991
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Information & Communications Technology in Education

Exploring pre-service biology teachers’ intention to teach genetics using an AI intelligent tutoring - based system

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2310976 | Received 15 Sep 2023, Accepted 23 Jan 2024, Published online: 11 Mar 2024

References

  • Abdel-Maksoud, N. F. (2018). The relationship between students’ satisfaction in the LMS" Acadox" and their perceptions of its usefulness, and ease of use. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n2p184
  • Abimbola, I. O. (2015). Learning how to learn for perfect understanding. Bamitex Printing and Publishing.
  • Adebayo, I., Oladejo, A. I., & Okebukola, P. A. (2022). Examining the relative effectiveness of CTCA in improving secondary school students’ achievement in genetics. In Proceedings of the NARST 95th Annual International Conference: Unity and Inclusion for Global Scientific Literacy: Invite as a Community. Unite as a Community, Vancouver, BC, Canada (pp. 27–30).
  • Adelana, O. P., & Akinyemi, A. L. (2021). Artificial intelligence-based tutoring systems utilization for learning: A survey of senior secondary students’ awareness and readiness in Ijebu- Ode, Ogun State. Unizik Journal of Educational Research and Policy Studies, 9, 16–28.
  • Adelana, O. P., Akinsulure, A. O., Ajose, M. A., & Ishola, A. M. (2023a). Perceptions of genetics difficulty among science students in Nigeria. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 11(1), 51–58.
  • Adelana, O. P., Ayanwale, M. A., Ishola, A. M., Oladejo, A. I., & Adewuyi, H. O. (2023b). Exploring pre-service teachers’ intention to use virtual reality: A mixed method approach. Computers & Education: X Reality, 3, 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100045
  • Adelana, O. P., Ishola, A. M., & Adeeko, O. (2021). Development and validation of instructional package for teaching and learning of genetics in secondary schools. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 32–41.
  • Agboghoroma, T. E., & Oyovwi, E. O. (2015). Evaluating effect of students’ academic achievement on identified difficult concepts in senior secondary school biology in delta state. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(30), 117–125.
  • Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34(0), 301e314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.035
  • Ajanaku, A. A., Gambari, A. I., & Ibrahim, I. K. (2019). Development and assessment of gamification instructional package on genetic concepts for senior secondary schools achievement and gender in Minna, Nigeria. Conference Proceedings of the AITIE 3rd International Conference and Workshop on Innovation, Technology and Education (ICWITE), Abuja.
  • Ajayi, O. A., & Adelana, O. P. (2020). Effectiveness of multimedia self-learning package in teaching and learning of genetics in secondary schools. Journal of Psychometry and Assessment Techniques, 1(1), 119–120.
  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (p. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (p. 173–221). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Akinnubi, R. T., Oketayo, O. O., Akinwande, D. D., & Ifedayo, O. A. (2012). Student-lecturer variables and low performance of students in genetics: A case study of course in Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 3(2), 78–82.
  • Akinyemi, A. L., Adelana, O. P., & Olurinola, O. D. (2022). Use of infographics as teaching and learning tools: Survey of pre-service teachers’ knowledge and readiness in a Nigerian university. Journal of ICT in Education, 9(1), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol9.1.10.2022
  • Alabi, H., & Abimbola, I. O. (2022). Score level, text structures and senior secondary school students’ achievement in genetics in Ilorin, Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7(4), 198–209.
  • Amusa, J. O., & Ayanwale, M. A. (2021). Partial least square modeling of personality traits and academic achievement in physics. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.8.2021
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2021.114662
  • Annetta, L. A., Minogue, J., Holmes, S. Y., & Cheng, M. T. (2009). Investigating the impact of video games on high school students’ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.020
  • Aptyka, H., & Großschedl, J. (2022). Analyzing pre-service biology teachers’ intention to teach evolution using the theory of planned behavior. Evolution, 15(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-022-00175-1
  • Arthur, S. (2013). Evolution acceptance among pre-service primary teachers. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(20), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-20
  • Asiri, M. J. (2019). Do teachers’ attitudes, perception of usefulness, and perceived social influences predict their behavioral intentions to use gamification in EFL classrooms? Evidence from the Middle East. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(3), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.73.112.122
  • Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre‐service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12437
  • Auwalu, R. A., Mohd, E. T., & Muhammad, B. G. (2014). Academic achievement in biology with suggested solutions in selected secondary schools in Kano State, Nigeria. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(11), 215–224.
  • Ayanwale, M. A. (2023). Evidence from Lesotho Secondary Schools on Students’ Intention to Engage in Artificial Intelligence Learning [Paper presentation]. IEEE Africon, Nairobi, Kenya. pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/AFRICON55910.2023.10293644
  • Ayanwale, M. A., Molefi, R. R., & Matsie, N. (2023a). Modelling secondary school students’ attitudes toward TVET subjects using social cognitive and planned behavior theories. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100478
  • Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099
  • Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Molefi, R. R., & Otunla, A. O. (2023b). A structural equation approach and modelling of pre-service teachers’ perspectives of cybersecurity education. Education and Information Technologies, 6, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11973-5
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A test of some key hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(4), 607–627. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.4.607
  • Bahcivan, E., Gurer, M. D., Yavuzalp, N., & Akayoglu, S. (2019). Investigating the relations among pre-service teachers’ teaching/learning beliefs and educational technology integration competencies: A structural equation modeling study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09788-6
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  • Bao, Y., Xiong, T., Hu, Z., & Kibelloh, M. (2013). Exploring gender differences on general and specific computer self-efficacy in mobile learning adoption. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.1.e
  • Barker, L. J., & Aspray, W. (2006). The state of research on girls and IT. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology (pp. 3–54). MIT Press.
  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
  • Can, H., & Hiğde, E. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ intentions to implement STEM activities. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(S1-Aug), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10iS1-Aug.4956
  • Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020a). A Multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
  • Cheng, E. W. L. (2018). Choosing between the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9598-6
  • Cheung, S.-F., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2000). The role of perceived behavioral control in predicting human behavior: A meta-analytic review of studies on the theory of planned behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31093.01766
  • Choden, T., & Kijkuakul, S. (2020). Blending problem based learning with scientific argumentation to enhance students’ understanding of basic genetics. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 445–462. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13129a
  • Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
  • Cimer, A. (2012). What makes biology learning difficult and effective: Students’ views. Educational Research and Reviews, 7(3), 61.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  • Corbett, A., Kauffman, L., Maclaren, B., Wagner, A., & Jones, E. (2010). A cognitive tutor for genetics problem solving: Learning gains and student modeling. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.42.2.e
  • Cuhadar, C. (2018). Investigation of pre-service teachers’ levels of readiness to technology integration in education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6211
  • Cukurova, M., Khan-Galaria, M., Millán, E., & Luckin, R. (2021). A learning analytics approach to monitoring the quality of online one-to-one tutoring. Journal of Learn. Anal, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/qfh7z
  • D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.001
  • Danmole, B. T., & Lameed, S. N. (2014). Exploring annotated drawing for improving Nigerian secondary school students’ achievement in genetics. International Journal of Biology Education, 3(1b), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20876/ijobed.48555
  • Darmansyah, D., Fianto, B. A., Hendratmi, A., & Aziz, P. F. (2020). Factors determining behavioral intentions to use Islamic financial technology: Three competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 12(4), 794–812. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2019-0252
  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  • Deniz, H., & Borgerding, L. A. (2018). Evolution education around the globe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4
  • Deniz, H., & Sahin, E. A. (2016). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers and the relationship between acceptance and teaching preference. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20223
  • Dogru-Atay, P., & Tekkaya, C. (2008). Promoting students’ learning in genetics with the learning cycle. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76(3), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.76.3.259-280
  • Dorjee, K., Baxi, S. M., Reingold, A. L., & Hubbard, A. (2017). Risk of cardiovascular events from current, recent, and cumulative exposure to abacavir among persons living with HIV who were receiving antiretroviral therapy in the United States: A cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2808-8
  • Du Boulay, B. (2016). Artificial intelligence as an effective classroom assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31(6), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.93
  • Ernest, T. (2015). The impact of computer-aided instruction on student achievement. Education Theses, Dissertations and Projects, 127
  • Ertel, W. (2018). Introduction to artificial intelligence (pp. vii). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58487-4
  • Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1999.10782269
  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs.
  • Etobro, A. B., & Banjoko, S. O. (2017). Misconceptions of genetics concepts among pre-service teachers. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.6
  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2014). National policy on Education. NERDC.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  • Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
  • Glavee-Geo, R., Shaikh, A. A., & Karjaluoto, H. (2017). Mobile banking services adoption in Pakistan: Are there gender differences? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(7), 1090–1114. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2015-0142
  • Goodhue, D.L., Lewis, W., & Thompson, R. (2012). Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? MIS Quarterly, 36(3), 981–1001. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703490
  • Goy, A., Nishtar, S., Dzau, V., Balatbat, C., & Diabo, R. (2019). Health and healthcare in the fourth industrial revolution: Global Future Council on the future of health and healthcare, 2016-2018. World Economic Forum.
  • Greisel, M., Wekerle, C., Wilkes, T., Stark, R., & Kollar, I. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ evidence-informed reasoning: Do attitudes, subjective norms, and self-efficacy facilitate the use of scientific theories to analyze teaching problems? Psychology Learning & Teaching, 22(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/14757257221113942
  • Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 791–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20027
  • Grosschedl, J., Konnemann, C., & Basel, N. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers’ acceptance of evolutionary theory and their preference for its teaching. Evol Educ Outreach, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0018-z
  • Guilherme, A. (2019). AI and education: The importance of teacher and student relations. AI & Society, 34(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0693-8
  • Gusmalini, A., & Wulandari, S. (2020, October). Identification of misconceptions and causes of student misconceptions on genetics concept with CRI method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1655(1), 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1655/1/012053
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (7th Edition). Pearson.
  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‐SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr, Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS- SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
  • Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  • Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  • Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2018). Student learning benefits of a mixed-reality teacher awareness tool in AIEnhanced classrooms. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10947 , 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93843-1_12
  • Hou, M., Lin, Y., Shen, Y., & Zhou, H. (2022). Explaining pre-service teachers’ intentions to use technology-enabled learning: An extended model of the theory of planned behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 900806. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900806
  • Hsieh, P.-J. (2015). Physicians’ acceptance of electronic medical records exchange: An extension of the decomposed TPB model with institutional trust and perceived risk. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.008
  • Hu, H., & Garimella, U. (2014). iPads for STEM Teachers: A case study on perceived usefulness, perceived proficiency, intention to adopt, and integration in K-12 instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 7(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0701.04
  • Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2020). Chinese students’ intentions to use the Internet-based technology for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y
  • Humphrey, S. E., & Aime, F. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.904140
  • Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education: A bibliometric mapping analysis and systematic review. Mathematics, 9(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060584
  • Hwang, G. J., Hung, P. H., Chen, N. S., & Liu, G. Z. (2014). Mind tool-assisted in-field learning (MAIL): An Advanced ubiquitous learning project in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 4–16.
  • Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020c). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  • Iddrisu, A., Ondigi, S., Muchiri, M. M., & Kiio, M. N. (2019). Senior high schools’ students’ perception of computer-aided instruction in north east region of Ghana. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 6(8), 19.
  • Ismail, S. A. A., Almekhlafi, A. G., & Al-Mekhlafy, M. H. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of technology in teaching languages in United Arab Emirates’ schools. International Journal for Research in Education, 27(1), 37–56.
  • Jamovi project. (2021). jamovi. (Version 2.2.3) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
  • Jatileni, C. N., Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Ayanwale, M. A., Agbo, F. J., & Oyelere, P. B. (2023). Artificial intelligence in compulsory level of education: Perspectives from Namibian in‑service teachers. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12341-z
  • Jekayinfa, A. A., Yahaya, L. A., Yusuf, A., Ajidagba, U. A., Oniye, A. O., Oniyangi, S. O., & Ibraheem, T. O. (2012). Lecturers’ assessment of teaching practice exercise in Nigerian universities. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(4), 79–86.
  • Kantahan, S., Junpeng, P., Punturat, S., Tang, K. N., Gochyyev, P., & Wilson, M. (2020). Designing and verifying a tool for diagnosing scientific misconceptions in genetics topic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(3), 564–571. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20544
  • Karsenti, T. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: The urgent need to prepare teachers for tomorrow’s schools. Formation et Profession, 27(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.18162/fp.2018.a16
  • Kay, R. H. (2008). Exploring gender differences in computer-related behaviour: Past, present, and future. In T. T. Chen & I. Chen (Eds.), Social information technology: Connecting society and cultural issues (pp. 12–30). Information Science Reference.
  • Kay, R. H. (2009). Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Computers & Education, 52(4), 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.015
  • Khor, K. S., & Hazen, B. T. (2017). Remanufactured products purchase intentions and behaviour: Evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Production Research, 55(8), 2149–2162. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1194534
  • Khukalenko, I. S., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., An, Y., & Iushina, V. D. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of using virtual reality technology in classrooms: A large-scale survey. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11591–11613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11061-0
  • Kilic, D. S. (2012). Biyoloji oğretmen adaylarinin evrim oğretimi niyetleri [Pre-service biology teacher’s intention to teach evolution]. Hacet Univ Eğit Fakultesi Derg, 42, 250–261.
  • Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 755914. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  • Knippels, M. C. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2005). Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655976
  • Kock, N. (2014). Advanced mediating effects tests, multi-group analyses, and measurement model assessments in PLS-based SEM. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2014010101
  • Kock, N. (2017). Common method bias: A full collinearity assessment method for PLS-SEM. In H. Latan & R. Noonan (Eds.), Partial least squares path modeling. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_11
  • Kock, N. (2021). WarpPLS 7.0 user manual. ScriptWarp Systems.
  • Kock, N., & Gaskins, L. (2014). The mediating role of voice and accountability in the relationship between Internet diffusion and government corruption in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. Information Technology for Development, 20(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.832129
  • Kock, N., & Lynn, G. S. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7), 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302
  • Koohang, A. A. (1989). A study of attitudes toward computers: Anxiety, confidence, liking and perception of usefulness. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1989.10781909
  • Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., & Talaee, E. (2020). Worked example or scripting? Fostering students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing and learning. Interact. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1799032
  • Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance—Do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
  • Lin, H. C., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., & Huang, H. (2021). From precision education to precision medicine. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 123–137.
  • Marbach‐Ad, G., Rotbain, Y., & Stavy, R. (2008). Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students’ achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20222
  • Maynard, A. D. (2015). Navigating the fourth industrial revolution. Nature Nanotechnology, 10(12), 1005–1006. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.286
  • Mitrovíc, A. (1998). Experiences in implementing constraint-based modeling in SQL-Tutor. In International conference on intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 414–423). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_47
  • Molefi, R. R., & Ayanwale, M. A. (2023). Using composite structural equation modeling to examine high school teachers’ acceptance of e-learning after Covid-19. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(1), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v10i1.8837
  • Mueller, Ashley L., Knobloch, Neil A., OrKthryn S.,. (2015). Exploring the Effects of Active Learning on High School Students’ Outcomes and Teachers’ Perceptions of Biotechnology and Genetics Instruction.Journal of Agricultural Education, 56(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2015.02138
  • Musa, S., & Bello, G. (2022). Effects of metaphor instructional strategy on senior school students achievement in genetics in Ilorin, Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.1098303
  • Nudelma, N. S., & Okechukwu, R. N. (2006). The effect of concept mapping and problem- solving teaching strategies on achievement in genetics among Nigerian secondary school students. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences, 4, 93–98.
  • Odufuwa, T. T., Adelana, O. P., & Adekunjo, M. A. (2022). Assessment of senior secondary students’ perceptions and career interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in Ijebu-Ode Local Government Area, Ogun State. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Education, 18(1), 147.
  • Oladele, J. I., Ndlovu, M., & Ayanwale, M. A. (2022). Computer adaptive-based learning and assessment for enhancing STEM education in Africa: A fourth industrial revolution possibility. In B. Chirinda, K. Luneta, & A. Uworwabayeho (Eds.), Mathematics education in Africa. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13927-7_8
  • Onowugbeda, F. U. (2020). Variation and genetics as difficult topics for secondary school students in biology: Exploring the impact of indigenous (cultural) knowledge for better understanding. Breaking Barriers to Learning of Science: The CTC Approach, 140–154.
  • Orser, B., Riding, A., & Stanley, J. (2012). Perceived career challenges and response strategies of women in the advanced technology sector. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 24(1-2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.637355
  • Osman, E., BouJaoude, S., & Hamdan, H. (2017). An investigation of Lebanese G7-12 students’ misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and their genetics literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1257–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9743-9
  • Ozcan, A. (2014). Mobile phones democratize and cultivate next-generation imaging, diagnostics and measurement tools. Lab on a Chip, 14(17), 3187–3194. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4lc00010b
  • Pan, J., Ding, S., Wu, D., Yang, S., & Yang, J. (2019). Exploring behavioural intentions toward smart healthcare services among medical practitioners: A technology transfer perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 57(18), 5801–5820. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1550272
  • Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012). Using partial least squares in operations management research: A practical guideline and summary of past research. Journal of Operations Management, 30(6), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002
  • Petker, G., & Petersen, N. (2017). Teacher education students’ struggles with group work in service learning. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v7i1.479
  • Pitsoe, V. J., & Isingoma, P. (2014). How do school management teams experience teamwork: A case study in the schools in the Kamwenge district, Uganda. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 138. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n3p138
  • Pobiner, B. (2016). Accepting, understanding, teaching, and learning (human) evolution: Obstacles and opportunities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159(Suppl 61), S232–S74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22910
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Ramayah, T., & Ignatius, J. (2005). Impact of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived enjoyment on intention to shop online. The ICFAI Journal of Systems Management, 1–16. http://ramayah.com/journalarticlespdf/impactpeu.pdf
  • Raza, A. (2020). Intelligent tutoring systems and metacognitive learning strategies: A survey. Muhammad ZAYYAD, 47
  • Roumbanis Viberg, A., Frykedal, K., & Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2020). Teacher educators’ perceptions of their profession in relation to the digitalization of society. Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 1(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc80
  • Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 20 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782602
  • Sakiyo, J., & Badau, K. M. (2015). Assessment of the trend of secondary school students’ academic performance in the sciences, Mathematics and English: Implications for the attainment of the Millennium Development Goals in Nigeria. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.22.805
  • Salman, M., & Güven, T. (2021). The evolution usefulness scale: Development, reliability, and validity. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(3), 778–788. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.933194
  • Samuel, N., Onasanya, S. A., & Olumorin, C. O. (2018). Perceived usefulness, ease of use and adequacy of use of mobile technologies by Nigerian university lecturers. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 14(3), 5–16.
  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Cruz-Benito, J., Therón Sánchez, R., & García Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Assessed by Machines: Development of a TAM-Based Tool to Measure AI-based Assessment Acceptance among Students. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(4), 80. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.11.009
  • Sánchez‐Prieto, J. C., Huang, F., Olmos‐Migueláñez, S., García‐Peñalvo, F. J., & Teo, T. (2019). Exploring the unknown: The effect of resistance to change and attachment on mobile adoption among secondary pre‐service teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2433–2449. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12822
  • Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Olmos-Migueláñez, S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017). MLearning and pre-service teachers: An assessment of the behavioral intention using an expanded TAM model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 644–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.061
  • Sanders, M., & Ngxola, N. (2009). Identifying teachers’ concerns about teaching evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656166
  • Sanusi, I. T., Ayanwale, M. A., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2023b). Investigating the moderating effects of social good and confidence on teachers’ intention to prepare school students for artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12250-1
  • Sanusi, I. T., Olaleye, S. A., Agbo, F. J., & Chiu, T. K. (2022). The role of learners’ competencies in artificial intelligence education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100098
  • Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., Vartiainen, H., Suhonen, J., & Tukiainen, M. (2023a). A systematic review of teaching and learning machine learning in K-12 education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5967–5997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11416-7
  • Siani, M., & Yarden, A. (2022). I think that teachers do not teach evolution because it is complicated: Difficulties in teaching and learning evolution in Israel. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10179-w
  • Sickel, A. J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2013). Examining the evolution education literature with a focus on teachers: Major findings, goals for teacher preparation, and directions for future research. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1936-6434-6-23
  • Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 539–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9216-4
  • Song, P., & Wang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of worldwide educational artificial intelligence research development in recent twenty years. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09640-2
  • Starbek, P., Starčič Erjavec, M., & Peklaj, C. (2010). Teaching genetics with multimedia results in better acquisition of knowledge and improvement in comprehension. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00344.x
  • Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
  • Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Almerich, G., Orellana, N., & Díaz-García, I. (2018). A basic model of integration of ICT by teachers: Competence and use. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9591-0
  • Sun, L., Zhou, X., & Sun, Z. (2019). Improving cycling behaviors of DocklessBike-sharing users based on an extended theory of planned behavior and credit-based supervision policies in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2189. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02189
  • Sungur-Gül, K., & Ateş, H. (2021). Understanding pre-service teachers’ mobile learning readiness using theory of planned behavior. Educational Technology & Society, 24(2), 44–57.
  • Tekkaya, C., Akyol, G., & Sungur, S. (2012). Relationships among teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding the teaching of evolution: A case for Turkey. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(3), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0433-y
  • Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2011). Computer based assessment: Gender differences in perceptions and acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2108–2122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005
  • Torcello, L. (2016). The ethics of belief, cognition, and climate change pseudoskepticism: Implications for public discourse. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 19–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12179
  • Tran, H. T. T., Nguyen, N. T., & Tang, T. T. (2023). Influences of subjective norms on teachers’ intention to use social media in working. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1), ep400. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/12659
  • Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Ho, y A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002202
  • Tuomi, I. (2019). The impact of artificial intelligence on learning, teaching, and education: Policies for the future. JRC Science for Policy Report. Luxembourg: European Commission.
  • Turan, Z., Küçük, S., & Karabey, S. (2022). Investigating pre-service teachers’ behavioral intentions to use web 2.0 gamification tools. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.85.9.4
  • Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don’t men even stop to ask for directions’ gender, social influences and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviour. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. & Davis, F. (2003a). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27 (3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  • Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. (2003b). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2002.tb01646.x
  • Violato, C., Marini, A., & Hunter, W. (1989). A confirmatory analysis of a four-factor model of attitudes toward computers: A study of pre-service teachers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22(2), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1989.10781915
  • Walker, A. S. (2019). Perusall: Harnessing AI robo-tools and writing analytics to improve student learning and increase instructor efficiency. The Journal of Writing Analytics, 3(1), 227–263. https://doi.org/10.37514/JWA-J.2019.3.1.11
  • Wang, Y., Liu, C., & Tu, Y.-F. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of AI-based applications in higher education: An analysis of teachers’ perspectives using structural equation modelling. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 116–129. 10.2307/27032860
  • Wang, Y.-S., Wu, M.-C., & Wang, H.-Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00809.x
  • Williams, L. J., & McGonagle, A. K. (2016). Detection and remediation of common method variance in PLS analysis. Information Systems Journal, 26(6), 435–466.
  • World Health Organization. (2018, March 5). Genes and human disease. http://www.who.int/genomics/public/geneticdiseases/en/index2.html.
  • Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.
  • Yang, S. J. (2021). Guest editorial: Precision education-a new challenge for AI in education. Educational Technology & Society, 24, 105–108.
  • Yuen, A. H. K., & Ma, W. W. K. (2008). Exploring teacher acceptance of e-learning technology. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660802232779
  • Zhai, X., Haudek, K. C., Shi, L., Nehm, R. H., & Urban-Lurain, M. (2020). From substitution to redefinition: A framework of machine learning-based science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1430–1459. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21658