Neuropragmatics: A scientometric review

References

• Alduais, A., Al-Qaderi, I., & Alfadda, H. (2022). Pragmatic language development: Analysis of mapping knowledge domains on how infants and children become pragmatically competent. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 9(9), 1407. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alduais, A., Al-Qaderi, I., Alfadda, N., & Alfadda, H. (2022). Pragmatics: Mapping evidence on enhancing children’s use of linguistic and non-linguistic capacities for interactive communication. Children (Basel, Switzerland), 9(9), 1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, G. E., Furey, M. L., Grady, C. L., Pietrini, P., Brady, D. R., Mentis, M. J., & Schapiro, M. B. (1997). Association of premorbid intellectual function with cerebral metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease: Implications for the cognitive reserve hypothesis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(2), 165–172. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.2.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, J. (1973). Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part 2. Clinical application*. The British Journal of Radiology, 46(552), 1023–1047. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeleri, R., Bosco, F., Zettin, M., Sacco, K., Colle, L., & Bara, B. (2008). Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: A complete pragmatic assessment. Brain and Language, 107(3), 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balconi, M., & Amenta, S. (2010). From pragmatics to neuropragmatics. In M. Balconi, Neuropsychology of communication (pp. 93–109). Springer Milan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_5
   Google Scholar
• Bambini, V. (2010). Neuropragmatics: A foreword. In Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., & Bara, B. G. (2012). Neuropragmatics. In B. Frank, G. Pedro, D. Sigurd, & V. Mieke, Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–21). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.16.neu2
   Google Scholar
• Bara, B. G., & Tirassa, M. (2000). Neuropragmatics: Brain and communication. Brain and Language, 71(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (1999). Developmental pragmatics in normal and abnormal children. Brain and Language, 68(3), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, B. G., Bosco, F. M., & Bucciarelli, M. (2000). Rappresentazioni mentali e competenza pragmatica nei bambini [Mental representations and pragmatic competence in children]. Giornale Italiano Di Psicologia, 27(1), 91–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bara, B. G., Cutica, I., & Tirassa, M. (2001). Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic communication after closed head injury. Brain and Language, 77(1), 72–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, B. G., Tirassa, M., & Zettin, M. (1997). Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language, 59(1), 7–49. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(3), 216–241. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. R., & Dwivedi, V. D. (2003). Sensitivity to prosodic structure in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged individuals. Brain and Language, 87(2), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00109-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A., & Dennis, M. (1996). Attitudes of children toward a similar-aged child who uses augmentative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619612331277528
   Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. J., & Chiarello, C. (Eds.). (2013). Right hemisphere language comprehension. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203763544
   Google Scholar
• Belmonte, M. K., Cook, E. H., Anderson, G. M., Rubenstein, J. L. R., Greenough, W. T., Beckel-Mitchener, A., Courchesne, E., Boulanger, L. M., Powell, S. B., Levitt, P. R., Perry, E. K., Jiang, Y. H., DeLorey, T. M., & Tierney, E. (2004). Autism as a disorder of neural information processing: Directions for research and targets for therapy. Molecular Psychiatry, 9(7), 646–663. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D. A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
   Google Scholar
• Bischetti, L., Frau, F., & Bambini, V. (2022). Neuropragmatics.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M., Snowling, M. J., Thompson, P. A., & Greenhalgh, T. (2017). Phase 2 of CATALISE: A multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 58(10), 1068–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bögels, S., Barr, D. J., Garrod, S., & Kessler, K. (2015). Conversational interaction in the scanner: Mentalizing during language processing as revealed by MEG. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)), 25(9), 3219–3234. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., & Parola, A. (2018). Do executive function and theory of mind predict pragmatic abilities following traumatic brain injury? An analysis of sincere, deceitful and ironic communicative acts. Journal of Communication Disorders, 75, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. P., Milewski, K. M., & Beita-Ell, C. (2018). Disclosure of stuttering and quality of life in people who stutter. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 58, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M. C., Kelly, H., Godwin, J., Enderby, P., & Campbell, P. (2016). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(6), CD000425. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brain and Language. (n.d). Brain and language. Academic Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brain Sciences. (n.d). Brain sciences. MDPI.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012). Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brain Research, 1446, 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H. H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients*1. Brain and Language, 18(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90002-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H., Blum, A., & Winner, E. (1994). Attributional bias in RHD patients with impaired discourse comprehension. Brain and Language, 47(3), 476–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, K. (1995). The right hemisphere language battery. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Budzynski, T. H., Budzynski, H. K., Evans, J. R., & Abarbanel, A. (2009). Introduction to quantitative EEG and Neurofeedback. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374534-7.X0001-9
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Channon, S., Pellijeff, A., & Rule, A. (2005). Social cognition after head injury: Sarcasm and theory of mind. Brain and Language, 93(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., Levin, H. S., & Lawyer, S. L. (2016). Communication problems resulting from brain injury in children: Special issues of assessment and management. In M. Skye, C. Chris, & T. Leanne (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 235–270). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chellappandi, P., & Vijayakumar, C. S. (2018). Bibliometrics, scientometrics, webometrics/cybermetrics, informetrics and altmetrics - An emerging field in library and information science research. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2529398
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2014). The CiteSpace manual: Version 1.01 (pp. 1–84).
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. (2016, December). CiteSpace : A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. Novinka. http://www.dobraca.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/CiteSpacePracticalGuide-Nova-Sample1-50pp.pdf%0Ahttp://cluster.cis.drexel.edu/∼cchen/citespace/books/
   Google Scholar
• Choi, E. J., Vandewouw, M. M., Young, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (2018). Language network function in young children born very preterm. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciaramidaro, A., Adenzato, M., Enrici, I., Erk, S., Pia, L., Bara, B. G., & Walter, H. (2007). The intentional network: How the brain reads varieties of intentions. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3105–3113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (1998). Analysis of story grammar. In L. R. Cherney, C. A. Coelho, & B. B. Shadden (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults (pp. 115–122). Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. X. (2017). Where does EEG come from and what does it mean? Trends in Neurosciences, 40(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2017.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collura, T. F. (2014). Technical foundations of neurofeedback. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203795132
   Google Scholar
• Critchley, M. (1968). Speech and speech-loss in relation to duality of the brain. In V. B. Mountcasle (Ed.), Interhemispheric relations and cerebral dominance (pp. 208–213). John Hopkins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2015). Theory of mind in utterance interpretation: The case from clinical pragmatics. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1286. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutica, I., Bucciarelli, M., & Bara, B. G. (2006). Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right-hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 98(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40(2), 141–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099704000203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, E., Satoer, D., Robert, E., Colle, H., Verheyen, S., Visch-Brink, E., & Mariën, P. (2015). The Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol: A valid linguistic approach to awake brain surgery. Brain and Language, 140, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demos, J. N. (2005). Getting started with neurofeedback. WW Norton Co.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (1990). Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence*1. Brain and Language, 39(3), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(90)90149-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M., Purvis, K., Barnes, M. A., Wilkinson, M., & Winner, E. (2001). Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise following childhood head injury. Brain and Language, 78(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despins, E. H., Turkstra, L. S., Struchen, M. A., & Clark, A. N. (2016). Sex-based differences in perceived pragmatic communication ability of adults with traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97(2 Suppl), S26–S32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.06.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domaneschi, F., & Bambini, V. (2020). Pragmatic competence*. In E. Fridland & C. Pavese (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of skill and expertise (pp. 419–430). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180809-40
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, C. C., Barry, R. J., Connolly, J. F., Fischer, C., Michie, P. T., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Reinvang, I., & Van Petten, C. (2009). Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400. Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(11), 1883–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 55(6), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.6.608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyn, J. H. (2012). The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain. NeuroImage, 62(2), 1241–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egghe, L. (1994). Little science, big science… and beyond. Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 389–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenson, J. (1959). Language dysfunctions associated with right brain damage. Vol. 1. American Speech and Hearing Association, p. 107.
   Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., & Meyer, A. M. (2008). What’s "right" in language comprehension: ERPs reveal right hemisphere language capabilities. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2007.00042.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D. (2011). The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. Physiological Reviews, 91(4), 1357–1392. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00006.2011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R., Avgerinou, C., Goodman, C., Clegg, A., Hopkins, J., Gould, R. L., Gardner, B., Marston, L., Hunter, R., Manthorpe, J., Cooper, C., Skelton, D. A., Drennan, V. M., Logan, P., & Walters, K. (2022). Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a personalised health promotion intervention enabling independence in older people with mild frailty (‘HomeHealth’) compared to treatment as usual: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatrics, 22(1), 485. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03160-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galski, T., Tompkins, C., & Johnston, M. V. (1998). Competence in discourse as a measure of social integration and quality of life in persons with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 12(9), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990598122160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018008004
   Google Scholar
• Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). On understanding familiar and less-familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1601–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics … and beyond? Scientometrics, 30(2–3), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018107
   Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. (2019). The neurobiology of language beyond single-word processing. Science (New York, N.Y.), 366(6461), 55–58. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, E., Dhond, R. P., Christensen, N., Van Petten, C., Marinkovic, K., Lewine, J. D., & Dale, A. M. (2002). N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. NeuroImage, 17(3), 1101–1116. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Happé, F., Brownell, H., & Winner, E. (1999). Acquired ′theory of mind’ impairments following stroke. Cognition, 70(3), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00005-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, L. L., & Jensen, P. J. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699059109008097
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill, E. L. (2001). Non-specific nature of specific language impairment: A review of the literature with regard to concomitant motor impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820010019874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdsworth, S., & Bammer, R. (2008). Magnetic resonance imaging techniques: fMRI, DWI, and PWI. Seminars in Neurology, 28(4), 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D. J., Lynn, S. K., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2009). Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2245–2262. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsfield, G. N. (1973). Computerised transverse axial scanning (tomography) part 1. Description of system. British Journal of Radiology, 46(552):1016–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, J., Miao, X., Agarwal, S., Bettegowda, C., Quiñones-Hinojosa, A., Laterra, J., Van Zijl, P. C. M., Pekar J. J., & Pillai, J. J. (2017). Language mapping using T2-prepared BOLD functional MRI in the presence of large susceptibility artifacts—initial results in patients with brain tumor and epilepsy. Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 3(2), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.18383/j.tom.2017.00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Glänzel, W., & Zhang, L. (2021). Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains. Scientometrics, 126(7), 6201–6224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03821-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagoe, C. (2017). Disruption of pragmatics in adulthood. In A. Capone (Ed.), Perspectives in pragmatics, philosophy and psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 181–210). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_8
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., & Brownell, H. H. (Eds.). (1990). Discourse ability and brain damage. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3262-9
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Ska, B., & Côté, H. (2004). Montreal communication assessment protocol (MEC protocol) pocket version. EduZone.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J. A., Brownell, H. H., Jacobs, J. R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks*1. Brain and Language, 38(2), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(90)90117-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. P., & Adolphs, R. (2012). The social brain in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(11), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, R. M. (2016). What cognitive processes are likely to be exercised by bilingualism and does this exercise lead to extra-linguistic cognitive benefits? Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 6(5), 549–564. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15045.kle
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J. (2002). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining - KDD, pp. 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/775060.775061
   Google Scholar
• Knox, L., & Douglas, J. (2009). Long-term ability to interpret facial expression after traumatic brain injury and its relation to social integration. Brain and Cognition, 69(2), 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, K., & Cienki, A. (2017). Taking simulation semantics out of the laboratory: Towards an interactive and multimodal reappraisal of embodied language comprehension. Language and Cognition, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2014.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolias, A. G., Adams, H., Timofeev, I. S., Corteen, E. A., Hossain, I., Czosnyka, M., Timothy, J., Anderson, I., Bulters, D. O., Belli, A., Eynon, C. A., Wadley, J., Mendelow, A. D., Mitchell, P. M., Wilson, M. H., Critchley, G., Sahuquillo, J., Unterberg, A., Posti, J. P., Servadei, F., Teasdale, G. M., & Hutchinson, P. J. (2022). Evaluation of outcomes among patients with traumatic intracranial hypertension treated with decompressive craniectomy vs standard medical care at 24 months. JAMA Neurology, 79(7), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.1070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krestel, H., Annoni, J.-M., & Jagella, C. (2013). White matter in aphasia: A historical review of the Dejerines’ studies. Brain and Language, 127(3), 526–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Abbas, A. K., & Aster, J. C. (2022). Robbins basic pathology e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences. https://doi.org/10.33029/9704-6467-0-krb-2022-1-1036
   Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(8), 985–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.496237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logothetis, N. K. (2008). What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature, 453(7197), 869–878. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00070-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2005). Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 19(8), 712–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500172203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masland, S. R., Price, D., MacDonald, J., Finch, E., Gunderson, J., & Choi-Kain, L. (2018). Enduring effects of one-day training in good psychiatric management on clinician attitudes about borderline personality disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 206(11), 865–869. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matchin, W., Sprouse, J., & Hickok, G. (2014). A structural distance effect for backward anaphora in Broca’s area: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 138, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (2013). Impairments in social cognition following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : Jins, 19(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712001506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Flanagan, S. (2004). Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology, 18(3), 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53(1), 81–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Turkstra, L. (1998). Adolescents with traumatic brain injury: Assessing pragmatic language function. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209808985224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200305000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Wearne, T., & Kelly, M. (2023). Calling on clinicians to get social and emotional. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 37(3), 506–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2022.2085176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mentis, M. (1988). Topic management in the discourse of normal and language-impaired children. Journal of Childhool Communication Disorders, 14(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/152574018801400104
   Google Scholar
• Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Münte, T. F., & Kutas, M. (2008). Capitalizing on deep brain stimulation: Thalamus as a language monitor. Neuron, 59(5), 677–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale, S. (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(5), 509–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neurobiology of Language. (n.d). Neurobiology of language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nøkleby, K., Boland, E., Bergersen, H., Schanke, A.-K., Farner, L., Wagle, J., & Wyller, T. B. (2008). Screening for cognitive deficits after stroke: A comparison of three screening tools. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22(12), 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215508094711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olichney, J. M., Taylor, J. R., Gatherwright, J., Salmon, D. P., Bressler, A. J., Kutas, M., & Iragui-Madoz, V. J. (2008). Patients with MCI and N400 or P600 abnormalities are at very high risk for conversion to dementia. Neurology, 70(19), 1763–1770. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000281689.28759.ab
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozonoff, S. J., & Miller, J. N. (1996). An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language, 52(3), 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, M. (1998). The other side of language: Pragmatic competence. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0911-6044(98)00001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M. (2011). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Library Management, 32(3), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121111112934
   Google Scholar
• Parola, A., & Bosco, F. M. (2022). An eye-tracking investigation of the cognitive processes involved in the comprehension of simple and complex communicative acts. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 75(10), 1976–1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218221079629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, L. K., Van Lancker-Sidtis, D., Schieffer, B., Dietrich, R., & Brown, W. S. (2003). Communicative deficits in agenesis of the corpus callosum: Nonliteral language and affective prosody. Brain and Language, 85(2), 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00062-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penfold, R. (2020). Using the lens database for staff publications. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 108(2), 520–522. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2020.918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perani, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2005). The neural basis of first and second language processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 15(2), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12001495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnacker, J., Hagoort, P., Buitelaar, J., Teunisse, J.-P., & Geurts, B. (2009). Pragmatic inferences in high-functioning adults with autism and asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(4), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-008-0661-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PLOS ONE. (n.d). PLOS ONE.
   Google Scholar
• Połczyńska, M. M. (2021). Organizing variables affecting fMRI estimates of language dominance in patients with brain tumors. Brain Sciences, 11(6), 694. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11060694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranckutė, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, C. J. (2012). A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading. NeuroImage, 62(2), 816–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pronina, M., Prieto, P., Bischetti, L., & Bambini, V. (2023). Expressive pragmatics and prosody in young preschoolers are more closely related to structural language than to mentalizing. Language Learning and Development, 19(3), 323–344. – https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2022.2074852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sak-Wernicka, J. (2016). Exploring theory of mind use in blind adults during natural communication. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 45(4), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9379-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Bales, J. W. (2005). Understanding text after severe closed-head injury: Assessing inferences and memory operations with a think-aloud procedure. Brain and Language, 94(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnell, Z., Varga, E., Tényi, T., Simon, M., Hajnal, A., Járai, R., & Herold, R. (2016). Neuropragmatics and irony processing in schizophrenia – Possible neural correlates of the meta-module of pragmatic meaning construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 92, 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. M., Vosse, T., Kempen, G., Van Berkum, J. J. A., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: An fMRI study using word-category ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)), 19(7), 1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 117(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for the Neurobiology of Language. (n.d). Society for the neurobiology of language. Retrieved July 13, 2022, from https://www.neurolang.org/
   Google Scholar
• Sooryamoorthy, R. (2020). Scientometrics for the humanities and social sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003110415
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Hirschfeld, L. (1999). Culture, cognition, and evolution. In R. A. Wilson and F. C. Keil (Eds.), MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp: cxi-cxxxii). The MIT Press Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Stemmer, B. (1999). Discourse studies in neurologically impaired populations: A quest for action. Brain and Language, 68(3), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemmer, B. (2008). Neuropragmatics: Disorders and neural systems. In B. Stemmer & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.) Handbook of the neuroscience of language (pp. 175–188). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-045352-1.00017-3
   Google Scholar
• Stemmer, B., & Schönle, P. W. (2000). Neuropragmatics in the twenty-first century. Brain and Language, 71(1), 233–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemmer, B., & Whitaker, H. A. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of the neuroscience of language. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoeckel, L. E., Garrison, K. A., Ghosh, S., Wighton, P., Hanlon, C. A., Gilman, J. M., Greer, S., Turk-Browne, N. B., deBettencourt, M. T., Scheinost, D., Craddock, C., Thompson, T., Calderon, V., Bauer, C. C., George, M., Breiter, H. C., Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., Gabrieli, J. D., LaConte, S. M., … Evins, A. E. (2014). Optimizing real time fMRI neurofeedback for therapeutic discovery and development. NeuroImage. Clinical, 5, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss, D. T., & Anderson, V. (2004). The frontal lobes and theory of mind: Developmental concepts from adult focal lesion research. Brain and Cognition, 55(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00271-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuss, D. T., Murphy, K. J., Binns, M. A., & Alexander, M. P. (2003). Staying on the job: The frontal lobes control individual performance variability. Brain : A Journal of Neurology, 126(Pt 11), 2363–2380. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Summaka, M., Elias, E., Zein, H., Naim, I., Daoud, R., Fares, Y., & Nasser, Z. (2021). Computed tomography findings as early predictors of long-term language impairment in patients with traumatic brain injury. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1971982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, T. Y., Ledoux, K., Camblin, C. C., & Boudewyn, M. A. (2011). Language-related ERP components. In E. S. Kappenman & S. J. Luck (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 398–440). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195374148.013.0197
   Google Scholar
• The Journal of Neurolinguistics. (n.d). The Journal of Neurolinguistics. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M., & Thompson, L. (2003). The neurofeedback book: An introduction to basic concepts in applied psychophysiology. Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
   Google Scholar
• Togher, L., & Hand, L. (1998). Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: An investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 12(7–8), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A. (1995). Right hemisphere communication disorders: Theory and management. Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L. S. (1998). The effect of stimulus presentation rate on syntax test performance in brain-injured adolescents. Aphasiology, 12(6), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tynterova, A., Perepelitsa, S., & Golubev, A. (2022). Personalized neurophysiological and neuropsychological assessment of patients with left and right hemispheric damage in acute ischemic stroke. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12050554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchiyama, H., Seki, A., Kageyama, H., Saito, D. N., Koeda, T., Ohno, K., & Sadato, N. (2006). Neural substrates of sarcasm: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study. Brain Research, 1124(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92(1–2), 231–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285–320). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2022, January). VOSviewer manual: Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.18. Univeristeit Leiden. http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & van den Berg, J. (2010). A comparison of two techniques for bibliometric mapping: Multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological and imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, H., Bambini, V., & Schumacher, P. B. (2014). The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: Evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain : A Journal of Neurology, 100(4), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/100.4.717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, E., von Karolyi, C., Malinsky, D., French, L., Seliger, C., Ross, E., & Weber, C. (2001). Dyslexia and visual-spatial talents: Compensation vs deficit model. Brain and Language, 76(2), 81–110. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeates, K. O., Swift, E., Taylor, H. G., Wade, S. L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., & Minich, N. (2004). Short- and long-term social outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 10(3), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704103093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar