Phenomenon-based learning in Finland: a critical overview of its historical and philosophical roots 

References

• Beyer, C. (2022). Edmund Husserl. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. (Rev. version). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/ 
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2020). Introduction to book. In P. Howard, T. Saevi, A. Foran, & G. Biesta (Eds.), Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation: Back to education itself. (pp. 1–4). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2021). Konst som undervisning [Art as instruction] (Trans. P. Moerman). ArtEZ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, M. (2020). Bildung and embodiment: Learning, practicing, space and democratic education. In E. Howard, T. Saevi, A. Foran & G. Biesta (Eds.), Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation: Back to education itself. (pp. 115–127). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, H. (2012). Inquiry learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), The encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1571–1573). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014. Finnish National Board of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., et al. (1985). The use of pleasure: Vol 2. The history of sexuality (R. Hurley Trans.). Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foran, A. (2020). Pedagogical practice. In E. Howard, T. Saevi, A. Foran & G. Biesta (Eds.), Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation: Back to education itself. (pp. 115–127). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method. Blumsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Gorur, R. (2016). Seeing like PISA: A cautionary tale about the performativity of international assessments. European Educational Research Journal, 15(5), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/147490411665829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göğüş, A. (2012). Constructivist learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 783–786). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, E. (2007). A history of natural philosophy: From the ancient world to the nineteenth century. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halinen, I., & Jääskeläinen, L. (2015). Opetussuunnitelmauudistus 2016: Sivistysnäkemys ja opetuksen eheyttäminen [The renewing of curriculum 2016: The Bildung view and the defragmentation of education]. In H. Cantell (Ed.), Näin rakennat monialaisia oppimiskokonaisuuksia (pp. 19–36). PS-kustannus. 
   Google Scholar
• Hakala, L., & Kujala, T. (2021). A touchstone of Finnish curriculum thought and core curriculum for basic education: Reviewing the current situation and imagining the future. Prospects, 51(1-3), 473–487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09533-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henriksen, D. (2018). The 7 Transdisciplinary cognitive skills for creative education. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Horlacher, R. (2016). The educated subject and the German concept of Bildung: A comparative cultural history. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (2001). Logical investigations (Vol. 1). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kansanen, P. (1990). Education as a discipline in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 34(4), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031383900340403
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. (2001). The Nordic welfare state in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of History, 26(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/034687501750303864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivelä, A., & Siljander, P. (2013). Psychologism in Finnish educational science: From Herbartianism to constructivism. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2012.656282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1997). Education for Europe as seen from the international perspective: Key problems as a central point for future-oriented work in education. In M. Uljens (Ed.), European identity in change: The meeting between German, Russian and Nordic educational traditions. (pp. 172–185). Åbo Akademi.
   Google Scholar
• Klafki, W. (1999). The Significance of classical theories of Bildung for a contemporary concept of Allgemeinbildnung. In I. Westbury, S. Hopman, & K. Riquarts (Eds.), Teaching as a reflective practice: The German Didaktik tradition. (pp. 85–107). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Küpers, W. (2012). Phenomenology of learning. In N. B. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. (pp 2611–2615). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, J. G. (2001). Aristotle on the unity and disunity of science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 133–144.    https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590120059004
   Google Scholar
• Leppiniemi, H. (2016). Ilmiö nimeltä ilmiöpohjainen oppiminen: Opettajien käsityksiä ilmiöpohjaisesta oppimisesta [A phenomenon called phenomenon-based learning: Teachers’ views of phenomenon-based learning]   [Master thesis]. Tampere University.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2018). Education by the numbers and the making of society. The expertise of international assessments. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Manninen, J., Ihanus, J., Jalava, M., & Niiniluoto, I. (2021). A history of philosophy and psychology in Finland, 1809 − 1917. Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
   Google Scholar
• Masschelein, J., & Ricken, N. (2003). Do we (still) need the concept of Bildung? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-5812.00015
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mertanen, K., Vainio, S., & Brunila, K. (2021). Educating for the future? Mapping the emerging lines of precision education governance. Policy Futures in Education, 20(6), 731–744. https://doi.org/10.1177/14782103211049914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. (2021). Co-sensoriality, con-sensoriality, and common-sensoriality: The complexities of sensorialities in interaction. Social Interaction. Video-Based Studies of Human Sociality, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i3.128153
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1843/1978). A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive: Being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation. Collected works, books IV-VI and appendices. (Ed. J. M. Robson). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., & Brown, T. (2012). Learning as relational: Intersubjectivity and pedagogy in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(5), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.700648
   Google Scholar
• Niemelä, M. A. (2019). Eheyttäminen koulutyössä: Katsaus käsitteeseen [Defragmation of school education: A view on a concept]. In M. Rautiainen, & M. Tarnanen (Eds.), Tutkimuksesta luokkahuoneisiin (pp. 465–481). Ainedidaktisia tutkimuksia 15 Suomen Ainedidaktinen Tutkimusseura.
   Google Scholar
• Opetushallitus. (2014). Perusopetuksen opetussuunnitelman perusteet. Opetushallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Østergaard, E., Dahlin, B., & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: A research review. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260802264081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overgaard, S. (2004). Husserl and Heidegger on being in the world. Kluver Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Parreira do Amaral, M., & Thompson, C. (2019). Conclusion: Changing education in the GEI: Rationales, logics, and modes of operation. In M. Parreira do Amaral, G., Steiner-Khamsi, & C. Thompson (Eds.), Researching the global education industry: Commodification, the market and business involvement. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peim, N. (2022). Rethinking the politics of education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rauste-von Wright, M.-L. (2001). The function of curriculum and the concept of learning. In E. Kimonen (Ed.), Curriculum approaches: Readings and activities for educational studies. (pp. 21–34). Jyvaskyla University.
   Google Scholar
• Rauste-von Wright, M.-L., von Wright, J., & Soini, T. (2003). Oppiminen ja koulutus [Learning and education]. VS Bookwell Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Rinne, R. (2008). The growing supranational impacts of the OECD and the EU on national educational policies, and the case of Finland. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 665–680.     https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2008.6.6.665
   Google Scholar
• Roberts. (2020). More than measurement: Education, uncertainty and existence. In E. Howard, T. Saevi, A. Foran, & G. Biesta (Eds.), Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation: Back to education itself (pp. 63–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, F. (2022). Globalization and Education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblad, N., Schaffar, B., & Löfström, E. (2022). Immeasurability loss? An analysis of the impacts of accountability measures on counselling within VET. Nordic Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 12(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3384/njvet.2242-458X.221221
   Google Scholar
• Saari, A., & Säntti, J. (2018). The rhetoric of the ‘digital leap’ in Finnish educational policy documents. European Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 442–457.   https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117721373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saari, A., Salmela, S., & Vilkkilä, J. (2014). Governing autonomy. Subjectivity, freedom, and knowledge in Finnish curriculum discourse. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (2nd ed., pp. 183–200). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffar, B. (2022). Slöjd och filosofi: De viktigaste skolämnena för en hållbar framtid. [Craft and philosophy: The most important subjects for a sustainable future]. Finsk Tidskrift, (1), 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffar, B. (2021a). Competent uses of competence: On the difference between a value-judgment and empirical assessability. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 7(2), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1958993
   Google Scholar
• Schaffar, B. (2021b). Bildning som etisk fråga och dialog [Bildung as an ethical question and dialogue]. In J. Ahlskog (Ed.), Människans allsidiga utveckling: Essäer om bildningens betydelser i tjugoförsta århundradet [Essays on the role of Bildung in the 21th century] (pp. 94–107). Svenska Folkskolans Vänner.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffar, B., & Uljens, M. (2015). Paradoxical tensions between Bildung and Ausbildung in academia: Moving within or beyond the modern Continental tradition? In E. Westergaard, & J. S. Wiewiura (Eds.), On the facilitation of the academy. Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Schwenk, B. (1996). Bildung. In D. Lenzen (Ed.), Pädagogische Grundbegriffe. [Basic concepts of education]. Rowohlt (Vol I, 4th. ed., pp. 208–221). 
   Google Scholar
• Seamon, D. (2020). Awakening the world as phenomenon: The value of phenomenology for a pedagogy of place and place making. In E. Howard, T. Saevi, A. Foran, & G. Biesta (Eds.), Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation: Back to education itself. (pp. 163–178). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, W. D. (2013). Phenomenology. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/phenomenology/
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2019). Conclusions: What policy-makers do with PISA. In F. Waldow, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), Understanding PISA’s attractiveness: Critical analyses in comparative policy studies (pp. 233–248). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Stichweh, R. (2001). History of scientific disciplines. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences. (pp. 287–290). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Summa, M. (2014). Spatio-temporal intertwining: Husserl’s trascendental aesthetic. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Säntti, J., Hansen, P., & Saari, A. (2021). Future jamming: Rhetoric of new knowledge in Finnish educational policy texts. Policy Futures in Education, 19(7), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorburn, M., & Stolz, S. A. (2022). Contemporary education and guiding pedagogical principals: The prospects for an embodied and intersubjective interpretation of phenomenology. Oxford Review of Education, 48(5), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.2006171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, M., & Risku, M. (2019). A distributed leadership perspective on the Finnish curriculum reform 2014. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1499806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uljens, M. (2002a). Tidigare tjänsteinnehavare [Earlier titleholders]. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Pedagogiken i Finland 150 år [Education in Finland 150 years] (pp. 115–179). University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M. (2002b). Pedagogiken i brytningen mellan det moderna och senmoderna [Education in the transition between the Modern and Late Modern time]. In M. Uljens (Ed.), Pedagogiken i Finland 150 år [Education in Finland 150 years] (pp. 11–31). University of Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Uljens, M., Wolff, L. A., & Frontini, S. (2016). Finland: NPM resistance or towards European neo-welfarism in education?. In New public management and the reform of education (pp. 39–52). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Utbildningsstyrelsen. (2014). Grunderna för läroplanen för den grundläggande utbildningen. Utbildningsstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Vlieghe, J., & Zamojski, P. (2020). Rethinking education: Phenomenology and immanence. In E. Howard, T. Saevi, A. Foran, & G. Biesta (Eds.), Phenomenology and educational theory in conversation: Back to education itself. (pp. 34–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, N. (2016). Läroplansteori och didaktik. Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, T. (2013). The child as natural phenomenologist: Primal and primary experience in Merleau-Ponty’s psychology. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why Knowledge Matters in Curriculum a Social Realist Argument/Leesa Wheelahan. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelahan, L., Moodie, G., & Doughney, J. (2022). Challenging the skills fetish. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(3), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2045186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wians, W. (2008). Aristotle and the problem of human knowledge. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 2(1), 41–64.    https://doi.org/10.1163/187254708X282286
   Google Scholar
• Willis, P. (2001). The “things themselves” in phenomenology. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20797222.2001.11433860
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, L.-A. (2022a). Phenomenon-based learning. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainability management. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, L.-A. (2022b). Transdisciplinary learning. In S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, N. Capaldi, L. Zu, M. del Baldo, & R. Abreu (Eds.), Encyclopedia of sustainability management. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Zahavi, D. (2017). Husserl’s legacy: Phenomenology, metaphysics, and transcendental philosophy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zilliacus, H., & Wolff, L.-A. (2021). Climate change and worldview transformation in Finnish education policy. In P. William (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar