A systematic review of research on educational superintendents

References

• *Abrego, C., & Pankake, A. (2011). The district-wide sustainability of a professional learning community during leadership changes at the superintendency level. Administrative Issues Journal, 1(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.5929/2011.1.1.2
   Google Scholar
• *Alsbury, T. L., & Whitaker, K. S. (2007). Superintendent perspectives and practice of accountability, democratic voice and social justice. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(2), 154–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710732943
   Google Scholar
• *Andero, A. (2000). The changing role of school superintendent with regard to curriculum policy and decision making. Education, 121(2), 276.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, G., Vedel, I., Hong, Q. N., et al. (2018). The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291.
   Google Scholar
• *Beard, K. S. (2012). Making the case for the outlier: Researcher reflections of an African-American female deputy superintendent who decided to close the achievement gap. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.647724
   Google Scholar
• Belotto, M. J. (2018). Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2622–2633. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björk, L. G., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Kowalski, T. J. (2014). The Superintendent and educational reform in the United States of America. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 444–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945656
   Google Scholar
• *Björk, L. G., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2016). International perspectives on the micropolitics of the superintendency. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 1(1), 121–156. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2016.1.5
   Google Scholar
• *Brazer, S. D., & Keller, L. R. (2006). A conceptual framework for multiple stakeholder educational decision making. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 1(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2006v1n3a40
   Google Scholar
• Brazer, S. D., Rich, W., & Ross, S. A. (2010). Collaborative strategic decision making in school districts. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231011027851
   Google Scholar
• Buck, J. T. (2005). The school superintendent: The profession and the person. School Administrator, 62(6), 49.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., & Köster, F., (Eds.). (2016). Governing education in a complex world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/20769679
   Google Scholar
• *Cha, S. H. (2016). Decentralization in educational governance and its challenges in Korea: Focused on policy conflicts between central and local government in education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(3), 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9448-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cox, D., & McLeod, S. (2014). Social media marketing and communications strategies for school superintendents. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(6), 850–868. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2012-0117
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, F. D., & Hughes, T. R. (2019). Exemplary superintendents’ experiences with trust. Education Leadership Review, 20(1), 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• *Davidson, F. D., Schwanenberger, M., & Wiggall, R. (2019). What matters most in superintendent evaluation. Education Leadership Review, 20(1), 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• *Davis, S. H. (2000). Why principals lose their jobs: Comparing the perceptions of principals and superintendents. Journal of School Leadership, 10(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268460001000104
   Google Scholar
• *Decman, J. M., Badgett, K., Shaughnessy, B., Randall, A., Nixon, L., & Lemley, B. (2018). Organizational leadership through management: Superintendent perceptions. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(6), 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217714255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *DeVore, S., & Bn, M. (2008). Ethical decision-making: Practices of female and male superintendents. Advancing Women in Leadership, 28(1).
   Google Scholar
• *Filippi, J. R., & Hackmann, D. G. (2019). Leading common core state standards implementation: Lessons from one successful superintendent. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 18(1), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2017.1398334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, B. (2020). Negating Amy Gutmann: Deliberative democracy, business influence, and segmentation strategies in education. Democracy and Education, 28(1), 4.
   Google Scholar
• *Gawlik, M. A., & Allen, A. (2020). Perceptions of the role of a charter superintendent by charter board members and principals. European Journal of Educational Management, 3(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.3.1.15
   Google Scholar
• Hart, C. (2018). Doing a literature review: Releasing the research imagination (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• *Hart, W. H. (2018). Is it rational or intuitive? Factors and processes affecting school superintendents’ decisions when facing professional dilemmas. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 29(1), 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hautala, T., Helander, J., & Korhonen, V. (2018). Loose and tight coupling in educational organizations – An integrative literature review. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2017-0027
   Google Scholar
• *Hemmer, L., Aguilar, I., & Fleming, K. (2017). Visionary planning and the Eagle Ford Shale play: A cross-case study of rural school superintendents as sense-makers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1318959
   Google Scholar
• Honingh, M., Ruiter, M., & Van Thiel, S. (2020). Are school boards and educational quality related? Results of an international literature review. Educational Review, 72(2), 157–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooge, E., & Honingh, M. (2014). Are schoolboards aware of the educational quality of their schools? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 42(4_suppl), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143213499256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hyle, A. E., Ivory, G., & McClellan, RL. (2010). Hidden expert knowledge: The knowledge that counts for the small school-district superintendent. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(4), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277511000500401
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, O., & Nihlfors, E. (2014). The Swedish superintendent in the policy stream. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 13(4), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2014.945652
   Google Scholar
• *Jones, K., & Howley, A. (2009). Contextual influences on superintendents’ time usage. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 17(23), 23. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v17n23.2009
   Google Scholar
• *Katz, S. J. (2012). Border crossing: A black woman superintendent builds democratic community in unfamiliar territory. Journal of School Leadership, 22(4), 771–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461202200405
   Google Scholar
• *Langlois, L. (2004). Responding ethically: Complex decision-making by school district superintendents. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(2), 78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S. (2015). Linking leadership to learning: State, district and local effects. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(3), 30321. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.30321
   Google Scholar
• Lundahl, L., Erixon Arreman, I., Holm, A.-S., & Lundström, U. (2013). Educational marketization the Swedish way. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 22620. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v4i3.22620
   Google Scholar
• *McClellan, R., Ivory, G., & Domínguez, R. (2008). Distribution of influence, communication, and relational mentoring in the US superintendency. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 16(3), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260802233514
   Google Scholar
• Maranto, R., Carroll, K., Cheng, A., & Teodoro, M. P. (2018). Boys will be superintendents: School leadership as a gendered profession. The Phi Delta Kappan, 100(2), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718803563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Margolin, I. (2013). Nurturing opportunities for educational leadership: How affordance and leadership interconnect. Higher Education Studies, 3(3), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v3n3p77
   Google Scholar
• *Melton, T. D., Reeves, L., & McBrayer, J. S. (2019). Navigating the politics of the superintendency. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 16(3), 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• *Menna, A. (2010). Quality of life and standard of living: Planning for conflict or cooperation. Educational Planning, 19(3), 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Noppe, R., Yager, S., & Webb, C. (2013). Decision-making and problem-solving practices of superintendents confronted by district dilemmas. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 103–120.
   Google Scholar
• Norberg, K., & Johansson, O. (2007). Ethical dilemmas of Swedish school leaders: Contrasts and common themes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143207075393
   Google Scholar
• *Oakley, D. L., Watkins, S. G., & Sheng, B. Z. (2017). Illinois public school superintendents: Influencing state-level education legislation and policy-making in Illinois. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 14(1), 4–18.
   Google Scholar
• *Opfer, V. D., & Denmark, V. (2001). Sorting out a sense of place: School and school board relationships in the midst of school-based decision making. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje7602_6
   Google Scholar
• Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—A web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Patterson, J. A., Koenigs, A., Mohn, G., & Rasmussen, C. (2006). Working against ourselves: Decision making in a small rural school district. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230610652033
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2013-0103
   Google Scholar
• Pérez, J., Díaz, J., Garcia-Martin, J., & Tabuenca, B. (2020). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering—Enhancement of the study selection process using Cohen’s kappa statistic. Journal of Systems and Software, 168, 110657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Petersen, G. J., & Short, P. M. (2001). The school board president’s perception of the district superintendent: Applying the lenses of social influence and social style. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(4), 533–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131610121969415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Polka, W. S., Litchka, P. R., Calzi, F. F., Denig, S. J., & Mete, R. E. (2014). Perspectives about living on the horns of dilemmas: An analysis of gender factors related to superintendent decision-making and problem-solving. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.22230/ijepl.2014v9n1a456
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, S. (2011). The director of education as a leader of pedagogical issues: A study of leadership in municipal educational sector activities. School Leadership and Management, 31(5), 471–490. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.587405
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, S., Segolsson, M., & Aktas, V. (2017). The director of education and research-based education: Exploring the tension between policy and what directors actually report. International Journal of Research and Education, 2(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• *Rapp, S., Ståhlkrantz, K., & Aktas, V. (2022). Schoolboards’ expectations of the superintendent – A Swedish national survey. Educational Review, 74(6), 1101–1118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1837740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Reingold, R., & Avidov-Ungar, O. (2019). “There should be more cooperation in setting the policy”: Israeli stakeholders’ perceptions of their appropriate role in implementing a new educational reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(6), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1529820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2014). Coding and analysis strategies. In The Oxford handbook of qualitative research (pp. 581–605). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, William L., & Walter, James K. (2004). The school superintendent: The profession and the person (2nd ed.). Scarecrow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. C., & Beckmann, J. (2014). The role of the district director in education districts: A South African perspective. Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• *Sperandio, J., & Devdas, L. (2015). Staying close to home: Women’s life-choices and the superintendency. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(3), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2013-0088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenmark, C. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Situational impacts on leader ethical decision-making. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 942–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Stewart, C., & Raskin, C., Zielaski, D. (2012). Barriers to district-level educational reform: A statewide study of Minnesota school superintendents. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7(3), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• *Touchton, D., & Acker-Hocevar, M. (2011). Decision-making quandaries that superintendents face in their work in small school districts building democratic communities. Journal of School Public Relations, 32(3), 210–236. https://doi.org/10.3138/jspr.32.3.210
   Google Scholar
• *Walker, K. D., & Kutsyuruba, B. (2020). Upgrading downsizing: Ethics and personnel reductions in declining organizations. European Journal of Educational Management, 3(2), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar