can be extended to children. Child Neuropsychology, 24(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2016.1259402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Flaro, L., Baldwin, F., Rai, J. K., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Further evidence for embedded Performance Validity Tests in Children within the Conners' Continuous Performance Test – Second Edition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 44(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2019.1565536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Greenacre, M. K., Cutler, L., Abeare, K., Baker, S. D., Kent, K. J., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Geographic variation and instrumentation artifacts: In search of confounds in performance validity assessment in adults with mild TBI. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09354-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Holcomb, M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2018). One-minute PVT: Further evidence for the utility of the California Verbal Learning Test – Children’s version Forced Choice Recognition trial. Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology, 4(3–4), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40817-018-0057-4
   Google Scholar
• Lippa, S. M. (2018). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: A clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(3), 391–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, T., Elbaum, T., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2018). Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the Word Memory Test. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 25(6), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1341410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, R. (2010). In Italy, north–south differences in IQ predict differences in income, education, infant mortality, stature, and literacy. Intelligence, 38(1), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, P., Schroeder, R., O'Brien, J., Fischer, R., Ries, A., Blesi, B., & Barker, J. (2010). Effectiveness of symptom validity measures in identifying cognitive and behavioral symptom exaggeration in adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(7), 1204–1237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2010.514290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). [Formula: see text] Neuropsychologists' validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., Olsen, D. H., Maloy, H., Boettcher, A., Ernst, N., & Okut, H. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 88–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1637027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A. (2006). Estimating state IQ: Measurement challenges and preliminary correlates. Intelligence, 34(6), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., Green, P., Henry, M., Blaskewitz, N., & Brockhaus, R. (2005). Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 20(6), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., & Rogers, R. (2017). An international perspective on feigned mental disabilities: Conceptual issues and continuing controversies. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, R. S., & Schatz, P. (2002). Enduring effects of concussion in youth athletes. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 17(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/17.1.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odland, A. P., Lammy, A. B., Martin, P. K., Grote, C. L., & Mittenberg, W. (2015). Advanced administration and interpretation of multiple validity tests. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9216-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ord, A. S., Miskey, H. M., Lad, S., Richter, B., Nagy, K., & Shura, R. D. (2020). Examining embedded validity indicators in Conners Continuous Performance Test-3 (CPT-3). The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1751301
   Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2009). Advanced clinical solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: Technical manual. The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. R., Gfeller, J. D., Hendricks, B. L., & Sharland, M. (2004). Detecting symptom- and test-coached simulators with the test of memory malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 19(5), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, J., An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Rey Complex Figure Test. Psychology & Neuroscience, 12(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000175
   Google Scholar
• Rai, J., & Erdodi, L. (2019). The impact of criterion measures on the classification accuracy of TOMM-1. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.161.1613994
   Google Scholar
• Reed, A. V. (1973). Speed-accuracy trade-off in recognition memory. Science, 181(4099), 574–576. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4099.574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, C. S., Suhr, J. A., & Riddle, T. L. (2012). Exploration of malingering indices in the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Digit Span subtest. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 27(2), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitan, R. M. (1958). The validity of the Trail Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8(3), 271–276. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271
   Google Scholar
• Resch, Z. J., Pham, A. T., Abramson, D. A., White, D. J., DeDios-Stern, S., Ovsiew, G. P., Castillo, L. R., & Soble, J. R. (2020). Examining independent and combined accuracy of embedded performance validity tests in the California Verbal Learning Test-II and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised for detecting invalid performance. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1742718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, F., Hall, S., Szalda-Petree, A., & Bach, P. (1998). A comparison of four tests of malingering and the effects of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 13(4), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00025-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R. M., Gioia, G. A., & Isquith, P. K. (2005). BRIEF-A: Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – adult version. PAR.
   Google Scholar
• Rüsseler, J., Brett, A., Klaue, U., Sailer, M., & Münte, T. F. (2008). The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment. BMC Neurology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-8-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. J., Testa, S. M., & Dux, M. (2017). Embedded performance validity tests within the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – Revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1245787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., Heinrichs, R. J., & Baade, L. E. (2019). Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(3), 466–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1484517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Olsen, D. H., & Martin, P. K. (2019). Classification accuracy rates of four TOMM validity indices when examined independently and jointly. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1373–1387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1619839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutte, C., Axelrod, B. N., & Montoya, E. (2015). Making sure neuropsychological data are meaningful: Use of performance validity testing in medicolegal and clinical contexts. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9225-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura, R. D., Brearly, T. W., Rowland, J. A., Martindale, S. L., Miskey, H. M., & Duff, K. (2018). RBANS validity indices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review, 28(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-018-9377-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura, R. D., Miskey, H. M., Rowland, J. A., Yoash-Gantz, R. E., & Denning, J. H. (2016). Embedded performance validity measures with postdeployment veterans: Cross-validation and efficiency with multiple measures. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 23(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1014556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soble, J. R., Alverson, W. A., Phillips, J. I., Critchfield, E. A., Fullen, C., O’Rourke, J. J. F., Messerly, J., Highsmith, J. M., Bailey, K. C., Webber, T. A., & Marceaux, J. C. (2020). Strength in numbers or quality over quantity? Examining the importance of criterion measure selection to define validity groups in performance validity test (PVT) research. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09370-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soble, J. R., Bain, K. M., Bailey, K. C., Kirton, J. W., Marceaux, J. C., Critchfield, E. A., McCoy, K. J. M., & O’Rourke, J. J. F. (2019). Evaluating the accuracy of the Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth Edition (WMS-IV) logical memory embedded validity index for detecting invalid test performance. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 26(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1418744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., & Williams, J. B. (1999). Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: The PHQ primary care study. JAMA, 282(18), 1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.18.1737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., Bahlo, S., Licha, C., Liske, B., & Vossler-Thies, E. (2016). Reaction time as an indicator of insufficient effort: Development and validation of an embedded performance validity parameter. Psychiatry Research, 245, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A., Friedel, E., Mehren, G., & Merten, T. (2008). Malingering and uncooperativeness in psychiatric and psychological assessment: Prevalence and effects in a German sample of claimants. Psychiatry Research, 157(1–3), 191–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strutt, A. M., Scott, B. M., Shrestha, S., & York, M. K. (2011). The Rey 15-Item Memory Test and Spanish-speaking older adults. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(7), 1253–1265. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.609839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman, M. A., & Axelrod, B. N. (2015). Embedded measures of performance validity using verbal fluency tests in a clinical sample. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 22(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.873439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr, J. A., & Boyer, D. (1999). Use of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in the detection of malingering in student simulator and patient samples. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(5), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.21.5.701.868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2000). The effects of coaching on the sensitivity and specificity of malingering measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 15(5), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/15.5.415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2007). Coaching and malingering: A review. In G. J. Larrabbe (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 287–311). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, K., & King, J. (2010). Detecting faked psychopathology: A comparison of two tests to detect malingered psychopathology using a simulation design. Psychiatry Research, 176(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(4), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.16.4.495.13909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering. Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Trueblood, W. (1994). Qualitative and quantitative characteristics of malingered and other invalid WAIS-R and clinical memory data. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 16(4), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639408402671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Helvoort, D., Merckelbach, H., & Merten, T. (2019). The Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SRSI) is sensitive to instructed feigning, but not to genuine psychopathology in male forensic inpatients: An initial study. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(6), 1069–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1559359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Serpa, J. G., Buehler, J., & Ziegler, E. A. (2009). Interpreting the meaning of multiple symptom validity test failure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(2), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802232682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, T., Bailey, K. C., Alverson, A., Critchfield, E., Bain, K., Messerly, J., O’Rourke, J., Kirton, J., Fullen, C., Marceaux, J., & Soble, J. (2018). Correction to: Further validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) trial 1 performance validity index: Examination of false positives and convergent validity. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9338-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Technical and interpretive manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Fourth Edition. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P., & Jacoby, L. L. (1994). Dissociations of processes in recognition memory: Effects of interference and of response speed. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Experimentale [Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology], 48(4), 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.48.4.516
   Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2015). Malingering in forensic disability-related assessments. Psychological Injury and Law, 8(3), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-015-9232-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccato, B. G., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2018). Early bird fails the PVT? The effects of timing artifacts on performance validity tests. Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1491–1498. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar