Model for social intelligence and teachers’ innovative work behavior: serial mediation

References

• Abu-Bader, S., & Jones, T. V. (2021). Statistical mediation analysis using the Sobel Test and hayes SPSS process macro. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 9(1), 42–61.
   Google Scholar
• Afsar, B., & Masood, M. (2017). Transformational leadership, creative self-efficacy, trust in supervisor, uncertainty avoidance, and innovative work behavior of nurses. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 54(1), 36–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886317711891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., Hussain, A., & Batool, A. (2020). Relationship between social brainpower and innovative behavior of school head teachers. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 57(1), 519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Akbari, M., Bagheri, A., Imani, S., & Asadnezhad, M. (2020). Does entrepreneurial leadership encourage innovation work behavior? The mediating role of creative self-efficacy and support for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2019-0283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcin, K., Erat, S., Alniacik, U., & Ciftcioglu, A. B. (2018). Effect of psychological ownership on employee silence and task performance: A study on academicians. International Business Research, 11(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v11n1p34
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar, M. W., Syed, F., Husnain, M., & Naseer, S. (2019). Person-organization fit and innovative work behavior: the mediating role of perceived organizational support, affective commitment and trust. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 13(2), 311–333.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, K. (2009). Social Intelligence: The new science of success. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Alifuddin, M., & Widodo, W. (2021). How social intelligence, integrity, and self-efficacy affect job satisfaction: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(7), 625–633. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no7.0625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, D., Kapshuk, Y., & Dekel, H. (2023). Promoting perceived creativity and innovative behavior: Benefits of future problem-solving programs for higher education students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amalia, A. N., Suyono, Arthur., & R., Supriyadi. (2023 The influence of emotional intelligence, social intelligence and adversity intelligence on videography creativity. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2540(1), 110023. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0106086
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Bledow, R., Hülsheger, U., & Rosing, K. (2018). Innovation and creativity in organizations. In The SAGE handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology. (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Arain, G. A., Bhatti, Z. A., Hameed, I., & Fang, Y. H. (2019). Top-down knowledge hiding and innovative work behavior (IWB): A three-way moderated-mediation analysis of self-efficacy and local/foreign status. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2018-0687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbari, M., Prasetya, A. B., Santoso, P. B., & Purwanto, A. (2021). From creativity to innovation: The role of female employees’ psychological capital. International Journal of Social and Management Studies (IJOSMAS), 2(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v2i2.18
   Google Scholar
• Atatsi, E. A., Azila-Gbettor, E. M., & Mensah, C. (2021). Predicting task performance from psychological ownership and innovative work behavior: A cross sectional study.Cogent. Business & Management, 8(1), 1917483. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-03-2020-0124
   Google Scholar
• Bak, H. (2020). Supervisor feedback and innovative work behavior: The mediating roles of trust in supervisor and affective commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 559160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.559160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, B., Ramadani, V., Gërguri-Rashiti, S., & Palalić, R. (2020). The impact of innovative working behaviour on employees’ working performance. In J. Leitão, A. Nunes, D. Pereira, & V. Ramadani (Eds.), Intrapreneurship and sustainable human capital (pp. 37–49). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49410-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Bessant, R. J., & Tidd, J. (2018). Innovation and entrepreneurship. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. (2014). The Human Brain Book. DK.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, E., Kim, J., & Cho, D. (2023). Relationship between core self-evaluation and innovative work behavior: mediating effect of affective organizational commitment and moderating effect of organizational learning capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1192859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1192859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., & Park, B. I. I. (2015). Inclusive leadership and work engagement: Mediating roles of affective organizational commitment and creativity. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 43(6), 931–943. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2015.43.6.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, A. J., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corazza, G. E., & Lubart, T. (2021). Intelligence and creativity: Mapping constructs on the space-time continuum. Journal of Intelligence, 9(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9010001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, B. A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868.
