752
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Curriculum & Teaching Studies

An exploration of Scottish teachers’ perceptions of equitable teaching practices in mathematics

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2310436 | Received 21 Sep 2023, Accepted 22 Jan 2024, Published online: 31 Jan 2024

References

  • Aguirre, J., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Celedón-Pattichis, S., Civil, M., Wilkerson, T., Stephan, M., Pape, S., & Clements, D. H. (2017). Equity within mathematics education research as a political act: Moving from choice to intentional collective professional responsibility. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(2), 124–147. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.2.0124
  • Andrews, P. (2009). Comparative studies of mathematics teachers’ observable learning objectives: validating low inference codes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(2), 97–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9165-x
  • Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. SUNY Press.
  • Appelbaum, P. (2007). Afterward: Bootleg mathematics. In E. de Freitas and K. Nolan (Eds.), Opening the research text: Critical insights and in(ter)ventions into mathematics education (pp. 221–247). SUNY Press.
  • Appelbaum, P. (2008). Sense and representation in elementary mathematics. In B. Maj, M. Pytlak, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Supporting independent thinking through mathematical education (pp. 10–17). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. http://dspace.hnpu.edu.ua/bitstream/123456789/4310/1/Problems%20of%20formation%20learning%20environment.pdf
  • Appelbaum, P. (2019). From equity and justice to dignity and reconciliation. In C. Xenofontos (Ed.), Equity in mathematics education: Addressing a changing world (pp. 23–40). Information Age Publishing.
  • Appelbaum, P., & Davila, E. (2007). Math education and social justice: Gatekeepers, politics and teacher agency. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 22, 1–23.
  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  • Banes, L., Ambrose, R., Bayley, R., Restani, R., & Martin, H. (2018). Mathematical classroom discussion as an equitable practice: Effects on elementary English learners’ performance. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 17(6), 416–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2018.1500464
  • Bartell, T., Wager, A., Edwards, A., Battey, D., Foote, M., & Spencer, J. (2017). Toward a framework for research linking equitable teaching with the Standards for Mathematical Practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 48(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0007
  • Bartell, T. G. (2013). Learning to teach mathematics for social justice: Negotiating social justice and mathematical goals. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 129–163. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0129
  • Baskerville, D., & Goldblatt, H. (2009). Learning to be a critical friend: From professional indifference through challenge to unguarded conversations. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902260
  • Benner, A. D., Thornton, A., & Crosnoe, R. (2017). Children’s exposure to sustainability practices during the transition from preschool into school and their learning and socioemotional development. Applied Developmental Science, 21(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2016.1175946
  • BERA. (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA. https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
  • Berry, R. Q., & Wickett, M. S. (2009). Equity: Teaching, learning, and assessing mathematics for diverse populations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(3), 132–133. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.16.3.0132
  • Björklund, C., Marton, F., & Kullberg, A. (2021). What is to be learnt? Critical aspects of elementary arithmetic skills. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10045-0
  • Biesta, G. J. J., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
  • Boaler, J. (2006). “Opening Our Ideas”: How a detracked mathematics approach promoted respect, responsibility, and high achievement. Theory Into Practice, 45(1), 40–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4501_6
  • Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532145
  • Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 110(3), 608–645. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-00714-003 https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810811000302
  • Boylan, M. (2009). Engaging with issues of emotionality in mathematics teacher education for social justice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9117-0
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
  • Buchheister, K., Jackson, C., & Taylor, C. (2019). “Sliding” into an equitable lesson. Teaching Children Mathematics, 25(4), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.25.4.0224
  • Celedón-Pattichis, S., Borden, L. L., Pape, S. J., Clements, D. H., Peters, S. A., Males, J. R., Chapman, O., & Leonard, J. (2018). Asset-based approaches to equitable mathematics education research and practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 373–389. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0373
  • Cheng, E. (2016). Learning through the variation theory: A case study. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 28(2), 283–292.
  • Clunies‐Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self‐reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802206700
  • Deieso, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2019). Learning environment, attitudes and anxiety across the transition from primary to secondary school mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 22(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9261-5
  • Denner, J., Laursen, B., Dickson, D., & Hartl, A. C. (2016). Latino children’s math confidence: The role of mothers’ gender stereotypes and involvement across the transition to middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(4), 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616675972
  • Education Scotland. (2018). Scottish Attainment Challenge. https://education.gov.scot/improvement/learning-resources/scottish-attainment-challenge
  • Ellis, S., & Sosu, E. (2015). Closing poverty-related attainment gaps in Scotland’s schools: What works?. University of Strathclyde International Public Policy Institute.
  • Esmonde, I., & Caswell, B. (2010). Teaching mathematics for social justice in multicultural, multilingual elementary classrooms. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2010.504485
  • Essien, A. A. (2021). Understanding the choice and use of examples in mathematics teacher education multilingual classrooms. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(2), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01241-6
  • Fan, L., Jones, K., Wang, J., & Xu, B. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education. ZDM, 45(5), 633–646. (Eds.) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
  • Felton-Koestler, M., & Koestler, C. (2017). Should mathematics teacher education be politically neutral? Mathematics Teacher Educator, 6(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.6.1.0067
  • Felton-Koestler, M. (2017). “Children know more than I think they do”: the evolution of one teacher’s views about equitable mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 22(2), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-017-9384-0
  • Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C., & Midgley, C. (2010). Changes in efficacy beliefs in mathematics across the transition to middle school: Examining the effects of perceived teacher and parent goal emphases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017590
  • Gilbert, A., Smith, N., Knudsen, L., Jindal-Snape, D., & Bradshaw, P. (2021). Transition from primary to secondary school: Findings from the Growing Up in Scotland study. Scottish Government.
  • Graven, M. H. (2014). Poverty, inequality and mathematics performance: the case of South Africa’s post-apartheid context. ZDM, 46(7), 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0566-7
  • Gregson, S. (2013). Negotiating social justice teaching: One full-time teacher’s practice viewed from the trenches. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 164–198. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0164
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2002). Enabling the practice of mathematics teachers in context: Towards a new equity research agenda. Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 44(2-3), 145–168.
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2008). A “gap gazing” fetish in mathematics education? Problematizing research on the achievement gap. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 357–364. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0357
  • Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037
  • Hamilton, L., & O’Hara, P. (2011). The tyranny of setting (ability grouping): Challenges to inclusion in Scottish primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 712–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.009
  • Hand, V. (2012). Seeing culture and power in mathematical learning: Toward a model of equitable instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9387-9
  • Jamar, I., & Pitts, V. R. (2005). High expectations: A ‘‘how’’ of achieving equitable mathematics classrooms. The Negro Educational Review, 56(2-3), 127–134.
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Making mathematics meaningful in multicultural contexts. In W. G. Secada, E. Fennema, and L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 126–145). Cambridge University Press.
  • Leatham, K. R. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9006-8
  • Lee, J. E., Kim, J., Kim, S., & Lim, W. (2018). How to envision equitable mathematics instruction: Views of U.S. and Korean preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.010
  • Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2009). Early childhood teachers’ misconceptions about mathematics education for young children in the United States. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(4), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910903400406
  • Leonard, J. (2018). Culturally specific pedagogy in the mathematics classroom: Strategies for teachers and students. Routledge.
  • Levitan, J. (2015). The difference between educational equality, equity, and justice… and why it matters. American Journal of Education Forum, http://www.ajeforum.com/the-difference-between-educational-equality-equity-and-justice-and-why-it-matters-by-joseph-levitan/
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
  • Martin, A., Way, J., Bobis, J., & Anderson, J. (2015). Exploring the ups and downs of mathematics engagement in the middle years of school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 199–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529365
  • Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography – describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516
  • Marton, F. (1986). Phenomenography – a research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42589189
  • Marton, F., & Booth, S. A. (1997). Learning and awareness. Routledge.
  • Marton, F., & Pong, W. Y. (2005). On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360500284706
  • McLeman, L., & Vomvoridi-Ivanovic, E. (2012). Understanding the practices of mathematics teacher educators who focus on issues of equity. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 1(3), 278–300. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2012.15
  • Melhuish, K., Ellis, B., & Hicks, M. D. (2020). Group theory students’ perceptions of binary operation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09925-3
  • Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J. (1989). Change in teacher efficacy and student self- and task-related beliefs in mathematics during the transition to junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.247
  • Moscardini, L. (2014). Developing equitable elementary classroom through teachers learning about children’s mathematical thinking: Cognitively guided instruction as an inclusive pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.06.003
  • Moschkovich, J. (2013). Principles and guidelines for equitable mathematics teaching practices and materials for English language learners. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v6i1a204
  • Myers, M., Sztajn, P., Wilson, P. H., & Edgington, C. (2015). From implicit to explicit: Articulating equitable learning trajectories based instruction. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 8(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v8i2a280
  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  • NCTM. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
  • Niehues, W., Kisbu-Sakarya, Y., & Selcuk, B. (2021). Family cohesion facilitates learning-related behaviors and math competency at the transition to elementary school. Early Education and Development, 32(1), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1739418
  • Orgill, M. (2012). Variation theory. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 3391–3393). Springer.
  • Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2009). Working with mathematics teachers and immigrant students: An empowerment perspective. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(6), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9116-1
  • Popkewitz, T. (1988). Institutional issues in the study of school mathematics: Curriculum research. In A.J. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematics Education and Culture (pp. 221–249). Springer.
  • Popkewitz, T. (2004). The alchemy of the mathematics curriculum: Inscriptions and the fabrication of the child. American Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041001003
  • Raymond, A. M. (1997). Inconsistency between a beginning elementary school teacher’s mathematics beliefs and teaching practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 550–576. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.28.5.0550
  • Scottish Government. (2016). Delivering excellence and equity in Scottish education: A delivery plan for Scotland. https://www.gov.scot/publications/delivering-excellence-equity-scottish-education-delivery-plan-scotland/
  • Scottish Government. (2017). Pupil equity funding – information leaflet for parents and careers. https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/factsheet/2017/04/pupil-equity-fund-information-for-parents-and-carers/documents/pupil-equity-funding-information-parents-carers-2017-pdf/pupil-equity-funding-information-parents-carers-2017-pdf/govscot%3Adocument/Pupil%2Bequity%2Bfunding%2B-%2Binformation%2Bfor%2Bparents%2Band%2Bcarers%2B2017.pdf
  • Sdolias, K., & Triandafillides, T. (2008). The transition to secondary school geometry: can there be a “chain of school mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9093-1
  • Secada, W.G., Fennema, E., Adajian, L.B., & Byrd, L. (Eds.). (1995). New directions for equity in mathematics education. Cambridge University Press.
  • Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a critical mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01284527
  • Stathopoulou, C., & Appelbaum, P. (2016). Dignity, recognition, and reconciliation: Forgiveness, ethnomathematics, and mathematics education. RIPEM - International Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 6(1), 26–44.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques. SAGE.
  • Swanson, D. (2017). Mathematics education and the problem of political forgetting: In search of research methodologies for global crisis. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 10(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v10i1a337
  • Swanson, D., Yu, H. L., & Mouroutsou, S. (2017). Inclusion as ethics, equity and/or human rights? Spotlighting school mathematics practices in Scotland and globally. Social Inclusion, 5(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v5i3.984
  • Tatto, M. T., Lerman, S., & Novotná, J. (2009). Overview of teacher education systems across the world. In R. Even, & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The Professional Education and Development of Teachers of Mathematics. New ICMI Study Series., vol. 11(pp. 15–23), Springer.
  • Taylor, B., Francis, B., Craig, N., Archer, L., Hodgen, J., Mazenod, A., Tereshchenko, A., & Pepper, D. (2019). Why is it difficult for schools to establish equitable practices in allocating students to attainment ‘sets’? British Journal of Educational Studies, 67(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2018.1424317
  • Tricarico, K. M., Jacobs, J., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2015). Reflection on their first five years of teaching: Understanding staying and impact power. Teachers and Teaching, 21(3), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.953821
  • van Es, E. A., Hand, V., & Mercado, J. (2017). Making visible the relationship between teachers’ noticing for equity and equitable teaching practice. In E.O. Schack, M.H. Fisher, & J.A. Wilhelm (Eds.), Teacher noticing: Bridging and broadening perspectives, contexts, and frameworks (pp. 251–270). Springer.
  • Wager, A. (2014). Noticing children’s participation: Insights into teacher positionality toward equitable mathematics pedagogy. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(3), 312–350. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.3.0312
  • Wagner, D., Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Choppin, J. (2012). Inherent connections between discourse and equity in mathematics classrooms. In B. Herbel-Eisenmann, J. Choppin, D. Wagner, & D. Pimm (Eds.), Equity in Discourse for Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library, 55. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4_1
  • Walshaw, M. (2010). Identity as the cornerstone of quality and equitable mathematical experiences. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, P. Valero (Eds.) Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9803-0_7
  • West, P., Sweeting, H., & Young, R. (2010). Transition matters: Pupils’ experiences of the primary-secondary school transition in the West of Scotland and consequences for well-being and attainment. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802308677
  • Willey, C., & Drake, C. (2013). Advocating for equitable mathematics education: Supporting novice teachers in navigating the sociopolitical context of schools. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 6(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v6i1a205
  • Xenofontos, C. (2015). Immigrant pupils in elementary classrooms of Cyprus: How teachers view them as learners of mathematics. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 475–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2014.987643
  • Xenofontos, C. (2016). Teaching mathematics in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: Greek-Cypriot elementary teachers’ reported practices and professional needs. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 9(1), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.21423/jume-v9i1a263
  • Xenofontos, C. (2018). Greek-Cypriot elementary teachers’ epistemological beliefs about mathematics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.007
  • Xenofontos, C. (2019). Equity and social justice in mathematics education: A brief introduction. In C. Xenofontos (Ed.), Equity in mathematics education: Addressing a changing world (pp. 1–22). Information Age Publishing.
  • Xenofontos, C., & Hizli Alkan, S. (2022). “They’re coming into school hungry, they’re not ready to learn”. Scottish teachers’ perceptions of marginalization in school mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2116. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12071
  • Xenofontos, C., Fraser, S., Priestley, A., & Priestley, M. (2021). Mathematics teachers and social justice: A systematic review of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 47(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1807314
  • Yolcu, A. (2019). Research on equitable mathematics teaching practices: Insights into its divergences and convergences. Review of Education, 7(3), 701–730. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3163