775
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
STEM EDUCATION

Effect of context based REACT strategy on students’ conceptual understanding of heredity

ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2290104 | Received 11 May 2023, Accepted 27 Nov 2023, Published online: 06 Dec 2023

References

  • Acar, B., & Yaman, M. (2011). The effects of context-based learning on students’ levels of knowledge and interest. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40(1), 1–13.
  • Bao, L., Xiao, Y., Koenig, K., & Han, J. (2018). Validity evaluation of the Lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020106
  • Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
  • Cabbar, B. G., & Senel, H. (2020). Content analysis of biology education research that used context-based approaches: The case of Turkey. Journal of Educational Issues, 6(1), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v6i1.16920
  • Cimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research & Reviews, 7(3), 61–71.
  • Crawford, M. L. (2001). Teaching contextually: Research, rational, and techniques for improving student motivation and achievement in mathematics and science. Texas CCI publishing Inc.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Debele, M. L. (2017). Curriculum as unquestioned hegemony: Trends that reveal the exclusion of Ethiopian primary school curriculum content from researchers’ critical look. Bahir Dar Journal of Education, 17(1), 14–33.
  • De Jong, O. (2008). Context-based chemical education: How to improve it? Chemical Education International, 8(1), 1–7.
  • Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M. W., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context‐based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
  • Hasanah, U., Suratno, S., & Iqbal, M. (2019). The effect of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) based on lesson study on the biology learning achievement of high school students. Pancaran Pendidikan, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v8i1.211
  • Joshi, R., & Verspoor, A. (2013). Secondary education in Ethiopia: Supporting growth and transformation. The World Bank.
  • Karslı, F., & Patan, K. K. (2016). Effects of the context-based approach on students’ conceptual understanding: “the umbra, the solar eclipse and the lunar eclipse”. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/16.15.246
  • Karsli, F., & Saka, Ü. (2017). The effect of the context-based approach on 5 th grade students’ conceptual understanding about“getting to know foods”. Ilkogretim Online, 16(3), 900–916.
  • Kazeni, M., & Onwu, G. (2013). Comparative effectiveness of context-based and traditional approaches in teaching genetics: Student views and achievement. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 17(2), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2013.826970
  • Klymkowsky, M., & DeHaan, R. (2010). Thinking about the conceptual foundations of the biological sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0061
  • Konicek-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. NSTA Press, National Science Teachers Association Arlington.
  • Lee, J.-A., & Kim, C.-J. (2019). Teaching and learning science in authoritative classrooms: Teachers’ power and students’ approval in Korean elementary classrooms. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 1367–1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9659-6
  • Mills, S. (2016). Conceptual understanding: A concept analysis. The Qualitative Report, 21(3), 546–557. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2308
  • MoE. (2017). National educational assessment and examinations agency Ethiopian third national learning assessment of grade 10 and 12 students. Ministor of eduaction.
  • MoE. (2018). Ethiopian education development roadmap. Ministor of education.
  • Negassa, O. (2014). Ethiopian students’ achievement challenges in science education: Implications to policy formulation. African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(1), 2–18.
  • Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). “Chemie im Kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context‐based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512
  • Podschuweit, S., & Bernholt, S. (2018). Composition-effects of context-based learning opportunities on students’ understanding of energy. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 717–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9585-z
  • Prince, M., Vigeant, M., & Nottis, K. (2016). Repairing student misconceptions in heat transfer using inquiry-based activities. Chemical Engineering Education, 50(1), 52–61.
  • Seltman, H. J. (2018). Experimental design and analysis. http://www.stat.cmu.edu/∼hseltman/309/Book/Book.pdf.
  • Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2005). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Understanding the wrong answers–teaching toward conceptual change. Cell Biology Education, 4(2), 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-02-0068
  • Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students’ misconceptions in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069880100204
  • Tsui, C. Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two‐tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902951429
  • van Moolenbroek, A., & Boersma, K. (2013). Behavioural biology: Developing a learning and teaching strategy in upper secondary education. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research – part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 601–617). SLO.