   Google Scholar
• Damasceno, R., Dimas, I. D., Lourenço, P. R., Rebelo, T., & Alves, M. P. (2021). Building innovative teams: Exploring the positive contribute of emotions expression and affective commitment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1, 732171. 10https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, X., & Guan, Z. (2017). Creative leaders create “unsung heroes”: Leader creativity and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11782-017-0013-7
   Google Scholar
• Develí, A., Pekkan, N. Ü., & ÇavuŞ, M. F. (2022). Social intelligence at work and its implication for organizational identification: A sectoral comparison. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 13(1), 364–383. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v13i1.1555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPietro, B. R., Moreo, A., & Cain, L. (2020). Well–being, affective commitment, and job satisfaction: Influences on turnover intentions in casual dining employees. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 29(2), 139–163. 19368623.2019.1605956. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2019.1605956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBrin, A. J., & Andrew, J. (2009). Human relations: Interpersonal job-oriented skill (10th ed.) Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimpoora, H., Zahed, A., & Elyasi, A. (2013). The study of relationship between social intelligence and organizational performance (Case study: Ardabil Regional Water Company’s Managers). International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2013.60352
   Google Scholar
• Elidemir, N. S., Ozturen, A., & Bayighomog, S. W. (2020). Innovative behaviors, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability, 12(8), 3295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enginyurt, O., Cankaya, S., Aksay, K., Tunc, T., Koc, B., Bas, O., & Ozer, E. (2016). Relationship between organizational commitment and burnout syndrome: A canonical correlation approach. Australian Health Review: a Publication of the Australian Hospital Association, 40(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH14177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fubara, S. (2020). Social awareness and organizational innovativeness of manufacturing firms in Rivers State, Nigeria. International Journal of Business & Law Research, 8, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10401.35688
   Google Scholar
• Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganji, S. F. G., Rahimnia, F., Ahanchian, M. R., & Syed, J. (2021). Analyzing the impact of diversity management on innovative behaviors through employee engagement and affective commitment. Iranian Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 14, 649–667. https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2020.307781.674164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gkontelos, A., Vaiopoulou, J., & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Teachers’ innovative work behavior as a function of self-efficacy, burnout, and irrational beliefs: A structural equation model. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(2), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13020030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence: The new science of human relationships. Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, R. T., & Passaro, P. D. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construct dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312031003627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gvpn, P., Mathotaarachchi, K., Indikasampathhb., & P., Senevirathneknda. (2019). Impact of employees’ commitment on sustained productivity with reference to government institutions sector in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management (IJFAM), 1, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v1i1.55
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, M. H., Choi, D. Y., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Effects of social and emotional intelligence on the creative process and individual creativity.International Conference on U- and E-Service. Science and Technology, 264, 217–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27210-3_26
   Google Scholar
• Hair, F. J., Barry, J. B., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis. (8thed.). Cengage India.=
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. A., & Pihl-Thingvad, S. (2019). Managing employee innovative behaviour through transformational and transactional leadership styles. Public Management Review, 21(6), 918–944. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1544272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, K., & Wahab, E. (2021, March 7–11). Reviewing the link between employee creativity, innovative behavior and organizational innovation. In Proceedings of the.11th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM), Singapore, (pp. 6616–6624). https://doi.org/10.46254/AN11.20211131
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, K., & Choi, M. (2017). Effects of innovation-supportive culture and organizational citizenship behavior on e-government information system security stemming from mimetic isomorphism. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal, A., Ahmad, M. S., & Nazir, T. (2023). Does servant leadership predict innovative behaviour above and beyond transformational leadership? Examining the role of affective commitment and creative self-efficacy. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2022-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivancevich, M. J., Konopaske, R., & Matteson, M. T. (2018). Organizational behavior and management. (11thed.). McGraw-Hill Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jadoa, S. A., & Faridi, M. (2022). Self-efficacy and social intelligence: A study of handball players. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences, 9(3), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6556182
   Google Scholar
• Jalil, M. F., Ullah, W., & Ahmed, Z. (2021). Training perception and innovative behavior of SME employees: Examining the mediating effects of firm commitment. SAGE Open, 11(4), 215824402110672. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211067250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Mišún, J. (2021). Innovative work behavior—A key factor in business performance? The role of team cognitive diversity and teamwork climate in this relationship. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jueajinda, S., Stiramon, O., & Ekpanyaskul, C. (2021). Social intelligence counseling intervention to reduce bullying behaviors among thai lower secondary school students: A mixed-method study. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health = Yebang Uihakhoe Chi, 54(5), 340–351. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.21.110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juliana, N. O., Hui, H. J., Clement, M., Solomon, E. N., & Elvis, O. K. (2021). The impact of creativity and innovation on entrepreneurship development: Evidence from Nigeria. Open Journal of Business and Management, 09(04), 1743–1770. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94095
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, C., & Sternberg, R.J. (eds.). (2019). Cambridge handbook of creativity. (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khalegkhah, A., Rezaiisharif, A., Sheikholslamy, A., & Kivi, M. P. (2019). The relationship between social intelligence and self-efficacy with students’ creative problem solving style. Journal of Innovation and Creativity in Human Science, 9, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, T. (2020). The effect of creative potential on innovation behavior: Focusing on design thinking. Journal of Distribution Science, 18(8), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.18.8.202008.65
   Google Scholar
• Kinga, S., & István, S. (2012). Relationship between social creativity and social intelligence, and their cognitive correlates. Erdélyi Pszichológiai Szemle, 13(1), 39–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kleysen, R. F., & Street, C. T. (2001). Toward a multi-dimensions measure of individual innovative behavior. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2(3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005660
   Google Scholar
• Kock, N. (2020). Harman’s single factor test in PLS-SEM: Checking for common method bias. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Koolor, H. R., & Seifollahi, N. (2018). Investigating the effect of social intelligence on innovative performance (Case study: Moghan Agro-Industrial & Livestock Co.). International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 13, 155–161.
   Google Scholar
• Kriemeen, H., & Hajaia, S. (2017). Social intelligence of principals and its relationship with creative behavior. World Journal of Education, 7(3), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n3p84
   Google Scholar
• Kularajasingam, J., Subramaniam, A., Singh, D. K. S., & Sambasivan, M. (2022). The impact of knowledge sharing behaviour and social intelligence of university academics on their performance: The mediating role of competencies. Journal of Education for Business, 97(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1887794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Velle, L. (2021). Teachers’ learning and knowledge: motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(4), 471–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1965420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, G. E., Keena, L. D., Leone, M., May, D., & Haynes, S. H. (2020). The effects of distributive and procedural justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment of correctional staff. The Social Science Journal, 57(4), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathesh, K. R., & Avadhani, V. D. (2018). A study on social intelligence and its impact on employee performance of insurance sectors in Mysuru City. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), 9(1), 530–537.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, K. M., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loan, L. T. M. (2020). The influence of organizational commitment on employees’ job performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Management Science Letters, 10, 3308–3312. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.007
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, S., Sassetti, S., & Cavaliere, V. (2019). Linking employees’ affective commitment and knowledge sharing for an increased customer orientation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(11), 4293–4312. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2018-0261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, L., Luo, T., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Perceived overqualification and deviant innovation behavior: The roles of creative self-efficacy and perceived organizational support. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 967052. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.967052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussier, R. N. (2016). Human relations in organizations: A skill-building approach (10thed.) McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Luu, T. (2021). Discretionary HR practices and proactive work behavior: The mediation role of affective commitment and the moderation roles of PSM and abusive supervision. Public Management Review, 20(6), 789–823. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1335342
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Y., Chen, M., Guo, H., Fan, W., & Lai, L. (2023). The influence of transformational tutor style on postgraduate students’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting, 2023, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9775338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, K. N., Schaller, T. K., & Patil, A. (2017). Common method variance in advertising research: When to be concerned and how to control for it. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1252287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín-Idárraga, D. A., & Cuartas-Marín, J. C. (2019). Performance: Impact of competitive intensity and organizational slack. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 59(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190203
   Google Scholar
• Masrek, M. N Heriyanto. (2021). Procedural remedies for controlling and minimizing common method variance in survey in library and information science research. Palimpsest: Journal of Information and Library Science, 12, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mazla, S. B., Izzuwan, M., Jabor, M. K. B., Tufail, K., Yakim, A. F. N., & Zainal, H. (2019 The roles of creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 470. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Student and Disable Student Development 2019 (ICoSD 2019), (213–217). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200921.035
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2014). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
   Google Scholar
• Miao, R., & Cao, Y. (2019). High-performance work system, work well-being, and employee creativity: Crosslevel moderating role of transformational leadership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirsafian, H. (2018). Effect of social intelligence on OCB and EB, with effect on social capital as a mediating variable, in a sports organization in Iran. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, 77(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2018-0003
   Google Scholar
• Mohadesi, E. (2021). An examination of the relationship between social intelligence and organisational commitment among the school managers of Kashmar and Khalilabad. Global Journal of Guidance and Counseling in Schools: Current Perspectives, 11(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjgc.v11i2.5705
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, E. S. H. (2021). The impact of social intelligence and employees’ collective self-efficacy on service provider’s performance in the Egyptian governmental hospitals. International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government, 1(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDIG-07-2020-0003
   Google Scholar
• Mohammdipouya, F., Gharloghi, S., Mohammdipouya, S., & Gharib–Tazareh, S. (2018). The relationship between perceived social intelligence by graduate students of the class structure, with the mediator role of self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Education Strategies inMedical Sciences, 11, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.29252/edcbmj.11.04.03
   Google Scholar
• Mohammed, A., & Al-Swidi, A. (2020). The mediating role of affective commitment between corporate social responsibility and eWOM in the hospitality industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(4), 570–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1818086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz, A. (2019). Innovative human resource management (HRM) practices as predictors of employee job involvement and organizational commitment. Asia Pacific Journal of Emerging Markets, 3(1), 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Nazir, S., Qun, W., Hui, L., & Shafi, A. (2018). Influence of social exchange relationships on affective commitment and innovative behavior: Role of perceived organizational support. Sustainability, 10(12), 4418. 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejad, H. A., Zareh, N. M., & Dadash, M. (2019). The relationship between creativity and social intelligence in Students of Allameh Tabatabai and Shahid Beheshti Universities. Journal of Military Caring Sciences, 6(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.29252/mcs.6.1.61
   Google Scholar
• Neto, J. C., Filipe, J. A., & Caleiro, A. B. (2019). Creativity and innovation: A contribution of behavioral economics. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 3(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2019.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A., Tse, H. H. M., Schwarz, G., & Nielsen, I. (2018). The effects of employees’ creative self-efficacy on innovative behavior: The role of entrepreneurial leadership. Journal of Business Research, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newstrom, J. W. (2015). Organizational behavior: Human behavior at work. (14th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. M., & Ngo, T. T. (2020). Psychological capital, organizational commitment, and job performance: A case in Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(5), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no5.269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noe, A. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2019). Human resource management: Gaining a competitive advantage. (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Northouse, P. G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice. (8th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Odoardi, C., Battistelli, A., Montani, F., & Peiró, J. M. (2019). Affective commitment, participative leadership, and employee innovation: A multilevel investigation. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 35(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2019a12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onufriieva, L., Chaikovska, O., Kobets, O., Pavelkiv, R., & Melnychuk, T. (2020). Social intelligence as a factor of volunteer activities by future medical workers. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2536
   Google Scholar
• Oppi, C., Bagheri, A., & Vagnoni, E. (2020). Antecedents of innovative work behaviour in healthcare: Does efficacy play a role? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2018-0267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshi, J. E. O., Akaibe, M. V., & Chikwe, J. O. (2021). Social intelligence and organizational citizenship behaviour of Government Parastatals in Nigeria. Noble International Journal of Social Sciences Research, 06(61), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.51550/nijssr.61.7.17
   Google Scholar
• Patel, J., & Poston, R. (2021). Using SI to overcome agile adoption challenges. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 62(4), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2021.1913670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., Scott, B. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, M. I., & Pérez-Santana, M. P. (2014). Managing innovative work behavior: The role of human resource practices. Personnel Review, 43(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2012-0199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Princy, K., & Rebeka, E. (2019). Employee commitment on organizational performance. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(3), 891–895. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C4078.098319
   Google Scholar
• Promsri, C. (2019). The effects of social intelligence on workplace spirituality. Journal of Advances in Social Science and Humanities, 5(5), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.15520/jassh55432
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A. (2014). A structural equations model of leaders’ social intelligence and creative performance. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahim, M. A., Civelek, I., & Liang, F. H. (2018). A process model of social intelligence and problem-solving style for conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29(4), 487–499. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2017-0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raihan, T., & Uddin, M. A. (2023). The influence of creative self-efficacy, creative self-identity, and creative process engagement on innovative behaviour. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 30(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2023.128334
   Google Scholar
• Rezaei, A., & Jeddi, E. M. (2020). Relationship between wisdom, perceived control of internal states, perceived stress, social intelligence, information processing styles and life satisfaction among college students. Current Psychology, 39(3), 927–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9804-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietzschel, E. F., Zacher, H., & Stroebe, W. (2016). A lifespan perspective on creativity and innovation at work. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2(2), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). Editorial: How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohmaniyah, A., & Nurhayati, T. (2017). Improving teacher performance based on creative model. International Journal of Islamic Business Ethics, 2(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.30659/ijibe.2.2.347-364
   Google Scholar
• Saether, E. A. (2019). Motivational antecedents to high-tech R&D employees’ innovative work behavior: Self-determined motivation, person-organization fit, organization support of creativity, and pay justice. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30(2), 100350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2019.100350
   Google Scholar
• Santoso, H., & Furinto, A. (2019). Combining self-efficacy and employee friendly workplace to generate innovative work behavior: Evidence from telecommunication industry. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(2), 498–505.
   Google Scholar
• Sanwal, T., & Sareen, P. (2023). The relevance of social intelligence for effective optimization of retirement and successful ageing. Ageing International, 48(1), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-021-09469-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saremi, H., & Rezeghi, A. A. (2015). A study on the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and organizational commitment with job satisfaction in-office employees in Esfarayen City, Iran. International Journal of Life Sciences, 9(6), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v9i6.12682
   Google Scholar
• Scherbakov, S. V. (2021). Studentssocial intelligence and the choice of behavioral strategies in conflict resolution. Clin Schizophr Relat Psychoses, 15(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.SS.081021.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi, U. J., & Sharma, M. S. (2023). An Empirical study on social intelligence and self efficacy in information technology organizations. Res Militaris, 13(2), 4145–4155.
   Google Scholar
• Setyaningrum, R. P., & Muafi, M. (2022). The effect of creativity and innovative behavior on competitive advantage in womenpreneur. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(0) a2069. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v20i0.2069
   Google Scholar
• Shahzadi, K., & Khurram, S. (2020). Self-efficacy and innovative work behavior: The role of individual ambidexterity and formalization at work place in Pakistan. Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 57(1), 31–46.
   Google Scholar
• Sinaga, A. T. I., Lumbanraja, P., Sadalia, I., & Silalahi, A. S. (2021, 2019). The influence of affective commitment on the employees innovative work behavior. In Proceedings of the 2nd Economics and Business International Conference (EBIC 2019) – Economics and Business in Industrial Revolution, 4, (596–601). https://doi.org/10.5220/0009327305960601
   Google Scholar
• Snow, F. (2019). Creativity and innovation. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1097/naq.0000000000000367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sosa, R., & Connor, A. (2018). Innovation teams and organizational creativity: Reasoning with computational simulations. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Spiegelaere, D. S., Gyes, G. V., & Hootegem, G. V. (2016). Innovative work behavior and performance-related pay: rewarding the individual or the collective? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(12), 1900–1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1216873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoffers, J. M. M., Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Jacobs, E. A. G. M. (2020). Employability and innovative work behaviour in small and medium-sized enterprises. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(11), 1439–1466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1407953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suendarti, M., Widodo, W., & Hasbullah, H. (2020). Demonstrating the effect of grit and creativity on innovative behavior of teachers’ natural science: Mediating by self-efficacy. Journal of Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology, 12(6), 470–478.
   Google Scholar
• Sungu, L. J., Jisuvei, L. Q., Xu, X., & Derek, Weng. (2019). Organizational commitment and job performance: Examining the moderating roles of occupational commitment and transformational leadership. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamunosiki-Amadi, J., Okponanabofa, G. D., Sele., & Ernest, O. E. (2020). Social intelligence and employee commitment in Bayelsa State health sector. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 11(2), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss.v11n2a8
   Google Scholar
• Tan, A. B. C., Dun, D. H. V., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2021). Innovative work behavior in Singapore evoked by transformational leaders through innovation support and readiness. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(4), 697–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Shao, Y.-F., & Chen, Y.-J. (2019). Assessing the mediation mechanism of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on innovative behavior: The perspective of psychological capital. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1, 2699. 11https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available method. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142–168. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.1704202
   Google Scholar
• Torabi, Z. (2021). Investigating the relationship between social intelligence of marketing managers on organizational learning of staf of insurance centers in Isfahan. Journal of Engineering in Industrial Research, 2, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.22034/JEIRES.2021.269830.1024
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 944–956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsegaye, W. K., Su, Q., & Malik, M. (2020). The quest for a comprehensive model of employee innovative behavior: The creativity and innovation theory perspective. The Journal of Developing Areas, 54(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2020.0022
   Google Scholar
• Ukala, C. C. (2019). Management of teachers’ social intelligence as a correlate of productivity in secondary schools in Rivers State, Nigeria. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(11), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2604642
   Google Scholar
• Ulabor, E. A., & Bosede, A. I. (2019). Employee commitment and organizational performance in selected fast food outlets in Osun State. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 1(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.35912/ijfam.v1i1.55
   Google Scholar
• Vaganova, O. I., Korostelev, L. I., Smirnova, Z. V., Bulaeva, M. N., & Bobylev, E. L. (2019). Improving teachers’ professionalism through the development of creativity. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (IJITEE), 8(8), 630–634. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.B7042.129219
   Google Scholar
• Van Waeyenberg, T., Peccei, R., & Decramer, A. (2020). Performance management and teacher performance: The role of affective organizational commitment and exhaustion. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(4), 623–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2020.1754881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, H. D., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Han, X., & Li, J. (2020). Supervisor narcissism and employee performance: A moderated mediation model of affective organizational commitment and power distance orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 43(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2020.1810042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, A., Mulder, R. H., & König, C. (2019). Team learning behaviours as predictors of innovative work behaviour – A longitudinal study. Innovation, 21(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2018.1530567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widodo, W. (2021). Enhancing teachers’ professional competence through grit, personality, and creativity. Management Science Letters, 11, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.022
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, W. (2021). Metodologi Penelitian Populer & Praktis [Popular & practical research methodologies]. Rajawali Pers.
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, W., & Gunawan, R. M. B. (2021). Effect of grit on the teaching creativity of Indonesian teachers: The mediating role of organizational commitment and knowledge management. Cogent Education, 8(1), 2006111. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.2006111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widodo, W., & Gustari, I. (2020). Teachers’ innovative behavior in Indonesian school: The role of knowledge management, creativity, and OCB. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4784–4791. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081050
   Google Scholar
• Widodo, W., Gustari, I., & Permana, R. (2023). A mediation model of the effect of visionary leadership on teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(4), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.4.7
   Google Scholar
• Wilaphan, K., Noawanit, S., & Ngudgratoke, S. (2023). Transformative leadership and innovative behavior in medical education: Mediating effects of psychological empowerment and creative self-efficacy. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(2), 50–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organization (8th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zocche, L., de Paula, I. C., Kunrath, S. E., Martins, V. L. M., & Lermen, F. H. (2018). Variables that influence creativity in perception of professionals: A case study in innovative Brazilian companies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar