Systematic literature review on performance drivers of Ph.D. success: utilizing PRISMA, TCCM, and an 8-step approach

References

• Ann Danowitz, M. (2016). Power, jobs, and bodies: The experiences of becoming a gender scholar in doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(5), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1147720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., Kehm, B. M., & Ma, Y. (2018). From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 524–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1182481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasy, K., Emery, S., & Crawford, J. (2021). Drowning in the shallows: An Australian study of the PhD experience of wellbeing. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1669014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billore, S., & Anisimova, T. (2021). Panic buying research: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 777–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, S., Holbrook, A., Lovat, T., & Farley, P. (2004). Attrition, Completion and Completion times of PhD Candidates. AARE annual conference.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, P. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertations using a collaborative cohort model. Counselor Education and Supervision, 39(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.1999.tb01789.x
   Google Scholar
• Calle-Arango, L., & Ávila Reyes, N. (2022). Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in Continuing Education, 45(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2022.2026315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canal-Domínguez, J. F., & Wall, A. (2014). Factors determining the career success of doctorate holders: Evidence from the Spanish case. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1750–1773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, S., Santos, S., Diogo, S., Soares, D., & Carvalho, T. (2022). The transformation of doctoral education: A systematic literature review. Higher Education, 84(4), 885–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-021-00805-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castelló, M., Pardo, M., Sala-Bubaré, A., & Suñe-Soler, N. (2017). Why do students consider dropping out of doctoral degrees? Institutional and personal factors. Higher Education, 74(6), 1053–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0106-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vogel, S. (2022). Simply the best? Determinants of achieving the highest grade in a doctoral degree in Germany. Higher Education, 85(5), 1161–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00883-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot, D. L., & Kobayashi, S. (2019). How can PhD supervisors play a role in bridging academic cultures? Teaching in Higher Education, 24(8), 911–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1517305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espenshade, T. J. (1997). Completing the Ph.D.: Comparative performances of U.S. and foreign students. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 593–605.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003). Investing in research: An action plan for Europe: Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Fiset, J., & Saffie‐Robertson, M. C. (2020). The impact of gender and perceived academic supervisory support on new faculty negotiation success. Higher Education Quarterly, 74(3), 240–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, A. M., Klein, L. B., Thomas, S. H., Kainz, K., & Blank Wilson, A. (2022). Holistic admissions and racial/ethnic diversity: A systematic review and implications for social work doctoral education. Journal of Social Work Education, 58(2), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.1895927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golde, C. M., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Envisioning the future of doctoral education: Preparing stewards of the discipline, Carnegie essays on the doctorate (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. J. (2003). Advising to avoid or to cope with dissertation hang-ups. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.9901674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenvynck, H., Vandevelde, K., & Van Rossem, R. (2013). The PhD track: Who succeeds, who drops out? Research Evaluation, 22(4), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. A., Dutkowsky, D. H., & Grodner, A. (2007). Survive then thrive: Determinants of success in the economics Ph.D. program. Economic Inquiry, 45(4), 864–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruzdev, I., Terentev, E., & Dzhafarova, Z. (2020). Superhero or hands-off supervisor? An empirical categorization of PhD supervision styles and student satisfaction in Russian universities. Higher Education, 79(5), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00437-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haake, U. (2011). Contradictory values in doctoral education: A study of gender composition in disciplines in Swedish academia. Higher Education, 62(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9369-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hnatkova, E., Degtyarova, I., Kersschot, M., & Boman, J. (2022). Labour market perspectives for PhD graduates in Europe. European Journal of Education, 57(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzweiss, P. C. (2022). The challenges and trade-offs of supporting doctoral student writing: A case study of faculty experiences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(2), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2065329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, H., Cattaneo, M., & Meoli, M. (2019). The impact of Ph.D. funding on time to Ph.D. completion. Research Evaluation, 28(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2022). Exploring the professional development of doctoral supervisors through workplace learning: A literature review. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(3), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1877629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., & Tight, M. (2013). The metaphors we study by: The doctorate as a journey and/or as work. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2013.777031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, R., Marshall, N., & Leonardo, L. (2012). the impact of research training and research codes of practice on submission of doctoral degrees: An exploratory cohort study: The impact on submission of doctoral degrees. Higher Education Quarterly, 66(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00499.x
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, P. C., Jacobs, L., Hawkins, R. M., & Sisson, K. (2022). Mental health and psychological wellbeing in the early stages of doctoral study: A systematic review. European Journal of Higher Education, 12(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2021.1939752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, S., van Vuuren, M., & de Jong, M. D. T. (2021). Sensemaking in supervisor-doctoral student relationships: Revealing schemas on the fulfillment of basic psychological needs. Studies in Higher Education, 46(12), 2738–2750. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1804850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jara, M. (2021). Research-based doctoral supervision development programme: Learning through peer learning, reflection and case studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1786433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Lee, A., & Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. (2013). Issues in doctoral studies – Forty years of journal discussion: Where have we been and where are we going? International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 8, 083–104. https://doi.org/10.28945/1871
   Google Scholar
• Jöstl, G., Bergsmann, E., Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., & Spiel, C. (2012). When will they blow my cover?: The impostor phenomenon among Austrian doctoral students. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 220(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeling, R. (2006). The Bologna process and the Lisbon research agenda: The European Commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education, 41(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00256.x
   Google Scholar
• Kevork, E. K., & Vrechopoulos, A. P. (2009). CRM literature: Conceptual and functional insights by keyword analysis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 27(1), 48–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500910928362
   Google Scholar
• Kiley, M. (2017). Career professionals entering doctoral study: Advantages and challenges. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1377099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., & Karau, S. J. (2009). Working environment and the research productivity of doctoral students in management. Journal of Education for Business, 85(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832320903258535
   Google Scholar
• Kluever, R. C. (1997). Students’ Attitudes Toward the Responsibilities and Barriers in Doctoral Study. New Directions for Higher Education, 1997(99), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.9904
   Google Scholar
• Larivière, V. (2012). On the shoulders of students? The contribution of PhD students to the advancement of knowledge. Scientometrics, 90(2), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0495-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Boud, D. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507032000058109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liechty, J. M., Liao, M., & Schull, C. P. (2009). Facilitating dissertation completion and success among doctoral students in social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 45(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.5175/JSWE.2009.200800091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovitts, B. (2002). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study (1st ed.). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, G. (2022). The employment destination of PhD‐holders in Italy: Non‐academic funded projects as drivers of successful segmentation. European Journal of Education, 57(2), 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsuo, M., & Turkulainen, V. (2011). Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903469598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine, L., Castello, M., & Pyhaltö, K. (2020). What influences PhD graduate trajectories during the degree: A research-based policy agenda. Higher Education, 80(6), 1011–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00448-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCray, J., & Joseph-Richard, P. (2020). Towards a model of resilience protection: Factors influencing doctoral completion. Higher Education, 80(4), 679–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00507-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertkan, S., Onurkan Aliusta, G., & Bayrakli, H. (2022). Pressured to publish: Stories of inexperienced researchers. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(3), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-08-2021-0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, R., & Rodwell, J. (2009). The ‘invisible’ part‐time research students: A case study of satisfaction and completion. Studies in Higher Education, 34(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802601960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of tertiary education: Croatia 2008. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264039155-en
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. (2005). New Variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600800500120068
   Google Scholar
• Paul, J., & Rosado-Serrano, A. (2019). Gradual internationalization vs born-global/international new venture models: A review and research agenda. International Marketing Review, 36(6), 830–858. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-10-2018-0280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRISMA TRANSPARENT REPORTING of SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS and META-ANALYSES.prisma-statement.org. http://prisma-statement.org/
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. J. (2017). Ages and career stages: Considerations in providing support for mid-late career stage doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 560–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1355261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (Eds.). (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
   Google Scholar
• Smith McGloin, R. (2021). A new mobilities approach to re-examining the doctoral journey: Mobility and fixity in the borderlands space. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(3), 370–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1898364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaulding, L. S., & Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. (2012). Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7, 199–219. https://doi.org/10.28945/1589
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., Barnacle, R., & Cuthbert, D. (2014). How the doctorate contributes to the formation of active researchers: What the research tells us. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1972–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skopek, J., Triventi, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2022). How do institutional factors shape PhD completion rates? An analysis of long-term changes in a European doctoral program. Studies in Higher Education, 47(2), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1744125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soin, K., & Huber, C. (2021). Compliance and resistance: How performance measures make and unmake universities. Organization, 30(5), 1130–1151. 135050842110668. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505084211066810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spronken-Smith, R., Cameron, C., & Quigg, R. (2018). Factors contributing to high PhD completion rates: A case study in a research-intensive university in New Zealand. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1298717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan, R., Murray, R., & Grierson, H. (2004). A web-based tool for dissertation writing Rosanne Strachan, Rowena Murray, and Hilary Grierson. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0007-1013.2004.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, K. W., & Gloria, A. M. (2019). Should I stay or should I go? The role of impostorism in STEM persistence. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318802333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot, R., Yerkes, M. A., Mouw, J. M., & Sonneveld, H. (2013). What took them so long? Explaining PhD delays among doctoral candidates. PLOS One, 8(7), e68839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Haert, M., Arias Ortiz, E., Emplit, P., Halloin, V., & Dehon, C. (2014). Are dropout and degree completion in doctoral study significantly dependent on type of financial support and field of research? Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 1885–1909. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.806458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooij, E., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., & Jansen, E. (2021). Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success: The importance of PhD project characteristics. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2019.1652158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassil, K., & Solvak, M. (2012). When failing is the only option: Explaining failure to finish PhDs in Estonia. Higher Education, 64(4), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9507-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, M. S., Luwel, M., & Moed, H. F. (2007). The attainment of doctoral degrees at Flemish Universities: A survival analysis. Higher Education, 54(5), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9021-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, A. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2020). Developing a student-doctoral education fit analytical model to assess performance. Studies in Higher Education, 45(7), 1448–1460. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1545758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westaby, J. D. (2005). Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnen, M. N., Massen, J. J. M., & Kret, M. E. (2021). Gender bias in the allocation of student grants. Scientometrics, 126(7), 5477–5488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03985-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T., & Cochrane, R. (2000). Factors influencing successful submission of PhD theses. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. (2015). International students’ motivation to pursue and complete a Ph.D. in the U.S. Higher Education, 69(5), 719–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9802-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar